Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Spectra of "fattened" open book structures

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For open book structures in 3D, the eigenvalues of the Neumann Laplacian on an epsilon-fattened neighborhood converge to those of a 2D limit operator as epsilon tends to zero.

desk verdict A clear research announcement that reduces the main spectral convergence theorem to a deferred construction of averaging and extension operators — the central claim is not proven in this manuscript. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06222 v1 pith:6Z5FIQCA submitted 2019-08-17 math-ph math.MP

James E. Corbin , Peter Kuchment This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 35P9958J0558J9058Z05
keywords openbookstructurespectralconvergenceNeumannLaplacianthindomainsaveragingoperatorsextensionLaplace-BeltramioperatorKirchhoffconditions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that, for a class of branching 2D surfaces in three-space called open book structures, the eigenvalues of the Neumann Laplacian on a thin epsilon-neighborhood converge, as epsilon tends to zero, to the eigenvalues of a limit operator defined on the surface itself. The limit operator acts as the Laplace-Beltrami operator on each page and enforces continuity and Kirchhoff flux conditions at the binding where pages meet. This makes the limit operator a 2D analog of the quantum graph, extending a well-developed theory for thin graphs to thin branched surfaces. The proof is conditional: it shows that if certain averaging and extension operators exist, then convergence follows, and it asserts their existence in a separate theorem that is deferred to another publication.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a pair of operator families: averaging operators $J^\epsilon$ mapping functions on the fattened domain to functions on the surface, and extension operators $K^\epsilon$ mapping in the opposite direction. They are required to be nearly isometries on low-energy spectral subspaces and to be nearly energy-nonincreasing, in the sense of Definitions 2.2 and 2.3. These inequalities let any finite-dimensional test space for one problem be transplanted into the other with only $o(1)$ changes to its Rayleigh quotient, which forces the min-max eigenvalues to coincide in the limit. The paper proves this implication (Theorem 2.4) and states the existence of such operators (Theorem 2.6) without proof.

What would settle it

Compute numerically the first few Neumann Laplacian eigenvalues on an epsilon-fattened open book built from two disks meeting along a diameter, for epsilon decreasing to zero, and compare them with the eigenvalues of the claimed limit operator with continuity and Kirchhoff conditions at the binding. If the differences fail to vanish, or if no such averaging and extension operators can be constructed for this geometry, the convergence claim would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 2.7: for any open book structure M satisfying the stated hypotheses, and for any index n, the n-th eigenvalue $\lambda_n(A^\epsilon)$ of the Neumann Laplacian on the fattened domain $M^\epsilon$ converges to $\lambda_n(A)$, the n-th eigenvalue of the operator $A$ on $M$. The operator $A$ is the 2D analog of a quantum graph: on each page it is the Laplace-Beltrami operator, and across each binding it imposes continuity of the function and the Kirchhoff condition that the sum of normal derivatives over the incident pages vanishes. The proof works by replanting test spaces between the two quadratic forms using averaging and extension operators, then applying min-max to force the Rayleigh quotients together. The existence of these operators appears as Theorem 2.6, which is stated but not proved in this manuscript.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument rests on the existence of averaging and extension operators that transfer functions between the 3D fattened domain and the 2D surface while nearly preserving lengths and energies; this existence is stated as a theorem but proved in another text.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every allowed open book structure, each Neumann eigenvalue of the thin 3D body converges to the corresponding eigenvalue of the 2D surface operator as the thickness goes to zero.
  • The limit operator gives a 2D analog of quantum graphs, so thin branched surfaces can be modeled by 2D surface operators with continuity and Kirchhoff conditions at the bindings.
  • Convergence holds eigenvalue by eigenvalue for each fixed index, so spectral gaps and multiplicities of the limit are inherited by sufficiently thin fattened domains.
  • The result covers the previously known smooth-surface case as a special case and extends the graph-case theory to branching 2D strata.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the deferred construction of $J$ and $K$ can be carried out for structures with corners (0D strata), the same min-max comparison should yield convergence with vertex conditions at the corners, a case the paper leaves open.
  • Varying the fattening rate at bindings relative to pages is expected to change the effective junction condition; a concrete test would be to compute the limit of the spectrum under anisotropic shrinking to see whether delta-like or Robin couplings appear.
  • A numerical study on a simple open book, such as two rectangular pages meeting at a common edge, could validate the Kirchhoff condition as the correct junction rule and reveal how fast the convergence is in $\epsilon$.
  • The proof structure suggests that adding a bounded potential to the Laplacian should preserve the convergence, since the operator inequalities are insensitive to lower-order terms; this is a testable extension of Theorem 2.7.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the Neumann Laplacian on a thin ``fattened'' neighborhood $M^\epsilon$ of a two-dimensional stratified set $M$ in $\mathbb{R}^3$, where $M$ is an ``open book'' structure with smooth two-dimensional pages meeting transversely along one-dimensional bindings. The authors propose a limiting operator $A$ on $M$ acting as the Laplace-Beltrami operator on each page with continuity and Kirchhoff conditions at the bindings, and they claim that, as $\epsilon\to 0$, each eigenvalue $\lambda_n(A^\epsilon)$ of the Neumann Laplacian on $M^\epsilon$ converges to the corresponding eigenvalue $\lambda_n(A)$. The proof is reduced in Section 2 to the existence of averaging operators $J^\epsilon$ and extension operators $K^\epsilon$ satisfying near-isometry and energy inequalities (9)--(12). Theorem 2.4 proves that such operators imply spectral convergence; Theorem 2.6 asserts their existence but is explicitly deferred to another text; Theorem 2.7 states the main convergence result as an immediate corollary. The paper's original content is therefore the abstract reduction of the spectral convergence problem to the construction of $J^\epsilon$ and $K^\epsilon$, together with the formulation of the limiting operator.

Significance. If the missing technical construction were supplied, the result would be a natural and interesting two-dimensional analogue of the well-developed spectral convergence theory for fattened graphs, with potential applications in physics and engineering. The manuscript is clearly written and the limiting operator is formulated in a plausible way, including the expected continuity and Kirchhoff conditions at the bindings. The paper also honestly states the restrictions of its approach, such as the absence of zero-dimensional strata and the assumption that the pages meet transversely. Credit is due for isolating the precise sufficient conditions for spectral convergence in Definitions 2.2 and 2.3 and for stating Theorem 2.4 in a clean conditional form. However, the decisive technical step, the construction of the operators $J^\epsilon$ and $K^\epsilon$ with the required estimates near the binding, is not carried out in this manuscript and is deferred to a separate publication. Consequently the main theorem is not established here, and the paper functions as a research announcement or reduction rather than a proof of the advertised convergence result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 2.6, Section 2] The central claim of the paper, Theorem 2.7, depends entirely on Theorem 2.6, which asserts the existence of averaging and extension operators $J^\epsilon$ and $K^\epsilon$ satisfying (9)--(12). The manuscript states on page 8 that this is ``the long technical task, to be addressed elsewhere'' and provides no proof, no construction, and no reference to an available text. This is not a peripheral detail: inequalities (10) and (12) are exactly the estimates that must control the averaging and splicing near the binding, where traces of $H^1$ functions only lie in $H^{1/2}$. Without Theorem 2.6, Theorem 2.4 is a conditional statement and Theorem 2.7 does not follow. This omission cannot be repaired within the present manuscript's scope.
  2. [Proof of Theorem 2.4, inequalities (14)--(19)] The proof applies the estimates (9)--(12) to arbitrary $n$-dimensional subspaces $W_n$ and $W^\epsilon_n$ in (16)--(17), but those estimates are only assumed for vectors in the spectral subspaces $P^\epsilon_\Lambda$ and $P_\Lambda$. A subspace realizing the min-max maximum need not be contained in a spectral subspace. The argument can be repaired by fixing $\Lambda$ between $\lambda_n(A)$ and $\lambda_{n+1}(A)$, choosing $W^\epsilon_n$ as the span of the first $n$ eigenfunctions of $A^\epsilon$ and $W_n$ as the span of the first $n$ eigenfunctions of $A$, and using $K^\epsilon$ first to bound $\lambda^\epsilon_n$ within a spectral window before applying $J^\epsilon$. This ordering is not stated and should be made explicit.
  3. [Definitions 2.2--2.3] The definitions require the estimates (9)--(12) to hold uniformly over spectral subspaces corresponding to an arbitrary $\Lambda$ not in the spectrum, with an $\epsilon_0$ that may depend on $\Lambda$. In the proof of Theorem 2.4 one must pass from a fixed $\Lambda$ for $A$ to a corresponding $\Lambda$ for $A^\epsilon$ for sufficiently small $\epsilon$. The manuscript does not discuss this uniformity or the role of spectral gaps near the limiting eigenvalues. This is likely fixable by a standard spectral-window argument, but it should be part of the proof rather than left implicit.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Proposition 1.5] The characterization of the domain $G_2$ with the Kirchhoff condition (8) is stated without proof and described as standard. Since the binding is a singular set and the normal derivatives are traces of $H^2$ functions, a reference or a short justification of the precise sense in which the sum in (8) vanishes would be helpful.
  2. [Section 3, final remarks] The remarks about phase transitions and corners are interesting but do not compensate for the absence of the main technical proof; they should be clearly labeled as conjectural or planned work rather than results of this paper.
  3. [General presentation] There are minor typographical issues, including a duplicated reference [22] in the introduction and some informal spacing in displayed formulas; these do not affect the mathematics.
  4. [Reference [31]] The manuscript cites Post's book for the statement that averaging and extension operators are sufficient for spectral convergence. Since this is the backbone of Theorem 2.4, the precise theorem or proposition in [31] should be cited, not only the book as a whole.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the spectral convergence claim is conditional on an explicitly deferred existence theorem, but no step of the derivation reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. The paper defines a limiting operator A with continuity and Kirchhoff conditions at bindings, then reduces spectral convergence to the existence of averaging and extension operators in Definitions 2.2-2.3. Theorem 2.4 proves, via the min-max principle, that existence of such operators implies eigenvalue convergence; that proof is explicit and does not use the target eigenvalues as inputs. The limiting operator is not defined from the eigenvalues of A^epsilon, and no parameters are fitted to spectral data. The only load-bearing unresolved ingredient is Theorem 2.6, which the paper states without proof, saying 'The long technical task, to be addressed elsewhere, consists in proving the following statement.' This is a missing proof or deferred construction, not a self-referential reduction: no equation makes Theorem 2.7 equal to its assumptions by construction. Self-citations such as [2], [24], and [31] are used for context and for the standard sufficiency criterion, which is reproved as Theorem 2.4, so they are not load-bearing in a circular way. Thus there is no significant circularity, with the caveat that Theorem 2.7 is conditional on a theorem not established in this manuscript.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on an unproved existence theorem for averaging and extension operators, plus specific geometric restrictions on the open book structure and the fattening. No numerical parameters are fitted and no new physical entities are postulated. The limiting operator and its Kirchhoff conditions are posited by analogy with quantum graphs, not derived within this manuscript.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption M is a compact open book structure with finitely many smooth 2D pages meeting transversely along smooth 1D bindings, and with no zero-dimensional strata.
    Used throughout Section 1.1. The restrictions exclude corners and tangential contacts; the authors state that corners are deferred to future work.
  • domain assumption The fattened domain is the union of epsilon-balls around M with the same shrinkage speed around all strata, for all epsilon below a positive threshold.
    Definition 1.1 and the final remarks. Unequal shrinkage speeds are explicitly left to future work and are expected to change the limiting behavior.
  • domain assumption The limiting operator A is defined by the quadratic form Q with continuity across bindings and, on the operator domain, the Kirchhoff condition at bindings.
    Definitions 1.4 and Proposition 1.5. The junction condition is part of the claimed limit model and is not derived from the fattened problem in this text.
  • ad hoc to paper Existence of averaging operators J^epsilon and extension operators K^epsilon satisfying Definitions 2.2 and 2.3.
    Stated as Theorem 2.6 and explicitly deferred to another text. All spectral convergence conclusions depend on this unproved existence.
  • standard math Standard min-max characterization of eigenvalues of self-adjoint non-negative operators with discrete spectrum.
    Proposition 2.5, attributed to Reed and Simon. This is the mechanism used to reduce spectral convergence to comparison of Rayleigh quotients.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectra of "fattened" open book structures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6Z5FIQCA

@misc{pith2026190806222,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectra of "fattened" open book structures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6Z5FIQCA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06222}
}
read the original abstract

We establish convergence of spectra of Neumann Laplacian in a thin neighborhood of a branching 2D structure in 3D to the spectrum of an appropriately defined operator on the structure itself. This operator is a 2D analog of the well known by now quantum graphs. As in the latter case, such considerations are triggered by various physics and engineering applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06222 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An open book structure with “pages” Mk meeting at a “binding.” M1 M2 M4 M3 E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A transversal intersection of two spheres yields an open book structure with four pages and a circular binding. The requirement of absence of zero￾dimensional strata prohibits adding a third sphere with a generic triple intersection. Tangential contacts of spheres are also disallowed. Similar results have been obtained previously for the case of fattened graphs (see [27,35], as well as books [2,31] and references th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A local model of a binding neighborhood Definition 1.1. Let M denote an open book structure in R 3 and 0 > 0, as defined above. We define for any  < 0 the corresponding fattened domain M as follows: (1) M := [ x∈M B(x, ) 1.3. Quadratic forms and operators. We adopt the standard nota￾tion for Sobolev spaces (see, e.g. [29]). Thus, H1 (Ω) denotes the space of square integrable with respect to the Lebesgue measur… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Arnold, V. I. ; Gusein-Zade, S. M. ; Varchenko, A. N. Singularities of differ- entiable maps. Volume 1. Classification of critical points, caustics and wave fronts, Birkh¨ auser/Springer, New York, 2012

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Berkolaiko and P

    G. Berkolaiko and P. Kuchment, Introduction to Quantum Graphs, AMS 2013

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Dell’Antonio, A

    G. Dell’Antonio, A. Michelangeli, Dynamics on a graph as the limit of the dy- namics on a ”fat graph”. Mathematical technology of networks, 49–64, Springer Proc. Math. Stat., 128, Springer, Cham, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Dell’Antonio, Dynamics on quantum graphs as constrained systems

    G. Dell’Antonio, Dynamics on quantum graphs as constrained systems. Rep. Math. Phys. 59 (2007), no. 3, 267–279

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Dell’Antonio, L

    G. Dell’Antonio, L. Tenuta, Quantum graphs as holonomic constraints. J. Math. Phys. 47 (2006), no. 7, 072102, 21 pp

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    D. E. Edmunds and W. Evans, Spectral Theory and Differential Operators , Oxford Science Publ., Claredon Press, Oxford, 1990

    work page 1990

  7. [7]

    W. D. Evans and D. J. Harris, Fractals, trees and the Neumann Laplacian, Math. Ann. 296(1993), 493-527

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    Exner, J

    P. Exner, J. Keating, P. Kuchment, T. Sunada, and A. Teplyaev (Ed.), Anal- ysis on Graphs and its Applications , Proc. Symp. Pure Math., AMS,2008

    work page 2008

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Exner and O

    P. Exner and O. Post, Convergence of spectra of graph-like thin manifolds, J. Geom. Phys. 54 (2005), no. 1, 77-115

    2005

  2. [10]

    Exner, P

    P. Exner, P. Seba, Electrons in semiconductor microstructures: a challenge to operator theorists, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Schr¨ odinger Operators, Standard and Nonstandard (Dubna 1988), World Scientific, Singapore 1989; pp. 79-100

    1988

  3. [11]

    Figotin and P

    A. Figotin and P. Kuchment, Band-gap structure of the spectrum of periodic and acoustic media. I. scalar model, SIAM J. Applied Math. 56 (1996), no.1, 68-88. 10 JAMES E. CORBIN AND PETER KUCHMENT

    1996

  4. [12]

    Figotin and P

    A. Figotin and P. Kuchment, Band-gap structure of the spectrum of peri- odic and acoustic media. II. 2D photonic crystals, SIAM J. Applied Math. 56 (1996), 1561-1620

    1996

  5. [13]

    Figotin and P

    A. Figotin and P. Kuchment, 2D photonic crystals with cubic structure: as- ymptotic analysis, in Wave propagation in Complex Media , G. Papanicolaou (Editor), IMA Volumes in Math. and Appl., 96 (1997), 23-30

    1997

  6. [14]

    Figotin and P

    A. Figotin and P. Kuchment, Spectral properties of classical waves in high contrast periodic media, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 58 (1998), no.2, 683- 702

    1998

  7. [15]

    Freidlin, Markov processes and differential equations: asymptotic problems , Lectures in Mathematics ETH Z¨ urich, Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1996

    M. Freidlin, Markov processes and differential equations: asymptotic problems , Lectures in Mathematics ETH Z¨ urich, Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1996

    1996

  8. [16]

    Freidlin and A

    M. Freidlin and A. Wentzell, Diffusion processes on graphs and the averaging principle, Annals of Probability, 21 (1993), no.4, 2215-2245

    1993

  9. [17]

    Freidlin and A

    M. Freidlin and A. Wentzell, Diffusion processes on an open book and the averaging principle, Stochastic Processes and their Applications 113 (2004), 101 – 126

    2004

  10. [18]

    Froese and I

    R. Froese and I. Herbst. Realizing holonomic constraints in classical and quan- tum mechanics. Comm. Math. Phys. 220 (2001), 3, 489-535

    2001

  11. [19]

    Gerasimenko and B

    N. Gerasimenko and B. Pavlov, Scattering problems on non-compact graphs, Theor. Math. Phys., 75(1988), 230-240

    1988

  12. [20]

    Goresky, Stratified Morse Theory, Springer Verlag 1988

    M. Goresky, Stratified Morse Theory, Springer Verlag 1988

    1988

  13. [21]

    Grieser, Thin tubes in mathematical physics, global analysis and spectral geometry, in [8], pp

    D. Grieser, Thin tubes in mathematical physics, global analysis and spectral geometry, in [8], pp. 565–593, 2008

    2008

  14. [22]

    Kuchment, The Mathematics of Photonics Crystals, in Mathematical Mod- eling in Optical Science, G

    P. Kuchment, The Mathematics of Photonics Crystals, in Mathematical Mod- eling in Optical Science, G. Bao, L. Cowsar, and W. Masters (Editors), SIAM, 2001

    2001

  15. [23]

    Kuchment, Differential and pseudo-differential operators on graphs as mod- els of mesoscopic systems, Analysis and applicationsISAAC 2001 (Berlin), 7– 30, Int

    P. Kuchment, Differential and pseudo-differential operators on graphs as mod- els of mesoscopic systems, Analysis and applicationsISAAC 2001 (Berlin), 7– 30, Int. Soc. Anal. Appl. Comput., Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 2003

    2001

  16. [24]

    Kuchment, and H

    P. Kuchment, and H. Zeng, Asymptotics of spectra of Neumann Laplacians in thin domains. Advances in differential equations and mathematical physics (Birmingham, AL, 2002) , 199–213, Contemp. Math., 327, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2003

    2002

  17. [25]

    Kuchment, Graph models for waves in thin structures, Waves Random Media 12 (2002), no

    P. Kuchment, Graph models for waves in thin structures, Waves Random Media 12 (2002), no. 4, R1–R24

    2002

  18. [26]

    Kuchment and L

    P. Kuchment and L. Kunyansky, Spectral properties of high contrast band-gap materials and operators on graphs, Experimental Mathematics, 8 (1999), no.1, 1-28

    1999

  19. [27]

    Kuchment and H

    P. Kuchment and H. Zeng, Convergence of spectra of mesoscopic systems col- lapsing onto a graph, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 258 (2001), 671-700

    2001

  20. [28]

    Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1980

    Yung Chen Lu, Singularity theory and an introduction to catastrophe theory , Universitext. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1980

    1980

  21. [29]

    Maz’ja, Sobolev spaces, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985

    V. Maz’ja, Sobolev spaces, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985

    1985

  22. [30]

    Maz’ya and S

    V. Maz’ya and S. Poborchi, Differential functions on bad domains , World Sci- entific, New Jersey, 1997

    1997

  23. [31]

    Post, Spectral analysis on graph-like spaces, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2012

    O. Post, Spectral analysis on graph-like spaces, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2012

    2012

  24. [32]

    Ranicki, High-dimensional knot theory

    A. Ranicki, High-dimensional knot theory. Algebraic surgery in codimension 2 , Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1998. OPEN BOOKS 11

    1998

  25. [33]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of modern mathematical physics I: functional analysis, Academic Press, San Diego, 1980

    1980

  26. [34]

    Rubinstein and M

    J. Rubinstein and M. Schatzman, Spectral and variational problems on multi- connected strips, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I Math. 325 (1997), no.4, 377-382

    1997

  27. [35]

    Rubinstein and M

    J. Rubinstein and M. Schatzman, Asymptotics for thin superconducting rings, J. Math. Pures Appl. 77 (1998), no. 8, 801–820

    1998

  28. [36]

    Rubinstein and M

    J. Rubinstein and M. Schatzman, On multiply connected mesoscopic super- conducting structures, S´ emin. Th´ eor. Spectr. G´ eom., no. 15, Univ. Grenoble I, Saint-Martin-d’H` eres, 1998, 207-220

    1998

  29. [37]

    Rubinstein and M

    J. Rubinstein and M. Schatzman, Variational problems on multiply connected thin strips I: basic estimates and convergence of the Laplacian spectrum, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. (2001), 160-271

    2001

  30. [38]

    Ruedenberg and C

    K. Ruedenberg and C. W. Scherr, Free-electron network model for conjugated systems. I. Theory, J. Chem. Physics, 21 (1953), no.9, 1565-1581

    1953

  31. [39]

    Saito, The limiting equation of the Neumann Laplacians on shrinking do- mains, Elec

    Y. Saito, The limiting equation of the Neumann Laplacians on shrinking do- mains, Elec. J. Diff. Eq. 2000 (2000), No. 31, 1-25

    2000

  32. [40]

    Schatzman, On the eigenvalues of the Laplace operator on a thin set with Neumann boundary conditions, Applicable Anal

    M. Schatzman, On the eigenvalues of the Laplace operator on a thin set with Neumann boundary conditions, Applicable Anal. 61 (1996), 293-306

    1996

  33. [41]

    Whitney, Collected papers

    H. Whitney, Collected papers. Vol. II. , Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1992

    1992

  34. [42]

    H. E. Winkelnkemper, Manifolds as open books, Bull. AMS 79 (1973), 45–51. Department of Mathematics, Texas A& M University, College Sta- tion, TX E-mail address : jxc8004@math.tamu.edu Department of Mathematics, Texas A& M University, College Sta- tion, TX E-mail address : kuc...

    1973

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.