REVIEW 2 cited by
On the first $\tau$-tilting Hochschild cohomology of an algebra
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this paper we introduce, according to one of the main ideas of $\tau$-tilting theory, the $\tau$-Hochschild cohomology in degree one of a finite dimensional $k$-algebra $\Lambda$, where $k$ is a field. We define the excess of $\Lambda$ as the difference between the dimensions of the $\tau$-Hochschild cohomology in degree one and the dimension of the usual Hochschild cohomology in degree one. One of the main results is that for a zero excess bound quiver algebra $\Lambda=kQ/I$, the Hochschild cohomology in degree two $\mathsf{HH}^2(\Lambda) $ is isomorphic to the space of morphisms $\mathsf{Hom}_{kQ-kQ}(I/I^2, \Lambda).$ This is useful to determine when $\mathsf{HH}^2(\Lambda)=0$ for these algebras. We compute the excess for hereditary, radical square zero and monomial triangular algebras. For a bound quiver algebra $\Lambda$, a formula for the excess of $\Lambda$ is obtained. We also give a criterion for $\Lambda$ to be $\tau$-rigid.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
$\tau$-Hochschild (co)homology, the square of the Serre bimodule, and the Coxeter automorphism of the Tamarkin--Tsygan calculus
τ-translates of the regular bimodule are the cycle modules of the Nakayama-twisted Happel resolution of the square of the Serre bimodule, linking τ-Hochschild theory to the Coxeter automorphism.
-
Happel's question, Han's conjecture and $\tau$-Hochschild (co)homology
Introduces higher tau-Hochschild (co)homology and proves that, for bound quiver algebras, its infinite non-vanishing is equivalent to two newly defined 'infinite' global dimension properties tied to Happel's question ...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.