Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Misinformation and Polarization around COVID-19 vaccines in France, Germany, and Italy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.03763 v1 pith:737YSXHT submitted 2024-02-06 cs.SI physics.soc-ph

Misinformation and Polarization around COVID-19 vaccines in France, Germany, and Italy

classification cs.SI physics.soc-ph
keywords polarizationdiscussionsvaccinationanalysisbehavioralcampaigncountriescovid-19
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The kick-off of vaccination campaigns in Europe, starting in late December 2020, has been followed by the online spread of controversies and conspiracies surrounding vaccine validity and efficacy. We study Twitter discussions in three major European languages (Italian, German, and French) during the vaccination campaign. Moving beyond content analysis to explore the structural aspects of online discussions, our investigation includes an analysis of polarization and the potential formation of echo chambers, revealing nuanced behavioral and topical differences in user interactions across the analyzed countries. Notably, we identify strong anti- and pro-vaccine factions exhibiting heterogeneous temporal polarization patterns in different countries. Through a detailed examination of news-sharing sources, we uncover the widespread use of other media platforms like Telegram and YouTube for disseminating low-credibility information, indicating a concerning trend of diminishing news credibility over time. Our findings on Twitter discussions during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in major European languages expose nuanced behavioral distinctions, revealing the profound impact of polarization and the emergence of distinct anti-vaccine and pro-vaccine advocates over time.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.