Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Comparing Rationality Between Large Language Models and Humans: Insights and Open Questions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.09798 v1 pith:75UDIAYL submitted 2024-03-14 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords llmsrationalityartificialdelveshumanhumansinsightsintelligence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper delves into the dynamic landscape of artificial intelligence, specifically focusing on the burgeoning prominence of large language models (LLMs). We underscore the pivotal role of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) in augmenting LLMs' rationality and decision-making prowess. By meticulously examining the intricate relationship between human interaction and LLM behavior, we explore questions surrounding rationality and performance disparities between humans and LLMs, with particular attention to the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer. Our research employs comprehensive comparative analysis and delves into the inherent challenges of irrationality in LLMs, offering valuable insights and actionable strategies for enhancing their rationality. These findings hold significant implications for the widespread adoption of LLMs across diverse domains and applications, underscoring their potential to catalyze advancements in artificial intelligence.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Planted in Pretraining, Swayed by Finetuning: A Case Study on the Origins of Cognitive Biases in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Cognitive biases in LLMs are largely set during pretraining, while finetuning data and seed randomness only modulate them.

  2. Visually grounded emotion regulation via diffusion models and user-driven reappraisal

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AI-generated images made from a person's own spoken reappraisal reduced self-reported negative affect more than reappraisal alone in a 20-person lab experiment.

Pith tools