REVIEW 3 cited by
A Deep Dive into NFT Rug Pulls
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
NFT rug pull is one of the most prominent type of scam that the developers of a project abandon it and then run away with investors' funds. Although they have drawn attention from our community, to the best of our knowledge, the NFT rug pulls have not been systematically explored. To fill the void, this paper presents the first in-depth study of NFT rug pulls. Specifically, we first compile a list of 253 known NFT rug pulls as our initial ground truth, based on which we perform a pilot study, highlighting the key symptoms of NFT rug pulls. Then, we enforce a strict rule-based method to flag more rug pulled NFT projects in the wild, and have labelled 7,487 NFT rug pulls as our extended ground truth. Atop it, we have investigated the art of NFT rug pulls, with kinds of tricks including explicit ones that are embedded with backdoors, and implicit ones that manipulate the market. To release the expansion of the scam, we further design a prediction model to proactively identify the potential rug pull projects in an early stage ahead of the scam happens. We have implemented a prototype system deployed in the real-world setting for over 5 months. Our system has raised alarms for 7,821 NFT projects, by the time of this writing, which can work as a whistle blower that pinpoints rug pull scams timely, thus mitigating the impacts.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Real-CATS: A Practical Training Ground for Emerging Research on Cryptocurrency Cybercrime Detection
Real-CATS provides 103,203 criminal and 106,196 benign cryptocurrency addresses on Bitcoin and Ethereum, with transaction profiles and a temporal test set for cybercrime detection research.
-
RPHunter: Unveiling Rug Pull Schemes in Crypto Token via Code-and-Transaction Fusion Analysis
RPHunter fuses a code-risk graph and a transaction-behavior graph with graph neural networks to detect rug pull tokens, reporting 94.5% F1 on a curated dataset and 90.7% precision on a real-world sample.
-
Rugsafe: A multichain protocol for recovering from and defending against Rug Pulls
A protocol white paper that asserts an inverse logarithmic peg between rugged tokens and newly minted 'anticoin' receipts, without implementation or a specified mechanism that would enforce the peg.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.