Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Discounted Adaptive Online Learning: Towards Better Regularization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02720 v2 pith:7ABEK3XG submitted 2024-02-05 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords learningonlineadaptivealgorithmdiscountedoptimizationregularizationadversarial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study online learning in adversarial nonstationary environments. Since the future can be very different from the past, a critical challenge is to gracefully forget the history while new data comes in. To formalize this intuition, we revisit the discounted regret in online convex optimization, and propose an adaptive (i.e., instance optimal), FTRL-based algorithm that improves the widespread non-adaptive baseline -- gradient descent with a constant learning rate. From a practical perspective, this refines the classical idea of regularization in lifelong learning: we show that designing good regularizers can be guided by the principled theory of adaptive online optimization. Complementing this result, we also consider the (Gibbs and Cand\`es, 2021)-style online conformal prediction problem, where the goal is to sequentially predict the uncertainty sets of a black-box machine learning model. We show that the FTRL nature of our algorithm can simplify the conventional gradient-descent-based analysis, leading to instance-dependent performance guarantees.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. WQLCP: Weighted Adaptive Conformal Prediction for Robust Uncertainty Quantification Under Distribution Shifts

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    WQLCP weights calibration samples by VAE reconstruction losses and scales test scores by a test-loss quantile to improve conformal prediction under shifts, but the algorithm is ill-defined and the empirical support is weak.

Pith tools