Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

First steps towards quantum machine learning applied to the classification of event-related potentials

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.02648 v1 pith:7BREIF3J submitted 2023-02-06 cs.HC stat.ML

First steps towards quantum machine learning applied to the classification of event-related potentials

classification cs.HC stat.ML
keywords classifieraccuracypredictingqsvcableaccurateachievedapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Low information transfer rate is a major bottleneck for brain-computer interfaces based on non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG) for clinical applications. This led to the development of more robust and accurate classifiers. In this study, we investigate the performance of quantum-enhanced support vector classifier (QSVC). Training (predicting) balanced accuracy of QSVC was 83.17 (50.25) %. This result shows that the classifier was able to learn from EEG data, but that more research is required to obtain higher predicting accuracy. This could be achieved by a better configuration of the classifier, such as increasing the number of shots.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Rethinking Generalized BCIs: Benchmarking 340,000+ Unique Algorithmic Configurations for EEG Mental Command Decoding

    q-bio.NC 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0

    No universal EEG decoding pipeline exists: covariance tangent-space projection and CSP rank best on average across three datasets, but per-subject winners vary — and the claimed 340,000+ unique configurations is reall...