Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Monoidal model categories

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv math/9803002 v1 pith:7COWAYIL submitted 1998-02-28 math.AT

Monoidal model categories

classification math.AT
keywords modelcategorymonoidalhomotopymodulesmonoidscategoriesconditions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A monoidal model category is a model category with a compatible closed monoidal structure. Such things abound in nature; simplicial sets and chain complexes of abelian groups are examples. Given a monoidal model category, one can consider monoids and modules over a given monoid. We would like to be able to study the homotopy theory of these monoids and modules. This question was first addressed by Stefan Schwede and Brooke Shipley in "Algebras and modules in monoidal model categories", who showed that under certain conditions, there are model categories of monoids and of modules over a given monoid. This paper is a follow-up to that one. We study what happens when the conditions of Schwede-Shipley do not hold. This will happen in any topological situation, and in particular, in topological symmetric spectra. We find that, with no conditions on our monoidal model category except that it be cofibrantly generated and that the unit be cofibrant, we still obtain a homotopy category of monoids, and that this homotopy category is homotopy invariant in an appropriate sense.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Controlled theories, categorification, and homotopification

    math.CT 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Controlled theories yield functorial Lawvere 2-theories and simplicial Lawvere theories, producing a new model of ∞-groups and a candidate for infinite loop spaces.

  2. Controlled theories, categorification, and homotopification

    math.CT 2026-07 reject novelty 7.0

    Controlled theories are claimed to yield functorial categorifications and homotopifications, but the central 'strong augmentation' theorem is false for the paper's main examples and Proposition 6.18 asserts Ωmon(n,1) ...