Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Social Network Text Processing Applications: Techniques, Challenges and Future Research Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.13980 v1 pith:7CZULRCV submitted 2021-10-26 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords socialadversarialapplicationsattacksdetectionfuturemediadirections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The growing use of social media has led to the development of several Machine Learning (ML) and Natural Language Processing(NLP) tools to process the unprecedented amount of social media content to make actionable decisions. However, these MLand NLP algorithms have been widely shown to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. These vulnerabilities allow adversaries to launch a diversified set of adversarial attacks on these algorithms in different applications of social media text processing. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the main approaches for adversarial attacks and defenses in the context of social media applications with a particular focus on key challenges and future research directions. In detail, we cover literature on six key applications, namely (i) rumors detection, (ii) satires detection, (iii) clickbait & spams identification, (iv) hate speech detection, (v)misinformation detection, and (vi) sentiment analysis. We then highlight the concurrent and anticipated future research questions and provide recommendations and directions for future work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Talking Like a Phisher: LLM-Based Attacks on Voice Phishing Classifiers

    cs.CR 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-rewritten vishing transcripts lower the accuracy of TF-IDF-based ML classifiers trained on the KorCCViD Korean voice-phishing dataset, though the reported accuracy drops are overstated by inconsistent evaluation sets.

Pith tools