pith. sign in

arxiv: 1105.1232 · v1 · pith:7DBEK4MMnew · submitted 2011-05-06 · 🪐 quant-ph

On the "Security analysis and improvements of arbitrated quantum signature schemes"

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords schemessignaturequantumarbitratedpartyproblemsecurityaccordingly
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recently, Zou et al. [Phys. Rev. A 82, 042325 (2010)] pointed out that two arbitrated quantum signature (AQS) schemes are not secure, because an arbitrator cannot arbitrate the dispute between two users when a receiver repudiates the integrity of a signature. By using a public board, they try to propose two AQS schemes to solve the problem. This work shows that the same security problem may exist in their schemes and also a malicious party can reveal the other party's secret key without being detected by using the Trojan-horse attacks. Accordingly, two basic properties of a quantum signature, i.e. unforgeability and undeniability, may not be satisfied in their scheme.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.