Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 78 references

Generalized Brans-Dicke theory from Verlinde's entropic gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Combining entropic gravity with q-deformed Fermi statistics yields scalar-tensor field equations in which the deformation enters only as a constant rescaling of Newton's constant, so the result is Brans-Dicke theory with no new degrees of…

desk verdict A q-deformed entropic route to Brans-Dicke that falls apart at the N bookkeeping and ends as a constant rescaling. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02729 v1 pith:7EPX3R7V submitted 2025-06-03 gr-qc

Salih Kibaroğlu , Mustafa Senay This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83D0581R50 PACS 04.50.Kd05.30.Fk
keywords q-deformedfermiongasentropicgravityBrans-Dicketheoryscalar-tensorstatisticsholographicscreeneffectivegravitationalconstantmodified
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives a scalar-tensor theory of gravity by feeding q-deformed Fermi statistics into the entropic-gravity picture, in which gravity emerges from entropy changes on a holographic screen. Its central result is a set of field equations whose only new ingredient is a constant deformation factor $\alpha(z,q)$ multiplying the matter term; the paper shows this factor acts purely as a rescaling of Newton's constant, $G_{\rm eff}=G/\alpha$, without adding any dynamical degrees of freedom. In the appropriate limits the equations reduce to Brans-Dicke theory ($\alpha=1$), to q-deformed Einstein gravity ($\psi=1$), and to general relativity ($\psi=1$, $\alpha=1$). The paper itself stresses that unless $\alpha\simeq 1$ the theory would fail the Newtonian limit and solar-system tests, so the deformation does not yield a substantial modification of known physics.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the q-deformed fermion oscillator, defined by $aa^*+q a^*a=1$ with number-operator spectrum $[n]=(1-(-q)^n)/(1+q)$ and average occupation number $n_i=|\ln|1-ze^{-\beta\epsilon_i}|/(1+qze^{-\beta\epsilon_i})|/|\ln q|$. Its thermodynamics, encoded in generalized Fermi-Dirac functions $f_n(z,q)$, yields the entropy $S$ of the gas; treating that entropy as the entropy of the holographic screen and extremizing it under virtual displacements gives the deformed Unruh temperature $T=\alpha(z,q)T_U$. Inserting this temperature into the equipartition-based Gauss law $M=\frac{1}{2}\oint T\,dN$ with $dN=\psi dA/\hbar$, and converting the surface integral to a volume integral via Stokes' theorem, produces the field equations (34) and (36).

What would settle it

A precision local measurement of Newton's constant in a regime where the q-deformed Fermi gas is the relevant screen entropy would settle the claim: if the measured $G_{\rm eff}$ differs from the standard $G$ by the predicted factor $1/\alpha(z,q)$, the deformation is real; if no difference appears while $\alpha\ne 1$, the identification of gas entropy with screen entropy fails and the derivation collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a q-deformed fermion gas on the holographic screen produces a modified Unruh temperature $T=\alpha(z,q)\,T_U$, whose constant prefactor, $\alpha(z,q)/N = \frac{5}{2}\!\left(\frac{5}{2}\frac{f_{5/2}(z,q)}{f_{3/2}(z,q)}-\ln z\right)$, rescales the gravitational coupling when carried through the entropic Gauss law. With a conformally related scalar field $\psi$, the resulting field equation is $$R_{ab}-\frac{1}{2}g_{ab}R = \frac{8\pi}{\$\alpha$\psi}T^M_{ab} + \frac{\omega}{\$\alpha$\$psi^{2}$}\!\left(\partial_a\psi\partial_b\psi-\frac{1}{2}g_{ab}\partial_c\psi\partial^c\psi\right) + \frac{1}{\psi}(\nabla_a\nabla_b-g_{ab}\Box)\psi,$$ which the paper describes as a kind of scalar-tensor theory. Because $\alpha$ is constant, this is Brans-Dicke theory with a rescaled Newton constant rather than a new gravitational dynamics; the paper states explicitly that the deformation does not lead to an intrinsic modification of gravitational dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the entropy of the q-deformed fermion gas in a box is the same as the entropy of the holographic screen, and that the factor $\alpha(z,q)$ remains constant when it is moved outside the Gauss-law surface integral; if either fails, the modified field equations (34) and (36) do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the limit $\alpha(z,q)=1$, equation (36) is exactly Brans-Dicke theory with the standard scalar field $\psi$ and coupling $\omega$.
  • In the limit $\psi=1$, the same equation reduces to the q-deformed Einstein field equations obtained in earlier entropic-gravity studies.
  • Setting both $\psi=1$ and $\alpha=1$ gives general relativity with matter, so the construction contains GR as a doubly trivial limit.
  • Because $\alpha$ only multiplies the whole matter sector, all predictions of the theory are those of Brans-Dicke theory with $G_{\rm eff}=G/\alpha$, so no new propagating degree of freedom or new observational signature appears.
  • The near-undeformed regime $\alpha\simeq 1$ is the only one compatible with the Newtonian limit and solar-system tests, which the paper identifies as a limitation rather than a new prediction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If $\alpha(z,q)$ were promoted to a spacetime-dependent function, the derivation would fail at the step where $\alpha$ is pulled out of the surface integral, and the resulting theory would be a genuinely new scalar-tensor model rather than a rescaling; the paper leaves this as future work.
  • A general lesson suggested by the calculation is that any entropic correction entering as a state-independent prefactor in the screen entropy will only renormalize Newton's constant, so entropic-gravity models need variable deformations to produce observable deviations from general relativity.
  • Since $\alpha$ is expressed through thermodynamic variables (fugacity $z$ and deformation $q$), the formalism ties the gravitational constant to the local statistical state of matter; a testable extension is to search for environment-dependent $G$ in dense astrophysical settings where $z$ and $q$ would differ from their vacuum values.
  • Applying equation (36) to cosmology with constant $\alpha$ would simply rescale the Friedmann equations by $1/\alpha$, so any deviation from standard cosmology would have to come from promoting $\alpha$ to a dynamical field.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript attempts to derive a generalized Brans-Dicke (BD) scalar-tensor theory by combining Verlinde's entropic gravity with a q-deformed fermion gas. It computes a q-deformed Unruh-like temperature T = α(z,q) T_U (Eq. 21), introduces a conformal scalar field ψ via the transformation g̃_ab = ψ g_ab, and uses the equipartition/Gauss-law relation M = 1/2 ∮ T dN to obtain the field equations (34) and (36). The paper shows the limits α=1 → BD-like theory, ψ=1 → q-deformed Einstein equations, and α=ψ=1 → general relativity. It emphasizes that α is treated as a constant, effectively rescaling G, and concludes that the theory does not substantially deviate from Brans-Dicke. The paper is transparent about these limitations.

Significance. If the derivation were correct, the result would be a modest unification showing that q-deformed entropic gravity, after adding a scalar kinetic term by hand, reproduces a one-parameter family of Brans-Dicke-type equations with a rescaled gravitational constant. The algebraic steps from the Gauss law to Eq. (34) are internally consistent, and the paper correctly identifies its known limits. However, the physical significance is limited: the final theory is not a new scalar-tensor dynamics but essentially a rescaled BD system with an undetermined scalar field, and the paper itself states that no substantial modification of BD is obtained. The central derivation rests on an identification of two different particle numbers, which invalidates the claimed result as it stands.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III and Appendix I, Eqs. (22), (27), (29), (46)] Eq. (46) defines α/N = 5/2[5/2 f5/2/f3/2 - ln z], so α = C(z,q) N, where N is the particle number of the q-deformed gas in a box (N = V f3/2/λ^3). In the entropic-gravity derivation, Eq. (27) defines N as the number of bits on the holographic screen via dN = ψ dA/ℏ, which is generally spacetime-dependent. The paper silently identifies these two N's and treats α as a constant, pulling it out of the surface integral in Eq. (29). If α ∝ N_screen, then α is not constant over the screen unless ψ is constant, and Eq. (29) should have N (or an integral of dN) inside the integral. If α is instead the fixed particle number of a gas, it is not the screen bit number and cannot be imported into the screen Gauss law. Either way the passage from Eq. (29) to Eq. (30) is unjustified, and Eqs. (34) and (36) are unsupported. This is an internal inconsistency, not a disagreement with external consensus.
  2. [Sec. III, Eq. (35)] The scalar kinetic term is not derived but inserted by hand. Up to Eq. (34), ψ appears only through the conformal transformation (24) and the bit-counting relation (27); the derived field equation contains no ∂ψ∂ψ term. The decomposition (35), with arbitrary constant ω, is an additional postulate. Thus the central claim that Eq. (36) is a 'generalized Brans-Dicke theory' obtained from entropic gravity is conditional on an ad hoc input; the derivation does not produce the scalar kinetic term. The paper should either derive this term from the entropic/holographic setup or explicitly state that Eq. (36) is a conjectured extension rather than a derived result.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (36)] Even after accepting Eq. (36), the system is not a complete scalar-tensor theory because no field equation for ψ is given. In Brans-Dicke theory, ψ obeys a second-order equation obtained from varying the action or from the consistency of the field equations with energy-momentum conservation. Here ψ is unconstrained by any dynamics, so Eq. (36) is underdetermined and cannot yield definite predictions for, e.g., the PPN parameters or cosmological solutions. The absence of a ψ equation means the reduction to Brans-Dicke in the limit α=1 is formal only.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] There are typesetting artifacts such as 'aq-deformed' and 'theirtheoreticalconsistency' (missing spaces) that should be fixed before publication.
  2. [Appendix II, Eq. (58)] Eq. (58) writes α/(4πG) while the main text Eq. (30) writes α/(4π); since G=1 is set, this is only a notation issue, but it should be made consistent.
  3. [References] Several references are incomplete; for example, [20] and [28] lack volume and year information, which will hinder readers.
  4. [Sec. III, after Eq. (36)] The statement that α≠1 prevents recovery of the Newtonian limit is not self-evident: a constant rescaling of G can be absorbed into G_eff, and the physical constraint should be phrased in terms of G_eff and the PPN parameters rather than α alone.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The central Brans-Dicke endpoint is partly by construction: the BD kinetic term is inserted by hand through Eq. (35), and the q-deformation parameter alpha is defined via N but treated as a global constant in Eq. (29), so the final equations reduce to Brans-Dicke with a rescaled G rather than being independently derived.

  1. self definitional [Section III, Eq. (35) and Eq. (36); Conclusion]
    "At this stage, we consider the scalar field ψ as a component of the matter sector, contributing to the overall stress-energy content of the system. Consequently, the total energy-momentum tensor Tab can be decomposed into two distinct parts: Tab = T M_ab + ω/(8πψ)(∂aψ∂bψ − 1/2 gab∂cψ∂^cψ), where T M_ab originated from ordinary matter, the remaining part is related to the scalar field and ω is an arbitrary constant."

    Equation (36) is obtained simply by substituting Eq. (35) into Eq. (34). Since Eq. (35) defines the scalar-field contribution to the stress-energy tensor to be exactly the standard Brans-Dicke kinetic term with arbitrary ω, the final field equation is Brans-Dicke by construction rather than by derivation from the q-deformed entropic setup. The paper's own Conclusion confirms this: 'This equation may also be interpreted as the q-deformed BD gravitational field equation by assuming that the introduced coupling constant ω corresponds to the BD parameter.' The claimed reduction to Brans-Dicke therefore rests on an assumption inserted at the last step.

  2. self definitional [Appendix I, Eq. (46); Section III, Eqs. (27), (29), (30)]
    "Finally, using E = T, λ = h/(2πmT )1/2 and V f3/2(z,q)/λ^3 = N, the function α(z,q) can be written as α(z,q)/N = 5/2(5/2 f5/2(z,q)/f3/2(z,q) − ln z). ... M = α(z,q)/(4π) ∮∂Σ e^ϕ N^a(aa + 1/2 ∇a log ψ) ψ dA."

    In Eq. (46), α is defined to be proportional to N, the particle number of the q-deformed gas in a box (N/V = f3/2/λ^3). In Eq. (27), the same symbol N is introduced as the number of bits on the holographic screen, dN = ψ dA/ℏ. The two N's are silently identified, and α is then pulled out of the surface integral in Eq. (29) and treated as a global constant through Eq. (30). If α ∝ N with N the screen bit number, the integrand should contain α(N) or an extra factor of N; if α is a spacetime constant, Eq. (46) forces N to be constant on every screen, contradicting dN = ψ dA/ℏ for non-constant ψ. In either case, Eqs. (34) and (36) follow from the imposed constancy of α, not from the q-deformed entropy calculation.

1 more flagged steps
  1. renaming known result [Section III, paragraph after Eq. (36); Conclusion]
    "In our current formulation, the deformation function α(q,z) is treated as a constant parameter... As it appears solely as a constant multiplicative factor, α(q,z) effectively rescales Newton's gravitational constant as Geff = G/α(q,z), without introducing additional dynamical degrees of freedom. Consequently, the modified field equations retain the standard form of Brans-Dicke equations with a constant scalar field."

    The paper itself states that the only effect of α is a constant rescaling of Newton's constant. A constant multiplicative rescaling of G can be absorbed into the definition of the gravitational constant, so the resulting theory is the standard Brans-Dicke theory in different notation, not a dynamically new generalization. The paper also acknowledges that it 'does not yield a significant deviation from Brans-Dicke theory,' so the advertised q-deformed scalar-tensor theory is, by its own account, a relabeling of the known Brans-Dicke result with rescaled constants.

full rationale

Most of the derivation chain is self-contained and not circular: the q-deformed fermion entropy in Eqs. (8)-(13), the resulting q-deformed temperature in Eqs. (21) and (44)-(46), and the surface-integral comparison leading to Eq. (34) are all reproduced in this paper, and the self-citations to the authors' earlier entropic-gravity works are not load-bearing because the key steps are shown explicitly. The circularity enters at the advertised Brans-Dicke endpoint. Eq. (35) defines the scalar-field part of the stress-energy tensor to be exactly the Brans-Dicke kinetic term with arbitrary ω, and Eq. (36) then has the BD form by substitution; the Conclusion even states that the BD interpretation follows 'by assuming' that ω is the BD parameter. In parallel, α is defined through N in Eq. (46) but extracted from the screen integral as a global constant in Eq. (29), so the final equations reduce to ordinary Brans-Dicke theory with G rescaled by an input constant. The paper's own admission that α only rescales G and that no significant deviation arises confirms that the claimed generalization is, by construction, a re-parameterization of Brans-Dicke theory rather than an independently derived new theory. The score of 5 reflects this partial by-construction character while acknowledging the substantial independent content in the entropy and temperature derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on Verlinde's entropic gravity framework, the q-deformed fermion gas model, the standard Komar mass formula, and an ad hoc kinetic term for psi. The free parameters are q, z, omega, and the particle number N; none is fixed by data. There are no invented physical entities.

free parameters (4)
  • q (deformation parameter) = 0 < q < 1 (unspecified)
    Introduced in Eqs. (1)-(3) to deform fermionic statistics; no physical value or observational constraint is provided.
  • z (fugacity)
    Appears in the occupation number (5) and in alpha(z,q) (Eq. 22); related to chemical potential, but no value or physical setting is specified for the screen.
  • omega (Brans-Dicke coupling)
    Arbitrary constant inserted by hand in Eq. (35) to give the scalar field a kinetic term; not derived from entropic gravity.
  • N (number of q-deformed gas particles)
    Enters alpha/N in Eq. (46); later treated as the number of bits on the holographic screen without justification; value never specified.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Gravity is an entropic force on a holographic screen, with temperature determined by entropy variation under displacement.
    Verlinde's framework [28,29] is used throughout Section III, especially in Eqs. (20)-(21).
  • domain assumption The q-deformed fermion gas algebra (Eqs. 1-2) and its entropy (Eq. 13) describe the microscopic degrees of freedom of the holographic screen.
    Central modeling hypothesis; not independently tested in this paper.
  • domain assumption The standard Komar mass formula, Eq. (31), remains valid in the deformed theory, allowing comparison with Eq. (30).
    Used in Section III after Eq. (31); assumes the GR mass formula holds even when the field equations are modified.
  • ad hoc to paper The scalar field psi can be added to the matter sector with a kinetic term proportional to omega (Eq. 35).
    Introduced by hand, not derived from entropic gravity.
  • ad hoc to paper Single-particle kinetic energy equals temperature, E = T, in the derivation of alpha in Appendix I.
    Used in Appendix I to express alpha in terms of z and q; not justified for the screen system.
  • standard math Standard tools: Killing equation, Stokes theorem, and conformal transformation.
    Used in Appendix II to convert surface integrals to volume integrals.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generalized Brans-Dicke theory from Verlinde's entropic gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7EPX3R7V

@misc{pith2026250602729,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generalized Brans-Dicke theory from Verlinde's entropic gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7EPX3R7V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02729}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, we develop a q-deformed scalar-tensor theory of gravitation by combining Verlinde's entropic gravity paradigm with statistical deformation effects. The resulting model modifies the Brans-Dicke framework through a deformation function, treated as a constant rescaling factor for the effective gravitational coupling. We derive the corresponding q-deformed field equations and analyze their theoretical consistency including the recovery of standard gravitational models in specific limits. While the present formulation preserves key symmetries and provides a generalized description of gravitational dynamics, it does not yield a significant deviation from Brans-Dicke theory. The study concludes with prospects for future research, including the exploration of cosmological solutions arising from the q-deformed field equations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Capozziello and M

    S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, Extended Theories of Gravity, Phys. Rept.509, 167 (2011)

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Clifton, P

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Modified Gravity and Cosmology, Phys. Rept.513, 1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution, Phys. Rept.692, 1 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Wave equations in conformal space, Annals Math.37, 429 (1936)

    work page 1936

  5. [5]

    Mack and A

    G. Mack and A. Salam, Finite component field representations of the conformal group, Annals Phys.53, 174 (1969)

    work page 1969

  6. [6]

    Shaposhnikov and D

    M. Shaposhnikov and D. Zenhausern, Scale invariance, unimodular gravity and dark energy, Phys. Lett. B671, 187 (2009), arXiv:0809.3395 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    Israelit, A Weyl-Dirac Cosmological Model with DM and DE, Gen

    M. Israelit, A Weyl-Dirac Cosmological Model with DM and DE, Gen. Rel. Grav.43, 751 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    I. Bars, P. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, Local Conformal Symmetry in Physics and Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D89, 043515 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Aguila, J

    R. Aguila, J. E. Madriz Aguilar, C. Moreno, and M. Bellini, Present accelerated expansion of the universe from new Weyl-Integrable gravity approach, Eur. Phys. J. C74, 3158 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    G. K. Karananas and M. Shaposhnikov, Scale invariant alternatives to general relativity. II. Dilaton properties, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084052 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    P. G. Ferreira, C. T. Hill, J. Noller, and G. G. Ross, Inflation in a scale invariant universe, Phys. Rev. D97, 123516 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Casas, G

    S. Casas, G. K. Karananas, M. Pauly, and J. Rubio, Scale-invariant alternatives to general relativity. III. The inflation-dark energy connection, Phys. Rev. D99, 063512 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    D. M. Ghilencea, Gauging scale symmetry and inflation: Weyl versus Palatini gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 510 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Tang and Y.-L

    Y. Tang and Y.-L. Wu, Weyl Symmetry Inspired Inflation and Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B803, 135320 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D7, 2333 (1973)

    1973

  8. [16]

    S. W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975), [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  9. [17]

    Jacobson, Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state, Phys

    T. Jacobson, Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1260 (1995)

    1995

  10. [18]

    Padmanabhan, Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons, Phys

    T. Padmanabhan, Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons, Phys. Rept.406, 49 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    Padmanabhan, Thermodynamical Aspects of Gravity: New insights, Rept

    T. Padmanabhan, Thermodynamical Aspects of Gravity: New insights, Rept. Prog. Phys.73, 046901 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    Cai and S

    R.-G. Cai and S. P. Kim, First law of thermodynamics and Friedmann equations of Friedmann-Robertson-Walker universe, JHEP 02, 050

  13. [21]

    Akbar and R.-G

    M. Akbar and R.-G. Cai, Thermodynamic Behavior of Friedmann Equations at Apparent Horizon of FRW Universe, Phys. Rev. D 75, 084003 (2007)

    2007

  14. [22]

    Cai and L.-M

    R.-G. Cai and L.-M. Cao, Unified first law and thermodynamics of apparent horizon in FRW universe, Phys. Rev. D75, 064008 (2007)

    2007

  15. [23]

    Jamil, E

    M. Jamil, E. N. Saridakis, and M. R. Setare, Thermodynamics of dark energy interacting with dark matter and radiation, Phys. Rev. D81, 023007 (2010)

    2010

  16. [24]

    Sheykhi, Thermodynamics of apparent horizon and modified Friedmann equations, Eur

    A. Sheykhi, Thermodynamics of apparent horizon and modified Friedmann equations, Eur. Phys. J. C69, 265 (2010), arXiv:1012.0383 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and T. Paul, Early and late universe holographic cosmology from a new generalized entropy, Phys. Lett. B831, 137189 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and T. Paul, Modified cosmology from the thermodynamics of apparent horizon, Phys. Lett. B 835, 137553 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and T. Paul, Different Aspects of Entropic Cosmology, Universe10, 352 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    E. P. Verlinde, On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton, JHEP04, 029. 13

  21. [29]

    E. P. Verlinde, Emergent Gravity and the Dark Universe, SciPost Phys.2, 016 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Sheykhi, Entropic Corrections to Friedmann Equations, Phys

    A. Sheykhi, Entropic Corrections to Friedmann Equations, Phys. Rev. D81, 104011 (2010)

    2010

  23. [31]

    Sheykhi and S

    A. Sheykhi and S. H. Hendi, Power-Law Entropic Corrections to Newton’s Law and Friedmann Equations, Phys. Rev. D 84, 044023 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    Cai, L.-M

    R.-G. Cai, L.-M. Cao, and N. Ohta, Friedmann Equations from Entropic Force, Phys. Rev. D81, 061501 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    Cai and E

    Y.-F. Cai and E. N. Saridakis, Inflation in Entropic Cosmology: Primordial Perturbations and non-Gaussianities, Phys. Lett. B 697, 280 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Y.-F. Cai, J. Liu, and H. Li, Entropic cosmology: a unified model of inflation and late-time acceleration, Phys. Lett. B 690, 213 (2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    Wei, Cosmological Constraints on the Modified Entropic Force Model, Phys

    H. Wei, Cosmological Constraints on the Modified Entropic Force Model, Phys. Lett. B692, 167 (2010)

    2010

  28. [36]

    Sheykhi and K

    A. Sheykhi and K. R. Sarab, Einstein Equations and MOND Theory from Debye Entropic Gravity, JCAP10, 012

  29. [37]

    Komatsu and S

    N. Komatsu and S. Kimura, Non-adiabatic-like accelerated expansion of the late universe in entropic cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 87, 043531 (2013)

    2013

  30. [38]

    Komatsu and S

    N. Komatsu and S. Kimura, Entropic cosmology for a generalized black-hole entropy, Phys. Rev. D88, 083534 (2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    H.Moradpour, A.Sheykhi, C.Corda,andI.G.Salako,ImplicationsofthegeneralizedentropyformalismsontheNewtonian gravity and dynamics, Phys. Lett. B783, 82 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Şenay and S

    M. Şenay and S. Kibaroğlu,q-Deformed Einstein equations from entropic force, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33, 1850218 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Kibaroğlu and M

    S. Kibaroğlu and M. Senay, Effects of bosonic and fermionicq-deformation on the entropic gravity, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950249 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Moradpour, A

    H. Moradpour, A. H. Ziaie, S. Ghaffari, and F. Feleppa, The generalized and extended uncertainty principles and their implications on the Jeans mass, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.488, L69 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Kibaroğlu, Generalized entropic gravity from modified Unruh temperature, Int

    S. Kibaroğlu, Generalized entropic gravity from modified Unruh temperature, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34, 1950119 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Kibaroğlu and M

    S. Kibaroğlu and M. Senay, Friedmann equations for deformed entropic gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D29, 2050042 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Senay, Entropic gravity corrected byq-statistics, and its implications to cosmology, Physics Letters B820, 136536 (2021)

    M. Senay, Entropic gravity corrected byq-statistics, and its implications to cosmology, Physics Letters B820, 136536 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Senay, M

    M. Senay, M. M. Sabet, and H. Moradpour, Heat capacity of holographic screen inspires mond theory, Physica Scripta96, 075001 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Senay, Jeans mass and gamow temperature: insights fromq-deformed systems, Physica Scripta99, 105001 (2024)

    M. Senay, Jeans mass and gamow temperature: insights fromq-deformed systems, Physica Scripta99, 105001 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Senay, Implications of q-deformed statistics on stellar stability, Physica A , 130163 (2024)

    M. Senay, Implications of q-deformed statistics on stellar stability, Physica A , 130163 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Moradpour, S

    H. Moradpour, S. Jalalzadeh, and M. Javaherian, Fractional stars, Astrophys. Space Sci.369, 98 (2024), arXiv:2409.12869 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Moradpour, M

    H. Moradpour, M. Javaherian, B. Afshar, and S. Jalalzadeh, Tsallisian non-extensive stars, Physica A636, 129564 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Kibaroğlu and M

    S. Kibaroğlu and M. Senay, Anisotropic cosmology in q-deformed entropic gravity, Nucl. Phys. B1012, 116820 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    Strominger, Black hole statistics, Phys

    A. Strominger, Black hole statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3397 (1993)

    1993

  45. [53]

    Arik and D

    M. Arik and D. D. Coon, Hilbert Spaces of Analytic Functions and Generalized Coherent States, J. Math. Phys.17, 524 (1976)

    1976

  46. [54]

    Parthasarathy and K

    R. Parthasarathy and K. S. Viswanathan, A q-analogue of the supersymmetric oscillator and its q-superalgebra, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General24, 613 (1991)

    1991

  47. [55]

    K. S. Viswanathan, R. Parthasarathy, and R. Jagannathan, Generalized q-fermion oscillators and q-coherent states, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General25, L335 (1992)

    1992

  48. [56]

    Chaichian, R

    M. Chaichian, R. G. Felipe, and C. Montonen, Statistics of q-oscillators, quons and relations to fractional statistics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General26, 4017 (1993)

    1993

  49. [57]

    M. R. Ubriaco, Anyonic behavior of quantum group gases, Phys. Rev. E55, 291 (1997)

    1997

  50. [58]

    Lavagno and P

    A. Lavagno and P. Swamy,q-Deformed structures and nonextensive statistics: a comparative study, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications305, 310 (2002)

    2002

  51. [59]

    Algin and M

    A. Algin and M. Senay, High temperature behavior of a deformed Fermi gas obeying interpolating statistics, Phys. Rev. E 85, 041123 (2012)

    2012

  52. [60]

    Algin and M

    A. Algin and M. Senay, Fermionic q -deformation and its connection to thermal effective mass of a quasiparticle, Physica A 447, 232 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Algin and M

    A. Algin and M. Senay, General thermostatistical properties of aq-deformed fermion gas in two dimensions, Journal of Physics: Conference Series766, 012008 (2016). 14

    2016

  54. [62]

    Algin, D

    A. Algin, D. Irk, and G. Topcu, Anyonic behavior of an intermediate-statistics fermion gas model, Phys. Rev. E91, 062131 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    Algin, M

    A. Algin, M. Arik, M. Senay, and G. Topcu, Thermostatistics of bosonic and fermionic fibonacci oscillators, International Journal of Modern Physics B31, 1650247 (2017)

    2017

  56. [64]

    Mohammadzadeh, Y

    H. Mohammadzadeh, Y. Azizian-Kalandaragh, N. Cheraghpour, and F. Adli, Thermodynamic geometry, condensation and debye model of two-parameter deformed statistics, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2017, 083104 (2017)

    2017

  57. [65]

    Nutku, K

    F. Nutku, K. Sen, and E. Aydiner, Complexity study of q-deformed quantum harmonic oscillator, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications533, 122041 (2019)

    2019

  58. [66]

    A. A. Altintas, F. Ozaydin, and C. Bayındır,q-Deformed three-level quantum logic, Quant. Inf. Proc.19, 247 (2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    Ozaydin, O

    F. Ozaydin, O. E. Müstecaplıoğlu, and T. Hakioğlu, Powering quantum Otto engines only withq-deformation of the working substance, Phys. Rev. E108, 054103 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    A. A. Marinho, F. A. Brito, G. M. Viswanathan, and C. G. Bezerra, Intermediate statistics: Addressing the thermoelectric properties of solids, Phys. Rev. E110, 034136 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Boumali, A

    A. Boumali, A. Bouzenada, S. Zare, and H. Hassanabadi, Thermal properties of theq-deformed spin-one dkp oscillator, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications628, 129134 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Boutabba, S

    N. Boutabba, S. Grira, and H. Eleuch, Analysis of aq-deformed hyperbolic short laser pulse in a multi-level atomic system, Scientific Reports 12, 9308 (2022)

    2022

  63. [71]

    Nutku and E

    F. Nutku and E. Aydiner, Investigation of bose-einstein condensates inq-deformed potentials with first order perturbation theory, Communications in Theoretical Physics69, 154 (2018)

    2018

  64. [72]

    A. A. Marinho, F. A. Brito, and C. Chesman, Fibonacci oscillators in the landau diamagnetism problem, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications411, 74 (2014)

    2014

  65. [73]

    A. M. Gavrilik and Y. A. Mishchenko, Virial coefficients in the( ˜ µ, q)-deformed bose gas model related to compositeness of particles and their interaction: Temperature-dependence problem, Phys. Rev. E90, 052147 (2014)

    2014

  66. [74]

    M. E. Ismail and D. Stanton, Applications ofq-taylor theorems, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics153, 259 (2003)

    2003

  67. [75]

    Jalalzadeh, H

    S. Jalalzadeh, H. Moradpour, and P. Moniz, Modified cosmology from quantum deformed entropy, Physics of the Dark Universe 42, 101320 (2023)

    2023

  68. [76]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity(Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984)

    1984

  69. [77]

    W. G. Unruh, Notes on black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D14, 870 (1976)

    1976

  70. [78]

    Brans and R

    C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Mach’s principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation, Phys. Rev.124, 925 (1961)

    1961

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.