REVIEW 1 cited by
Transmission and Capacity Expansion Planning Against Rising Temperatures: A Case Study in Arizona
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The stable and efficient operation of the transmission network is fundamental to the power system's ability to deliver electricity reliably and cheaply. As average temperatures continue to rise, the ability of the transmission network to meet demand is diminished. Higher temperatures lead to congestion by reducing thermal limits of lines while simultaneously reducing generation potential. Due to prohibitive costs and limited real estate for building new lines, it is necessary to consider capacity expansion as well to improve the functioning and efficiency of the grid. Optimal control, however, requires many discrete choices, rendering fully accurate models intractable. Furthermore, temperature changes will impact different regions and climate differently. As such, it is necessary to model both temperature changes and transmission flows with high spatial resolution. This work proposes a case study of the transmission grid centered in Arizona, using a DC optimal power flow mathematical formulation to plan for future transmission expansion and capacity expansion to efficiently meet demand. The effects of rising temperatures on transmission and generation are modeled at the regional level. Several classes of valid inequalities are employed to speed up the solution process. Multiple experiments considering different temperature and demand trends are considered which include each of the above technologies.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Evaluating Undergrounding Decisions for Wildfire Ignition Risk Mitigation across Multiple Hazards
Wildfire-motivated undergrounding in Texas does not meaningfully reduce load shed from hurricanes, wind, or active wildfires, supporting multi-hazard co-optimization.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.