Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Synapse: Trajectory-as-Exemplar Prompting with Memory for Computer Control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.07863 v3 pith:7FWMQS6F submitted 2023-06-13 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords computertaskssynapseexemplarsstatesagentscompletecontext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Building agents with large language models (LLMs) for computer control is a burgeoning research area, where the agent receives computer states and performs actions to complete complex tasks. Previous computer agents have demonstrated the benefits of in-context learning (ICL); however, their performance is hindered by several issues. First, the limited context length of LLMs and complex computer states restrict the number of exemplars, as a single webpage can consume the entire context. Second, the exemplars in current methods, such as high-level plans and multi-choice questions, cannot represent complete trajectories, leading to suboptimal performance in long-horizon tasks. Third, existing computer agents rely on task-specific exemplars and overlook the similarity among tasks, resulting in poor generalization to novel tasks. To address these challenges, we introduce Synapse, a computer agent featuring three key components: i) state abstraction, which filters out task-irrelevant information from raw states, allowing more exemplars within the limited context, ii) trajectory-as-exemplar prompting, which prompts the LLM with complete trajectories of the abstracted states and actions to improve multi-step decision-making, and iii) exemplar memory, which stores the embeddings of exemplars and retrieves them via similarity search for generalization to novel tasks. We evaluate Synapse on MiniWoB++, a standard task suite, and Mind2Web, a real-world website benchmark. In MiniWoB++, Synapse achieves a 99.2% average success rate (a 10% relative improvement) across 64 tasks using demonstrations from only 48 tasks. Notably, Synapse is the first ICL method to solve the book-flight task in MiniWoB++. Synapse also exhibits a 56% relative improvement in average step success rate over the previous state-of-the-art prompting scheme in Mind2Web.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PraMem: Practice-derived Experiential Memory for Long-horizon Behavior Prediction

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Offline practice on historical user actions builds dual experiential memory (patterns plus bias alerts) that improves LLM long-horizon behavior prediction over compression baselines.

  2. LIFELONG SOTOPIA: Evaluating Social Intelligence of Language Agents Over Lifelong Social Interactions

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Language agents' believability and goal achievement decline over multi-episode social interactions, and curated memory summaries only partially close the gap with humans.

  3. G-Memory: Tracing Hierarchical Memory for Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.MA 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    G-Memory stores past multi-agent teamwork in a three-tier graph and retrieves it to boost performance on five benchmarks.

  4. Bridging Inference-Time Scaling and Episodic Memory with Action-Centric Graphs

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Graph-based action memory with dual-stream TD learning improves best-of-N inference scaling for LLM agents, reporting +20.81% success / +6.17% progress over vanilla baselines.

  5. Can Past Experience Accelerate LLM Reasoning?

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLMs can cut reasoning compute by up to 56% on similar questions when memory of past correct solutions is combined with adaptive early stopping, though the benchmark is small and synthetic.

Pith tools