REVIEW 3 cited by
A Survey of Stance Detection on Social Media: New Directions and Perspectives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In modern digital environments, users frequently express opinions on contentious topics, providing a wealth of information on prevailing attitudes. The systematic analysis of these opinions offers valuable insights for decision-making in various sectors, including marketing and politics. As a result, stance detection has emerged as a crucial subfield within affective computing, enabling the automatic detection of user stances in social media conversations and providing a nuanced understanding of public sentiment on complex issues. Recent years have seen a surge of research interest in developing effective stance detection methods, with contributions from multiple communities, including natural language processing, web science, and social computing. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of stance detection techniques on social media, covering task definitions, datasets, approaches, and future works. We review traditional stance detection models, as well as state-of-the-art methods based on large language models, and discuss their strengths and limitations. Our survey highlights the importance of stance detection in understanding public opinion and sentiment, and identifies gaps in current research. We conclude by outlining potential future directions for stance detection on social media, including the need for more robust and generalizable models, and the importance of addressing emerging challenges such as multi-modal stance detection and stance detection in low-resource languages.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
MT2-CSD: A New Dataset and Multi-Semantic Knowledge Fusion Method for Conversational Stance Detection
The paper presents a large new English conversational stance detection dataset and a model that fuses LLM-generated relation and act knowledge, reporting state-of-the-art F1.
-
Quantifying Political Partisanship for Cross-Platform Analyses
Partisanship of individual posts can be scored on a common embedding axis anchored by AllSides news-bias labels, yielding cross-platform scores that transfer from Bluesky/Truth Social to X.
-
PolitiSky24: U.S. Political Bluesky Dataset with User Stance Labels
PolitiSky24 provides 16,044 AI-labeled user-level stance pairs for Trump and Harris from 8,467 Bluesky users, with the labeling pipeline reporting 81% validation accuracy.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.