REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 65 references
Dynamic scaling behavior in the presence of a periodic magnetic driving across Ising continuous transitions
T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Periodic magnetic sweeps across a 2D Ising critical point obey a universal dynamic scaling law.
desk verdict A plausible and mostly convincing extension of dynamic scaling to periodically driven Ising systems; the main gap is that the load-bearing scaling variable is only tested along one line in parameter space. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the renormalization-group scaling variable $\sigma=A P^\kappa$, obtained by treating the field amplitude $A$ as a static magnetic field with RG dimension $y_h$ and the period $P$ as a time scale with dynamic dimension $z$. In finite size this means $W_a=A L^{y_h}$ and $W_p=P L^{-z}$; in the thermodynamic limit these two variables combine into $\sigma=W_a W_p^{y_h/z}=A P^\kappa$, while $\tau=t/P$ is the ratio of the two time scales. This construction carries the argument because it turns a two-parameter family of protocols into one-parameter families of universal functions, and it fixes the exponents $\zeta=y_\phi/y_h=1/15$ and $\varepsilon=y_e/y_h=8/15$ that make data from different $A$ and $P$ collapse.
What would settle it
A run at fixed $\sigma=1$ with $P=200,300,\ldots,1000$ in the thermodynamic limit should show no residual $P$ dependence of $A^{-\zeta}M(\tau)$; a systematic drift with $P$ would falsify the scaling form. A sharper check is to measure $\kappa$ from the collapse and compare it with $15/8$ divided by an independent determination of $z$; because the paper's exponents are tied to the equilibrium dynamic universality class, any effective $\kappa$ that varies with $\sigma$ or $P$ would break the central identity.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
For the 2D Ising model at $T_c$ evolving under purely relaxational (model-A) dynamics in a field $h(t)=-A\cos(2\pi t/P)$, the infinite-volume magnetization obeys $M(t,A,P)\approx A^{1/15}\mathcal{M}(\sigma,\tau)$ and the subtracted bond-energy density obeys $E_s(t,A,P)\approx A^{8/15}\mathcal{E}_s(\sigma,\tau)$, with $\tau=t/P$ and $\sigma=A P^\kappa$, $\kappa=y_h/z=0.8653(4)$. The scaling functions are universal for the model-A equilibrium dynamic universality class; they are synchronized with the drive (period one in $\tau$), show a phase delay of about 0.2 to 0.25 periods that vanishes as $\sigma\to\infty$, and at large $\tau$ reach a stationary state whose period-averaged magnetization is zero, so the $Z_2$ symmetry broken by the initial condition is recovered. The same scaling theory, with $\rho=B P^{y_t/z}$ and $y_t/z\approx 0.4615$, describes periodic temperature variation at zero field, where the susceptibility scales as $B^{-7/4}$ times a universal function. The argument is expected to carry to higher-dimensional Ising systems and, with caveats about energy injection, to quantum transitions.
Load-bearing premise
The entire scaling structure rests on the hypothesis that the amplitude $A$ enters only through the static-field scaling variable and the period only through the time scaling variable, so their combined effect is captured by $\sigma=A P^{y_h/z}$; a periodic drive that creates an independent relevant perturbation would destroy the collapse.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- At fixed $\sigma$, changing $P$ from 100 to 300 leaves the rescaled magnetization and bond energy unchanged in the thermodynamic limit; the collapse is the direct signature of the scaling law.
- In the large-$\sigma$ limit the magnetization approaches the equilibrium curve $\mathrm{sgn}[h(t)]\,c\,|\cos(2\pi\tau)|^{1/15}$ with $c=1.00268751$, so the periodic protocol becomes effectively adiabatic.
- For $\sigma\lesssim 2$ the system takes many periods to forget its initial magnetization; the rescaled relaxation time grows as $\tau_s\approx a\,\sigma^{-u}$ with $u\approx 3.9$, so $Z_2$ symmetry is recovered only after a number of cycles that diverges as $\sigma\to 0$.
- Square-wave magnetic drives and periodic temperature drives obey the same dynamic scaling structure with their own universal functions; in the temperature case the susceptibility scales as $B^{-7/4}$ and the properly subtracted energy as $B^{-1}$.
- In the three-dimensional Ising universality class the predicted exponent is $\kappa\approx 1.226$, and for quantum Ising transitions $z=1$ would set a different scaling regime; these numbers give concrete targets for future tests.
Reading between the lines
- A direct test of universality would be to run the same protocol in a three-dimensional Ising or $O(N)$ model and verify collapse at $\kappa=y_h/z\approx 1.226$; the paper predicts this but does not simulate it.
- The divergent relaxation time $\tau_s\sim\sigma^{-4}$ resembles the slow dynamics seen near the dynamic phase transition of driven Ising magnets, and connecting the two could give an independent route to measure $u$.
- Near a zero of the field the out-of-equilibrium interval shrinks as $\Delta\tau\sim\sigma^{-1/(1+\kappa)}$, so measuring the phase delay versus $\sigma$ would probe whether quench-scaling physics controls the synchronization.
- In a thin ferromagnetic film, sweeping frequency and amplitude while recording AC susceptibility should show the predicted data collapse, making the phase delay and the stationary large-$\tau$ state directly observable.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This paper studies the 2D Ising model at T_c under purely relaxational (Metropolis) dynamics and a periodic magnetic field h(t)=-A cos(2πt/P). It proposes a dynamic scaling theory in which the only relevant combinations are σ=A P^{y_h/z} and τ=t/P, leading to M ≈ A^{1/15} M(σ,τ) and E_s ≈ A^{8/15} E_s(σ,τ). The authors support the theory with Monte Carlo simulations for several values of σ and P, checks against the σ→∞ and σ→0 limits, a square-wave protocol, and a periodically varying temperature protocol. They also study the transient approach to the stationary state and report a non-standard divergence exponent u≈3.9 for the transient time scale.
Significance. If established, the result is a clean extension of dynamic scaling to periodic driving, with the central exponents y_h and z taken from independent equilibrium results, so the collapse is essentially parameter-free apart from the peripheral transient exponent u. The paper includes useful consistency checks, including the σ→∞ and σ→0 limits and a square-wave protocol that are not obtained by fitting the collapse exponents. The main limitations are that the numerical test of the two-variable scaling form covers only a narrow range of P at fixed σ, and the collapse claims are not accompanied by displayed error bars; the universality claim also rests on a single model and a single dynamics. These issues are addressable with additional analysis rather than requiring a change in the theoretical framework.
major comments (2)
- [Sec. III B, Eqs. (8)-(15), and Figs. 2, 4, 5, 11, 12] The central claim that the driving enters only through σ=A P^{y_h/z} and τ=t/P is tested only along the one-parameter family A=σ P^{-κ} with P spanning a factor of 2-3 for each σ (for example, σ=1 uses P=100,200,300; σ=1/2 uses P=100,200; σ=10 uses P=200,400). Given the paper's own estimate that scaling corrections decay as P^{-0.92}, a weak additional P-dependence could be hidden in the visually assessed collapse. I request a more stringent test: at least one σ with P varied by an order of magnitude, or a quantitative correction-to-scaling analysis (for instance, fitting the data with an additional P^{-0.92} term and showing its amplitude is consistent with zero). Without this, the two-variable scaling form is plausible but not established.
- [Sec. IV A, Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12] The collapse evidence is presented without error bars, and statements such as "they collapse onto single curves" and "corrections are smaller than the statistical errors" cannot be independently checked. Please display representative error bars, or provide a residual plot with errors, for at least the main collapse figures. This is important because the visual collapse is the principal numerical support for Eqs. (14) and (15).
minor comments (4)
- [Sec. IV A, Eq. (23) and Fig. 6] The exponent u=3.9(2) is inferred from only four τ_s estimates with relative uncertainties of 10-20%, each obtained from a fit over a limited range of ln|M_a|. The reported uncertainty likely underestimates systematic errors; if this result is retained, a more complete analysis including fit-range dependence and model selection is needed.
- [Sec. IV B and Conclusions] There are several typographical errors: "the evolution of a a single system" in Sec. IV B, "broken be the starting condition" in the Conclusions, and "non-exaustive" in the Introduction.
- [Sec. IV A, around Fig. 3 and Sec. IV B] The oscillation amplitude is quoted as A_m≈0.17 for the rescaled magnetization and as A_m≈0.1254 for the raw magnetization at P=200, σ=1; the notation should state explicitly which quantity is being reported in each case.
- [Sec. V, Eqs. (6) and (30)] The notation E_s(t) for the subtracted bond-energy density in the magnetic-driving case and E_se(t) in the temperature-driving case is similar; a more distinct symbol would help the reader avoid confusion.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the scaling exponents are independent inputs and the data collapse is a genuine, falsifiable test of the hypothesized scaling form.
full rationale
The central scaling laws in Eqs. (14) and (15) are not derived from the simulated data. The exponents kappa=y_h/z, zeta=y_phi/y_h, and epsilon=y_e/y_h are fixed by independent published values: y_h=15/8 and y_t=1 from Onsager/Ferdinand-Fisher, z=2.167(1) from equilibrium Monte Carlo estimates (Refs. 48-52), and standard RG relations for y_phi and y_e. Although Ref. [11] is a review by the same authors, the facts taken from it are standard and externally supported, so no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation. The scaling form in Sec. III B is explicitly introduced as a 'reasonable hypothesis' (amplitude scales as field, period as time), and then it is tested by demanding that data at fixed sigma=A P^kappa collapse when plotted as A^{-zeta}M(t) versus tau=t/P for P=100,200,300; a wrong kappa or zeta, or a missing third scaling variable, would break the collapse. The only fitted quantity, the transient exponent u about 3.9 in Eq. (23), is an empirical characterization, explicitly stated not to be related to the standard critical exponents, and it is not used to derive the scaling laws. The square-wave protocol and the periodic-temperature protocol provide additional independent checks. The limited range of periods weakens the test but is a robustness concern, not circularity.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- u (divergence exponent of the transient time scale tau_s) =
3.9(2)
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption The amplitude A of the periodic field scales with the static magnetic field RG dimension y_h, while the period P scales with time; equivalently, dynamic FSS variables W_a = A L^{y_h}, W_t = t L^{-z}, W_p = P L^{-z} control the evolution.
- domain assumption Known equilibrium critical exponents (y_h = 15/8, y_t = 1, eta = 1/4) and dynamic exponent z = 2.167(1) for the 2D Ising model A dynamics apply under the periodic driving.
- domain assumption Metropolis single-spin-flip dynamics at T_c realizes model A purely relaxational dynamics with the quoted z.
- domain assumption Systems of size L about 300 or larger (and L about 200 or larger for temperature driving) accurately approximate the thermodynamic limit at fixed Hamiltonian parameters.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Dynamic scaling behavior in the presence of a periodic magnetic driving across Ising continuous transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7GCX57VM
@misc{pith2026260805936,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Dynamic scaling behavior in the presence of a periodic magnetic driving across Ising continuous transitions},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7GCX57VM}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05936}
}
abstract
We study the critical dynamics arising from a time-dependent periodic homogenous source coupled to the order-parameter field, which drives a classical ferromagnetic system across a continuous transition. For this purpose, we consider the paradigmatic two-dimensional (2D) Ising model in the presence of a periodic magnetic field $h(t)=-A\, \cos (2\pi t/P)$, evolving under a purely relaxational dynamics at the critical temperature. We show that the periodic driving gives rise to a peculiar dynamic scaling behavior in the thermodynamic limit, arising from a nontrivial interplay among the time $t$, the amplitude $A$ and period $P$ of $h(t)$. The relevant scaling variables are $\tau=t/P$ and $\sigma=A P^\kappa$, with $\kappa = y_h/z$, where $y_h=(d+2-\eta)/2$ is the critical dimension of the magnetic field, and $z$ is dynamic exponent for the critical relaxational dynamics ($\kappa\approx 0.865$ for the 2D Ising model). The dynamic scaling behaviors of the magnetization and bond-energy density show an oscillatory behavior around a smooth curve which approaches a large-$\tau$ stationary behavior. We also briefly discuss the dynamic behavior of an Ising system driven across the critical point by a periodic time-varying temperature at zero magnetic field.
Figures
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group and critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.55, 483 (1983)
1983
-
[2]
K. G. Wilson and J. B. Kogut, The Renormalization group and the epsilon expansion, Phys. Rept.12, 75 (1974)
1974
-
[3]
M. E. Fisher, The renormalization group in the theory of critical behavior, Rev. Mod. Phys.46, 597 (1974); Erra- tum: Rev. Mod. Phys.47, 543 (1975)
work page 1974
-
[4]
F. J. Wegner, The Critical State, General Aspects, C. Domb, C. and M. S. Green editors,Phase transitions and critical phenomena, vol. 6, (Academic Press, London, 1976)
work page 1976
-
[5]
Aharony, inPhase Transitions and Critical Phenom- ena, C
A. Aharony, inPhase Transitions and Critical Phenom- ena, C. Domb and J. Lebowitz eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1976), Vol. 6, p. 357
work page 1976
-
[6]
Ma,Modern theory of critical phenomena, Rout- ledge Editor (New York, 2001)
S.-k. Ma,Modern theory of critical phenomena, Rout- ledge Editor (New York, 2001)
work page 2001
-
[7]
K. Binder, Monte Carlo investigations of phase tran- sitions and critical phenomena.Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Domb, C. & Green, M. S. (eds.) vol. 5b, 1 (Academic Press, London, 1976)
work page 1976
-
[8]
P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435 (1977)
1977
Show all 65 references
-
[9]
T. W. B. Kibble, Some implications of a cosmological phase transition, Phys. Rep.67, 183 (1980)
1980
-
[10]
W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in condensed matter systems, Phys. Rep.276, 177 (1996)
1996
-
[11]
Pelissetto and E
A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Critical phenomena and renormalization group theory, Phys. Rep.368, 549 (2002)
2002
-
[12]
Cardy,Scaling and renormalization in statistical physics(Cambridge University Press, 1996)
J. Cardy,Scaling and renormalization in statistical physics(Cambridge University Press, 1996)
1996
-
[13]
Calabrese and A
P. Calabrese and A. Gambassi, Ageing properties of crit- ical systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.38, R133 (2005)
2005
-
[14]
Folk and G
R. Folk and G. Moser, Critical dynamics: A field- theoretical approach, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.39, R207 (2006)
2006
-
[15]
Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed
S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)
2011
-
[16]
Chandran, A
A. Chandran, A. Erez, S. S. Gubser, and S. L. Sondhi, Kibble-Zurek problem: Universality and the scaling limit, Phys. Rev. B86, 064304 (2012)
2012
-
[17]
Pelissetto and E
A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Off-equilibrium scaling be- haviors driven by time-dependent external fields in three- dimensional O(N) vector models, Phys. Rev. E93, 032141 (2016)
2016
-
[18]
G. Biroli, Slow Relaxations and Non-Equilibrium Dy- namics in Classical and Quantum Systems, inStrongly interacting quantum systems out of equilibrium: Lecture notes of the Les Houches Summer School, Aug. 2012, ed. T. Giamarchi and A. J. Millis and O. Parcollet and H. Saleur a...
2012 arXiv
-
[19]
D’Alessio, Y
L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From Quantum Chaos and Eigenstate Thermalization to Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016)
2016
-
[20]
Pelissetto, D
A. Pelissetto, D. Rossini, and E. Vicari, Dynamic finite- size scaling after a quench at quantum transitions, Phys. Rev. E97, 052148 (2018). 12
2018
-
[21]
Rossini and E
D. Rossini and E. Vicari, Coherent and dissipative dy- namics at quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rept.936, 1 (2021)
2021
-
[22]
Tarantelli and E
F. Tarantelli and E. Vicari, Out-of-equilibrium dynamics arising from slow round-trip variations of Hamiltonian parameters across quantum and classical critical points, Phys. Rev. B105, 235124 (2022)
2022
-
[23]
De Franco and E
F. De Franco and E. Vicari, Out-of-equilibrium finite-size scaling in generalized Kibble-Zurek protocols crossing quantum phase transitions in the presence of symmetry- breaking pertubations, Phys. Rev. B107, 115175 (2023)
2023
-
[24]
Bonati, A
C. Bonati, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Three- dimensional Abelian and non-Abelian gauge Higgs theo- ries, Phys. Rept.1133, 1 (2025)
2025
-
[25]
M. G. Grifoni and P. H¨ anggi, Driven quantum tunneling. Phys. Rep.304, 229 (1998)
1998
-
[26]
S. N. Shevchenko, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Landau-Zener- St¨ uckelberg interferometry, Phys. Rep.492, 1 (2010)
2010
-
[27]
Russomanno, A
A. Russomanno, A. Silva, and G. Santoro, Periodic Steady Regime and Interference in a Periodically Driven Quantum System, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 257201 (2012)
2012
-
[28]
Lorenzo, J
S. Lorenzo, J. Marino, F. Plastina, G. M. Palma, and T. J. G. Apollaro, Quantum Critical Scaling under Periodic Driving, Sci. Rep.7, 5672 (2017)
2017
-
[29]
Bukov, L
M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Adiabatic perturbation theory and geometry of periodically-driven systems, Phys. Rep.688, 1 (2017)
2017
-
[30]
S. N. Ray, A. Das, and K. Sengupta, Analytic approaches to periodically driven closed quantum systems: methods and applications, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 33, 443001 (2021)
2021
-
[31]
Reichhardt, I
C. Reichhardt, I. Regev, K. Dahmen, S. Okuma, and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Reversible to irreversible transitions in periodic driven many-body systems and future directions for classical and quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 021001 (2023)
2023
-
[32]
H. P. Ojeda Collado, G. Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, D. H. Zanette, and J. Lorenzana, Dynamical phase transi- tions in periodically driven Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer systems, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023014 (2023)
2023
-
[33]
Tarantelli and S
F. Tarantelli and S. Scopa, Out-of-equilibrium scaling be- havior arising during round-trip protocols across a quan- tum first-order transition, Phys. Rev. B108, 104316 (2023)
2023
-
[34]
Cheng, Y
Y. Cheng, Y. Zhang, T. Qiu, P. Xin, and B.-M. Xu, Dynamic Phase Transitions in Periodically Driving 1D Ising Model, Commun. Theor. Phys.78, 075104 (2026)
2026
-
[35]
Sindelka and D
M. Sindelka and D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, Steady state of periodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 8, L012008 (2026)
2026
-
[36]
Y. Yang, Y. Tang, P. Zhang, and F. Li, Floquet quantum multiparameter estimation with periodic-driving-induced topological phase transition, New J. Phys.28, 054514 (2026)
2026
-
[37]
Gadge, A
K. Gadge, A. Prem, and R. Jha, Temporal Entanglement Transitions in the Periodically Driven Ising Chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 100203 (2026)
2026
-
[38]
W. S. Lo and R. A. Pelcovits, Ising model in a time- dependent magnetic field, Phys. Rev. A42, 7471 (1990)
1990
-
[39]
G. M. Buend ´ ıa, C. Mendes, and P. A. Rikvold, A compar- ative review of recent results on supercritical anomalies in two-dimensional kinetic Ising and Blume-Capel ferro- magnets, Eur. Phys. J. B98, 174 (2025)
2025
-
[40]
R. Xu, F. Khodabandehlou, and C. Maes, Critical behav- ior of the driven Curie-Weiss model, arXiv:2607.05130
-
[41]
S. W. Sides, P. A. Rikvold, and M. A. Novotny, Kinetic Ising model in an oscillating field: Finite-size scaling at the dynamic phase tran- sition, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 834 (1998)
1998
-
[42]
B. K. Chakrabarti and M. Acharyya, Dynamic transi- tions and hysteresis. Rev. Mod. Phys.71, 847 (1999)
1999
-
[43]
Park and M
H. Park and M. Pleimling, Dynamic phase transition in the three-dimensional kinetic Ising model in an oscillating field, Phys. Rev. E87, 032145 (2013)
2013
-
[44]
Mendes, G
C. Mendes, G. M. Buend ´ ıa, and P. A. Rikvold, Numerical simulation of a two-dimensional Blume-Capel ferromag- net in an oscillating magnetic field with a constant bias, Phys. Rev. E110, 044133 (2024)
2024
-
[45]
Onsager, Crystal statistics
L. Onsager, Crystal statistics. I. A two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition, Phys. Rev.65, 117 (1944)
1944
-
[46]
A. E. Ferdinand and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev.185, 832 (1969)
1969
-
[47]
Metropolis, A
N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Phys.21, 1087 (1953)
1953
-
[48]
M. P. Nightingale and H. W. J. Bl¨ ote, Monte Carlo com- putation of correlation times of independent relaxation modes at criticality, Phys. Rev. B62, 1089 (2000)
2000
-
[49]
Wang and C.-K, Hu, Universality in dynamic crit- ical phenomena, Phys
F.-G. Wang and C.-K, Hu, Universality in dynamic crit- ical phenomena, Phys. Rev. E56, 2310 (1997)
1997
-
[50]
M. P. Nightingale and H. W. J. Bl¨ ote, Dynamic Expo- nent of the Two-Dimensional Ising Model and Monte Carlo Computation of the Subdominant Eigenvalue of the Stochastic Matrix, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4548 (1996)
1996
-
[51]
Grassberger, Damage spreading and critical expo- nents for “model A” Ising dynamics, Physica A214, 547 (1995)
P. Grassberger, Damage spreading and critical expo- nents for “model A” Ising dynamics, Physica A214, 547 (1995)
1995
-
[52]
Costagliola and E
G. Costagliola and E. Vicari, Critical dynamics in trapped particle systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2011) L08001
2011
-
[53]
M. E. Fisher and M. N. Barber, Scaling theory for finite- size effects in the critical region, Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 1516 (1972)
1972
-
[54]
M. N. Barber, Finite-size scaling, inPhase transitions and critical phenomena, vol. 8, p. 145, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, London, 1983)
1983
-
[55]
Privman (Ed.),Finite size scaling and numerical sim- ulation of statistical systems(World Scientific, Singapore, 1990)
V. Privman (Ed.),Finite size scaling and numerical sim- ulation of statistical systems(World Scientific, Singapore, 1990)
1990
-
[56]
Campostrini, A
M. Campostrini, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Finite-size scaling at quantum transitions, Phys. Rev. B89, 094516 (2014)
2014
-
[57]
Caselle, M
M. Caselle, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Irrelevant operators in the two-dimensional Ising model, J. Phys. A35, 4861 (2002)
2002
-
[58]
Caselle and M
M. Caselle and M. Hasenbusch, Critical amplitudes and mass spectrum of the 2d Ising model in a magnetic field, Nucl. Phys. B579, 667 (2000)
2000
-
[59]
T. T. Wu, Theory of Toeplitz Determinants and the Spin Correlations of the Two-Dimensional Ising Model. I, Phys. Rev.149, 380b (1966)
1966
-
[60]
Aharony and M
A. Aharony and M. E. Fisher, Analytic Corrections to Scaling for Planar Ising Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.45 (1980) 679; Nonlinear scaling fields and corrections to scaling near criticality, Phys. Rev. B27(1983) 4394
1980
-
[61]
Y. Chan, A. J. Guttmann, B. G. Nickel, and J. H. H. Perk, The Ising Susceptibility Scaling Function, J. Stat. 13 Phys.145, 549 (2011)
2011
-
[62]
Kaufman, Crystal Statistics
B. Kaufman, Crystal Statistics. II. Partition Function Evaluated by Spinor Analysis, Phys. Rev.76, 1232 (1949)
1949
-
[63]
R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Me- chanics, Academic Press (1982)
1982
-
[64]
Hasenbusch, The dynamic critical exponentzof the three-dimensional Ising universality class: Monte Carlo simulations of the improved Blume-Capel model, Phys
M. Hasenbusch, The dynamic critical exponentzof the three-dimensional Ising universality class: Monte Carlo simulations of the improved Blume-Capel model, Phys. Rev. E101, 022126 (2020)
2020
-
[65]
F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Precision islands in the Ising and O(N) models, J. High Energy Phys. JHEP 08 (2016) 036
2016
Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.