Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Lagrangian model for passive scalar gradients in turbulence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.17336 v1 pith:7GEEEEZA submitted 2022-10-31 physics.flu-dyn

Lagrangian model for passive scalar gradients in turbulence

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords modelscalarlagrangianequationgradientgradientsalongdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The equation for the fluid velocity gradient along a Lagrangian trajectory immediately follows from the Navier-Stokes equation. However, such an equation involves two terms that cannot be determined from the velocity gradient along the chosen Lagrangian path: the pressure Hessian and the viscous Laplacian. A recent model handles these unclosed terms using a multi-level version of the recent deformation of Gaussian fields (RDGF) closure (Johnson \& Meneveau, Phys.~Rev.~Fluids, 2017). This model is in remarkable agreement with DNS data and works for arbitrary Taylor Reynolds numbers $\Rey_\lambda$. Inspired by this, we develop a Lagrangian model for passive scalar gradients in isotropic turbulence. The equation for passive scalar gradients also involves an unclosed term in the Lagrangian frame, namely the scalar gradient diffusion term, which we model using the RDGF approach. However, comparisons of the statistics obtained from this model with direct numerical simulation (DNS) data reveal substantial errors due to erroneously large fluctuations generated by the model. We address this defect by incorporating into the closure approximation information regarding the scalar gradient production along the local trajectory history of the particle. This modified model makes predictions for the scalar gradients, their production rates, and alignments with the strain-rate eigenvectors that are in very good agreement with DNS data. However, while the model yields valid predictions up to around $\Rey_\lambda\approx 500$, beyond this, the model breaks down.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.