Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 minor 1 cited by

Azimuthal anisotropies of charged particles with high transverse momentum in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

T0 review · 0 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In mid-central lead-lead collisions at 5.02 TeV, elliptic anisotropy of charged particles remains positive up to 100 GeV of transverse momentum, indicating that parton energy loss in the quark-gluon plasma depends on the event-by-event…

desk verdict Solid, careful extension of the high-pT flow program; the nonflow caveats are real but already transparently acknowledged. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15658 v3 pith:7IWJUZFS submitted 2024-12-20 nucl-ex hep-ex

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-exhep-ex
keywords azimuthalanisotropyellipticflowtriangularquark-gluonplasmajetquenchingpartonenergylossscalarproductmethodmultiparticlecumulants
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper measures how strongly very high-momentum charged particles are aligned with the shape of the quark-gluon plasma created in lead-lead collisions at 5.02 TeV. Using the ATLAS 2018 dataset, it finds that elliptic anisotropy $v_2$ stays positive up to a charged-particle transverse momentum of 100 GeV in mid-central collisions, at about 1\,--\,2%, and triangular anisotropy $v_3$ stays positive up to about 25 GeV. Since particles above roughly 10 GeV come mostly from jet fragmentation, these persistent harmonics indicate that the energy loss of hard-scattered partons is influenced by the event-by-event geometry of the plasma. The paper extends the three-subevent cumulant technique to differential $v_2$ and $v_3$ and uses method comparisons to separate genuine geometry-driven flow from residual jet correlations.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the Fourier coefficients $v_n$ of the azimuthal distribution of charged particles, estimated by two correlation methods: the scalar-product method ($v_n\{SP\}$), which uses forward-calorimeter flow vectors with a pseudorapidity gap, and four-particle cumulants ($v_n\{4\}$) computed with $Q$-cumulants, including a three-subevent variant that forces the correlated particles into separated pseudorapidity intervals. These estimators separate the long-range, geometry-driven anisotropy from short-range nonflow, and their cross-comparison is what allows the paper to attribute the high-$p_{\text{T}}$ signal to path-length-dependent energy loss.

What would settle it

A measurement of $v_2$ for charged particles above 20 GeV using a method that removes back-to-back dijet contributions entirely (for example, four-subevent cumulants with all-particle pseudorapidity gaps, or a jet-vetoed event sample) that drives $v_2$ to zero or negative in mid-central collisions would contradict the claim that the positive high-$p_{\text{T}}$ $v_2$ reflects path-length-dependent energy loss in the quark-gluon plasma.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At $\sqrt{s_{_{\text{NN}}}} = 5.02$ TeV, the ATLAS measurement shows that in mid-central lead-lead collisions the elliptic flow coefficient $v_2\{SP\}$ measured for charged particles with the scalar-product method remains positive up to a transverse momentum of 100 GeV, with a magnitude of about 1\,--\,2%, while triangular flow $v_3\{SP\}$ remains positive up to about 25 GeV. Because charged particles with $p_{\text{T}}$ above roughly 10 GeV are produced mainly by jet fragmentation, the persistence of positive harmonics at such high $p_{\text{T}}$ indicates that hard partons lose energy in a way that depends on the amount of quark-gluon plasma they traverse, i.e., on the event-by-event initial geometry. The paper also develops and applies a $p_{\text{T}}$-differential three-subevent cumulant technique that suppresses short-range nonflow correlations, and uses comparisons among analysis strategies to show that residual back-to-back dijet correlations contribute positively to $v_2$ and negatively to $v_3$, especially in peripheral collisions.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation rests on the assumption that the measured high-$p_{\text{T}}$ anisotropy is dominated by path-length-dependent parton energy loss in the quark-gluon plasma, rather than by residual back-to-back dijet correlations that survive the nonflow suppression.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Positive $v_2\{SP\}$ at 1\,--\,2% up to 100 GeV and $v_3\{SP\}$ up to about 25 GeV extend the known high-$p_{\text{T}}$ reach of flow harmonics and sharpen constraints on path-length-dependent jet quenching.
  • The three-subevent $Q$-cumulant method, now applied differentially in $p_{\text{T}}$, suppresses short-range nonflow while still revealing residual back-to-back dijet contributions that push $v_2$ and $v_3$ in opposite directions in peripheral events.
  • Computing cumulants in narrow centrality bins before combining shows that $v_2\{4\}$ is primarily sensitive to nonflow fluctuations, while $v_3\{4\}$ is more sensitive to fluctuations of the initial triangular geometry.
  • Agreement with earlier ATLAS and CMS measurements validates the new partial-event-building dataset for high-$p_{\text{T}}$ correlation studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because back-to-back dijets push $v_2$ up and $v_3$ down, a joint fit to both harmonics at $p_{\text{T}} > 20$ GeV could quantify and subtract this contamination, leaving a cleaner geometric signal for theory comparisons.
  • Tagging events with an isolated photon or $Z$ boson, where the hard parton direction is known, would provide a direct test of whether the positive $v_2$ at high $p_{\text{T}}$ comes from path-length-dependent energy loss rather than from dijet kinematics.
  • The methodology of subevent cumulants in narrow centrality intervals is likely to become the default for future flow measurements at high $p_{\text{T}}$, since it separates fluctuation sources without requiring large pseudorapidity coverage.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 8 minor

Summary. This paper reports measurements of the elliptic and triangular azimuthal anisotropy coefficients v2 and v3 for charged particles with transverse momentum from 1 to 400 GeV in Pb+Pb collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 5.02 TeV, using 0.44 nb^-1 of ATLAS 2018 data. The measurement uses the scalar-product method with FCal reference flow vectors and the multiparticle cumulant method, including a pT-differential extension of the three-subevent Q-cumulant technique. The principal results are positive v2{SP} values up to pT of about 100 GeV and positive v3{SP} values up to about 25 GeV in mid-central collisions, with comparisons to CMS and ATLAS 2015 measurements and to ATLAS jet v_n measurements. The paper interprets the high-pT anisotropy as evidence that parton energy loss is influenced by the event-by-event initial geometry, while acknowledging residual nonflow effects, especially in peripheral events.

Significance. If the results hold, this analysis extends the transverse-momentum reach of charged-particle flow measurements by roughly a factor of four relative to earlier LHC results and provides a new differential three-subevent cumulant implementation that is useful for nonflow studies. The extraction is direct: v_n values are measured rather than fitted, the MC afterburner enters only in efficiency corrections, and the comparisons with independent CMS and ATLAS datasets provide useful cross-checks. The systematic uncertainty budgets in Figures 1 and 2 are detailed, and statistical uncertainties dominate at high pT as stated in Section 5. The main limitation is the interpretation of the high-pT anisotropy in terms of path-length-dependent energy loss, because residual dijet correlations can mimic even-harmonic signals; this limitation is explicitly discussed in Section 6.2. The specific worry that FCal reference contamination alone drives the high-pT v2 is not supported by the data, since positive v2 is also observed with the four-particle cumulant method, which does not use the FCal.

minor comments (8)
  1. [Abstract and Section 6.1] The statements that v2{SP} is positive up to pT of about 100 GeV and v3{SP} positive up to about 25 GeV are not accompanied by an explicit significance threshold; please add a sentence specifying the statistical significance of the last positive pT bins, or qualify the wording as 'central values are positive' if the significance is marginal.
  2. [Abstract and Section 6.1] The abstract states that positive v3 values are observed up to about 25 GeV, but Section 6.1 reports negative v3{SP} for pT > 20 GeV in the 50-60% centrality interval; the abstract should mention this exception for clarity.
  3. [Section 7] The final interpretive sentence of the conclusions should explicitly carry the caveat from Section 6.2 that multiple effects, including residual dijet contributions, could contribute to the observed high-pT trends in peripheral events.
  4. [Figures 9 and 16] The captions of Figures 9 and 16 refer to the difference in v3{SP}, but panel (a) of both figures shows v2{SP}; the captions should read 'v_n{SP}' or be corrected to match the panels.
  5. [Section 6.2] The phrase 'short-rage nonflow correlations' should be corrected to 'short-range nonflow correlations'.
  6. [Section 7] The word 'flucutations' should be corrected to 'fluctuations'.
  7. [References] References [42] and [47] are identical (both are ATLAS vertex reconstruction performance notes); they should be merged or cross-referenced.
  8. [Article header] The DOI string '10.1103/d46f-yl4n' in the header appears to be a placeholder and should be replaced with the final DOI.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: v2{SP} and v3{SP} are direct correlator measurements, and the MC afterburner flow input affects only efficiency corrections, not the extracted values.

full rationale

The central results are direct measurements rather than model outputs: v_n{SP} is defined by Eq. (3) as a measured ratio of track-FCal correlators, and v_n{4} is defined by Eq. (8) from measured two- and four-particle cumulants, with no parameter fitted to the data and later reported as a prediction. The only flow input in the analysis chain, the 2.76 TeV v_n values embedded by the afterburner in Sec. 3.1, enters solely through track reconstruction efficiency corrections, and the resulting v_n values agree with the independent CMS 2015 and ATLAS 2015 measurements (Figs. 4-5), so they are not forced by that input. The conclusion that positive high-pT v2 and v3 reflect path-length-dependent parton energy loss is an interpretation of the measured values, and the paper explicitly acknowledges that residual dijet nonflow could contribute to the observed trends (Sec. 6.2), which is a contamination caveat, not a circular step. Self-citations to prior ATLAS analyses (Refs. [13], [15], [27], [29], [38], [50]) serve as methods provenance, comparison points, and the MC efficiency input; none supplies the central claim by definition, and the event-combination sensitivity cited from Ref. [27] is re-demonstrated with the present data in Figs. 12-13. No circular step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim does not depend on any fitted free parameter: the v_n coefficients are direct experimental observables. The axiomatic content is limited to standard Fourier/cumulant mathematics and well-established domain assumptions about jet fragmentation and nonflow suppression, all explicitly stated in the paper. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The azimuthal distribution of charged particles can be expanded as a Fourier series in the event-plane angle.
    Invoked in Section 1, Eq. (1), to define v_n and the event planes.
  • standard math The cumulant identities c_n{4} = <v_n^4> - 2<v_n^2>^2 and the differential relation v_n{4} = -d_n{4}/(-c_n{4})^{3/4} are valid.
    Used in Section 4.2.1, Eqs. (6) and (8), from the Q-cumulant framework of Refs. [21-24].
  • domain assumption Charged particles with pT greater than about 10 GeV are dominantly produced from jet fragmentation.
    Stated in the introduction and used throughout as the basis for interpreting high-pT v_n as a jet-quenching observable.
  • domain assumption Pseudorapidity gaps (3.2 units for SP, subevent gaps for MPC) suppress short-range nonflow correlations such as resonance decays and same-jet correlations.
    Used in Sections 4.1 and 4.2.2 to justify the nonflow suppression in the measured v_n.
  • domain assumption The centrality of each event is determined from the total transverse energy in the forward calorimeters calibrated by a Glauber model.
    Section 3.2 describes this standard procedure; it underpins all centrality-dependent results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Azimuthal anisotropies of charged particles with high transverse momentum in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7IWJUZFS

@misc{pith2026241215658,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Azimuthal anisotropies of charged particles with high transverse momentum in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrts__\textNN = 5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7IWJUZFS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15658}
}
abstract

A measurement is presented of elliptic ($v_2$) and triangular ($v_3$) azimuthal anisotropy coefficients for charged particles produced in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV using a dataset corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $0.44$ nb$^{-1}$ collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC in 2018. The values of $v_2$ and $v_3$ are measured for charged particles over a wide range of transverse momentum ($p_\text{T}$), 1-400 GeV, and Pb+Pb collision centrality, 0-60%, using the scalar product and multiparticle cumulant methods. These methods are sensitive to event-by-event fluctuations and nonflow effects in the measurements of azimuthal anisotropies. Positive values of $v_2$ are observed up to a $p_{\text{T}}$ of approximately 100 GeV from both methods across all centrality intervals. Positive values of $v_3$ are observed up to approximately 25 GeV using both methods, though the application of the three-subevent technique to the multiparticle cumulant method leads to significant changes at the highest $p_{\text{T}}$. At high $p_{\text{T}}$ ($p_{\text{T}} \gtrapprox 10$ GeV), charged particles are dominantly from jet fragmentation. These jets, and hence the measurements presented here, are sensitive to the path-length dependence of parton energy loss in the quark-gluon plasma produced in Pb+Pb collisions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhanced hydrodynamic predictions for $v_{02}(p_T)$

    nucl-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ideal hydrodynamics plus a v2-fitted correction predicts v02(pT): a high-pT decrease for charged hadrons, meson-baryon splitting, and a non-monotonic proton v02 in mid-central Pb+Pb.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Busza, K

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68 (2018) 339, arXiv:1802.04801 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Cunqueiro and A

    L. Cunqueiro and A. M. Sickles,Studying the QGP with Jets at the LHC and RHIC, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.124 (2022) 103940, arXiv:2110.14490 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the nuclear modification factor for inclusive jets in Pb+Pb collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B790 (2019) 108, arXiv: 1805.05635 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    CMS Collaboration, First measurement of large area jet transverse momentum spectra in heavy-ion collisions, JHEP 05(2021) 284, arXiv:2102.13080 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of Suppression of Large-Radius Jets and Its Dependence on Substructure in Pb+Pb Collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 172301, arXiv:2301.05606 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    ALICE Collaboration, Measurements of inclusive jet spectra in pp and central Pb-Pb collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV, Phys. Rev. C101 (2020) 034911, arXiv:1909.09718 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Jet Quenching and Azimuthal Anisotropy of Large $p_T$ Spectra in Non-central High-energy Heavy-ion Collisions

    X.-N. Wang,Jet quenching and azimuthal anisotropy of large𝑝T spectra in noncentral high-energy heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C63(2001) 054902, arXiv:nucl-th/0009019

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    Gyulassy, I

    M. Gyulassy, I. Vitev, and X. N. Wang,High𝑝T azimuthal asymmetry in noncentral A+A at RHIC, Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 2537, arXiv:nucl-th/0012092

    arXiv 2001

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    jet quenching

    E. V. Shuryak,The Azimuthal asymmetry at large𝑝T seem to be too large for a “jet quenching”, Phys. Rev. C66 (2002) 027902, arXiv:nucl-th/0112042

    2002 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Heinz and R

    U. Heinz and R. Snellings,Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.63 (2013) 123, arXiv:1301.2826 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  3. [11]

    A. M. Poskanzer and S. A. Voloshin, Methods for analyzing anisotropic flow in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C58 (1998) 1671, arXiv:nucl-ex/9805001

    1998 arXiv

  4. [12]

    CMS Collaboration,Azimuthal anisotropy of charged particles with transverse momentum up to 100 GeV/c in PbPb collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV, Phys. Lett. B776 (2018) 195, arXiv: 1702.00630 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of azimuthal anisotropies of jet production in Pb+Pb collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C105 (2022) 064903, arXiv: 2111.06606 [nucl-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the Azimuthal Angle Dependence of Inclusive Jet Yields in Pb+Pb Collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 152301, arXiv: 1306.6469 [hep-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  7. [15]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy of charged particles produced in√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV Pb+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 997, arXiv: 1808.03951 [nucl-ex]. 33

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    ALICE Collaboration, Investigations of Anisotropic Flow Using Multiparticle Azimuthal Correlations in pp, p-Pb, Xe-Xe, and Pb-Pb Collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 142301, arXiv:1903.01790 [nucl-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    STAR Collaboration, Elliptic flow from two and four particle correlations in Au+Au collisions at√𝑠NN = 130 GeV, Phys. Rev. C66 (2002) 034904, arXiv:nucl-ex/0206001

    2002 arXiv

  10. [18]

    PHENIX Collaboration, Multiparticle azimuthal correlations for extracting event-by-event elliptic and triangular flow in Au+Au collisions at√𝑠NN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C99 (2019) 024903, arXiv: 1804.10024 [nucl-ex]

    2019

  11. [19]

    Collective phenomena in non-central nuclear collisions,

    S. A. Voloshin, A. M. Poskanzer, and R. Snellings, “Collective phenomena in non-central nuclear collisions,”Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics, ed. by R. Stock, vol. 23, Landolt-Börnstein, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010 293

    2010

  12. [20]

    Luzum and J.-Y

    M. Luzum and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Eliminating experimental bias in anisotropic-flow measurements of high-energy nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C87 (2013) 044907, arXiv:1209.2323 [nucl-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Borghini, P

    N. Borghini, P. M. Dinh, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Flow analysis from multiparticle azimuthal correlations, Phys. Rev. C64(2001) 054901, arXiv: nucl-th/0105040

    2001 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Borghini, P

    N. Borghini, P. M. Dinh, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, A New method for measuring azimuthal distributions in nucleus-nucleus collisions, Phys. Rev. C63 (2001) 054906, arXiv:nucl-th/0007063

    2001 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Bilandzic, R

    A. Bilandzic, R. Snellings, and S. Voloshin,Flow analysis with cumulants: Direct calculations, Phys. Rev. C83 (2011) 044913, arXiv:1010.0233 [nucl-ex]

    2011 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Bilandzic, C

    A. Bilandzic, C. H. Christensen, K. Gulbrandsen, A. Hansen, and Y. Zhou, Generic framework for anisotropic flow analyses with multiparticle azimuthal correlations, Phys. Rev. C89 (2014) 064904, arXiv:1312.3572 [nucl-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [25]

    J. Jia, M. Zhou, and A. Trzupek, Revealing long-range multiparticle collectivity in small collision systems via subevent cumulants, Phys. Rev. C96 (2017) 034906, arXiv:1701.03830 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    P. Huo, K. Gajdošová, J. Jia, and Y. Zhou, Importance of nonflow in mixed-harmonic multiparticle correlations in small collision systems, Phys. Lett. B777 (2018) 201, arXiv:1710.07567 [nucl-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Fluctuations of anisotropic flow in Pb+Pb collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 01(2020) 051, arXiv:1904.04808 [nucl-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    ALICE Collaboration, Azimuthal anisotropy of charged jet production in√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV Pb–Pb collisions, Phys. Lett. B753 (2016) 511, arXiv:1509.07334 [nucl-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of flow harmonics with multiparticle cumulants in Pb+Pb collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 3157, arXiv: 1408.4342 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST 3 (2008) S08003. 34

    2008

  23. [31]

    ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Insertable B-Layer: Technical Design Report, ATLAS-TDR-19; CERN-LHCC-2010-013, 2010, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1291633, Addendum: ATLAS-TDR-19-ADD-1; CERN-LHCC-2012-009, 2012,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1451888

    2010

  24. [32]

    Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST 13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

    B. Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST 13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST 13 (2018) P07017

    G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST 13 (2018) P07017

    2018

  26. [34]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [35]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Operation of the ATLAS trigger system in Run 2, JINST15 (2020) P10004, arXiv: 2007.12539 [physics.ins-det]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [36]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Gyulassy and X.-N

    M. Gyulassy and X.-N. Wang,HIJING 1.0: A Monte Carlo program for parton and particle production in high-energy hadronic and nuclear collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun.83(1994) 307, arXiv: nucl-th/9502021

    1994 arXiv

  30. [38]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy for charged particle production in√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV lead-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C86(2012) 014907, arXiv: 1203.3087 [hep-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  31. [39]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv: 1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

    2010 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250

    2003

  33. [41]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST 15 (2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [43]

    M. L. Miller, K. Reygers, S. J. Sanders, and P. Steinberg, Glauber modeling in high energy nuclear collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57 (2007) 205, arXiv: nucl-ex/0701025

    2007 arXiv

  35. [44]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the centrality dependence of the charged particle pseudorapidity distribution in lead-lead collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B710 (2012) 363, arXiv:1108.6027 [hep-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  36. [45]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS Track Reconstruction Algorithms in Dense Environments in LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 673, arXiv:1704.07983 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [46]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of jet fragmentation in Pb+Pb and𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C98 (2018) 024908, arXiv: 1805.05424 [nucl-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [47]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Vertex Reconstruction Performance of the ATLAS Detector at√𝑠= 13 TeV, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-026, 2015,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037717. 35

    2015

  39. [48]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy of charged-particle production in 𝑋𝑒+𝑋𝑒 collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.44 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C101 (2020) 024906, arXiv: 1911.04812 [nucl-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [49]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of longitudinal flow decorrelations in Pb+Pb collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76and 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 142, arXiv: 1709.02301 [nucl-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [50]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the distributions of event-by-event flow harmonics in lead-lead collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76TeVwith the ATLAS detector at the LHC, JHEP11 (2013) 183, arXiv: 1305.2942 [hep-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Demokritos

    ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Computing Acknowledgements, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2025-001, 2025, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2922210. 36 The ATLAS Collaboration G. Aad 105, E. Aakvaag 17, B. Abbott 124, S. Abdelhameed 120a, K. Abeling 56, N.J. Abicht 50, S.H. Abidi 30, M. Aboelela 46, ...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.