REVIEW 1 cited by
Deep Learning for Survival Analysis: A Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The influx of deep learning (DL) techniques into the field of survival analysis in recent years has led to substantial methodological progress; for instance, learning from unstructured or high-dimensional data such as images, text or omics data. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive systematic review of DL-based methods for time-to-event analysis, characterizing them according to both survival- and DL-related attributes. In summary, the reviewed methods often address only a small subset of tasks relevant to time-to-event data - e.g., single-risk right-censored data - and neglect to incorporate more complex settings. Our findings are summarized in an editable, open-source, interactive table: https://survival-org.github.io/DL4Survival. As this research area is advancing rapidly, we encourage community contribution in order to keep this database up to date.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Federated Deep Learning for Privacy-Preserving Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction
FedAvg DeepSurv across Lifelines (n=148k, self-report) and Rotterdam Study (n=10k, linked outcomes) raised C-statistics from 0.728 to 0.739 and 0.783 to 0.787 versus local training.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.