Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 minor 1 cited by

Axial Algebras: Questions and Conjectures

T0 review · 0 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read The paper expands the list of open problems and conjectures in axial algebras beyond a recent survey.

desk verdict This is a curated list of open problems in axial algebras that expands an existing survey, with no new theorems or proofs. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.30048 v1 pith:7LQGKDXN submitted 2026-06-29 math.RA

classification math.RA
keywords axialalgebrasopenproblemsconjecturesfusionlawsnon-associativeidempotentsautomorphisms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Axial algebras are non-associative algebras generated by idempotents called axes whose adjoint actions satisfy a fusion law. When the fusion law is graded, the axes produce automorphisms that link the algebras to groups. This article complements an earlier survey by significantly expanding the list of interesting open problems suggested by specialists. It also supplies further discussion of related concepts and available results. A reader would care because the problems point to concrete directions for work in non-associative algebra and its ties to group theory.

What carries the argument

Axial algebra: non-associative algebra generated by idempotents (axes) whose adjoint action satisfies a fusion law, often yielding group automorphisms when the law is graded.

What would settle it

A check showing that several listed problems have already been resolved in the literature would falsify the claim that the paper expands the set of open problems.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors significantly expand the list of interesting open problems in axial algebras and provide further discussion of related concepts and available results, complementing the recent survey.

Load-bearing premise

The listed problems are genuinely open, significant to specialists, and accurately described relative to the prior survey.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a curated collection of open questions and conjectures in the theory of axial algebras. It complements the recent survey [ms] by expanding the list of interesting open problems suggested by specialists and providing further discussion of related concepts and available results. Axial algebras are defined as non-associative algebras generated by idempotents (axes) whose adjoint actions satisfy a fusion law; when graded, these induce automorphisms linking the algebras to groups.

Significance. This work provides a service to the axial algebra community by systematically expanding the catalog of open problems. If the listed items are accurately described as open and of interest to specialists, the manuscript can help direct future research in non-associative algebras and their connections to finite groups. No new theorems, proofs, or computational results are claimed, so the contribution rests on the utility of the curated list rather than on technical derivations.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and introduction reference the survey as [ms] without a full bibliographic entry visible in the provided text; ensure the reference list includes the complete citation for [ms] to allow readers to locate the prior survey.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The report accurately captures the purpose of the work as a curated expansion of open questions to complement the recent survey.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; paper is a curated list of open questions with no derivations

full rationale

The manuscript contains no theorems, proofs, equations, predictions, or fitted parameters. Its sole purpose is to expand a list of open problems complementing the cited survey [ms]. All references to prior work serve only to frame questions and are not load-bearing for any internal claim. No self-citation reduces a result to an unverified input, and the paper is self-contained as a non-technical survey of open items.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced because the paper contains no derivations or new constructions; it only lists questions about existing concepts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Axial Algebras: Questions and Conjectures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7LQGKDXN

@misc{pith2026260630048,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Axial Algebras: Questions and Conjectures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7LQGKDXN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.30048}
}
read the original abstract

Axial algebras are non-associative algebras generated by idempotents, called axes, whose adjoint action satisfies a fusion law. When this fusion law is graded, axes naturally lead to automorphisms of the algebra, and so such axial algebras are inextricably linked with groups. This article is meant to complement the recent survey \cite{ms} by significantly expanding the list of interesting open problems suggested by the specialists in the field, and providing a further discussion of the related concepts and available results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30048 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Monster fusion law This table represents what is now called a fusion law, specifically, the Monster fusion law, and it describes the properties of the adjoint action of Majorana axes. Up to our knowledge, this was the first time a fusion law appeared as part of the axiomatics of a class of algebras. However, similar properties of idempotents in algebras have been observed earlier. In 1881, Peirce [P] described how a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Associative fusion law In 1947, Albert introduced three-term Peirce decompositions in Jordan algebras. Again, these are with respect to an arbitrary idempotent and they can be described by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Jordan fusion law 2 Background This section introduces the foundational definitions of axial algebras and their subclasses, focusing on algebras of Jordan and Monster type. Definition 2.1 A fusion law is a pair (F, ∗), where F is a set and ∗ : F × F → 2 F is a binary operation on F with values in the set 2 F of all subsets of F. The fusion laws we focus on are defined on a small set F, and we find it useful to organ… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the fusion law of Jordan type η, denoted by J (η). Here F = J (η) = {1, 0, η}, η ̸= 1, 0, is a subset of a field F. The fusion law J (η) generalises the Jordan fusion law from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Monster type fusion law M(α, β) (b) For λ ∈ F, set Aλ(a) = {b ∈ A|ada(b) = λb} = {b ∈ A|ab = λb}. (c) For Λ ⊆ F, set AΛ(a) = L λ∈Λ Aλ(a). Let F ⊆ F be a fusion law. Definition 2.3 An idempotent 0 ̸= a ∈ A is an F-axis if (a) A = AF (a); and (b) Aλ(a)Aµ(a) ⊆ Aλ∗µ(a) for…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Fusion law M(4η, 4η) This product also works in the group 52 : 2, but not in A5 if for products of order 1, 2, and 3 the usual Matsuo multiplication is used. 6.2 Almost Jordan type fusion law Whybrow [W] did an algorithmic study of all fusion laws of small size. In par…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fusion law J (α, β) type. algebras can be classified. This was developed further by Afanasev [Af], who provided a nearly complete classification of 2-generated primitive algebras of almost Jordan type (α, β). More recently, Welch [SW] completed Afanasiev’s classificati…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The fusion law F for Hˆ 5, the eigenvalue 5 2 becomes zero, and the fusion law folds into the Monster type (2, 1 2 ) fusion law. Problem 6.6 Is it possible to classify primitive algebras with the above extended Monster type fusion law. C. Franchi, M. Mainardis 6.4 Axia…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fusion law H for Hsiang algebras 35 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Fusion law B for type Bn. This is a C2-graded fusion law with the partition F+ = {1, 0} and F− = { 1 2 , 1 4 }. Problem 6.12 Is it possible to classify 2-generated primitive axial algebras with the fusion law B? S. Shpectorov If this first step is doable then the much…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Fusion law CG for type Cn, F4. More generally, all Chayet-Garibaldi algebras, except the one arising for the type G2, have primitive idempotents obeying the fusion law in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Fusion law G for type G2. We will formulate the following blanket questions concerning these fusion laws. Problem 6.14 What can we say about algebras with fusion laws CG and G? E.g., can 2-generated primitive algebras with these fusion laws be classified? S. Shpectoro…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fusion rules from the Norton inequality

    math.RA 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Norton inequality forces A0(e) and A1(e) to be subalgebras and A0(e)A1(e)subseteq A1/2(e) for non-degenerate Frobenius forms; a degenerate counter-example is given.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Alharbi, Automorphism groups of Matsuo algebras , Ph.D

    F. Alharbi, Automorphism groups of Matsuo algebras , Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham (2024)

  2. [2]

    Alsaeedi, V

    M. Alsaeedi, V. Bovdi, S. Shpectorov, Flip subalgebras in Matsuo algebras for extended symmetric groups , in preparation

  3. [3]

    Afanasev, On axial algebras with 3 eigenvalues , arXiv:2410.02034

    V. Afanasev, On axial algebras with 3 eigenvalues , arXiv:2410.02034

  4. [4]

    Bergman, A note on growth functions of algebras and semigroups , mimeographed notes, University of California, Berkeley (1978)

    G.M. Bergman, A note on growth functions of algebras and semigroups , mimeographed notes, University of California, Berkeley (1978)

  5. [5]

    Bildanov, I

    R. Bildanov, I. Gorshkov, On 3-generated axial algebras of Jordan type 1 2 , Commun. Math. 33 :3 (2025), Paper No. 4, 12 p

  6. [6]

    Buekenhout, La géometrie des groupes de Fischer , preprint, Univ

    F. Buekenhout, La géometrie des groupes de Fischer , preprint, Univ. Libre de Bruxelles

  7. [7]

    Cantarini, V

    N. Cantarini, V. Kac, Classification of linearly compact simple rigid superalgebras , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, 17 (2010), 3341--3393

  8. [8]

    Cuypers, Graphs, axial algebras and their automorphism groups , arXiv:2603.03822

    H. Cuypers, Graphs, axial algebras and their automorphism groups , arXiv:2603.03822

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Cuypers, J.I

    H. Cuypers, J.I. Hall, The 3-transposition groups with trivial center , J. Algebra 178 (1995), 149--193

  2. [10]

    Centrone, Private communication

    L. Centrone, Private communication

  3. [11]

    Chayet, S

    M. Chayet, S. Garibaldi. A class of continuous non-associative algebras arising from algebraic groups including E_8 , Forum Math. Sigma 9 (2021)

  4. [12]

    Conway, A simple construction for the Fischer-Griess monster group , Invent

    J.H. Conway, A simple construction for the Fischer-Griess monster group , Invent. Math., 79 (1985), 513--540

  5. [13]

    De Medts, F

    T. De Medts, F. Rehren, Jordan algebras and 3 -transposition groups , J. Algebra 478 , (2017) 318--340

  6. [14]

    De Medts, L

    T. De Medts, L. Rowen, Y. Segev, Primitive 4 -generated axial algebras of Jordan type , Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 152 :2 (2024), 537--551

  7. [15]

    De Medts, M

    T. De Medts, M. Van Couwenberghe, Modules over axial algebras , Algebr. Represent. Theory 23 :1 (2020), 209--227

  8. [16]

    Desmet, Non-associative aspects of algebraic groups , PhD thesis, University of Ghent, 2025

    J. Desmet, Non-associative aspects of algebraic groups , PhD thesis, University of Ghent, 2025

  9. [17]

    Desmet, Solid lines in axial algebras of Jordan-type 1 2 and Jordan algebras , Proc

    J. Desmet, Solid lines in axial algebras of Jordan-type 1 2 and Jordan algebras , Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 153 :4 (2025), 1461--1479

  10. [18]

    Desmet, Automorphism groups of Matsuo algebras , arXiv:2511.10084

    J. Desmet, Automorphism groups of Matsuo algebras , arXiv:2511.10084

  11. [19]

    Desmet, In preparation

    J. Desmet, In preparation

  12. [20]

    Desmet, S

    J. Desmet, S. Shpectorov, Components in algebras of Jordan type half , in preparation

  13. [21]

    Etherington, Genetic algebras , Proc

    I.M.H. Etherington, Genetic algebras , Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 59 (1939), 242--258

  14. [22]

    Fischer, Distributive Quasigruppen endlicher Ordnung , Mathematische Zeitschrift, 83 :4 (1964), 267--303

    B. Fischer, Distributive Quasigruppen endlicher Ordnung , Mathematische Zeitschrift, 83 :4 (1964), 267--303

  15. [23]

    Fischer, Finite groups generated by 3-transpositions , I

    B. Fischer, Finite groups generated by 3-transpositions , I. Invent. Math. 13 (1971), 232-246

  16. [24]

    Franchi, A

    C. Franchi, A. Ivanov, M. Mainardis, Saturated Majorana representations of A_ 12 , Trans. Am. Math. Soc, 375 :8 (2022), 5753--5801

  17. [25]

    Franchi, A

    C. Franchi, A. Ivanov, M. Mainardis, Standard Majorana representations of the symmetric groups , J. Algebr. Comb. 44 :2 (2016), 265--292

  18. [26]

    Franchi, M

    C. Franchi, M. Mainardis, On subalgebras of the Griess algebra with alternating Miyamoto group , J. Algebra, 691 (2026), 811--854

  19. [27]

    Franchi, M

    C. Franchi, M. Mainardis, Classifying 2-generated symmetric axial algebras of Monster type , J. Algebra, 596 (2022), 200--218

  20. [28]

    Franchi, M

    C. Franchi, M. Mainardis, J. McInroy, Quotients of the Highwater algebra and its cover , J. Algebra 640 (2024), 432 -- 476

  21. [29]

    Franchi, M

    C. Franchi, M. Mainardis, J. McInroy, M. Turner, The Classification of the 2-generated Primitive Axial Algebras of Monster Type , arXiv:2605.18737

  22. [30]

    Franchi, M

    C. Franchi, M. Mainardis, S. Shpectorov, An infinite-dimensional 2-generated primitive axial algebra of monster type , Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 201 :4 (2022), 1279--1293

  23. [31]

    Franchi, M

    C. Franchi, M. Mainardis, S. Shpectorov, 2-generated axial algebras of Monster type (2 , ) , J. Algebra 636 (2023), 123--170

  24. [32]

    Franchi, M

    C. Franchi, M. Mainardis, S. Shpectorov, 2-generated axial algebras of Monster type , J. Algebra 683 (2025), 60--115

  25. [33]

    A. Galt, V. Joshi, A. Mamontov, S. Shpectorov, A. Staroletov, Double axes and subalgebras of monster type in Matsuo algebras , Commun. Algebra 49 :10 (2021), 4208--4248

  26. [34]

    The GAP Group, GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.12.2; 2022, https://www.gap-system.org

  27. [35]

    Guterman, D.K

    A.E. Guterman, D.K. Kudryavtsev, Upper bounds for the length of non-associative algebras , J. Algebra 544 (2020), 483--497

  28. [36]

    Griess Jr., The friendly giant , Ivent

    R.L. Griess Jr., The friendly giant , Ivent. Math. 69 (1982), 1--102

  29. [37]

    Gorshkov, A

    I. Gorshkov, A. Mamontov, A. Staroletov, On Jordan algebras that are factors of Matsuo algebras , Int. Electron. J. Algebra 37 (2025), 70--90

  30. [38]

    Gorshkov, J

    I. Gorshkov, J. McInroy, T.M. Mudziiri Shumba, S. Shpectorov, Automorphism groups of axial algebras , J. Algebra 661 (2025), 657--712

  31. [39]

    Gorshkov, S

    I. Gorshkov, S. Shpectorov, A. Staroletov, Solid subalgebras in algebras of Jordan type half , arXiv:2401.16218

  32. [40]

    Gorshkov, A

    I. Gorshkov, A. Staroletov, On primitive 3-generated axial algebras of Jordan type , J. Algebra 563 (2020), 74--99

  33. [41]

    J.I. Hall, F. Rehren, S. Shpectorov, Universal Axial Algebras and a Theorem of Sakuma , J. Algebra 421 (2015), 394--424

  34. [42]

    J.I. Hall, F. Rehren, S. Shpectorov, Primitive axial algebras of Jordan type , J. Algebra 437 (2015), 379-–115

  35. [43]

    J.I. Hall, Y. Segev, S. Shpectorov, Miyamoto involutions in axial algebras of Jordan type half , Israel J. Math. 223 (2018), 261--308

  36. [44]

    J.I. Hall, Y. Segev, and S. Shpectorov, On primitive axial algebras of Jordan type , Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sin. (N.S.) 13 :4 (2018), 397--409

  37. [45]

    Ivanov, The Monster Group and Majorana Involutions , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 176, Cambridge University Press, 2009

    A.A. Ivanov, The Monster Group and Majorana Involutions , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 176, Cambridge University Press, 2009

  38. [46]

    Ivanov, D.V

    A.A. Ivanov, D.V. Pasechnik, A. Seress, S. Shpectorov, Majorana representations of the symmetric group of degree 4 , J. Algebra 324 :9 (2010) 2432--2463

  39. [47]

    Joshi, Axial algebras of Monster type (2 , ) , Ph.D

    V. Joshi, Axial algebras of Monster type (2 , ) , Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham (2020)

  40. [48]

    Kantor, Certain generalizations of Jordan algebras (Russian) , Trudy Sem

    I. Kantor, Certain generalizations of Jordan algebras (Russian) , Trudy Sem. Vektor. Tenzor. Anal., 16 (1972), 407--499

  41. [49]

    Kantor, Some problems in L-functor theory , Trudy Inst

    I. Kantor, Some problems in L-functor theory , Trudy Inst. Mat. (Novosibirsk), 16 (1989), Issled. po Teor. Kolets i Algebr, 54--75, 198

  42. [50]

    Kaygorodov, C

    I. Kaygorodov, C. Martín González, P. Páez-Guillán, Central extensions of axial algebras , J. Algebra 662 (2025), 797--831

  43. [51]

    Khasraw, J

    S.M.S. Khasraw, J. McInroy, S. Shpectorov, On the structure of axial algebras , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373 :3 (2020), 2135--2156

  44. [52]

    Krause, T.H

    G. Krause, T.H. Lenagan, Growth of Algebras and Gelfand-Kirillov Dimension , Research Notes in Math. 116 (1985)

  45. [53]

    Computer algebra system (CAS)

    MAGMA. Computer algebra system (CAS). http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/magma/

  46. [54]

    Mamontov, S

    A. Mamontov, S. Shpectorov, V. Zhelyabin, Radicals in primitive axial algebras , arXiv:2602.11984

  47. [55]

    Mamontov, A

    A. Mamontov, A. Staroletov, Axial algebras of Monster type (2 , ) for D diagrams , Commun. Algebra 53 :8 (2025), 3218--3252

  48. [56]

    Martinez, E

    C. Martinez, E. Zelmanov, Jordan algebras of Gelfand-Kirillov dimension one , J. Algebra 180 :1 (1996), 211--238

  49. [57]

    McInroy, S

    J. McInroy, S. Shpectorov, An expansion algorithm for constructing axial algebras , J. Algebra, 550 (2020), 379--409

  50. [58]

    McInroy, S

    J. McInroy, S. Shpectorov, Axial algebras of Jordan and Monster type , London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 496 , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2025), 246--294

  51. [59]

    Miyamoto, Griess algebras and conformal vectors in vertex operator algebras , J

    M. Miyamoto, Griess algebras and conformal vectors in vertex operator algebras , J. Algebra 179 :2 (1996), 523--548

  52. [60]

    Miyamoto, Vertex operator algebras generated by two conformal vectors whose -involutions generate S_3 , J

    M. Miyamoto, Vertex operator algebras generated by two conformal vectors whose -involutions generate S_3 , J. Algebra 268 :2 (2003), 653--671

  53. [61]

    Osborn, Identities of non-associative algebras , Canad

    J.M. Osborn, Identities of non-associative algebras , Canad. J. Math. 19 :21 (1965), 78--92

  54. [62]

    Parker, M

    C. Parker, M. Turner, Almost simple and quasisimple groups of 6 -transpositions , in preparation

  55. [63]

    Peirce, Linear Associative Algebra , American Journal of Mathematics, 4 :1 (1881), 97--229

    B. Peirce, Linear Associative Algebra , American Journal of Mathematics, 4 :1 (1881), 97--229

  56. [64]

    Rehren, Axial algebras ,Ph.D

    F.G. Rehren, Axial algebras ,Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, 2015

  57. [65]

    Rehren, Generalised dihedral subalgebras from the Monster , Trans

    F. Rehren, Generalised dihedral subalgebras from the Monster , Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 369 :10 (2017), 6953--6986

  58. [66]

    Rowen, AXIAL IDENTITIES, arXiv:2508.16427

    L. Rowen, AXIAL IDENTITIES, arXiv:2508.16427

  59. [67]

    Sakuma, 6-transposition property of -involutions of vertex operator algebras , Int

    S. Sakuma, 6-transposition property of -involutions of vertex operator algebras , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 9 (2007), 19 p

  60. [68]

    R. D. Schafer, Inner derivations of non-associative algebras , Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 55 (1949), 769--776

  61. [69]

    Segev, Half-axes in power associative algebras , J

    Y. Segev, Half-axes in power associative algebras , J. Algebra 510 (2018), 1--23

  62. [70]

    Shpectorov, B

    S. Shpectorov, B. Welch, Classification of primitive 2 -generated axial algebras of type ( , ) , in preparation

  63. [71]

    Shi, Baric Axial Algebras of Jordan Type , Ph.D

    Y. Shi, Baric Axial Algebras of Jordan Type , Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, 2025

  64. [72]

    Tkachev, The universality of one half in commutative nonassociative algebras with identities , J

    V.G. Tkachev, The universality of one half in commutative nonassociative algebras with identities , J. Algebra 569 (2021), 466--510

  65. [73]

    Turner, Skew axial algebras of Monster type , J

    M. Turner, Skew axial algebras of Monster type , J. Algebra 652 (2024), 67--93

  66. [74]

    Turner, Skew axial algebras of Monster type II , arXiv:2311.00520

    M. Turner, Skew axial algebras of Monster type II , arXiv:2311.00520

  67. [75]

    Yabe, On the classification of 2 -generated axial algebras of Majorana type , J

    T. Yabe, On the classification of 2 -generated axial algebras of Majorana type , J. Algebra, 619 (2023), 347--382

  68. [76]

    Whybrow, Graded 2-generated axial algebras , arXiv:2005.03577

    M. Whybrow, Graded 2-generated axial algebras , arXiv:2005.03577

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.