Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Are we overlooking Lepton Flavour Universal New Physics in $b\to s\ell\ell$ ?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.08447 v2 pith:7M3IMA2K submitted 2018-09-22 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords anomalieslfuvdifferentflavourobservedcurrentlepton-flavourobservables
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The deviations with respect to the Standard Model (SM) that are currently observed in $b \to s \ell\ell$ transitions (the so-called flavour anomalies) can be interpreted in terms of different New Physics (NP) scenarios within a model-independent effective approach. We reconsider the determination of NP in global fits from a different perspective by removing one implicit hypothesis of current analyses, namely that NP is only Lepton-Flavour Universality Violating (LFUV). We examine the roles played by LFUV NP and Lepton-Flavour Universal (LFU) NP altogether, providing new directions to identify the possible theory beyond the SM responsible for the anomalies observed. New patterns of NP emerge due to the possibility of allowing at the same time large LFUV and LFU NP contributions to $C_{10\mu}$, which provides a different mechanism to obey the constraint from the $B_s \to\mu^+\mu^-$ branching ratio. In this landscape of NP, we discuss how to discriminate among these scenarios in the short term thanks to current and forthcoming observables. While the update of $R_K$ will be a major milestone to confirm the NP origin of the flavour anomalies, additional observables, in particular the LFUV angular observable $Q_5$, turn out to be central to assess the precise NP scenario responsible for the observed anomalies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Large Vision-Language Models Understand Multimodal Sarcasm?

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Large vision-language models are reported to be weak at multimodal sarcasm, and a training-free knowledge-augmented framework is claimed to improve sarcasm detection and explanation.

  2. Constraints on New Physics from $B$ mesons

    hep-ph 2019-08 unverdicted

    A 2019 review of B meson and kaon physics anomalies, summarizing the evidence for lepton flavor universality violation and tensions in mixing and CP violation, and assessing new physics explanations.

Pith tools