Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 286 references

For most Z-type neutron star X-ray binaries, the dominant polarized signal is Comptonized emission, reaching about 6% on the horizontal branch — higher than spreading-layer models predict.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 21:14 UTC pith:7MF2N3CT

load-bearing objection Careful, useful branch-resolved spectropolarimetric analysis with a real discovery claim, but the component-level polarization values inherit fixed priors that need a sensitivity test before the headline should be taken at face value. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16140 v1 pith:7MF2N3CT submitted 2026-07-17 astro-ph.HE

X-ray polarization of Z-type neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries -- II. Spectropolarimetric analysis

Andrea Gnarini , Francesco Ursini , Giorgio Matt , Stefano Bianchi , Fiamma Capitanio , Massimo Cocchi , Sergio Fabiani , Ruben Farinelli
show 3 more authors
Philip Kaaret Lorenzo Marra Antonella Tarana
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords X-ray polarimetryZ-sourcesneutron star low-mass X-ray binariesComptonizationaccretion diskreflectionspectropolarimetryIXPE
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Using imaging X-ray polarimetry together with NICER and NuSTAR spectra, the paper builds the first branch-resolved spectropolarimetric picture of six Z-type neutron star X-ray binaries as they move along their color–color diagrams. It tries to establish that Comptonized emission is the main source of both flux and polarization for most sources and branches: the 2–8 keV polarization degree is about 6% on the horizontal branch and falls to 3–4% on the normal branch. Those numbers exceed theoretical expectations for spreading-layer or boundary-layer geometries, so the authors argue the Comptonizing region is not a simple spreading layer. The disk component is less polarized (below 3%) but still above the plane-parallel scattering-atmosphere prediction, and its polarization angle is generally not perpendicular to the Comptonized angle, suggesting a non-axisymmetric system.

Core claim

The central claim is that, for most of the sources and branches, the main contribution to the X-ray emission and polarization is due to Comptonization: moving from the horizontal branch to the normal branch, the polarization degree in the 2–8 keV band varies from about 6% to 3–4%, while the flaring branch is loosely constrained. These values are significantly higher than theoretical expectations for typical spreading or boundary layer configurations. The disk polarization is generally lower (below 3%) but still higher than the prediction for an electron scattering-dominated, plane-parallel atmosphere at the corresponding inclination. The polarization angle of the disk appears significantly m

What carries the argument

The analysis uses a single spectral baseline for all sources — a thermal accretion disk model plus thermal Comptonization of a blackbody seed, with a relativistic reflection model (and occasionally an extra hard tail) added where needed — and fits the IXPE, NICER, and NuSTAR spectra separately for each branch of the color–color diagram. Polarization is then assigned component by component with a constant-polarization multiplicative model (polconst), with the reflected component's polarization degree fixed at 10% and its angle tied to the Comptonized component. This decomposition is the load-bearing device: it turns measured total Stokes parameters into per-component polarization degrees and

Load-bearing premise

The component-level polarization results depend on the assumed spectral decomposition and on fixing the reflected component's polarization degree at 10% with its angle tied to the Comptonized angle; if the degeneracy between Comptonized and reflected emission is resolved differently, or the reflection polarization differs, the reported per-component degrees and angle misalignment would not hold.

What would settle it

Take a bright Z-source (e.g., Cyg X-2) and leave the reflected component's polarization degree and angle free instead of fixing them at 10% and parallel to the Comptonized angle; if the best fit yields a reflection PD far below 10% or a PA that is not parallel to the Comptonized PA, the headline Comptonized PD values would not be reproduced. A second, weaker test: obtain high-signal branch-resolved data (e.g., with a more sensitive future polarimeter) and check whether the disk PA remains misaligned when it is not frozen to Comptonization+90°.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the high Comptonized polarization degrees (up to about 6–7% in the horizontal branch) are real, standard optically thick spreading-layer geometries, which predict only a few percent, are ruled out for most Z-sources and branches.
  • The non-orthogonal disk and Comptonized polarization angles imply broken axial symmetry in the inner accretion flow, so inclination alone is insufficient to predict the observed polarization.
  • Because the disk contribution rises as sources move from the horizontal to the normal branch, the branch-to-branch drop in total polarization can be explained partly by dilution from a weakly and misaligned polarized disk component.
  • Including the reflected component in the polarization budget matters: even at 5–20% of the photon flux, highly polarized reflected photons can shift the inferred Comptonized polarization if omitted.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fixed 10% reflection polarization and the parallel PA assumption are wrong — for example, if the reflection PA follows a warped disk's local normal — the quoted Comptonized polarization degrees would change; a future fit that frees the reflection PA on a bright source would settle this.
  • The paper's claim that the disk is more polarized than a plane-parallel scattering atmosphere could be tested independently with spectropolarimetric atmosphere models that include absorption, since the measured values are still consistent with those.
  • A natural extension is to model the Z-track as a continuous sequence of spreading-layer opening angles or covering fractions; if the covering fraction varies systematically along the track, the polarization evolution observed here may be reproduced without invoking an extra wind component.
  • The strong HB-to-NB contrast suggests that dedicated observations of currently unobserved branches in Sco X-1-like sources could decide whether the two Z-source subclasses differ in polarization or only in sampling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents the first branch-resolved spectropolarimetric analysis of a sample of six Z-type neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries observed with IXPE, NICER, and NuSTAR. The authors fit a common spectral model — TBabs*(diskbb+thcomp*bbodyrad), plus relxillNS reflection for all sources except GX 5–1 — to each branch of the Z-track, then fix the spectral parameters and apply polconst component-by-component to the IXPE Stokes spectra. They report a Comptonized-component PD of roughly 3–6% in the HB/NB, a disk PD generally below 3%, and a disk PA that is often not perpendicular to the Comptonization PA. They interpret the high Comptonized PD as evidence that the Comptonizing region is not a simple spreading layer, and they compare the disk PD with plane-parallel atmosphere predictions. They also find no correlation between polarization and inclination or reflection fraction.

Significance. If the component-level polarization values are robust, this is a valuable step: it is the first uniform, branch-resolved spectropolarimetric study of Z-sources, it includes a reflection component in the polarimetric decomposition, and it provides a direct observational test of spreading-layer/boundary-layer geometries. The paper also makes useful connections to ADC systems and winds. However, the central quantitative claims rest on priors for the reflection polarization and on only a subset of rows with free disk polarization angles. The paper itself acknowledges the Comptonization/reflection degeneracy and the difficulty of estimating component PD/PA. The significance of the results therefore depends on sensitivity checks that are not currently presented.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4, Table 2, Appendix A] The component-resolved PD/PA values in Table 2 are derived by fixing the spectral model and assigning polarization with polconst under three priors: reflection PD is fixed to 10%, reflection PA is tied to the Comptonization PA for every source and branch, and in several rows the disk PA is frozen to Comp+90 (Cyg X-2 HB/FB, XTE J1701–462 FB, Sco X-1 FB, GX 340+0 NB/FB). The central claim in the abstract and §4 — that the Comptonized PD is 3–6% and significantly above spreading-layer expectations of ~2% — is sensitive to these priors. Reflection contributes 5–32% of the 2–8 keV flux in the Appendix tables; e.g., Cyg X-2 HB has N_relxillNS/N_Tot = 17.8% and Table 2 gives Comp PD = 4.2±0.9. If the true reflection PD were 20% (a value the paper itself cites from Matt 1993 and Podgorný et al. 2025) with PA aligned to the Comptonization, the inferred Comptonized PD would shift downward by sever
  2. [§4, Table 2, §5] The claim that the disk PA is 'significantly misaligned and not perpendicular' to the Comptonization PA is only testable in rows where the disk PA was left free. In several rows the disk PA is frozen to Comp+90, so those rows cannot provide evidence for misalignment. Among the free rows, some are actually consistent with perpendicular orientation within the quoted 90% errors: for example, Cyg X-2 NB has disk PA = 54±15 and Comp PA = −42±7, giving ΔPA≈96°, consistent with 90° within errors. Moreover, the reflection PA is tied to the Comptonization PA in §4 under the assumption of an axisymmetric configuration, but the paper later invokes a possible break in axial symmetry to explain the absence of an inclination trend and the non-orthogonal PAs. In a non-axisymmetric geometry, the reflection PA would not in general be locked to the Comptonization PA. The present treatment therefore preclu
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 1] The header 'XTE J1071–461' is a typo; the source is XTE J1701–462 throughout the text.
  2. [§3.5] There is a repeated word in 'also simultaneously observed the the source'; please correct.
  3. [§4, Table 2] The notation '=PA Comp +90' and bracketed values such as '[10]' should be defined explicitly in the table notes as frozen priors, not as measured quantities. This will avoid confusion about which entries are constraints and which are assumptions.
  4. [§3.4] The gray-filter correction E^{−ΔΓ} for Sco X-1 is mentioned but ΔΓ is not defined or described in terms of how it was constrained. Please clarify whether this factor is applied to the model I, Q, and U consistently and what value of ΔΓ was used.
  5. [Figures 2 and 4] The legend states that empty markers correspond to 'values frozen during the fits,' but it is not always clear whether the PD or the PA was frozen. Please make the legend more explicit, e.g., 'PD frozen' vs 'PA frozen'.
  6. [§4] The uncertainties in Table 2 are statistical only, since the spectral parameters are fixed to their best-fit values. The paper should state explicitly that the quoted errors do not include covariance with the spectral parameters, especially given the Comptonization/reflection degeneracy.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction: component-level PD/PA values are conditional on explicit priors, but the headline comparison rests on independent IXPE measurements and published external models.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is observational: IXPE Stokes spectra are fit with polconst applied to a fixed spectral decomposition, and the resulting component PD/PA are compared with published theoretical models (Chandrasekhar atmospheres, spreading-layer/boundary-layer simulations). The measured total and branch-resolved polarization are external data, not outputs of the theories being tested. The model-dependent component decomposition in Table 2 does involve priors: relxillNS PD is fixed at 10% with PA tied to thcomp*bbodyrad, and in some rows the disk PA is frozen perpendicular to the Comptonization PA. These are assumptions, and the paper explicitly acknowledges the resulting degeneracy: 'it is difficult to estimate the PD and PA for each component due to the limited bandpass of IXPE and the degeneracy of some components' (Sect. 4) and 'Although there is strong degeneracy between the Comptonized and reflected components, as expected...' (Sect. 5). Frozen values are marked in Table 2 and Fig. 2, and the misalignment claim is restricted to rows 'when measurable,' so no prediction is silently forced by construction. Self-citations to G25 are prior data-analysis work (branch GTIs, model-independent PD) and serve as cross-checks, not as an unverified load-bearing premise. Thus the central claim is conditional on modeling choices but not circularly derived from its inputs. The score of 2 reflects these acknowledged model-dependence caveats and minor self-citation, not a circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

15 free parameters · 9 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central spectropolarimetric results rest on a fairly large number of fitted spectral parameters (disk, Comptonization, reflection, cross-calibration) and on several imposed priors for the polarization of reflection (PD=10%, PA tied) and sometimes the disk. These are standard in the field but mean the component-level PD/PA values are model-dependent rather than pure measurements.

free parameters (15)
  • diskbb kT_in (per source/branch) = 0.65–1.26 keV
    Inner disk temperature; defines the disk spectral component whose polarization is measured.
  • diskbb normalization (R_d sqrt(cos i)) = 10–30 km
    Sets the disk flux contribution in the 2–8 keV band, affecting the decomposition into disk vs Comptonized components.
  • thcomp electron temperature kT_e = 2.6–14.5 keV
    Defines the Comptonized continuum shape; this is the component with the highest PD.
  • thcomp optical depth τ = 7.5–30
    Together with kT_e sets the thcomp spectral shape and flux fraction.
  • thcomp covering fraction f = 0–1 (fixed to 1 or 0 in many branches; free values ~0.2–0.51)
    Controls the fraction of seed photons that are Comptonized; strongly changes the relative flux of the Comptonized component.
  • bbodyrad seed temperature kT = 0.99–1.57 keV
    Seed photon temperature for thcomp, tied to relxillNS seed temperature.
  • bbodyrad normalization / R_bb = 8–29 km
    Sets seed photon flux; affects the Comptonized component normalization.
  • relxillNS inclination i = 30°–62°
    Used for the disk PD comparison to plane-parallel atmosphere predictions; a systematic underestimate would weaken the disk-PD tension.
  • relxillNS inner radius R_in = upper limits; fixed to ISCO in some branches
    Controls the reflection flux and profile.
  • relxillNS ionization log ξ = 1.5–3.0
    Reflection spectral shape; affects the reflected flux normalization.
  • relxillNS iron abundance A_Fe = 1.4–9.7 (often fixed)
    Sets the Fe line/reflection strength.
  • reflection PD (fixed) = 10%
    Chosen from Matt (1993); applied to relxillNS in all sources/branches, directly setting the reflection's contribution to the polarized signal.
  • NICER edge depth D = 0.015–0.079
    Ad hoc multiplicative edge at ~1.839 keV to correct NICER residuals; affects the low-energy spectral shape.
  • GX 5-1 powerlaw normalization N_pl = 0.44–0.47 (or upper limit 0.02)
    Extra hard-tail component for GX 5-1; its polarization is tied to thcomp.
  • Cross-calibration constants (per DU/FPM/NICER) = 0.728–1.392
    Account for inter-instrument normalization; do not directly affect polarization but affect the joint spectral fit.
axioms (9)
  • domain assumption The spectral model TBabs*(diskbb+thcomp*bbodyrad)+relxillNS adequately describes the 1.5–30 keV spectra of all Z-sources (with source-specific additions like edge, powerlaw, apec).
    Used throughout §3; if the true continuum contains e.g. a separate corona or different seed photon distribution, the component polarization assignments would change.
  • domain assumption The Comptonized component is produced by thcomp applied to bbodyrad seed photons from the NS surface/boundary layer; its covering fraction f is a valid descriptor.
    Baseline model §3; the physical identification of thcomp*bbodyrad with the Comptonizing region underpins the interpretation of its PD.
  • domain assumption relxillNS (single-temperature blackbody illuminating a disk at 45°) describes the reflection component, with spin fixed at 0.1, outer radius 1000 Rg, and reflection fraction −1.
    §3; the reflection normalization and parameters are used in the spectropolarimetric decomposition and inclination estimates.
  • ad hoc to paper Reflected photons have PD = 10% and PA parallel to the Comptonization PA (axisymmetric geometry).
    §4: 'we decided to fix the PD of relxillNS at 10% ... while the PA is tied to that of thcomp*bbodyrad'; this is a prior imposed on the polarimetric fit, not derived from the data.
  • domain assumption Chandrasekhar/Sobolev plane-parallel electron-scattering atmosphere predictions are the correct baseline for disk atmospheric polarization at the measured inclination.
    Used to claim disk PD is higher than predictions (§4, comparing to Chandrasekhar 1960; Sobolev 1963); more detailed atmosphere models (Taverna et al. 2021; Marra et al. 2026) are cited but not used quantitatively.
  • ad hoc to paper NICER residuals below 2 keV are instrumental and can be modeled with an absorption edge at ~1.839 keV (Al edge).
    §2.2; if the edge is astrophysical, the continuum decomposition at low energies changes.
  • ad hoc to paper For Sco X-1, the IXPE gray-filter residuals can be corrected by multiplying the model by E^{-ΔΓ}.
    §3.4; this correction is applied during polarimetric analysis and could bias the component polarization if wrong.
  • domain assumption Branch classifications (HB/NB/FB) from G25 are correct; the GTIs split the data appropriately.
    All branch-resolved results depend on this; incorrect branch assignment would mix states.
  • domain assumption The adopted distances (2.1–11 kpc) used to convert normalizations to physical radii are correct.
    Used for R_d and R_bb values; not central to polarization but used in parameter interpretation.
invented entities (1)
  • Sub-relativistic or fully ionized accretion disk wind no independent evidence
    purpose: Offered as a possible additional source of polarized photons to explain the high Comptonized-component PD without changing the continuum spectrum (§5).
    Mentioned speculatively; no direct detection or falsifiable prediction is provided in this paper, and it is not part of the fitted model.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 27730 in / 20127 out tokens · 150708 ms · 2026-08-01T21:14:07.190821+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

IXPE has provided for the first time detailed energy- and time-resolved X-ray polarimetry of Z-type neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries (NS-LMXBs) as they move along their color-color diagrams (CCDs). These sources can reach the highest polarization observed for NS-LXMBs in the 2-8 keV range when they move along the horizontal branch. In a previous paper, we characterized the spectral state of a sample of Z-sources using the CCD and estimated the polarization with model-independent analysis. Here, we present detailed spectropolarimetric analysis for each source on each branch using data from IXPE, NICER, and NuSTAR. The continuum X-ray emission of all the sources is well described with a combination of thermal accretion disk emission plus a harder Comptonized component. In addition, reflection features, in particular the relativistically broadened Fe line, are observed for our sources, except GX 5-1. For most of the sources and branches, the main contribution to the X-ray emission and polarization is due to Comptonization: moving from the horizontal branch (HB) to the normal branch (NB), the polarization degree (PD) in the 2-8 keV band varies from about 6% to 3-4%, while the PD is loosely constrained in the flaring branch (FB), due to the shorter exposures. These PD values are significantly higher than theoretical expectations for typical spreading or boundary layer configurations. The polarization of the disk is generally lower (below 3%) but still higher than predictions for an electron scattering-dominated, plane-parallel atmosphere above the disk observed at the corresponding inclination. Moreover, the polarization angle (PA) of the disk seems to be significantly misaligned and not perpendicular to that of Comptonization. We find no correlation between the polarization signal and the inclination, nor with the contribution of reflected photons throughout the Z-track.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16140 by Andrea Gnarini, Antonella Tarana, Fiamma Capitanio, Francesco Ursini, Giorgio Matt, Lorenzo Marra, Massimo Cocchi, Philip Kaaret, Ruben Farinelli, Sergio Fabiani, Stefano Bianchi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Deconvolved spectra for each Z-source with the resulting best-fit model and the corresponding residuals in units of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Polarization degree of Comptonized (top) and disk (mid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Polarization degree of Comptonized (left) and disk (right) emission for each Z-source as a function of the inclination. Empty [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

286 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Model-independent, time-resolved X-ray polarimetry

    X-ray polarization of Z-type neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries: I. Model-independent, time-resolved X-ray polarimetry. , year = 2025, month = jul, volume =

    2025

  2. [2]

    Galaxies , year = 2024, month = aug, volume =

    The IXPE View of Neutron Star Low-Mass X-ray Binaries. Galaxies , year = 2024, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.3390/galaxies12040043 , archivePrefix =. 2409.07161 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Constraining the Size of the Corona with Fully Relativistic Calculations of Spectra of Extended Coronae. I. The Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer Code. , year = 2019, month = apr, volume =

    2019

  4. [4]

    and Dovčiak, M

    Zhang, W. and Dovčiak, M. and Bursa, M. and Karas, V. and Matt, G. and Ursini, F. , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2022 , month =

    2022

  5. [5]

    and Ursini, F

    Gnarini, A. and Ursini, F. and Matt, G. and Bianchi, S. and Capitanio, F. and Cocchi, M. and Farinelli, R. and Zhang, W. , title = ". , volume =. 2022 , month =

    2022

  6. [6]

    Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus) , year = 1973, month = jan, pages =

    Astrophysics of black holes. Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus) , year = 1973, month = jan, pages =

    1973

  7. [7]

    , year = 1980, month = jan, volume =

    Polarization features of X-ray radiation emitted near black holes. , year = 1980, month = jan, volume =

    1980

  8. [8]

    , year = 2000, month = mar, volume =

    Light Curves of Rapidly Rotating Neutron Stars. , year = 2000, month = mar, volume =

    2000

  9. [9]

    Patruno and B

    A. Patruno and B. Haskell and N. Andersson , title =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa927a , year = 2017, month =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa927a 2017

  10. [10]

    , year = 2021, month = mar, volume =

    Spectral and polarization properties of black hole accretion disc emission: including absorption effects. , year = 2021, month = mar, volume =

    2021

  11. [11]

    , year = 1987, month = may, volume =

    The light curves of low-mass X-ray binaries. , year = 1987, month = may, volume =

    1987

  12. [12]

    , year = 1988, month = jan, volume =

    The X-Ray Spectral Properties of Accretion Disks in X-Ray Binaries. , year = 1988, month = jan, volume =

    1988

  13. [13]

    , year = 1984, month = jan, volume =

    Energy spectra of low-mass binary X-ray sources observed from Tenma. , year = 1984, month = jan, volume =

    1984

  14. [14]

    , year = 1989, month = jan, volume =

    Luminosity-related changes of the energy spectrum of X 1608-522. , year = 1989, month = jan, volume =

    1989

  15. [15]

    , year = 1989, month = nov, volume =

    Two patterns of correlated X-ray timing and spectral behaviour in low-mass X-ray binaries. , year = 1989, month = nov, volume =

    1989

  16. [16]

    , year = 1989, month = jan, volume =

    Quasi-periodic oscillations and noise in low-mass X-ray binaries. , year = 1989, month = jan, volume =

    1989

  17. [17]

    , year = 1990, month = sep, volume =

    Correlation of X-Ray Burst Properties with Source State in the ``Atoll'' Source 4U/MXB 1636-53. , year = 1990, month = sep, volume =

    1990

  18. [18]

    , title =

    van der Klis, M. , title =. X-ray Binaries , editor =

  19. [19]

    , year = 1995, month = dec, volume =

    X-Ray Spectra of Z Sources. , year = 1995, month = dec, volume =

    1995

  20. [20]

    , editor=

    van der Klis, M. , editor=. Rapid X-ray variability , DOI=. Compact stellar X-ray sources , publisher =. 2006 , pages=

    2006

  21. [21]

    , year = 2010, month = mar, volume =

    On the nature of the Cygnus X-2 like Z-track sources. , year = 2010, month = mar, volume =

    2010

  22. [22]

    , year = 2012, month = jan, volume =

    Dipping - versus flaring in Z-track sources: resolving the controversy. , year = 2012, month = jan, volume =

    2012

  23. [23]

    , year = 2012, month = oct, volume =

    Spectral investigations of the nature of the Scorpius X-1 like sources. , year = 2012, month = oct, volume =

    2012

  24. [24]

    , year = 2003, month = oct, volume =

    Boundary layer, accretion disk and X-ray variability in the luminous LMXBs. , year = 2003, month = oct, volume =

    2003

  25. [25]

    10.1051/0004-6361:20053964

    Boundary layer emission and Z-track in the color-color diagram of luminous LMXBs , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361:20053964", journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053964

  26. [26]

    Revnivtsev, M. G. and Suleimanov, V. F. and Poutanen, J. , title = ". , volume =. 2013 , month =

    2013

  27. [27]

    Everything you always wanted to know about accretion but were afraid to ask

    Modelling the behaviour of accretion flows in X-ray binaries. Everything you always wanted to know about accretion but were afraid to ask. , year = 2007, month = dec, volume =

    2007

  28. [28]

    , year = 2011, month = may, volume =

    BeppoSAX view of the NS-LMXB GS 1826-238. , year = 2011, month = may, volume =

    2011

  29. [29]

    , year = 1994, month = jun, volume =

    Similarities in Neutron Star and Black Hole Accretion. , year = 1994, month = jun, volume =

    1994

  30. [30]

    , year = 2006, month = feb, volume =

    Jets in neutron star X-ray binaries: a comparison with black holes. , year = 2006, month = feb, volume =

    2006

  31. [31]

    Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics , publisher =

    Low-Magnetic-Field Neutron Stars in X-ray Binaries. Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics , publisher =

  32. [32]

    , year = 1977, month = jan, volume =

    Soft X-ray emission from dwarf novae. , year = 1977, month = jan, volume =

    1977

  33. [33]

    Astronomy Letters , year = 1999, month = may, volume =

    Spread of matter over a neutron-star surface during disk accretion. Astronomy Letters , year = 1999, month = may, volume =

    1999

  34. [34]

    and Poutanen, J

    Suleimanov, V. and Poutanen, J. , title = ". , volume =. 2006 , month =

    2006

  35. [35]

    , year = 2001, month = jan, volume =

    Accretion Disk Boundary Layers around Neutron Stars: X-Ray Production in Low-Mass X-Ray Binaries. , year = 2001, month = jan, volume =

    2001

  36. [36]

    , year = 1985, month = feb, volume =

    Comptonization of low-frequency radiation in accretion disks Angular distribution and polarization of hard radiation. , year = 1985, month = feb, volume =

    1985

  37. [37]

    A treatise on radiative transfer

  38. [38]

    , year = 2024, month = apr, volume =

    The polarization of the boundary layer around weakly magnetized neutron stars in X-ray binaries. , year = 2024, month = apr, volume =

    2024

  39. [39]

    , year = 2025, month = oct, volume =

    A Monte Carlo spectropolarimetric model for the high-soft state of neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries. , year = 2025, month = oct, volume =

    2025

  40. [40]

    , year = 2025, month = apr, volume =

    Polarized radiation from the spreading layer of weakly magnetized neutron stars. , year = 2025, month = apr, volume =

    2025

  41. [41]

    , year = 1982, month = jun, volume =

    Accretion disk coronae. , year = 1982, month = jun, volume =

    1982

  42. [42]

    , year = 1988, month = jan, volume =

    X-ray orbital modulations from low-mass X-ray binaries. , year = 1988, month = jan, volume =

    1988

  43. [43]

    Schnittman and Julian H

    Jeremy D. Schnittman and Julian H. Krolik , title =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1175 , year =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/701/2/1175

  44. [44]

    , year = 1996, month = dec, volume =

    Green's matrix for Compton reflection of polarized radiation from cold matter. , year = 1996, month = dec, volume =

    1996

  45. [45]

    , year = 1993, month = feb, volume =

    X-ray polarization properties of a centrally illuminated accretion disc. , year = 1993, month = feb, volume =

    1993

  46. [46]

    , year = 1985, month = nov, volume =

    Angular distribution and polarization of X-ray-burster radiation (during stationary and flash phases). , year = 1985, month = nov, volume =

    1985

  47. [47]

    , year = 2024, month = jan, volume =

    Reflecting on accretion in neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries. , year = 2024, month = jan, volume =

    2024

  48. [48]

    , year = 2013, month = apr, volume =

    Irradiation of an accretion disc by a jet: general properties and implications for spin measurements of black holes. , year = 2013, month = apr, volume =

    2013

  49. [49]

    , year = 2014, month = oct, volume =

    The role of the reflection fraction in constraining black hole spin. , year = 2014, month = oct, volume =

    2014

  50. [50]

    , year = 2014, month = feb, volume =

    Improved Reflection Models of Black Hole Accretion Disks: Treating the Angular Distribution of X-Rays. , year = 2014, month = feb, volume =

    2014

  51. [51]

    , year = 2022, month = feb, volume =

    Relativistic X-Ray Reflection Models for Accreting Neutron Stars. , year = 2022, month = feb, volume =

    2022

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    Reflection spectra from an accretion disc illuminated by a neutron star X-ray burst. , keywords =

  53. [53]

    , year = 2016, month = oct, volume =

    The effects of high density on the X-ray spectrum reflected from accretion discs around black holes. , year = 2016, month = oct, volume =

    2016

  54. [54]

    , year = 2025, month = jun, volume =

    A Persistent Disk Wind and Variable Jet Outflow in the Neutron-star Low-mass X-Ray Binary GX 13+1. , year = 2025, month = jun, volume =

    2025

  55. [55]

    arXiv e-prints , year = 2025, month = jul, eid =

    X-ray polarization of reflected thermal emission. arXiv e-prints , year = 2025, month = jul, eid =

    2025

  56. [56]

    Direct radiation

    Polarization properties of thermal accretion disk emission: I. Direct radiation. , year = 2026, month = jan, volume =

    2026

  57. [57]

    , year = 2001, month = feb, volume =

    High-Energy X-Ray Timing Experiment Detections of Hard X-Ray Tails in Scorpius X-1. , year = 2001, month = feb, volume =

    2001

  58. [58]

    , year = 2006, month = nov, volume =

    Average hard X-ray emission from NS LMXBs: observational evidence of different spectral states in NS LMXBs. , year = 2006, month = nov, volume =

    2006

  59. [59]

    , year = 1966, month = aug, volume =

    Cosmic X-Ray Sources-Galactic and Extragalactic. , year = 1966, month = aug, volume =

    1966

  60. [60]

    , year = 1979, month = jul, volume =

    The halo population X-ray source Cygnus X-2. , year = 1979, month = jul, volume =

    1979

  61. [61]

    , year = 1990, month = aug, volume =

    Optical spectroscopy of V 1341 Cygni, the optical counterpart of Cygnus X-2. , year = 1990, month = aug, volume =

    1990

  62. [62]

    , year = 1998, month = jan, volume =

    The Mass of the Neutron Star in Cygnus X-2 (V1341 Cygni). , year = 1998, month = jan, volume =

    1998

  63. [63]

    , year = 2010, month = feb, volume =

    On the mass of the neutron star in Cyg X-2. , year = 2010, month = feb, volume =

    2010

  64. [64]

    , year = 1999, month = may, volume =

    The optical light curves of Cygnus X-2 (V1341 Cyg) and the mass of its neutron star. , year = 1999, month = may, volume =

    1999

  65. [65]

    , year = 1998, month = feb, volume =

    Discovery of kHz Quasi-periodic Oscillations in the Z Source Cygnus X-2. , year = 1998, month = feb, volume =

    1998

  66. [66]

    , year = 1998, month = may, volume =

    A Type I Burst with Radius Expansion Observed from Cygnus X-2 with the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer. , year = 1998, month = may, volume =

    1998

  67. [67]

    , year = 1986, month = aug, volume =

    Spectral Variability of Cygnus X-2: Structure in the Circumsource Material. , year = 1986, month = aug, volume =

    1986

  68. [68]

    , year = 1993, month = jun, volume =

    Resolving the Iron K Line in Cygnus X-2: an Observation with BBXRT. , year = 1993, month = jun, volume =

    1993

  69. [69]

    , year = 1997, month = jul, volume =

    Low-energy line emission from Cygnus X-2 observed with the BeppoSAX LECS. , year = 1997, month = jul, volume =

    1997

  70. [70]

    , year = 2002, month = may, volume =

    On the spectral evolution of Cygnus X-2 along its color-color diagram. , year = 2002, month = may, volume =

    2002

  71. [71]

    , year = 2009, month = may, volume =

    The X-ray spectral evolution of Cygnus X-2 in the framework of bulk Comptonization. , year = 2009, month = may, volume =

    2009

  72. [72]

    , year = 2010, month = sep, volume =

    Relativistic Lines and Reflection from the Inner Accretion Disks Around Neutron Stars. , year = 2010, month = sep, volume =

    2010

  73. [73]

    , year = 2018, month = feb, volume =

    NuSTAR view of the Z-type neutron star low-mass X-ray binary Cygnus X-2. , year = 2018, month = feb, volume =

    2018

  74. [74]

    R. M. Ludlam and E. M. Cackett and J. A. Garc. Radius Constraints from Reflection Modeling of Cygnus X-2 with. , volume =

  75. [75]

    , year = 2013, month = oct, volume =

    Radio and X-ray observations of jet ejection in Cygnus X-2. , year = 2013, month = oct, volume =

    2013

  76. [76]

    , year = 2026, month = jan, volume =

    XRISM Observations of Accretion Disk Corona in Cyg X-2. , year = 2026, month = jan, volume =

    2026

  77. [77]

    Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    Decoding Cygnus X-2: The critical role of reflection in IXPE data. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , year = 2026, month = mar, volume =

    2026

  78. [78]

    , year = 2007, month = sep, volume =

    The variable radio counterpart and possible large-scale jet of the new Z source XTE J1701-462. , year = 2007, month = sep, volume =

    2007

  79. [79]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Radius expansion bursts from the neutron star transient XTE J1701-462; a new distance estimate. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  80. [80]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    New X-ray Transient, XTE J1701-462. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

Showing first 80 references.