REVIEW 2 cited by
Apparent Superluminality of Lensed Gravitational Waves
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We consider gravitational wave (GW) sources with an associated electromagnetic (EM) counterpart, and analyze the time delay between both signals in the presence of lensing. If GWs have wavelengths comparable to the Schwarzschild radius of astrophysical lenses, they must be treated with wave optics, whereas EM waves are typically well within the approximation of geometric optics. With concrete examples, we confirm that the GW signal never arrives before its EM counterpart, if both are emitted at the same time. However, during the inspiral of a binary, peaks of the GW waveform can arrive before their EM counterpart. We stress this is only an apparent superluminality since the GW waveform is both distorted and further delayed with respect to light. In any case, measuring the multi-messenger time delay and correctly interpreting it has important implications for unveiling the distribution of lenses, testing the nature of gravity, and probing the cosmological expansion history.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Detectability of lensed gravitational waves in matched-filtering searches
Matched-filtering searches recover strongly lensed gravitational waves at rates far below optimal-SNR predictions, with detection efficiency dropping to under one percent.
-
Probability of gravitational-wave lensing by intermediate-mass black holes and globular clusters
The rate of compound gravitational-wave lensing by intermediate-mass black holes in globular clusters is at most about 10^-3 of galaxy-scale lensed events, disfavoring GW231123 as such an event.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.