Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 128 references

Rotational spectra and de-perturbation analysis for ground state ytterbium oxide, YbO

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that YbO's known irregularities in ground-state vibrational spacings, particularly the v = 4 anomaly near 3000 cm⁻¹, are caused by two nearly degenerate excited-state levels, and that a three-state effective Hamiltonian…

desk verdict Solid new FTMW rotational data and BOB terms for YbO; the three-state deperturbation model is a plausible first pass but has a load-bearing Morse/cubic inconsistency that needs to be quantified before the deperturbed potentials are trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05905 v1 pith:7OWI2OV6 submitted 2026-08-06 physics.chem-ph

Richard J. Mawhorter , Sean Jackson , Charles Brainin , Trevor J. Sears , Peter F. Bernath , Philipp Buschmann , Jens-Uwe Grabow This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords ytterbiumoxiderotationalspectroscopyFouriertransformmicrowaveBorn-Oppenheimerbreakdownde-perturbationMorsepotentialFranck-Condonfactorvibrationalperturbations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports high-precision Fourier transform microwave measurements of the $J = 1 \leftarrow 0$ rotational transition in three even-mass isotopologues of ytterbium oxide, YbO, and combines them with near-infrared data to sharpen the ground-state rotational and centrifugal distortion constants. The main explanatory claim is that the ground state's irregular vibrational spacings, especially the abnormally small $v = 4 \rightarrow 3$ interval near 3000 cm$^{-1}$, cannot be produced by a single perturbing state. The authors build a three-state effective Hamiltonian in which the $X\,^1\Sigma^+$ ground state mixes with the $B_1$ and $D_1$ excited states through electronic coupling matrix elements, with Morse potentials generating the vibrational overlaps. Diagonalizing this matrix reproduces the measured $X$-state levels through $v = 8$ with an RMS deviation of 8.4 cm$^{-1}$, yielding de-perturbed potentials for all three states. If correct, the model explains the long-noted anomaly and provides de-perturbed potentials for studying other ytterbium-containing molecules.

What carries the argument

The central object is an effective Hamiltonian matrix built in the basis of vibrational levels of the three electronic states $X$, $B_1$, and $D_1$. Diagonal terms are Morse-based vibrational energies with an added cubic anharmonic term, $\omega_e y_e (v+1/2)^3$, needed for the higher ground-state levels; off-diagonal terms are the product of a state-independent electronic coupling $H^E_{s s'}$ and a vibrational overlap $F_{s s'} = \langle v_{s} | v_{s'} \rangle$ computed numerically from Morse wavefunctions. The model carries the argument because diagonalizing this matrix simultaneously reproduces the perturbed $X$-state spacings, locates the two perturbing states, and yields wavefunctions whose Franck-Condon factors match the observed fluorescence intensities.

What would settle it

Measure the $D_1(v=1)$ and $D_1(v=2)$ vibrational levels directly with high-resolution near-infrared or laser spectroscopy; the de-perturbed $D_1$ potential from the model predicts their positions, and a deviation of more than a few wavenumbers would falsify that potential. A second, calculation-based check is to recompute the 4518 Å fluorescence branching ratios using numerical (non-Morse) eigenfunctions of the fitted potentials to see whether the 80:10.4:0.7 and 30:1.1 predictions survive the change in wavefunction model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the perturbed ground-state spacings of YbO, and in particular the small $v = 4 \rightarrow 3$ interval, are a three-state resonance: $X(v=4)$ sits nearly degenerate with $B_1(v=2)$ and $D_1(v=0)$, and both excited levels plus a $B_1$–$D_1$ coupling are needed to reproduce the data. After fixing equilibrium bond-length shifts from theory and scaling the $D_1$ vibrational frequency, the model has 10 free parameters and fits all measured levels through $v=8$ for $X$, through $v=3$ for $B_1$, and the origin of $D_1$ with an RMS deviation of 8.4 cm$^{-1}$, two orders of magnitude smaller than the level spacing. The authors state that the model "reproduces the observed perturbations in the ground state levels to well within the measurement uncertainties." An independent check is that the de-perturbed Morse wavefunctions predict fluorescence branching ratios of 80:10.4:0.7 to the $X$-state progression and 30:1.1 to the $B_1$ progression, matching the measured 80:10:1 and 30:1.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes Morse-shaped vibrational wavefunctions for the overlaps even though the fitted energy levels come from a Hamiltonian with an extra cubic anharmonic term beyond the Morse form, and the size of the resulting mismatch is never quantified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The de-perturbed $X$-state potential ($\omega_e = 701$, $\omega_e x_e = 10.2$, $\omega_e y_e = 0.34$ cm$^{-1}$) can be used in place of effective constants for modeling YbO spectra and computing molecular properties.
  • The $B_1$ and $D_1$ potentials predict the positions of unobserved vibrational levels, particularly $D_1(v=1,2)$, offering concrete targets for new infrared and optical searches.
  • The large Born-Oppenheimer breakdown terms of 45–50 kHz measured for the heavier isotopologues are consistent with the strong electronic mixing and will need to be included in any isotopologue-independent model of YbO.
  • The three-state coupled-Morse approach extends the de-perturbation method previously applied to YbF and PbO, providing a template for disentangling the overlapping f-hole states that complicate other lanthanide oxides.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The use of Morse wavefunctions for overlaps while fitting a cubic-term Hamiltonian is the least-tested piece of the model; a numerical potential fitted to the same levels could show whether the Franck-Condon validation is sensitive to this inconsistency.
  • Because the $D_1$ vibrational parameters are fixed by theory rather than data, the $D_1(v=1)$ prediction is the model's sharpest testable consequence; a miss there would not necessarily invalidate the $X$-state perturbation picture.
  • The authors note that the $B_1$-state residuals dominate the RMS error and suspect missing couplings to the lowest $\Omega = 0^-$ and $\Omega = 2$ states; adding those states to the matrix could shift the extracted $B_1$ origin and slightly alter the $X$–$B_1$ coupling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports Fourier transform microwave measurements of the N = 1←0 rotational transition for 172YbO, 174YbO, and 176YbO, together with a multi-isotopologue fit that includes Born-Oppenheimer breakdown terms. The rotational constants are combined with near-infrared combination differences from Melville et al. to improve the B and D constants. The second half of the paper presents a deperturbation model of the X 1Σ+, B1, and D1 states using coupled Morse potentials with electronic coupling matrix elements; the model is fitted to vibrational levels through X v = 8 and validated against fluorescence branching ratios. The authors conclude that the X-state spacing anomalies around v = 4 arise from near-degeneracy with B1(v = 2) and D1(v = 0).

Significance. If the deperturbation analysis is reliable, it provides the first quantitative account of the long-noted 3000 cm−1 anomaly in YbO and yields deperturbed potentials useful for the wider YbX family. The rotational analysis is a solid contribution: the multi-isotopologue FTMW fit is self-consistent, the combination-difference approach greatly reduces the uncertainties in B, and the BOB terms are physically plausible. The paper is also honest about its limitations, explicitly acknowledging the Morse-wavefunction mismatch and the lack of independent D1 potential information. However, the deperturbation model's central claims currently rest on approximations whose impact is not quantified, and the manual fit lacks parameter uncertainties.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III.C, Eq. (1)] The paper fits eigenvalues of Eq. (1), which includes the cubic anharmonic term ω_e y_e (v+1/2)^3, but computes vibrational overlaps and Franck-Condon factors with Morse wavefunctions that are eigenfunctions of a Hamiltonian containing only the quadratic anharmonic term. The text acknowledges this ('Morse wavefunctions ... are assumed') but never quantifies the resulting error. For the optimized X-state parameters (ω_e = 701 cm−1, ω_exe = 10.2 cm−1, ω_eye = 0.34 cm−1), the cubic term contributes roughly 209 cm−1 at v = 8, about 7% of the vibrational term value; this is large enough that the shapes of the high-v wavefunctions, and hence the overlaps entering the X(v = 4)–B1(v = 2) and X(v = 4)–D1(v = 0) couplings, may be significantly biased. Because the observed level shifts depend on products H_E × F, an unquantified bias in F propagates directly into the fitted electronic couplings and the reported deperturbed potentials. I request a quantitative estimate of this mismatch, for example by comparing the Morse-overlap results with overlaps obtained from numerical vibrational eigenfunctions of the full potential implied by Eq. (1), or by a sensitivity test on ω_eye.
  2. [Section III.C, Table V] The ten free parameters are optimized through a 'manual refinement process' and the paper reports no parameter uncertainties, no correlation matrix, and no stability analysis. The RMSE of 8.4 cm−1 is two orders of magnitude smaller than the level spacings, but this alone does not establish that the extracted potentials are reliable, particularly because several fixed inputs (Δr_B1, Δr_D1, ω_e,D1 scaled from theory, and ω_exe,D1 = ω_exe,B1) are taken from ab initio calculations without a reported sensitivity study. The authors should report at least one-dimensional confidence intervals from the fit, for example by scanning each parameter, and should show how the RMSE and the deperturbed potentials change when the theoretical constraints are varied within their stated uncertainties.
  3. [Section III.C, Table IV] The model is fitted to roughly 14 observed levels with 10 free parameters, and the fit through X v = 8 excludes higher electronic states; the authors state that the B1 residuals are dominated by the neglected Ω = 0− and Ω = 2 states, but they do not quantify whether those states also affect the X-state levels through v = 8. Since the central conclusion concerns the X-state spacings, a test of the sensitivity of the X(v = 4) shifts to the inclusion of a fourth state, or at least an estimate of the expected magnitude of the neglected couplings, is needed to support the claim that the three-state model is sufficient.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section III.C] The phrase 'To the extent that (2) is an accurate model' should read 'To the extent that Eq. (2) is an accurate model'.
  2. [Table III] The sentence 'equilibrium rotational constants B e and the corresponding bond distances are are derived' contains a duplicated 'are'; it should read 'are derived'.
  3. [Section III.C] The text contains 'the the 18 parameters originally in the model'; the duplicated article should be removed.
  4. [Section III.D] The reference in the text to 'Fig.III D' should be 'Fig. 4'.
  5. [Section III.D] The Franck-Condon validation uses an assumed upper-state r_e = 1.780 Å, and the authors note that the branching ratios are governed primarily by this choice of r_e; a short sensitivity statement showing the range of r_e that is consistent with the observed 80:10:1 and 30:1 ratios would strengthen the claimed independent validation.
  6. [General] The paper does not include a data availability statement or a link to the Python code used for the deperturbation fit; providing the code and input files would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's central energy-level results are a fit, not a prediction, and the only independent check (Franck-Condon branching ratios) is not an input to the fit.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is not circular. The FTMW and multi-isotopologue rotational analyses (Sections III.A and III.B) are standard least-squares fits of measured line frequencies; no quantity is presented as a prediction from first principles. The deperturbation model in Section III.C (Eqs. 1-3) fits 10 parameters to the experimental vibrational levels through v=8; the eigenvalues of the effective Hamiltonian are the fitted object, so the model's agreement with those levels is a fit statistic, not a claimed prediction. Nothing is defined in terms of the target result. The only genuinely predictive element is the Franck-Condon branching-ratio comparison in Section III.D, which uses the fitted lower-state wavefunctions and an assumed upper-state Morse potential; those emission intensities were not among the data used to determine the 10 parameters, so the comparison is an external validation rather than a recycled input. The fixed delta-r values and omega_e for the D1 state are taken from Liu, Dolg, and Li (1998), an independent external calculation, not from the present authors' prior work. The authors' own PbF and BaF papers are cited only for context in the BOB discussion and are not load-bearing. Finally, the acknowledged inconsistency that Morse wavefunctions (quadratic anharmonicity only) are used for overlaps while Eq. (1) includes a cubic term is a model-consistency or correctness concern, not a circularity: the overlap functions are an approximation, but they are not defined in terms of the fitted energies. No self-definitional step, fitted input renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 20 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The rotational part of the paper depends on nine FTMW lines plus prior NIR combination differences, with a D constant fixed from the combined fit. The deperturbation claim depends on 10 manually fitted parameters, several theory-fixed values, and assumed upper-state constants; parameter uncertainties are not reported, so the ledger is large relative to the roughly 14 experimental levels used. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (20)
  • omega_e(X) = 701 cm^-1
    Fitted to X-state vibrational spacings through v=8 in manual refinement.
  • omega_e*x_e(X) = 10.2 cm^-1
    Fitted anharmonic correction for the X state.
  • omega_e*y_e(X) = 0.34 cm^-1
    Cubic anharmonic term added to the X-state energy expression.
  • T_e(B1) = 936 cm^-1
    Fitted electronic origin of the B1 state.
  • omega_e(B1) = 848 cm^-1
    Fitted harmonic constant of the B1 state.
  • omega_e*x_e(B1) = 6.5 cm^-1
    Fitted anharmonicity of the B1 state.
  • T_e(D1) = 2635 cm^-1
    Fitted electronic origin of the D1 state.
  • H^E(X,B1) = 20 cm^-1
    Electronic coupling matrix element between X and B1.
  • H^E(X,D1) = 20 cm^-1
    Electronic coupling matrix element between X and D1.
  • H^E(B1,D1) = 50 cm^-1
    Electronic coupling matrix element between B1 and D1.
  • delta r_e(B1) = -0.042 angstrom
    Fixed from Liu et al. DFT; controls B1-X overlap and is not varied.
  • delta r_e(D1) = -0.022 angstrom
    Fixed from Liu et al. DFT; controls D1-X overlap and is not varied.
  • omega_e(D1) = 833 cm^-1
    Fixed in a constant ratio scaled to the B1 ab initio calculation.
  • omega_e*x_e(D1) = 6.5 cm^-1
    Fixed equal to the B1 anharmonicity because only the D1 origin is observed.
  • upper-state r_e (4518 A band) = 1.780 angstrom
    Assumed for the Franck-Condon branching ratio validation.
  • upper-state omega_e (4518 A band) = 820 cm^-1
    Assumed for the Franck-Condon branching ratio validation.
  • upper-state omega_e*x_e (4518 A band) = 6.0 cm^-1
    Assumed for the Franck-Condon branching ratio validation.
  • BOB correction for 172YbO = -0.04870(46) MHz
    Fitted in the multi-isotopologue SPFIT analysis.
  • BOB correction for 176YbO = 0.04609(43) MHz
    Fitted in the multi-isotopologue SPFIT analysis.
  • Y02 (D) for 174YbO = -0.008931(130) MHz
    Fixed in the FTMW fit to the value from the FTMW plus NIR combination-difference fit.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Electronic and vibrational degrees of freedom separate, so interstate coupling factorizes as H^E times the Franck-Condon overlap.
    Invoked in Section III.C to justify the effective Hamiltonian factorization; standard in diatomic spectroscopy but approximate for strongly mixed states like YbO.
  • ad hoc to paper The X, B1, and D1 states are adequately represented by Morse potentials over the fitted range.
    Morse curves with fixed r_e differences are assumed; the cubic energy term is added separately, which is not part of the Morse wavefunction model.
  • ad hoc to paper Morse wavefunctions can be used for overlap integrals even though Eq. (1) includes a cubic anharmonic term.
    The paper notes the wavefunctions refer to the quadratic-only Morse Hamiltonian, so the overlap integrals are not eigenfunctions of the fitted Hamiltonian.
  • ad hoc to paper D1 has the same anharmonicity as B1, and omega_e(D1) is scaled from B1 by the theoretical ratio.
    Section III.C states these are fixed because only the D1 origin is observed experimentally.
  • domain assumption The delta r_e values from Liu et al. DFT are correct for the B1 and D1 states.
    Section III.C fixes delta r_B1 and delta r_D1 to NLxc theory values; uncertainty in these values is not propagated.
  • domain assumption Assignments and term energies from Linton, McDonald, and Melville are correct.
    The fit uses their measured vibrational intervals and origins as ground truth for the deperturbation model.
  • ad hoc to paper Higher states, including the Omega=0- and Omega=2 states, can be neglected for the X-state levels through v=8.
    Section III.C excludes these states due to insufficient data, although they are invoked to explain B1-state residuals.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rotational spectra and de-perturbation analysis for ground state ytterbium oxide, YbO." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7OWI2OV6

@misc{pith2026260805905,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rotational spectra and de-perturbation analysis for ground state ytterbium oxide, YbO},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7OWI2OV6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05905}
}
abstract

A combination difference analysis of Fourier transform microwave spectroscopy (FTMW) measurements of $^{174}$YbO combined with earlier near-infrared chemiluminescence data have resulted in much improved YbO rotational and centrifugal distortion constants. These have been confirmed in a multi-isotopologue analysis of further FTMW measurements of $^{172}$YbO and $^{176}$YbO and an analysis of nuclear-size-dependent Born-Oppenheimer breakdown effects in the molecule. Multiple excited electronic states overlap with low-lying excited vibrational levels of the electronic ground state leading to irregularities in its vibrational spacings and other previously observed electronic manifolds. This has been modeled with a matrix of the vibrational levels of the ground and multiple interacting states assuming Morse potentials and including electronic Hamiltonian matrix elements mixing the states. Vibrational level overlaps were calculated numerically assuming Morse vibrational wavefunctions. The resulting de-perturbed potentials for the states inform continuing experimental and theoretical work on this and other ytterbium-containing molecules.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05905 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Rice, Steven F

    McDonald, Stephen A. and Rice, Steven F. and Field, Robert W. and Linton, Colan , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 1990 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.459347 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.459347 1990

  2. [2]

    Sauer, B. E. and Wang, Jun and Hinds, E. A. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 1996 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.472569 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.472569 1996

  3. [3]

    and Gordon, I and Tereszchuk, K.A

    Melville, T.C. and Gordon, I and Tereszchuk, K.A. and Coxon, J.A. and Bernath, P.F. , Title =. J. Molec. Spectrosc. , Year =. doi:10.1016/S0022-2852(02)00089-9 , ISSN =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-2852(02)00089-9

  4. [4]

    Science in China Series B: Chemistry , Year =

    Xu, WenHua and Zhang, Yong and Liu, WenJian , Title =. Science in China Series B: Chemistry , Year =

  5. [5]

    Liu, Wenjian and Dolg, Michael and Li, Lemin , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 1998 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.475676 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.475676 1998

  6. [6]

    and Tarbutt, Michael R

    Zhang, Chi and Zhang, Chaoqun and Cheng, Lan and Steimle, Timothy C. and Tarbutt, Michael R. , Title =. J. Molec. Spectrosc. , Year =. doi:10.1016/j.jms.2022.111625 , EarlyAccessDate =

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    and Field, R.W

    Linton, C and McDonald, S and Rice, S and Dulick, M and Liu, Y.C. and Field, R.W. , Title =. J. Molec. Spectrosc. , Year =. doi:10.1016/0022-2852(83)90139-X , ISSN =

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-2852(83)90139-x

  8. [8]

    , title =

    Mcdonald, S. , title =. 1985 , address =

    1985

Show all 128 references
  1. [9]

    2026 , organization=

    Fox, Benjamin F and Caldwell, Luke and Haswell, Sam and Sewell, Henry and Darling, Cathy , booktitle=. 2026 , organization=

    2026

  2. [10]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Ultracold high-spin -state polar molecules for new physics searches , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  3. [11]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Spin interferometry in a beam of ultracold molecules , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  4. [12]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=

    Polet, Johan David and Chamorro, Yuly and Pa. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  5. [13]

    2021 , publisher=

    Pilgram, Nickolas H and Jadbabaie, Arian and Zeng, Yi and Hutzler, Nicholas R and Steimle, Timothy C , journal=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  6. [14]

    2025 , publisher=

    Vadachkoria, Sophia and Lei, Qingqing and Steimle, Timothy C and Heaven, Michael C , journal=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  7. [15]

    and Hamilton, P

    Bickman, S. and Hamilton, P. and Jiang, Y. and DeMille, D. , journal =. Preparation and detection of states with simultaneous spin alignment and selectable molecular orientation in. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.023418 , url =

    2009 doi

  8. [16]

    Hur, Joonseok and Aude Craik, Diana P. L. and Counts, Ian and Knyazev, Eugene and Caldwell, Luke and Leung, Calvin and Pandey, Swadha and Berengut, Julian C. and Geddes, Amy and Nazarewicz, Witold and Reinhard, Paul-Gerhard and Kawasaki, Akio and Jeon, Honggi and Jhe, Wonho an...

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    , Title =

    Field, R.W. , Title =. Ber. Bunsen-Gesellschaft-Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , Year =. doi:10.1002/bbpc.19820860903 , ISSN =

    doi

  10. [18]

    , keywords =

    The electronic spectrum of gaseous CeO. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/156972 , adsurl =

    doi

  11. [19]

    Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy , year = 1981, month = dec, volume =

    Electronic spectra of TbO, DyO, and HoO. Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy , year = 1981, month = dec, volume =. doi:10.1016/0022-2852(81)90148-X , adsurl =

    1981 doi

  12. [20]

    OPTIKA I SPEKTROSKOPIYA , Year =

    KALEDIN, LA and SHENYAVSKAYA, EA , Title =. OPTIKA I SPEKTROSKOPIYA , Year =

  13. [21]

    Enomoto, Katsunari and Inoue, Hiroki and Miyamoto, Yuki and Kuma, Susumu and Iwakuni, Kana and Ciuryło, Roman and Baba, Masaaki , Title =. J. Molec. Spectrosc. , Year =. doi:10.2139/ssrn.6740343 , ISSN =

    doi

  14. [22]

    and Ohl, Aidan T

    Lasner, Zack D. and Ohl, Aidan T. and Albright, Nicole M. and Rice, Kendall L. and Peng, Charlene and Cheng, Lan and Doyle, John M. and Augenbraun, Benjamin L. , title =. J. Phys. Chem. A , volume =. 2026 , doi =. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c07797 , abstract =

    2026 doi

  15. [23]

    Baron and W

    The ACME Collaboration and J. Baron and W. C. Campbell and D. DeMille and J. M. Doyle and G. Gabrielse and Y. V. Gurevich and P. W. Hess and N. R. Hutzler and E. Kirilov and I. Kozyryev and B. R. O’Leary and C. D. Panda and M. F. Parsons and E. S. Petrik and B. Spaun and A. C....

    2014 doi

  16. [24]

    and Ang, D

    Andreev, V. and Ang, D. G. and DeMille, D. and Doyle, J. M. and Gabrielse, G. and Haefner, J. and Hutzler, N. R. and Lasner, Z. and Meisenhelder, C. and O’Leary, B. R. and Panda, C. D. and West, A. D. and West, E. P. and Wu, X. and ACME Collaboration , year =. Improved limit o...

  17. [25]

    2024 , publisher=

    Kawasaki, Akio and Kobayashi, Takumi and Nishiyama, Akiko and Tanabe, Takehiko and Yasuda, Masami , journal=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  18. [26]

    The pure rotational spectrum of

    Banser, Deike and Grabow, Jens-Uwe and Cocinero, Emilio J and Lesarri, Alberto and Alonso, Jos. The pure rotational spectrum of. Journal of molecular structure , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  19. [27]

    New Journal of Physics , abstract =

    Wu, X and Han, Z and Chow, J and Ang, D G and Meisenhelder, C and Panda, C D and West, E P and Gabrielse, G and Doyle, J M and DeMille, D , title =. New Journal of Physics , abstract =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab6a3a , url =

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    Kaledin and M.G

    L.A. Kaledin and M.G. Erickson and M.C. Heaven , abstract =. Laser Spectroscopy of. Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy , volume =. 1994 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsp.1994.1136 , url =

    1994

  21. [29]

    Rotational spectrum of jet-cooled

    Lesarri, Alberto and Suenram, RD and Brugh, Dale , journal=. Rotational spectrum of jet-cooled. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  22. [30]

    1990 , publisher=

    Suenram, RD and Lovas, FJ and Fraser, GT and Matsumura, K , journal=. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  23. [31]

    2005 , publisher=

    Petrov, AN and Titov, AV and Isaev, TA and Mosyagin, NS and DeMille, D , journal=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  24. [32]

    2006 , publisher=

    Cohen, EA and Goodridge, DM and Kawaguchi, K and Fink, EH and Setzer, KD , journal=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  25. [33]

    Rotational and near-infrared spectra of

    Jackson, Sean and Kim, Luke and Biekert, Andreas and Nguyen, Alex and Mawhorter, Richard J and Sears, Trevor J and Skripnikov, Leonid V and Baturo, Vera V and Petrov, Alexander N and Grabow, Jens-Uwe , journal=. Rotational and near-infrared spectra of. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  26. [34]

    Science , volume=

    An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment , author=. Science , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  27. [35]

    2024 , publisher=

    Enomoto, Katsunari and Tojo, Taichi and Kobayashi, Kaori and Kuma, Susumu and Hiramoto, Ayami and Miyamoto, Yuki and Baba, Masaaki , journal=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  28. [36]

    and Goodridge, Damian M

    Steimle, Timothy C. and Goodridge, Damian M. and Linton, Colan , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 1997 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.474727 , url =

    1997 doi

  29. [37]

    Gammon, R. H. and Stern, R. C. and Klemperer, W. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 1971 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.1675147 , url =

    1971 doi

  30. [38]

    Hilborn, R. C. , title =. American Journal of Physics , volume =

  31. [39]

    Herzberg, Gerhard , title =

  32. [40]

    Wu, Z. J. and Guan, W. and Meng, J. and Su, Z. M. , Title =. J. Cluster Sci. , Year =. doi:10.1007/s10876-007-0108-y , ISSN =

    doi

  33. [41]

    Two clock transitions in neutral

    Safronova, Marianna S and Porsev, Sergey G and Sanner, Christian and Ye, Jun , journal=. Two clock transitions in neutral. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  34. [42]

    2019 , publisher=

    Wang, Hailing and Le, Anh T and Steimle, Timothy C and Koskelo, Elise Anne C and Aufderheide, Graceson and Mawhorter, Richard and Grabow, Jens-Uwe , journal=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  35. [43]

    2014 , publisher=

    Glassman, Zachary and Mawhorter, Richard and Grabow, Jens-Uwe and Le, Anh and Steimle, Timothy C , journal=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  36. [44]

    Molecular Physics , volume=

    Pa. Molecular Physics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  37. [45]

    Science in China Series B: Chemistry , volume=

    Molecular structure of diatomic lanthanide compounds , author=. Science in China Series B: Chemistry , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  38. [46]

    2023 , publisher=

    Python for Chemists , author=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  39. [47]

    and Schaller, S

    Popa, S. and Schaller, S. and Fielicke, A. and Lim, J. and Sartakov, B. G. and Tarbutt, M. R. and Meijer, G. , journal =. Understanding Inner-Shell Excitations in Molecules through Spectroscopy of the 4f Hole States of. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021035 , url =

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    Engineered Molecular Clock Transitions for Precision Measurements , author =. Phys. Rev. X , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1103/4t7q-d58r , url =

    2026 doi

  41. [49]

    C P McRaven and P Sivakumar and N E Shafer-Ray. 2008

    2008

  42. [50]

    Baturo, V. V. and Rupasinghe, P. M. and Sears, T. J. and Mawhorter, R. J. and Grabow, J.-U. and Petrov, A. N. , journal =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.104.012811 , url =

    2021 doi

  43. [51]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =

    Grabow, Jens‐Uwe and Stahl, Wolfgang and Dreizler, Helmut , title = ". Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =. 1996 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.1147553 , url =

    1996 doi

  44. [52]

    Samuel and McCarthy, Michael C

    Grabow, Jens-Uwe and Palmer, E. Samuel and McCarthy, Michael C. and Thaddeus, Patrick , title =. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.2039347 , url =

    2005 doi

  45. [53]

    and Murphy, Benjamin S

    Mawhorter, Richard J. and Murphy, Benjamin S. and Baum, Alexander L. and Sears, Trevor J. and Yang, T. and Rupasinghe, P. M and McRaven, C. P. and Shafer-Ray, N. E. and Alphei, Lukas D. and Grabow, Jens-Uwe , journal =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.022508 , url =

    2011 doi

  46. [54]

    and Grabow, Jens-Uwe and Petrov, A

    Alphei, Lukas D. and Grabow, Jens-Uwe and Petrov, A. N. and Mawhorter, Richard and Murphy, Benjamin and Baum, Alexander and Sears, Trevor J. and Yang, T. Zh. and Rupasinghe, P. M. and McRaven, C. P. and Shafer-Ray, N. E. , journal =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.040...

    2011 doi

  47. [55]

    Mawhorter, Richard and Munoz-Lopez, Jose and Kim, Yongrak and Biekert, Andreas and Sears, Trevor and Grabow, Jens-Uwe and Kudashov, A. D. and Skripnikov, L. V. and Titov, A. V. and Petrov, A. N. , title =. 2018 , pages = "", publisher =

    2018

  48. [56]

    K Ziebarth and K D Setzer and O Shestakov and E H Fink. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1998

    1998

  49. [57]

    Ziebarth and R

    K. Ziebarth and R. Breidohr and O. Shestakov and E.H. Fink , abstract =. Chemical Physics Letters , volume =. 1992 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(92)85338-B , url =

    1992 doi

  50. [58]

    Huber, K. P. and Herzberg, G. Constants of diatomic molecules. Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure: IV. Constants of Diatomic Molecules. 1979. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0961-2_2

    1979 doi

  51. [59]

    Lumley, D. J. W. and Barrow, R. F. , Title =. J. Phys. B-Atom. Molec. Opt, Phys. , Year =. doi:10.1088/0022-3700/10/8/025 , ISSN =

    doi

  52. [60]

    Cohen and D.M

    E.A. Cohen and D.M. Goodridge and K.Kawaguchi and E.H. Fink and K.D. Setzer , journal =. The rotational spectrum of BiO radical in its X_1\,^2 _. 2006 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jms.2006.05.011 , url =

    2006 doi

  53. [61]

    Pickett , abstract =

    Herbert M. Pickett , abstract =. The fitting and prediction of vibration-rotation spectra with spin interactions , journal =. 1991 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2852(91)90393-O , url =

    1991 doi

  54. [62]

    Novick , keywords =

    Stewart E. Novick , keywords =. Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy , volume =. 2016 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jms.2016.08.015 , url =

    2016 doi

  55. [63]

    Drouin, BJ and Miller, CE and Muller, HSP and Cohen, EA , Title =. J. Molec. Spectrosc. , Year =. doi:10.1006/jmsp.2000.8252 , ISSN =

    2000

  56. [64]

    J. M. Brown and J. K. G. Watson , Title =. J. Molec. Spectrosc. , Year =. doi:10.1016/0022-2852(77)90358-7 , ISSN =

    doi

  57. [65]

    R. A. Frosch and H. M. Foley , Title =. Phys. Rev , Year =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.88.1337 , ISSN =

    doi

  58. [66]

    and Carrington, Alan , year=

    Brown, John M. and Carrington, Alan , year=. Rotational Spectroscopy of Diatomic Molecules , DOI=

  59. [67]

    Centrifugal correction to hyperfine structure constants in the ground state of lead monofluoride , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.010501 , url =

    2013 doi

  60. [68]

    1984 , publisher=

    Techniques of Chemistry, Microwave Molecular Spectra , author=. 1984 , publisher=

    1984

  61. [69]

    , title =

    Shirts, Randall B. , title =. J. Phys. Chem. A , volume =. 2018 , doi =. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b08095 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  62. [70]

    C. P. McRaven and P. Sivakumar and N. E. Shafer-Ray and Gregory E. Hall and Trevor J. Sears , keywords =. Spectroscopic constants of the known electronic states of lead monofluoride , journal =. 2010 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jms.2010.05.006 , url =

    2010 doi

  63. [71]

    Schlembach and E

    J. Schlembach and E. Tiemann , abstract =. Isotopic field shift of the rotational energy of the. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 1982 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(82)85077-5 , url =

    1982 doi

  64. [72]

    Tiemann and H

    E. Tiemann and H. Arnst and W.U. Stieda and T. Törring and J. Hoeft , abstract =. Observed adiabatic corrections to the born-oppenheimer approximation for diatomic molecules with ten valence electrons , journal =. 1982 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(82)85027-1 , url =

    1982 doi

  65. [73]

    Watson , abstract =

    James K.G. Watson , abstract =. The isotope dependence of diatomic Dunham coefficients , journal =. 1980 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2852(80)90152-6 , url =

    1980 doi

  66. [74]

    Angeli and K.P

    I. Angeli and K.P. Marinova , keywords =. Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update , journal =. 2013 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2011.12.006 , url =

    2013 doi

  67. [75]

    Further investigation of g factors for the lead monofluoride ground state , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.92.032508 , url =

    2015 doi

  68. [76]

    Nuclear size effects in vibrational spectra

    Almoukhalalati, Adel and Shee, Avijit and Saue, Trond. Nuclear size effects in vibrational spectra. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016. doi:10.1039/C6CP01913G

    2016 doi

  69. [77]

    and Bizzocchi, Luca and Cooke, Stephen and Banser, Deike and Hess, Mareike and Fritzsche, Juliane and Grabow, Jens-Uwe

    Giuliano, Barbara M. and Bizzocchi, Luca and Cooke, Stephen and Banser, Deike and Hess, Mareike and Fritzsche, Juliane and Grabow, Jens-Uwe. Pure rotational spectra of PbSe and PbTe : potential function , Born–Oppenheimer breakdown , field shift effect and magnetic shielding. ...

    2008 doi

  70. [78]

    Nuclear size effects in rotational spectra: A tale with a twist , journal =

    Stefan Knecht and Trond Saue , keywords =. Nuclear size effects in rotational spectra: A tale with a twist , journal =. 2012 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.10.030 , url =

    2012 doi

  71. [79]

    Relativistic study of nuclear-anapole-moment effects in diatomic molecules , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.022125 , url =

    2013 doi

  72. [80]

    Flambaum, V. V. and Stadnik, Y. V. and Kozlov, M. G. and Petrov, A. N. , journal =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.052124 , url =

    2013 doi

  73. [81]

    and Needham, Lisa-Maria E

    Evans, Corey J. and Needham, Lisa-Maria E. and Walker, Nicholas R. and Köckert, Hansjochen and Zaleski, Daniel P. and Stephens, Susanna L. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.4938247 , url =

    2015 doi

  74. [82]

    , title =

    Tiemann, E. , title =. , year =

  75. [83]

    Serafin and S.A

    M.M. Serafin and S.A. Peebles and C.T. Dewberry and K.C. Etchison and G.S. Grubbs and R.A. Powoski and S.A. Cooke , abstract =. Chemical Physics Letters , volume =. 2007 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2007.10.031 , url =

    2007 doi

  76. [84]

    1982 , url=

    Horst Kn. 1982 , url=

    1982

  77. [85]

    H. Kn\". Chemical Physics , volume =. 1985 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(85)80031-8 , url =

    1985 doi

  78. [86]

    Preston , year = 2021, month =

    A. Preston , year = 2021, month =

    2021

  79. [87]

    Using Spectroscopy of Diatomic Molecules to Search for Physics Beyond the Standard Model , author =

  80. [88]

    Phys. Rev. A , year =

  81. [89]

    Chemical Physics Letters , volume =

    Alex Preston and Sean Jackson and Richard Mawhorter , keywords =. Chemical Physics Letters , volume =. 2022 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2022.140089 , url =

    2022

  82. [90]

    Physica Scripta , abstract =

    Jing-Zhen Luan and Chuan-Lu Yang and Xiaohu Li and Wen-Wang Liu and Yu-Liang Liu and Wen-Kai Zhao , title =. Physica Scripta , abstract =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad23b3 , url =

    2024 doi

  83. [91]

    Hutzler , journal=

    Ivan Kozyryev and Nicholas R. Hutzler , journal=. 2017

    2017

  84. [92]

    Pilgram and Chandler J

    Arian Jadbabaie and Yuiki Takahashi and Nickolas H. Pilgram and Chandler J. Conn and Yi Zeng and Chi Zhang and Nicholas R. Hutzler , journal=. 2023

    2023

  85. [93]

    Giuliano and Mareike Hess and Jens-Uwe Grabow , journal=

    Luca Bizzocchi and Barbara M. Giuliano and Mareike Hess and Jens-Uwe Grabow , journal=. 2007

    2007

  86. [94]

    Zhu, Chengcheng and Wang, Hailing and Chen, Ben and Chen, Yini and Yang, Tao and Yin, Jianping and Liu, Jinjun , title = ". J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0099716 , url =

    2022 doi

  87. [95]

    Formulation and implementation of a relativistic unrestricted coupled-cluster method including noniterative connected triples

    L Visscher and T J Lee and K G Dyall. J. Chem. Phys. , title = "Formulation and implementation of a relativistic unrestricted coupled-cluster method including noniterative connected triples", year = "1996", volume = "105", number = "19", doi =

    1996

  88. [96]

    Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2007 , month =

    2007

  89. [97]

    A V Titov and N S Mosyagin. Int. J. Quant. Chem. , title = "Generalized relativistic effective core potential:. 1999

    1999

  90. [98]

    N. S. Mosyagin and A. V. Zaitsevskii and A. V. Titov. Shape-consistent relativistic effective potentials of small atomic cores. Int. Rev. At. Mol. Phys. 2010

    2010

  91. [99]

    and Zaitsevskii, Andrei V

    Mosyagin, Nikolai S. and Zaitsevskii, Andrei V. and Skripnikov, Leonid V. and Titov, Anatoly V. , title =. Int. J. Quant. Chem. , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  92. [100]

    Chem Phys

    L V Skripnikov and N S Mosyagin and A V Titov , title=. Chem Phys. Lett. , year=. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2012.11.013 , pages=

    2012 doi

  93. [101]

    Relativistic double-zeta, triple-zeta, and quadruple-zeta basis sets for the light elements H--Ar

    Dyall, Kenneth G. Relativistic double-zeta, triple-zeta, and quadruple-zeta basis sets for the light elements H--Ar. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2016. doi:10.1007/s00214-016-1884-y

    2016 doi

  94. [102]

    The DIRAC code for relativistic molecular calculations , journal =

    Saue,Trond and Bast,Radovan and Gomes,Andr\'. The DIRAC code for relativistic molecular calculations , journal =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  95. [103]

    Higher excitations in coupled-cluster theory , journal =

    Mih\'. Higher excitations in coupled-cluster theory , journal =. 2001 , volume =. doi:10.1063/1.1383290 , keywords =

    2001 doi

  96. [104]

    A general state-selective multireference coupled-cluster algorithm , journal =

    Mih\'. A general state-selective multireference coupled-cluster algorithm , journal =. 2002 , volume =. doi:10.1063/1.1483856 , keywords =

    2002 doi

  97. [105]

    and Lu, Hsin-I and Doyle, John M

    Hutzler, Nicholas R. and Lu, Hsin-I and Doyle, John M. , title =. Chemical Reviews , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  98. [106]

    Electronic matrix elements for parity doubling in the

    Petrov, Alexander , journal =. Electronic matrix elements for parity doubling in the. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.012819 , url =

    2024 doi

  99. [107]

    Sensitivity of the

    Petrov, Alexander and Zakharova, Anna , journal =. Sensitivity of the. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.105.L050801 , url =

    2022 doi

  100. [108]

    and Bay, F

    DeMille, D. and Bay, F. and Bickman, S and Kawall, D. and Hunter, L. and Krause, D. and Maxwell, S. and Ulmer, K. , booktitle =. doi:10.1063/1.1426795 , file =

    doi

  101. [109]

    Roussy and Luke Caldwell and Trevor Wright and William B

    Tanya S. Roussy and Luke Caldwell and Trevor Wright and William B. Cairncross and Yuval Shagam and Kia Boon Ng and Noah Schlossberger and Sun Yool Park and Anzhou Wang and Jun Ye and Eric A. Cornell , title =. Science , volume =. 2023 , doi =. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/1...

    2023 doi

  102. [110]

    Nature , volume=

    Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron , author=. Nature , volume=. 2018 , doi=

    2018

  103. [111]

    1978 , volume =

    L N Labzowsky , title = ". 1978 , volume =

    1978

  104. [112]

    1978 , volume =

    O P Sushkov and V V Flambaum , title =. 1978 , volume =

    1978

  105. [113]

    1979 , volume =

    V G Gorshkow and L N Labzovsky and A N Moskalyov , title =. 1979 , volume =

    1979

  106. [114]

    M G Kozlov and V I Fomichev and Yu Yu Dmitriev and L N Labzovsky and A V Titov. J. Phys. B , title = "Calculation of the. 1987

    1987

  107. [115]

    Skripnikov, L. V. and Kudashov, A. D. and Petrov, A. N. and Titov, A. V. , journal = pra, volume =. 2014 , month =

    2014

  108. [116]

    New Journal of Physics , keywords =

    Tarbutt, M R and Sauer, B E and Hudson, J J and Hinds, E a , doi =. New Journal of Physics , keywords =

  109. [117]

    and Fricke, G

    Schopper, H. and Fricke, G. and Heilig, K. and Martienssen, W. , publisher =. Elementary particles, nuclei and atoms

  110. [118]

    Global isotopic analysis of hyperfine-resolved rotational spectroscopic data for barium monofluoride,

    Preston, Alex and Aufderheide, Graceson and Ballard, Will and Mawhorter, Richard and Grabow, Jens-Uwe , journal=. Global isotopic analysis of hyperfine-resolved rotational spectroscopic data for barium monofluoride,. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  111. [119]

    Flambaum, V. V. and Leinweber, D. B. and Thomas, A. W. and Young, R. D. , journal =. 2004 , month =

    2004

  112. [120]

    Dependence of nuclear magnetic moments on quark masses and limits on temporal variation of fundamental constants from atomic clock experiments , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2006 , month =

    2006

  113. [121]

    and Butcher, R

    Shelkovnikov, A. and Butcher, R. J. and Chardonnet, C. and Amy-Klein, A. , journal =. 2008 , month =

    2008

  114. [122]

    Enhanced effect of temporal variation of the fine-structure constant in diatomic molecules , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2006 , month =

    2006

  115. [123]

    Flambaum, V. V. and Kozlov, M. G. , journal =. 2007 , month =

    2007

  116. [124]

    and Sainis, S

    DeMille, D. and Sainis, S. and Sage, J. and Bergeman, T. and Kotochigova, S. and Tiesinga, E. , journal =. 2008 , month =

    2008

  117. [125]

    and Kotochigova, S

    Zelevinsky, T. and Kotochigova, S. and Ye, Jun , journal =. 2008 , month =

    2008

  118. [126]

    and Abgrall, M

    Gu\'ena, J. and Abgrall, M. and Rovera, D. and Rosenbusch, P. and Tobar, M. E. and Laurent, Ph. and Clairon, A. and Bize, S. , journal =. 2012 , month =

    2012

  119. [127]

    Polak and Mary K

    Mark L. Polak and Mary K. Gilles and Robert F. Gunion and W.C. Lineberger. Photoelectron spectroscopy of PbO−. Chemical Physics Letters. 1993

    1993

  120. [128]

    Flambaum, V. V. and Stadnik, Y. V. and Kozlov, M. G. and Petrov, A. N. , journal =. 2013 , month =

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.