Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Analyzing Multilingual Competency of LLMs in Multi-Turn Instruction Following: A Case Study of Arabic

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.14819 v1 pith:7OYR75NT submitted 2023-10-23 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords arabicllmsmodelsmulti-turnmultilingualbenchmarkenglishopen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While significant progress has been made in benchmarking Large Language Models (LLMs) across various tasks, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation of their abilities in responding to multi-turn instructions in less-commonly tested languages like Arabic. Our paper offers a detailed examination of the proficiency of open LLMs in such scenarios in Arabic. Utilizing a customized Arabic translation of the MT-Bench benchmark suite, we employ GPT-4 as a uniform evaluator for both English and Arabic queries to assess and compare the performance of the LLMs on various open-ended tasks. Our findings reveal variations in model responses on different task categories, e.g., logic vs. literacy, when instructed in English or Arabic. We find that fine-tuned base models using multilingual and multi-turn datasets could be competitive to models trained from scratch on multilingual data. Finally, we hypothesize that an ensemble of small, open LLMs could perform competitively to proprietary LLMs on the benchmark.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Towards Inclusive NLP: Assessing Compressed Multilingual Transformers across Diverse Language Benchmarks

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Across Arabic, English, and Kannada benchmarks, 4-bit and 8-bit quantization preserves most accuracy while aggressive pruning degrades larger multilingual models more than smaller ones.

Pith tools