REVIEW 2 cited by
A universal splitting of string and particle scattering amplitudes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We propose a new splitting behavior of tree-level string/particle amplitudes for scalars, gluons and gravitons. We identify certain subspaces in the space of Mandelstam variables, where the universal Koba-Nielsen factor splits into two parts (each with an off-shell leg). Both open- and closed-string amplitudes with Parke-Taylor factors naturally factorize into two stringy ${\it currents}$, which implies the splitting of bi-adjoint $\phi^3$ amplitudes and via a simple deformation to unified stringy amplitudes, the splitting of amplitudes in the non-linear sigma model and Yang-Mills-scalar theory; the same splitting holds for scalar amplitudes without color such as the special Galileon. Remarkably, if we impose similar constraints on Lorentz products involving polarizations, gluon and graviton amplitudes in bosonic string and superstring theories also split into two (stringy) currents. A special case of the splitting implies soft theorems, and more generally it extends recently proposed smooth splittings and new factorizations near zeros to all these theories.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On differential operators for scalar-scaffolded gluons
Differential operators on scalar-scaffolded variables extract individual phi^3 diagrams from gluon amplitudes, and the independent mixed amplitudes are counted by Catalan numbers.
-
On the New Factorizations of Yang-Mills Amplitudes
Tree-level Yang-Mills amplitudes factorize into gluings of lower-point amplitudes when a rectangular set of Mandelstam variables vanishes, and this paper gives a rigorous CHY-based proof.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.