REVIEW 1 cited by
Committee Moderation on Encrypted Messaging Platforms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Encrypted messaging services like WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Signal provide secure and deniable communication for billions across the world, but these exact properties prevent holding users accountable for sending messages that are abusive, misinformative, or otherwise harmful to society. Previous works have addressed this concern by allowing a moderator to verify the identity of a message's sender if a message is reported; if not reported, messages maintain all security guarantees. Using primitives from threshold cryptography, this work extends the message-reporting protocol Hecate from Issa, Alhaddad, and Varia to a setting in which consensus among a group of moderators is required to reveal and verify the identity of a message's sender.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From Inquisitorial to Adversarial: Using Legal Theory to Redesign Online Reporting Systems
Online reporting systems are characterized as inquisitorial, and a design space gives users adversarial-style control over evidence disclosure, authentication, and privacy during moderation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.