Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Sequential microlensing by two lens planes produces caustic shapes that a single plane forbids, as shown by first recursive ray-shooting simulations of the Einstein zig-zag lens J1721+8842.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 18:53 UTC pith:7PQT6LNZ

load-bearing objection First compound-microlensing simulation for a real DSPL, but the ray shooting appears to drop the η factor in the multi-plane lens equation, so the maps are for η=1 rather than the claimed J1721 geometry. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.17144 v1 pith:7PQT6LNZ submitted 2026-07-19 astro-ph.CO

Microlensing of Microlensing: Effects of Random Stars on the Double-Source-Plane Gravitational Lens

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords compound microlensingdouble-source-plane lensEinstein zig-zagJ1721+8842causticsray shootingquasar microlensinggravitational lensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that when quasar light is deflected by compact stars on two successive lens planes, the combined microlensing produces magnification maps with caustic morphologies that are strictly forbidden in single-plane lensing: convexity-violating 'second-kind' cusps and lip caustics. Using the recently discovered double-source-plane system J1721+8842 as a fiducial case, the authors build the first recursive ray-shooting code that traces rays through two planes of point masses, and show these structures persist in realistic high-density star fields. The simulated lightcurves correspondingly show both an overall amplification of peaks from the first lens plane and an added population of small-scale peaks from new caustic crossings. This matters because compound lenses are promising cosmological probes, and microlensing noise must be understood if they are to deliver percent-level Hubble constant measurements.

Core claim

The central claim is that compound microlensing—sequential deflection of quasar light by compact masses on two lens planes—produces microcaustic networks that are qualitatively richer than single-plane microlensing. Building on the singularity-theory classification of multi-plane lensing, the authors demonstrate by simulation that the double-plane maps contain caustics of the 'second kind', where one fold at a cusp is concave relative to the inside of the caustic, as well as lip caustics, both of which are absent from single-plane maps because a single lens mapping cannot produce such convexity violations. These features appear in all six simulated images of the Einstein zig-zag lens J1721+8

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is a recursive, GPU-accelerated ray-shooting pipeline that traces rays through two successive planes of point-mass microlenses. The lens equation (a one-to-many mapping) is applied twice: first from the foreground lens to the intermediate source plane, then from that plane to the background quasar source plane, with each ray's final position determined by summing deflections from all microlenses on each plane. The code tiles and vectorises the computation to manage the large number of lenses and rays, and it produces 10^4 × 10^4 pixel magnification maps for each of the six images. The singularity-theory classification of multi-plane lensing is what identifies the extr

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that all of the convergence on both lens planes is made of static solar-mass stars (no smooth dark matter), so the distinctive caustic shapes could be suppressed in a realistic mix of stars and dark matter—a possibility the authors explicitly flag.

What would settle it

Compute the same six J1721 magnification maps with, say, half of the convergence placed in a smooth component (κ_s/κ = 0.5) while keeping the macro parameters fixed; if convexity-violating cusps and lip caustics become too rare to distinguish from single-plane maps, the claim that they persist in realistic high-density microlensing environments would be refuted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If compound microlensing produces these additional caustic structures, then flux ratios and lightcurves of double-source-plane quasars encode information about the mass distribution on both lens planes, not just one.
  • Lightcurves of the six J1721 images should show both enhanced peak magnifications and an extra population of short-duration peaks relative to a single-plane model; this is directly testable with monitoring data.
  • Compound microlensing adds a new source of brightness noise for double-source-plane time-delay cosmography, so statistical characterization of this effect is needed before percent-level Hubble constant measurements are attempted.
  • The persistence of the distinctive caustics in dense star fields validates the use of static point-mass fields for such simulations and motivates extending them to moving microlenses and realistic mass functions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper sets every bit of surface density in both planes to point masses, so the signature caustics may be weaker in real galaxies; if a smooth dark-matter component is added, the convexity violations could disappear or become too rare to detect.
  • The two 'zig-zag' images D and F showed more convexity-violating cusps in the simulations; if this holds over a wider parameter range, zig-zag images could serve as a targeted diagnostic for compound microlensing.
  • Typical double-source-plane systems have late-type star-forming galaxies on the intermediate plane; their stellar mass functions differ from J1721's early-type deflector, so the visibility of compound signatures may vary across the population.
  • The recursive ray-shooting approach could be extended to more than two lens planes; if so, the most complex caustic networks may appear in the rare systems with multiple background sources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first claimed numerical simulations of compound microlensing in the double-source-plane lens J1721+8842. The authors fit a macromodel of the system, extract convergence and shear at the six foreground-lens image positions and at two intermediate s1-plane image clusters, and then ray-shoot through two successive planes populated by 1 M⊙ point masses using a GPU-accelerated JAX code. They produce six compound magnification maps, lightcurves for point-like and extended quasar sources, and identify caustic morphologies—convexity-violating 'second-kind' cusps and a lip caustic—that are forbidden in single-plane lensing. The central claim is that these features are not theoretical curiosities but persist in realistic high-density microlensing environments, with observable signatures in the lightcurves.

Significance. If the simulations are faithful to the multi-plane lens equation, this is a genuinely new demonstration of a predicted effect. The paper is timely given the recent discovery of the Einstein zig-zag lens and the growing catalogue of DSPLs, and it opens a numerical pathway for studying compound microlensing. Strengths include the first bespoke recursive two-plane ray-shooting implementation, the use of a concrete astrophysical system with a fitted macromodel, and the explicit comparison of single-plane and compound maps and lightcurves. The authors are also candid about several limitations. However, the central result is currently compromised by an apparent mismatch between the stated DSPL lens equation and the implemented sequential two-plane ray-shooting scheme, and by the assumption that all convergence is in compact point masses. The circularity concern raised in the stress-test note does not, in my reading, land: Petters & Wicklin's classification is used to interpret the maps, not to generate them.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (5)] The code description states that rays are sequentially lensed: first by the foreground lens using the Table 2 parameters, then by the s1 plane using the Table 3 parameters. This implements a composition of two single-plane lens equations, β = M_s1(M_lens θ − Σ_lens) − Σ_s1. The exact DSPL equation (5), however, contains η α_lens(θ_lens) as the foreground contribution to the s2 source plane. No η factor appears anywhere in §3.2. In the smooth-only limit the sequential composition predicts μ = μ_lens μ_s1; for image A this gives (−6.178)(2.687) ≈ −16.6, whereas Table 1 lists μ_eff = −14.5, a ~14% discrepancy. Thus the maps and lightcurves as described do not solve the stated multi-plane lens equation. If η is in fact incorporated inside the code through a rescaling of Table 2 parameters, that needs to be stated explicitly; otherwise the 'first recursive ray-shooting' claim is not supportab
  2. [§3.2, §5] All convergence on both planes is assigned to static 1 M⊙ point masses (κ* = κ, κs = 0). The conclusion that the new caustic morphologies 'persist in realistic, high-density microlensing environments' is stronger than the simulations support: a high-density stellar field with zero smooth matter is an extreme end of the parameter space, not a demonstration of persistence under realistic smooth+compact decompositions. The authors themselves note in §5 that 'It is currently unclear how much convexity violation will be suppressed under a more realistic assumption that the convergence is formed of a smooth distribution of matter as well as compact masses.' This is a load-bearing limitation for the headline claim. I ask the authors to run at least a few maps with a nonzero smooth component (e.g., κs/κ = 0.5 and 0.8) and quantify how the frequency of convexity-violating cusps and lip caustics c
  3. [Appendix A, Tables 1–3] The s1-plane macro-parameters, which drive half of the compound effect, come from a deliberately simplified model in which the s1 quasar images are described as 'not as well focused' and are evaluated only at two mean positions. Tables 1–3 report single median values without credible intervals from the SVI posterior. Since the compound maps depend directly on these values, it is difficult to judge whether the reported morphologies and lightcurve differences are robust against plausible variations in the macromodel. At minimum, the authors should report some measure of uncertainty in κ, γ, and μ for the s1-plane parameters and test whether the second-kind cusps survive within that range.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4, Figure 7] The identification of convexity-violating cusps and the lip caustic is currently visual. A small automated criterion (e.g., computing the curvature of the two fold segments on either side of each cusp and checking the sign relative to the caustic interior) would make the central morphological claim more quantitative and less vulnerable to selection effects.
  2. [Figures 4–5] The y-axis labels on the lightcurve panels appear to be magnification values but are unlabelled. Please add axis labels or clarify the units in the captions.
  3. [Data Availability] The code and data are described as available 'on reasonable request'. Given that the paper's novelty is a new numerical pipeline, a public release of the code would materially help reproducibility and future use.
  4. [§2.2.1] The relationship between η and the alternative β parameter is explained in the footnote, but it may be helpful to state explicitly that Tables 2 and 3 are defined with s1 as the source and therefore that the η factor in Eq. (5) is required when these tables are used for s2 maps.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the compound-microlensing maps are a deterministic numerical consequence of the stated lens equations, and the cited theory is used as an external classification, not a fitted input.

full rationale

The central claim—that recursive two-plane microlensing simulations produce caustic morphologies beyond single-plane lensing—is a numerical consequence of the stated lens equations and macromodel parameters, not a restatement of the paper's inputs. The code applies Eq. (8) sequentially to lens and s1 planes using independently fitted convergence/shear values from Tables 2 and 3; no parameter is fitted to the target caustic morphologies, and the maps are not compared to the same data used for fitting. The use of Petters & Wicklin (1995) is an explicit external theoretical classification used as a label, not a constraint imposed on the simulation. The only self-citation is Ballard et al. (2024), supporting the motivational claim that DSPLs suppress source-position transforms; this is not load-bearing for the simulation and is prior peer-reviewed work. The paper itself flags its main fragility: 'It is currently unclear how much convexity violation will be suppressed under a more realistic assumption that the convergence is formed of a smooth distribution of matter as well as compact masses' (§5). That is a limitation, not a circular step. A separate concern—that the sequential application of Eq. (8) may omit the η rescaling in the exact multi-plane equation—bears on numerical validity, not on circularity, since the compound map is still a deterministic composition of the stated single-plane maps. Therefore no prediction reduces to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on the standard two-plane lens formalism and a macromodel fitted to J1721. No free parameter is tuned to produce the claimed caustic morphologies, so the simulation is not an exercise in fitting the target result; the main caveats are the all-stellar κ model and the lack of error propagation from the macromodel.

free parameters (4)
  • EPL macromodel parameters (γ, θ_E, q, PA, x0, y0, γ_ext1, γ_ext2) = not quoted numerically (median SVI result only)
    Fitted to HST ACS F814W image of J1721 (Appendix A); all κ, γ, φ inputs in Tables 1–3 derive from this fit.
  • s1-plane SIE parameters (implicit in the two mean s1 image positions) = not quoted
    The s1-plane convergence and shear (Table 3) are evaluated at two mean locations of poorly-focused quasar image clusters; the model itself is simplified to a single SIE.
  • SVI focusing-penalty rate λ = 500
    Set 'through experimentation' (Appendix A); controls the focusing constraint that shapes the fitted macromodel and hence the κ, γ inputs.
  • uniform 1 M⊙ microlens mass = 1 M⊙
    Adopted for all microlenses on both planes with κ* = κ; a hand-chosen input that sets the Einstein-radius scale of the maps and the pixel scale of the caustics.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Multi-plane lens equation with η rescaling (Eq. 5)
    Standard gravitational lensing formalism (Schneider et al. 1992); the core mapping used to shoot rays through two planes.
  • standard math Flat ΛCDM distance-redshift relation (Eq. 3)
    Used to compute D(za, zb) for κ scaling; standard cosmology.
  • domain assumption All quasar light passes through exactly two deflector planes; line-of-sight structures ignored
    Computation treats only the foreground lens and s1 planes; additional galaxies/halos along the sightline are neglected.
  • ad hoc to paper All convergence is in compact form: κ* = κ, κs = 0, with a uniform 1 M⊙ point-mass field
    The paper adopts this (§3.2) and flags in §5 that it is unclear whether the headline caustic signatures survive a smooth mass component.
  • domain assumption Static microlenses; quasar moves at 600 km/s; Gaussian source of radius 10^15 cm
    Standard microlensing lightcurve assumptions (Paczynski 1986; Wambsganss 2001; Kayser et al. 1986); microlens proper motion is neglected.
  • standard math Petters & Wicklin (1995) classification of double-plane caustic metamorphoses (lips, convexity violations)
    External theory used to interpret the maps as caustics of the second kind; the paper does not re-derive it.
  • domain assumption EPL + SIE mass profiles and multi-Gaussian/Sérsic light profiles for the macromodel
    The fitted J1721 model assumes these profiles (Appendix A); the resulting κ, γ inputs inherit the assumption.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 14009 in / 19911 out tokens · 190694 ms · 2026-08-01T18:53:41.447384+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Microlensing, the influence of stars within a galactic gravitational lens, has emerged as a powerful probe of compact mass and, through differential magnification, sub-parsec scale sources at cosmological distances. The recent discovery of a double-source-plane gravitational lens system in which the most distant source is a quasar offers the prospect of compound microlensing, in which quasar light rays are influenced by compact masses within the two foreground lensing galaxies. Here, we present the first numerical simulations of this "microlensing of microlensing". We consider the recently discovered "Einstein zig-zag" lens, J1721+8842, as a fiducial case, and construct microlensing magnification maps for each of the six quasar images in this system. Due to the secondary microlensing effects of the myriad of initial microimages, the resulting maps contain more complex caustic features than seen in the case of single plane microlensing. This is reflected in the expected lightcurves seen for each of the images.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17144 by Daniel J. Ballard, Geraint F. Lewis, Huimin Qu, Karl Glazebrook, Nada Salama.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the fiducial DSPL configuration employed in this study, the Einstein zig-zag lens J1721+8842. Light rays from source 2 (s2, a quasar at z = 2.38) are deflected by source 1 (s1, a galaxy at z = 1.885) and the foreground lens at z = 0.184, producing six lensed images labelled A–F. The observer’s sky projection shows the resultant image. The dashed rays denoting the trajectory of images D and … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The F814W HST data of J1721 used to fit a macrolens￾ing model, with quasar images A–F labelled as in Dux et al. (2025) The black contours highlight the lensed images of s1, plotted for illustrative purposes only. 2 COMPOUND MICROLENSING 2.1 Background The gravitational lensing of time-varying sources has long been recognised as a powerful and largely independent probe of cosmology as the lensing-induced ti… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The s1-plane magnification maps at images ABCD (left) and images EF (right). Parameters used to construct these maps are taken from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: compound microlensing magnification maps for a quasar lensed by both the lens plane and s1 plane for images A–C. Convergence and shear values at each plane are taken from Tables 2 and 3. The white lines on each map show three representative source tracks. Right: magnification as a function of time for the three source tracks shown on the left. From top-to-bottom, the lightcurves correspond to the lef… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Likewise as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of convexity violation seen in compound microlensing. Here, the inside of a caustic is labelled as region a, and the outside is region b. Left: caustic of the first kind, where both folds are convex relative to region a. Right: caustic of the second kind, where one fold is concave relative to region a. caustic shown in the right-most panel in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Examples of caustic structures in the microlensing magnification maps, relevant features are outlined in a white dashed line. (a) A swallowtail caustic in map ABCD. (b) A butterfly caustic in map ABCD. (c)–(e) Convexity-violating caustics in maps C, E, and F, respectively. Panel (e) shows a lip caustic, which is not permitted in single-plane lensing (Petters & Wicklin 1995). The white bar in each panel cor… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Science , keywords =

    Cosmological constraints from strong gravitational lensing in clusters of galaxies. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1185759 , archivePrefix =. 1008.4802 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    X-Ray and Optical Flux Ratio Anomalies in Quadruply Lensed Quasars. II. Mapping the Dark Matter Content in Elliptical Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/111 , archivePrefix =. 1108.2725 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Quasar Microlensing at High Magnification and the Role of Dark Matter: Enhanced Fluctuations and Suppressed Saddle Points. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/343856 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0204425 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Probing dark matter structure down to 10 ^ 7 solar masses: flux ratio statistics in gravitational lenses with line-of-sight haloes. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1593 , archivePrefix =. 1901.11031 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Warm dark matter chills out: constraints on the halo mass function and the free-streaming length of dark matter with eight quadruple-image strong gravitational lenses. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3480 , archivePrefix =. 1908.06983 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Quasar Microlensing Statistics and Flux-ratio Anomalies in Lens Models. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad2ae0 , archivePrefix =. 2404.09865 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    New constraints on the dark matter free-streaming properties and substructure abundance from gravitationally lensed quasars

    SHARP - VII. New constraints on the dark matter free-streaming properties and substructure abundance from gravitationally lensed quasars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3177 , archivePrefix =. 1905.04182 , primaryClass =

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Constraining Cosmology with Double-source-plane Strong Gravitational Lenses from the AGEL Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae092e , archivePrefix =. 2509.15012 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Cosmography with the Double-source-plane Strong Gravitational Lens AGEL150745+052256. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf442 , archivePrefix =. 2504.00656 , primaryClass =

  10. [10]

    Physics World , keywords =

    Gravitational microlensing. Physics World , keywords =

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Flux variations of QSO 0957 + 561 A, B and image splitting by stars near the light path. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/282561a0 , adsurl =

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Time delay cosmography. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-016-0096-8 , archivePrefix =. 1605.05333 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    , year = 1964, month = jan, volume =

    On the possibility of determining Hubble's parameter and the masses of galaxies from the gravitational lens effect. , year = 1964, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/128.4.307 , adsurl =

  14. [14]

    doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03758-4 , adsurl =

    Gravitational Lenses. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03758-4 , adsurl =

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Microlensing of Strongly Lensed Quasars. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-024-01043-8 , archivePrefix =. 2312.00931 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Unveiling lens light complexity with a novel multi-Gaussian expansion approach for strong gravitational lensing. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1577 , archivePrefix =. 2403.16253 , primaryClass =

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    A Mock Catalog of Gravitationally-lensed Quasars for the LSST Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac4cb0 , archivePrefix =. 2201.06761 , primaryClass =

  18. [18]

    Astrophysics Source Code Library , author =

    Herculens:. Astrophysics Source Code Library , author =. 2022 , note =

  19. [19]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Stochastic Variational Inference. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1206.7051 , archivePrefix =. 1206.7051 , primaryClass =

  20. [20]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyro. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1912.11554 , archivePrefix =. 1912.11554 , primaryClass =

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational microlensing time delays at high optical depth: image parities and the temporal properties of fast radio bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2044 , archivePrefix =. 2007.03919 , primaryClass =

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    A gravitational lens origin for AGN-variability ? Consequences of micro- lensing. , keywords =

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    The elliptical power law profile lens. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526773 , archivePrefix =. 1507.01819 , primaryClass =

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    J1721+8842: The first Einstein zigzag lens. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452970 , archivePrefix =. 2411.04177 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational imaging through a triple source plane lens: revisiting the CDM-defying dark subhalo in SDSSJ0946+1006. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae514 , archivePrefix =. 2309.04535 , primaryClass =

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational Microlensing at Large Optical Depth. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/163919 , adsurl =

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    Q0957+561 : effects of random stars on the gravitational lens. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/158752 , adsurl =

  28. [28]

    Gravitational Lensing , year = 1990, editor =

    Microlensing calculations with a hierarchical tree code: New results. Gravitational Lensing , year = 1990, editor =. doi:10.1007/BFb0009253 , adsurl =

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Astrophysical applications of gravitational micro-lensing. , keywords =

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Compound lensing: Einstein zig-zags and high-multiplicity lensed images. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2791 , archivePrefix =. 1510.00242 , primaryClass =

  31. [31]

    Strong lens model and time-delay predictions for J1721+8842, the first Einstein zigzag lens

    TDCOSMO: XVIII. Strong lens model and time-delay predictions for J1721+8842, the first Einstein zigzag lens. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449984 , adsurl =

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological constraints from the double source plane lens SDSSJ0946+1006. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1190 , archivePrefix =. 1403.5278 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    Shajib, A. J. and others. STRIDES: a 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408-5354. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa828 , archivePrefix =. 1910.06306 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    The Population of Galaxy-Galaxy Strong Lenses in Forthcoming Optical Imaging Surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/811/1/20 , archivePrefix =. 1507.02657 , primaryClass =

  35. [35]

    The Strong Lensing Discovery Engine D -- Double-source-plane lens candidates

    Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1). The Strong Lensing Discovery Engine D -- Double-source-plane lens candidates. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.15327 , archivePrefix =. 2503.15327 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Efficient generation of microlensing magnification maps with GPUs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf994 , archivePrefix =. 2506.02114 , primaryClass =

  37. [37]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    TDCOSMO 2025: Cosmological constraints from strong lensing time delays. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.03023 , archivePrefix =. 2506.03023 , primaryClass =

  38. [38]

    A 2.4 per cent measurement of H _ 0 from lensed quasars: 5.3 tension between early- and late-Universe probes

    H0LiCOW - XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H _ 0 from lensed quasars: 5.3 tension between early- and late-Universe probes. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3094 , archivePrefix =. 1907.04869 , primaryClass =

  39. [39]

    TDCOSMO. I. An exploration of systematic uncertainties in the inference of H _ 0 from time-delay cosmography. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937351 , archivePrefix =. 1912.08027 , primaryClass =

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Strong Gravitational Lensing and Microlensing of Supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-024-01044-7 , archivePrefix =. 2301.07729 , primaryClass =

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Cosmography with supernova Refsdal through time-delay cluster lensing: Independent measurements of the Hubble constant and geometry of the Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449278 , archivePrefix =. 2401.10980 , primaryClass =

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Assessing the effect of mass-model assumptions on measuring the Hubble constant from the cluster-lensed supernova Refsdal. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/v857-ylw5 , archivePrefix =. 2402.13476 , primaryClass =

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Cosmology with supernova Encore in the strong lensing cluster MACS J0138‑2155: Spectroscopy with MUSE. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453486 , archivePrefix =. 2412.13250 , primaryClass =

  44. [44]

    Science , keywords =

    Constraints on the Hubble constant from supernova Refsdal's reappearance. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.abh1322 , archivePrefix =. 2305.06367 , primaryClass =

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    SN H0pe: The First Measurement of H _ 0 from a Multiply Imaged Type Ia Supernova, Discovered by JWST. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9928 , archivePrefix =. 2403.18902 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Testing Lens Models of PLCK G165.7+67.0 Using Lensed SN H0pe. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.07637 , archivePrefix =. 2510.07637 , primaryClass =

  47. [47]

    Singularity theory and gravitational lensing

  48. [48]

    Strong Lens Time Delay Challenge. II. Results of TDC1. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/11 , archivePrefix =. 1409.1254 , primaryClass =

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Impact of Microlensing on Observational Strategies for Gravitational Time-delay Measurements. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc876 , archivePrefix =. 2007.13996 , primaryClass =

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Microlensing of Quasars. , keywords =. doi:10.1071/AS01016 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0010004 , primaryClass =

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Lensed Type Ia supernovae in light of SN Zwicky and iPTF16geu. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3031 , archivePrefix =. 2307.12881 , primaryClass =

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1\. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422 , archivePrefix =. 1903.07603 , primaryClass =

  53. [53]

    , year = 2024, month = aug, volume =

    Correction to: Detecting strongly lensed type Ia supernovae with LSST. , year = 2024, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1662 , adsurl =

  54. [54]

    COSMOGRAIL. XVII. Time delays for the quadruply imaged quasar PG 1115+080. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833287 , archivePrefix =. 1804.09183 , primaryClass =

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    Strong lensing time-delay cosmography in the 2020s. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00145-y , archivePrefix =. 2210.15794 , primaryClass =

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Source-position transformation: an approximate invariance in strong gravitational lensing. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322106 , archivePrefix =. 1306.4675 , primaryClass =

  57. [57]

    , keywords =

    Gravitationally lensed quasars and supernovae in future wide-field optical imaging surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16639.x , archivePrefix =. 1001.2037 , primaryClass =

  58. [58]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The Carousel Lens II: Cosmological Constraints with GIGA-Lens. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.16077 , archivePrefix =. 2602.16077 , primaryClass =

  59. [59]

    , keywords =

    Microlensing makes lensed quasar time delays significantly time variable. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2348 , archivePrefix =. 1707.01908 , primaryClass =

  60. [60]

    , year =

    Schneider, Peter and Kochanek, Christopher and Wambsganss, J. , year =. Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro , isbn =

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    Constraining the cosmological parameters using strong lensing. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020448 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0103500 , primaryClass =

  62. [62]

    Multiplane gravitational lensing. II. Global geometry of caustics. Journal of Mathematical Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1063/1.530962 , adsurl =

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Caustics of the double-plane two-point-mass gravitational lens with continuous matter and shear. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/277.4.1399 , adsurl =

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    A new parameter space study of cosmological microlensing. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1076 , archivePrefix =. 1306.3722 , primaryClass =

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    An Improved GPU-based Ray-shooting Code for Gravitational Microlensing. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac68ea , archivePrefix =. 2204.10871 , primaryClass =

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    An X-Ray Microlensing Test of AU-Scale Accretion Disk Structure in Q2237+0305. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/311431 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9804251 , primaryClass =

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    Size Is Everything: Universal Features of Quasar Microlensing with Extended Sources. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/431195 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0408195 , primaryClass =

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    The Structure of the Accretion Disk in the Lensed Quasar SBS 0909+532. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/16 , adsurl =

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    Strong Chromatic Microlensing in HE0047-1756 and SDSS1155+6346. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/61 , archivePrefix =. 1409.8246 , primaryClass =

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    The AGEL Survey Data Release 2: A Gravitational Lens Sample for Galaxy Evolution and Cosmology. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae1f86 , archivePrefix =. 2503.08041 , primaryClass =

  71. [71]

    The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. VI. Discovery and Analysis of a Double Einstein Ring. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/529541 , archivePrefix =. 0801.1555 , primaryClass =

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Reconstructing the extended structure of multiple sources strongly lensed by the ultra-massive elliptical galaxy SDSS J0100+1818. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244680 , archivePrefix =. 2211.16528 , primaryClass =

  73. [73]

    HST Imaging of the Eye of Horus, a Double Source Plane Gravitational Lens

  74. [74]

    150 new lenses, quasar pairs, and projected quasars

    Gravitationally lensed quasars in Gaia - IV. 150 new lenses, quasar pairs, and projected quasars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3721 , archivePrefix =. 2206.07714 , primaryClass =