REVIEW 1 cited by
The Perils of Pdot
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Schaefer (2024) has recently published observations of binary period derivatives $\dot P$ for 52 cataclysmic variables, and concluded that these strongly conflict with all proposed evolutionary pictures for these systems. We point out once again that using measurements of $\dot P$ is likely in practice to produce misleading evolutionary constraints in almost every case. The one identified exception to this is probably the recently-born X-ray binary SN 2022jli, because of its extremely high mass transfer rate.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The orbital period changes for novae
Binary-driven mass loss during nova eruptions can explain nearly all observed orbital period changes of normal cataclysmic variables, while fast winds alone cannot.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.