REVIEW 1 cited by
Kinematic distances of galaxies in the Local Volume
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Kinematic distances of galaxies in the Local Volume
read the original abstract
We consider the kinematic distances to nearby galaxies obtained by the Numerical Action Method (NAM) based on the Cosmic-flow-3 survey data. NAM distances are compared with 418 high-precision distances measured by the Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) method using the Hubble Space Telescope. We estimated the average difference <D_NAM - D_TRGB> = -0.30 +- 0.08 Mpc and the standard deviation of 1.57 Mpc. Approximately the same difference in the distance scale is obtained in comparison with less accurate distance estimates through the membership of galaxies in known groups or from the Tully-Fisher relation. We conclude that the NAM method provides distance estimates with an accuracy of 20% within the Local Volume, which is valid for ~90% of the sky, except for the regions of the Virgo cluster and the Coma-I group.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
New optical velocities for local galaxy candidates
BTA optical velocities confirm 12 new Local Volume companions (including satellites of DDO 46, NGC 2903, NGC 4826) and yield NGC 1068 group mass (2.6 ± 1.0) × 10^12 M⊙.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.