Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

GMM is Inadmissible Under Weak Identification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.12462 v3 pith:7RXVH5G3 submitted 2022-04-26 econ.EM

GMM is Inadmissible Under Weak Identification

classification econ.EM
keywords estimatorsidentificationestimationinadmissiblemomentsampleunderadmissible
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider estimation in moment condition models and show that under any bound on identification strength, asymptotically admissible (i.e. undominated) estimators in a wide class of estimation problems must be uniformly continuous in the sample moment function. GMM estimators are in general discontinuous in the sample moments, and are thus inadmissible. We show, by contrast, that bagged, or bootstrap aggregated, GMM estimators as well as quasi-Bayes posterior means have superior continuity properties, while results in the literature imply that they are equivalent to GMM when identification is strong. In simulations calibrated to published instrumental variables specifications, we find that these alternatives often outperform GMM.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quasi-Bayesian Hierarchical Models

    econ.EM 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    QBHM estimator matches standard GMM asymptotics for strongly identified parameters and is a Bayes rule under squared loss in weak-GMM limit experiments induced by the hierarchy.

  2. Multivariable Mendelian randomization with weak instruments: a comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods

    stat.ME 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MVMR-Pony, a Bayesian method, reduces weak-instrument bias in multivariable Mendelian randomization more effectively than frequentist alternatives in simulation studies covering correlated effects, measurement error, ...