Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 110 references

QCD for electroweak precision measurements: Foundations

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The same factorization and evolution methods that founded QCD now underpin precision electroweak measurements and new-physics searches.

desk verdict Solid invited foundations review by Sterman; no new results, but clear, accurate, and useful for the Physics Reports collection. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07908 v1 pith:7RYHNYQB submitted 2026-07-08 hep-ph

George Sterman This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords QCDfactorizationpartondistributionsDGLAPevolutiondeepinelasticscatteringDrell-YanprocessQTresummationelectroweakprecisionasymptoticfreedom
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review traces how electroweak probes of hadrons, beginning with deep inelastic scattering, revealed scaling that the parton model explained and that asymptotic freedom in QCD reconciled with strong interactions. Collinear factorization separates short-distance electroweak hard scatterings, computable in perturbation theory, from universal parton distributions that absorb long-distance physics. Evolution of those distributions with scale, plus extensions to leptonic annihilation, Drell-Yan production, and transverse-momentum resummation, then let the same distributions predict electroweak boson and Higgs rates in hadron collisions. The result is that techniques forged to understand the strong force now supply the calculational foundation for high-energy precision electroweak physics and searches beyond the Standard Model.

What carries the argument

Collinear factorization: the convolution of infrared-safe short-distance coefficient (hard) functions with universal parton distributions (or fragmentation functions, or TMDs) that absorb all long-distance collinear physics; its scale independence immediately yields DGLAP evolution equations that transport the distributions between energies.

What would settle it

A clear, process-dependent failure of universality: parton distributions extracted from deep-inelastic structure functions at one scale, evolved with the known DGLAP kernels, fail to describe measured Drell-Yan or electroweak-boson transverse-momentum spectra at another collider energy after all higher-order and nonperturbative corrections are accounted for.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Collinear factorization, DGLAP evolution, and QT resummation, first developed to turn scaling into a controlled theory of QCD, furnish the infrared-safe hard functions and universal parton distributions that make precision calculations of electroweak processes at colliders possible. Once coefficient functions are computed in an infrared-regulated theory, measured structure functions determine portable distributions that can be evolved and reused for Drell-Yan, vector-boson, and Higgs production, thereby linking the strong and electroweak sectors for both Standard-Model tests and new-physics searches.

Load-bearing premise

Infrared-safe hard functions calculated for free partons in a regulated theory remain exactly the same when the factorization formula is applied to real hadrons.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Parton distributions determined once from DIS or lattice data can be evolved and reused to predict W, Z, and Higgs cross sections and rapidity distributions at any collider energy.
  • QT-resummed spectra of electroweak bosons become precision observables that constrain both Standard-Model parameters and possible new-physics contributions in the same final state.
  • Jet and event-shape cross sections built from energy-flow operators remain infrared-safe and therefore calculable, furnishing additional handles on electroweak decays and associated production.
  • Any short-distance new-physics process that couples to quarks or gluons inherits the same factorized structure and can be predicted from the same universal distributions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same light-cone operator definitions that make parton distributions portable also open a direct path from lattice matrix elements to collider predictions, tightening the theory-experiment loop without new accelerators.
  • Because soft-gluon cancellations rely on inclusivity, any future precision measurement that tags additional soft hadronic activity will require a controlled extension of the factorization theorems themselves.
  • QT resummation already reaches vanishing transverse momentum; applying the identical separation-of-variables logic to other multi-scale electroweak observables (for example, joint threshold and QT logs) should yield comparable all-order control.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This review traces the historical and conceptual foundations linking QCD to electroweak precision physics. It begins with QED infrared and ultraviolet issues, moves through deep-inelastic scattering, Bjorken scaling, and the parton model (Secs. 2–3), then develops collinear factorization, the double-cycle extraction of parton distributions, one-loop coefficient functions (Eqs. 19–27), all-order arguments via Coleman–Norton configurations and the optical theorem (Fig. 2), DGLAP evolution (Eq. 31), and the crossed channels of leptonic annihilation and Drell–Yan production, including Collins–Soper–Sterman QT factorization and resummation (Eqs. 38–46). The central claim is that the same infrared-safe techniques that reconcile scaling with asymptotic freedom supply the calculational basis for precision electroweak measurements and new-physics searches.

Significance. If accepted as a foundations piece for the Electroweak Precision Physics collection, the manuscript supplies a compact, heuristic exposition of the classic results (factorization, evolution, QT resummation) that underwrite virtually all high-energy electroweak analyses. It correctly reproduces the standard one-loop DIS formulae, the optical-theorem argument for all-order collinear factorization, and the CSS double-log resummation, all supported by the foundational literature. The pedagogical clarity and explicit statement of the factorization hypothesis (Sec. 3.3) make it a useful entry point for readers whose primary expertise lies in electroweak phenomenology rather than QCD technicalities. No new theorems or numerical claims are advanced; the value is expository and archival.

minor comments (5)
  1. Section headings contain residual spacing artifacts (“2 F rom currents to partons”, “3 F rom partons to QCD”). These should be cleaned for the published version.
  2. The subsection labeled “4. Extensions” (immediately before Sec. 5) appears to be an unfinished outline containing bullet points and a garbled figure caption for Fig. 3. Either complete the material or remove the placeholder.
  3. Typographical slips remain: “singlulark T” (after Eq. 26), “reummation” and “beautry” (Sec. 5.3), and occasional missing spaces around math. A final proofreading pass is needed.
  4. Eq. (14) writes the one-loop running coupling with an extraneous square on the logarithm; the conventional form is 1/(b0 ln(µ^{2}/Λ^{2})).
  5. A few classic references (e.g., the original CSS papers) are cited, but a short pointer to modern global PDF fits or recent N^{3}LO coefficient-function results would help readers who wish to move from foundations to current practice.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: pure pedagogical review of established factorization, evolution and resummation; no new predictions or self-referential derivations.

full rationale

The manuscript is an invited foundations review that walks through the historical and technical development of collinear factorization, DGLAP evolution and QT resummation. Coefficient functions are computed order-by-order in an infrared-regulated partonic theory (Secs. 3.3–3.4, Eqs. 19–26); parton distributions are independently defined as light-cone matrix elements (Eq. 28) and extracted from data (or lattice). The “double-cycle” procedure of Sec. 3.3 is the standard matching of IR-safe hard functions onto non-perturbative distributions; it does not redefine one in terms of the other. All-order arguments (Coleman–Norton + optical theorem, Sec. 4.1) and the evolution equations (Eqs. 29–31) are standard textbook material. Self-citations are to classic results already verified in the literature; none are load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansätze that close a circular loop. No parameters are fitted and then re-labeled as predictions. The paper therefore contains no circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review of established QCD, the paper inherits the standard axioms of the Standard Model and of collinear factorization proofs; it introduces no free parameters or new entities.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Asymptotic freedom of non-Abelian gauge theories (Gross-Wilczek, Politzer)
    Invoked in Sec. 3.1 to reconcile scaling with strong interactions; taken as established.
  • domain assumption Collinear factorization theorems hold for DIS, Drell-Yan and single-particle inclusive annihilation (Collins-Soper-Sterman)
    Central technical premise of Secs. 3-5; proofs are cited rather than re-derived in full.
  • domain assumption Infrared-safe coefficient functions computed with partonic external states apply unchanged to hadronic external states
    Explicitly stated as an assumption in Sec. 3.3 when cycling from regulated theory to real data.
  • standard math Optical theorem / unitarity cancels final-state soft and collinear singularities in inclusive cross sections
    Used in Sec. 4.1 (Fig. 2) to reduce the cut diagram to a short-distance coefficient times a parton distribution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of QCD for electroweak precision measurements: Foundations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7RYHNYQB

@misc{pith2026260707908,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: QCD for electroweak precision measurements: Foundations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7RYHNYQB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07908}
}
read the original abstract

The couplings of the strong to electroweak sectors of the Standard Model enable the exploration of each using our growing knowledge of the other. In this review, we will follow the sweep of history. Starting with QED as a precision theory, deep inelastic scattering served as a gateway to the strong interactions, followed by leptonic annihilation and quark-antiquark annihilation in hadron-hadron scattering. In turn, the resulting understanding of QCD helped establish the Standard Model. The same techniques form the basis for many precision electroweak measurements at high energy and searches for signs of new physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07908 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Cartoon of the proof of factorization in DIS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Crossing from DIS and parton distributions to 1PI in leptonic annihilation and frag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 110 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Inward bound Of matter and forces in the physical world

    A. Pais, “Inward bound Of matter and forces in the physical world.” Cambridge University Press (1986)

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    Note on the Radiation Field of the electron,

    F. Bloch and A. Nordsieck, “Note on the Radiation Field of the electron,” Phys. Rev.52, 54-59 (1937) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.52.54

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.52.54 1937

  3. [3]

    Radiative Corrections: From Medium to High Energy Experiments

    A. Afanasev, J. C. Bernauer, P. Blunden, J. Bl¨ umlein, E. W. Cline, J. M. Friedrich, F. Hagel- stein, T. Husek, M. Kohl and F. Myhrer,et al.Eur. Phys. J. A60, no.4, 91 (2024) doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01281-y [arXiv:2306.14578 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01281-y 2024

  4. [4]

    Factorized QED and QCD Contribution to Deeply Inelastic Scattering

    J. Cammarota, J. W. Qiu, K. Watanabe and J. Y. Zhang, [arXiv:2505.23487 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  5. [5]

    High-energy electron and photon physics: exploring the unknown with the known,

    W. K. H. Panofsky, “High-energy electron and photon physics: exploring the unknown with the known,” Talk at National Academy of Sciences SymposiumRevelations and Prospects in High Energy PhysicsApril 24, 1968 SLAC-PUB-0406.(1968)

    work page 1968

  6. [6]

    High-Energy Inelas- tic e p Scattering at 6-Degrees and 10-Degrees,

    E. D. Bloom, D. H. Coward, H. C. DeStaebler, J. Drees, G. Miller, L. W. Mo, R. E. Tay- lor, M. Breidenbach, J. I. Friedman and G. C. Hartmann,et al.“High-Energy Inelas- tic e p Scattering at 6-Degrees and 10-Degrees,” Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 930-934 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.930

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.930 1969

  7. [7]

    Observed behavior of highly inelastic electron-proton scattering,

    M. Breidenbach, J. I. Friedman, H. W. Kendall, E. D. Bloom, D. H. Coward, H. C. DeStaebler, J. Drees, L. W. Mo and R. E. Taylor, “Observed behavior of highly inelastic electron-proton scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 935-939 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.935

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.935 1969

  8. [8]

    Very high-energy collisions of hadrons,

    R. P. Feynman, “Very high-energy collisions of hadrons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 1415-1417 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.1415 22

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.1415 1969

Show all 110 references
  1. [9]

    Inelastic Electron Proton and gamma Proton Scattering, and the Structure of the Nucleon,

    J. D. Bjorken and E. A. Paschos, “Inelastic Electron Proton and gamma Proton Scattering, and the Structure of the Nucleon,” Phys. Rev.185, 1975-1982 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.185.1975

    1975 doi

  2. [10]

    Gauge Theories of the Strong, Weak, and Electromagnetic Interactions: Sec- ond Edition,

    C. Quigg, “Gauge Theories of the Strong, Weak, and Electromagnetic Interactions: Sec- ond Edition,” Princeton University Press, 2013, ISBN 978-0-691-13548-9, 978-1-4008-4822-5 doi:10.1515/9781400848225

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model,

    M. D. Schwartz, “Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model,” Cambridge University Press, 2014, ISBN 978-1-107-03473-0, 978-1-107-03473-0

    2014

  4. [12]

    Handbook of perturbative QCD: Version 1.0,

    R. Brocket al.[CTEQ], “Handbook of perturbative QCD: Version 1.0,” Rev. Mod. Phys.67, 157-248 (1995) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.67.157

    1995 doi

  5. [13]

    QCD and collider physics,

    R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling and B. R. Webber, “QCD and collider physics,” Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol.8, 1-435 (1996) Cambridge University Press, 2011, ISBN 978-0-511-82328-2, 978-0-521-54589-1 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511628788

    1996 doi

  6. [14]

    Foundations of Perturbative QCD,

    J. Collins, “Foundations of Perturbative QCD,” Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol.32, 1-624 (2011) Cambridge University Press, 2011, ISBN 978-1-009-40184-5, 978-1- 009-40183-8, 978-1-009-40182-1 doi:10.1017/9781009401845

    2011 doi

  7. [15]

    The Black Book of Quantum Chromodynam- ics: a Primer for the LHC Era,

    J. Campbell, J. Huston and F. Krauss, “The Black Book of Quantum Chromodynam- ics: a Primer for the LHC Era,” Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 978-0-19-965274-7 doi:10.1093/oso/9780199652747.001.0001

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    Bl¨ umlein, Int

    J. Bl¨ umlein, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39, no.09n10, 2441004 (2024) doi:10.1142/S0217751X24410045 [arXiv:2306.01362 [hep-ph]]

    2024 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    Asymptotic Sum Rules at Infinite Momentum,

    J. D. Bjorken, “Asymptotic Sum Rules at Infinite Momentum,” Phys. Rev.179, 1547-1553 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.179.1547

    1969 doi

  10. [18]

    Polarized deep inelastic scattering at high-energies and parity violating structure functions,

    M. Anselmino, P. Gambino and J. Kalinowski, “Polarized deep inelastic scattering at high-energies and parity violating structure functions,” Z. Phys. C64, 267-274 (1994) doi:10.1007/BF01557397 [arXiv:hep-ph/9401264 [hep-ph]]

    1994 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories,

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, “Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1343-1346 (1973) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1343

    1973 doi

  12. [20]

    Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories - I,

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, “Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories - I,” Phys. Rev. D8, 3633-3652 (1973) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.8.3633

    1973 doi

  13. [21]

    ASYMPTOTICALLY FREE GAUGE THEORIES. 2.,

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, “ASYMPTOTICALLY FREE GAUGE THEORIES. 2.,” Phys. Rev. D9, 980-993 (1974) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.980

    1974 doi

  14. [22]

    Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?,

    H. D. Politzer, “Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?,” Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1346-1349 (1973) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1346

    1973 doi

  15. [23]

    Freedom at Moderate Energies: Masses in Color Dynamics,

    H. Georgi and H. D. Politzer, “Freedom at Moderate Energies: Masses in Color Dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D14, 1829 (1976) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.14.1829 23

    1976 doi

  16. [24]

    Singularities of current commutators on the light cone,

    H. Leutwyler and J. Stern, “Singularities of current commutators on the light cone,” Nucl. Phys. B20, 77-101 (1970) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(70)90197-5

    1970 doi

  17. [25]

    Scale invariance and current commutators near the light cone,

    Y. Frishman, “Scale invariance and current commutators near the light cone,” Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 966-969 (1970) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.966

    1970 doi

  18. [26]

    Operator product expansions near the light cone,

    R. A. Brandt and G. Preparata, “Operator product expansions near the light cone,” Nucl. Phys. B27, 541-567 (1971) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(71)90265-3

    1971 doi

  19. [27]

    Light cone behavior of perturbation theory,

    N. H. Christ, B. Hasslacher and A. H. Mueller, “Light cone behavior of perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D6, 3543 (1972) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.6.3543

    1972 doi

  20. [28]

    High-energy electroproduction and the constitution of the electric current,

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and D. J. Gross, “High-energy electroproduction and the constitution of the electric current,” Phys. Rev. Lett.22, 156-159 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.156

    1969 doi

  21. [29]

    Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD,

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper and G. F. Sterman, “Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD,” Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.5, 1-91 (1989) doi:10.1142/9789814503266 0001 [arXiv:hep- ph/0409313 [hep-ph]]

    1989 doi

  22. [30]

    Comments on collinear factorization,

    G. Sterman, “Comments on collinear factorization,” [arXiv:2207.06507 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language,

    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, “Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language,” Nucl. Phys. B126, 298-318 (1977) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90384-4

    1977 doi

  24. [32]

    Deep inelastic e p scattering in perturbation theory,

    V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov, “Deep inelastic e p scattering in perturbation theory,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.15, 438-450 (1972) IPTI-381-71

    1972

  25. [33]

    Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics.,

    Y. L. Dokshitzer, “Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics.,” Sov. Phys. JETP 46, 641-653 (1977)

    1977

  26. [34]

    Jet Structure in e+ e- Annihilation with Massless Hadrons,

    G. F. Sterman, “Jet Structure in e+ e- Annihilation with Massless Hadrons,” ILL-TH-75-32

  27. [35]

    Jets from Quantum Chromodynamics,

    G. F. Sterman and S. Weinberg, “Jets from Quantum Chromodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1436 (1977) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.1436

    1977 doi

  28. [36]

    Parton Physics on a Euclidean Lattice,

    X. Ji, “Parton Physics on a Euclidean Lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 262002 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.262002 [arXiv:1305.1539 [hep-ph]]

    2013 doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    Quasi-parton distribution functions, momentum distributions, and pseudo-parton distribution functions,

    A. V. Radyushkin, “Quasi-parton distribution functions, momentum distributions, and pseudo-parton distribution functions,” Phys. Rev. D96, no.3, 034025 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.034025 [arXiv:1705.01488 [hep-ph]]

    2017 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    Parton distributions and lattice QCD calculations: a community white paper,

    H. W. Lin, E. R. Nocera, F. Olness, K. Orginos, J. Rojo, A. Accardi, C. Alexandrou, A. Bacchetta, G. Bozzi and J. W. Chen,et al.“Parton distributions and lattice QCD calculations: a community white paper,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.100, 107-160 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.01.0...

    2018 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    Scattering processes and resonances from lattice QCD,

    R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek and R. D. Young, “Scattering processes and resonances from lattice QCD,” Rev. Mod. Phys.90, no.2, 025001 (2018) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.025001 [arXiv:1706.06223 [hep-lat]]. 24

    2018 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    Parton Distribution and Decay Functions,

    J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, “Parton Distribution and Decay Functions,” Nucl. Phys. B 194, 445-492 (1982) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90021-9

    1982 doi

  33. [41]

    The Third-order QCD corrections to deep-inelastic scattering by photon exchange,

    J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt and S. Moch, “The Third-order QCD corrections to deep-inelastic scattering by photon exchange,” Nucl. Phys. B724, 3-182 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.06.020 [arXiv:hep-ph/0504242 [hep-ph]]

    2005 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    The massless three-loop Wilson coefficients for the deep-inelastic structure functions F 2, F L, xF 3 and g 1,

    J. Bl¨ umlein, P. Marquard, C. Schneider and K. Sch¨ onwald, “The massless three-loop Wilson coefficients for the deep-inelastic structure functions F 2, F L, xF 3 and g 1,” JHEP11, 156 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2022)156 [arXiv:2208.14325 [hep-ph]]

    2022 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    A Critical Appraisal and Evaluation of Modern PDFs,

    A. Accardi, S. Alekhin, J. Bl¨ umlein, M. V. Garzelli, K. Lipka, W. Melnitchouk, S. Moch, J. F. Owens, R. Plaˇ cakyt˙ e and E. Reya,et al.“A Critical Appraisal and Evaluation of Modern PDFs,” Eur. Phys. J. C76, no.8, 471 (2016) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4285-4 [arXiv:1603.08...

    2016 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Hadronic structure in high-energy col- lisions,

    K. Kovaˇ r´ ık, P. M. Nadolsky and D. E. Soper, “Hadronic structure in high-energy col- lisions,” Rev. Mod. Phys.92, no.4, 045003 (2020) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.92.045003 [arXiv:1905.06957 [hep-ph]]

    2020 doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    Partons, factorization and resummation, TASI 95,

    G. F. Sterman, “Partons, factorization and resummation, TASI 95,” [arXiv:hep-ph/9606312 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Singularities in the physical region,

    S. Coleman and R. E. Norton, “Singularities in the physical region,” Nuovo Cim.38, 438-442 (1965) doi:10.1007/BF02750472

    1965 doi

  39. [47]

    Jet and Lepton Pair Production in High- Energy Lepton-Hadron and Hadron-Hadron Scattering,

    S. B. Libby and G. F. Sterman, “Jet and Lepton Pair Production in High- Energy Lepton-Hadron and Hadron-Hadron Scattering,” Phys. Rev. D18, 3252 (1978) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3252

    1978 doi

  40. [48]

    Introduction to Soft-Collinear Effective Theory,

    T. Becher, A. Broggio and A. Ferroglia, “Introduction to Soft-Collinear Effective Theory,” Lect. Notes Phys.896, pp.1-206 (2015) doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14848-9 [arXiv:1410.1892 [hep- ph]]

    2015 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    Factorization at the LHC: From PDFs to Initial State Jets,

    I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann and W. J. Waalewijn, “Factorization at the LHC: From PDFs to Initial State Jets,” Phys. Rev. D81, 094035 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.094035 [arXiv:0910.0467 [hep-ph]]

    2010 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    Hard scattering in QCD with polarized beams,

    J. C. Collins, “Hard scattering in QCD with polarized beams,” Nucl. Phys. B394, 169-199 (1993) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90105-X [arXiv:hep-ph/9207265 [hep-ph]]

    1993 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    Extraction of Spin- Dependent Parton Densities and Their Uncertainties,

    D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann and W. Vogelsang, “Extraction of Spin- Dependent Parton Densities and Their Uncertainties,” Phys. Rev. D80, 034030 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.034030 [arXiv:0904.3821 [hep-ph]]

    2009 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all,

    A. Accardi, J. L. Albacete, M. Anselmino, N. Armesto, E. C. Aschenauer, A. Bacchetta, D. Boer, W. K. Brooks, T. Burton and N. B. Chang,et al.“Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all,” Eur. Phys. J. A52, no.9, 268 (2016) doi:10.114...

    2016 doi arXiv

  45. [53]

    Science Requirements and Detec- tor Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report,

    R. Abdul Khalek, A. Accardi, J. Adam, D. Adamiak, W. Akers, M. Albaladejo, A. Al- bataineh, M. G. Alexeev, F. Ameli and P. Antonioli,et al.“Science Requirements and Detec- tor Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report,” Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022) doi:10.1...

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    The Three-loop splitting functions in QCD: The Singlet case,

    A. Vogt, S. Moch and J. A. M. Vermaseren, “The Three-loop splitting functions in QCD: The Singlet case,” Nucl. Phys. B691, 129-181 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.04.024 [arXiv:hep-ph/0404111 [hep-ph]]. 12x

    2004 doi arXiv

  47. [55]

    The Three loop splitting functions in QCD: The Nonsinglet case,

    S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, “The Three loop splitting functions in QCD: The Nonsinglet case,” Nucl. Phys. B688, 101-134 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.03.030 [arXiv:hep-ph/0403192 [hep-ph]]

    2004 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    Additional moments and x-space approximations of four-loop splitting functions in QCD,

    S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, “Additional moments and x-space approximations of four-loop splitting functions in QCD,” Phys. Lett. B849, 138468 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138468 [arXiv:2310.05744 [hep-ph]]

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    Measurement of the parity-violating longitudinal single- spin asymmetry forW ± boson production in polarized proton-proton collisions at √s= 500−GeV,

    M. M. Aggarwalet al.[STAR], “Measurement of the parity-violating longitudinal single- spin asymmetry forW ± boson production in polarized proton-proton collisions at √s= 500−GeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 062002 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.062002 [arXiv:1009.0326 [hep-ex]]

    2011 doi arXiv

  50. [58]

    Measurement of parity-violating spin asymmetries in W ± pro- duction at midrapidity in longitudinally polarizedp+pcollisions,

    A. Adareet al.[PHENIX], “Measurement of parity-violating spin asymmetries in W ± pro- duction at midrapidity in longitudinally polarizedp+pcollisions,” Phys. Rev. D93, no.5, 051103 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.051103 [arXiv:1504.07451 [hep-ex]]

    2016 doi arXiv

  51. [59]

    Cut Vertices and their Renormalization: A Generalization of the Wilson Expansion,

    A. H. Mueller, “Cut Vertices and their Renormalization: A Generalization of the Wilson Expansion,” Phys. Rev. D18, 3705 (1978) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3705

    1978 doi

  52. [60]

    G. C. Nayak, J. W. Qiu and G. F. Sterman, ‘Fragmentation, NRQCD and NNLO fac- torization analysis in heavy quarkonium production,” Phys. Rev. D72, 114012 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.114012 [arXiv:hep-ph/0509021 [hep-ph]]

    2005 doi arXiv

  53. [61]

    Statistical Model for electron-Positron Annihilation Into Hadrons,

    J. D. Bjorken and S. J. Brodsky, “Statistical Model for electron-Positron Annihilation Into Hadrons,” Phys. Rev. D1, 1416-1420 (1970) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.1.1416

    1970 doi

  54. [62]

    Evidence for Jet Struc- ture in Hadron Production by e+ e- Annihilation,

    G. Hanson, G. S. Abrams, A. Boyarski, M. Breidenbach, F. Bulos, W. Chinowsky, G. J. Feld- man, C. E. Friedberg, D. Fryberger and G. Goldhaber,et al.“Evidence for Jet Struc- ture in Hadron Production by e+ e- Annihilation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 1609-1612 (1975) doi:10.1103/PhysR...

    1975 doi

  55. [63]

    Zero Mass Limit for a Class of Jet Related Cross-sections,

    G. F. Sterman, “Zero Mass Limit for a Class of Jet Related Cross-sections,” Phys. Rev. D 19, 3135 (1979) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.19.3135

    1979 doi

  56. [64]

    Energy Correlations in electron - Positron Annihilation: Testing QCD,

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis and S. T. Love, “Energy Correlations in electron - Positron Annihilation: Testing QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.41, 1585 (1978) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.41.1585

    1978 doi

  57. [65]

    Jets and quantum field theory,

    N. A. Sveshnikov and F. V. Tkachov, “Jets and quantum field theory,” Phys. Lett. B382, 403-408 (1996) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00558-8 [arXiv:hep-ph/9512370 [hep-ph]]. 26

    1996 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    Power corrections and nonlocal operators,

    G. P. Korchemsky, G. Oderda and G. F. Sterman, “Power corrections and nonlocal operators,” AIP Conf. Proc.407, no.1, 988 (1997) doi:10.1063/1.53732 [arXiv:hep-ph/9708346 [hep-ph]]

    1997 doi arXiv

  59. [67]

    Energy Correlation Functions for Jet Substruc- ture,

    A. J. Larkoski, G. P. Salam and J. Thaler, “Energy Correlation Functions for Jet Substruc- ture,” JHEP06, 108 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)108 [arXiv:1305.0007 [hep-ph]]

    2013 doi arXiv

  60. [68]

    Conformal collider physics meets LHC data,

    K. Lee, B. Me¸ caj and I. Moult, “Conformal collider physics meets LHC data,” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.1, L011502 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L011502 [arXiv:2205.03414 [hep-ph]]

    2025 doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC,

    J. M. Butterworth, A. R. Davison, M. Rubin and G. P. Salam, “Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 242001 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.242001 [arXiv:0802.2470 [hep-ph]]

    2008 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    Jet Substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: A Review of Recent Advances in Theory and Machine Learning,

    A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult and B. Nachman, “Jet Substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: A Review of Recent Advances in Theory and Machine Learning,” Phys. Rept.841, 1-63 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.11.001 [arXiv:1709.04464 [hep-ph]]

    2020 doi arXiv

  63. [71]

    The Transverse Mass and Width of theWBoson,

    J. Smith, W. L. van Neerven and J. A. M. Vermaseren, “The Transverse Mass and Width of theWBoson,” Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1738 (1983) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1738

    1983 doi

  64. [72]

    Massive Lepton Pair Production in Hadron-Hadron Collisions at High-Energies,

    S. D. Drell and T. M. Yan, “Massive Lepton Pair Production in Hadron-Hadron Collisions at High-Energies,” Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 316-320 (1970) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.25, 902 (1970)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.316

    1970 doi

  65. [73]

    High-precision measurement of theWboson mass with the CDF II detector,

    T. Aaltonenet al.[CDF], “High-precision measurement of theWboson mass with the CDF II detector,” Science376, no.6589, 170-176 (2022) doi:10.1126/science.abk1781

    2022 doi

  66. [74]

    High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experiment at the LHC,

    V. Chekhovskyet al.[CMS], “High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” [arXiv:2412.13872 [hep-ex]]

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    Experimental Observation of Isolated Large Transverse Energy Electrons with Associated Missing Energy at √s= 540 GeV,

    G. Arnisonet al.[UA1], “Experimental Observation of Isolated Large Transverse Energy Electrons with Associated Missing Energy at √s= 540 GeV,” Phys. Lett. B122, 103-116 (1983) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)91177-2

    1983 doi

  68. [76]

    Experimental Observation of Lepton Pairs of Invariant Mass Around 95-GeV/c**2 at the CERN SPS Collider,

    G. Arnisonet al.[UA1], “Experimental Observation of Lepton Pairs of Invariant Mass Around 95-GeV/c**2 at the CERN SPS Collider,” Phys. Lett. B126, 398-410 (1983) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90188-0

    1983 doi

  69. [77]

    Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC,

    S. Chatrchyanet al.[CMS], “Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B716, 30-61 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 [arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]]

    2012 doi arXiv

  70. [78]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS], “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B716, 1-29 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 [arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]]

    2012 doi arXiv

  71. [79]

    Large Perturbative Corrections to the Drell-Yan Process in QCD,

    G. Altarelli, R. K. Ellis and G. Martinelli, “Large Perturbative Corrections to the Drell-Yan Process in QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B157, 461-497 (1979) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90116-0 27

    1979 doi

  72. [80]

    Vector Boson Production at Col- liders: A Theoretical Reappraisal,

    G. Altarelli, R. K. Ellis, M. Greco and G. Martinelli, “Vector Boson Production at Col- liders: A Theoretical Reappraisal,” Nucl. Phys. B246, 12-44 (1984) doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(84)90112-3

    1984 doi

  73. [81]

    Radiative corrections to Higgs boson production,

    S. Dawson, “Radiative corrections to Higgs boson production,” Nucl. Phys. B359, 283-300 (1991) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90061-2

    1991 doi

  74. [82]

    Higgs boson production at the LHC,

    M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz and P. M. Zerwas, “Higgs boson production at the LHC,” Nucl. Phys. B453, 17-82 (1995) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00379-7 [arXiv:hep-ph/9504378 [hep-ph]]

    1995 doi arXiv

  75. [83]

    An Update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders,

    J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis, “An Update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders,” Phys. Rev. D60, 113006 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.113006 [arXiv:hep- ph/9905386 [hep-ph]]

    1999 doi

  76. [84]

    Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to differential distributions of Higgs boson production in hadron hadron collisions,

    V. Ravindran, J. Smith and W. L. Van Neerven, “Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to differential distributions of Higgs boson production in hadron hadron collisions,” Nucl. Phys. B634, 247-290 (2002) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00333-4 [arXiv:hep-ph/0201114 [hep-ph]]

    2002 doi arXiv

  77. [85]

    Next-to-next-to-leading order Higgs production at hadron colliders,

    R. V. Harlander and W. B. Kilgore, “Next-to-next-to-leading order Higgs production at hadron colliders,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 201801 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.201801 [arXiv:hep-ph/0201206 [hep-ph]]

    2002 doi arXiv

  78. [86]

    NNLO corrections to the total cross-section for Higgs boson production in hadron hadron collisions,

    V. Ravindran, J. Smith and W. L. van Neerven, “NNLO corrections to the total cross-section for Higgs boson production in hadron hadron collisions,” Nucl. Phys. B665, 325-366 (2003) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00457-7 [arXiv:hep-ph/0302135 [hep-ph]]

    2003 doi arXiv

  79. [87]

    High precision QCD at hadron colliders: Electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at NNLO,

    C. Anastasiou, L. J. Dixon, K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, “High precision QCD at hadron colliders: Electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at NNLO,” Phys. Rev. D69, 094008 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.094008 [arXiv:hep-ph/0312266 [hep-ph]]

    2004 doi arXiv

  80. [88]

    Vector boson production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO,

    S. Catani, L. Cieri, G. Ferrera, D. de Florian and M. Grazzini, “Vector boson production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO,” Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 082001 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.082001 [arXiv:0903.2120 [hep-ph]]

    2009 doi arXiv

  81. [89]

    Higgs Boson Gluon- Fusion Production in QCD at Three Loops,

    C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, F. Herzog and B. Mistlberger, “Higgs Boson Gluon- Fusion Production in QCD at Three Loops,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 212001 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.212001 [arXiv:1503.06056 [hep-ph]]

    2015 doi arXiv

  82. [90]

    Higgs boson production at hadron colliders at N 3LO in QCD,

    B. Mistlberger, “Higgs boson production at hadron colliders at N 3LO in QCD,” JHEP05, 028 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2018)028 [arXiv:1802.00833 [hep-ph]]

    2018 doi arXiv

  83. [91]

    All Order Factorization for Drell-Yan Cross- sections,

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper and G. F. Sterman, “All Order Factorization for Drell-Yan Cross- sections,” Phys. Lett. B134, 263 (1984) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)90684-1

    1984 doi

  84. [92]

    Factorization of the Drell-Yan Cross-Section in Perturbation The- ory,

    G. T. Bodwin, “Factorization of the Drell-Yan Cross-Section in Perturbation The- ory,” Phys. Rev. D31, 2616 (1985) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D34, 3932 (1986)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.3932 28

    1985 doi

  85. [93]

    Factorization for Short Distance Hadron - Hadron Scattering,

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper and G. F. Sterman, “Factorization for Short Distance Hadron - Hadron Scattering,” Nucl. Phys. B261, 104-142 (1985) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90565-6

    1985 doi

  86. [94]

    Soft Gluons and Factorization,

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper and G. F. Sterman, “Soft Gluons and Factorization,” Nucl. Phys. B308, 833-856 (1988) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90130-7

    1988 doi

  87. [95]

    Summation of Large Corrections to Short Distance Hadronic Cross-Sections,

    G. F. Sterman, “Summation of Large Corrections to Short Distance Hadronic Cross-Sections,” Nucl. Phys. B281, 310-364 (1987) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90258-6

    1987 doi

  88. [96]

    Resummation of the QCD Perturbative Series for Hard Pro- cesses,

    S. Catani and L. Trentadue, “Resummation of the QCD Perturbative Series for Hard Pro- cesses,” Nucl. Phys. B327, 323-352 (1989) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90273-3

    1989 doi

  89. [97]

    Joint resummation in electroweak boson production,

    A. Kulesza, G. F. Sterman and W. Vogelsang, “Joint resummation in electroweak boson production,” Phys. Rev. D66, 014011 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.014011 [arXiv:hep- ph/0202251 [hep-ph]]

    2002 doi

  90. [98]

    Contopanagos, E

    H. Contopanagos, E. Laenen and G. F. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B484, 303-330 (1997) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(96)00567-6 [arXiv:hep-ph/9604313 [hep-ph]]

    1997 doi arXiv

  91. [99]

    Small Transverse Momentum Distributions in Hard Processes,

    G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, “Small Transverse Momentum Distributions in Hard Processes,” Nucl. Phys. B154, 427-440 (1979) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90040-3

    1979 doi

  92. [100]

    Coherent Quark-Gluon Jets,

    G. Curci, M. Greco and Y. Srivastava, “Coherent Quark-Gluon Jets,” Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 834-837 (1979) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.834

    1979 doi

  93. [101]

    Back-To-Back Jets in QCD,

    J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, “Back-To-Back Jets in QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B193, 381 (1981) [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B213, 545 (1983)] doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90339-4

    1981 doi

  94. [102]

    Transverse Momentum Distribution in Drell-Yan Pair and W and Z Boson Production,

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper and G. F. Sterman, “Transverse Momentum Distribution in Drell-Yan Pair and W and Z Boson Production,” Nucl. Phys. B250, 199-224 (1985) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90479-1

    1985 doi

  95. [103]

    TMD Handbook,

    R. Boussarie, M. Burkardt, M. Constantinou, W. Detmold, M. Ebert, M. Engelhardt, S. Fleming, L. Gamberg, X. Ji and Z. B. Kang,et al.“TMD Handbook,” [arXiv:2304.03302 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  96. [104]

    k T factorization is violated in production of high-transverse- momentum particles in hadron-hadron collisions,

    J. Collins and J. W. Qiu, “k T factorization is violated in production of high-transverse- momentum particles in hadron-hadron collisions,” Phys. Rev. D75, 114014 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.114014 [arXiv:0705.2141 [hep-ph]]

    2007 doi arXiv

  97. [105]

    2-soft-gluon exchange and factorization breaking,

    J. Collins, “2-soft-gluon exchange and factorization breaking,” [arXiv:0708.4410 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  98. [106]

    Recoil and threshold corrections in short distance cross-sections,

    E. Laenen, G. F. Sterman and W. Vogelsang, “Recoil and threshold corrections in short distance cross-sections,” Phys. Rev. D63, 114018 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.114018 [arXiv:hep-ph/0010080 [hep-ph]]

    2001 doi arXiv

  99. [107]

    Asymptotic Behavior of the Sudakov Form-Factor in QCD,

    A. Sen, “Asymptotic Behavior of the Sudakov Form-Factor in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D24, 3281 (1981) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.24.3281 29

    1981 doi

  100. [108]

    Transverse-momentum resumma- tion and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC,

    G. Bozzi, S. Catani, D. de Florian and M. Grazzini, “Transverse-momentum resumma- tion and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC,” Nucl. Phys. B737, 73-120 (2006) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.12.022 [arXiv:hep-ph/0508068 [hep-ph]]

    2006 doi arXiv

  101. [109]

    Improving resbos for the precision needs of the LHC,

    J. Isaacson, Y. Fu and C. P. Yuan, “Improving resbos for the precision needs of the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.7, 073002 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.073002 [arXiv:2311.09916 [hep-ph]]

    2024 doi arXiv

  102. [110]

    Measurement of theZ/γ ∗ boson transverse momentum distri- bution inppcollisions at √s= 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector,

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS], “Measurement of theZ/γ ∗ boson transverse momentum distri- bution inppcollisions at √s= 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” JHEP09, 145 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2014)145 [arXiv:1406.3660 [hep-ex]]. 30

    2014 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.