Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Crank up the volume: preference bias amplification in collaborative recommendation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.06362 v1 pith:7UVYOZHR submitted 2019-09-13 cs.IR cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.IRcs.LGstat.ML
keywords biasdifferentuseralgorithmsdisparitypreferencesaffectsamplification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender systems are personalized: we expect the results given to a particular user to reflect that user's preferences. Some researchers have studied the notion of calibration, how well recommendations match users' stated preferences, and bias disparity the extent to which mis-calibration affects different user groups. In this paper, we examine bias disparity over a range of different algorithms and for different item categories and demonstrate significant differences between model-based and memory-based algorithms.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Datasets for Navigating Sensitive Topics in Recommendation Systems

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Two benchmark datasets link user-preference data (MovieLens, Archive of Our Own) with community content-warning labels to study sensitive-content exposure in recommender systems.

Pith tools