Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger equation on a closed 3D elastica knot

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a traveling-wave solution of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation exists on a closed elastica knot only in an extended negative-parameter regime (m < −4.751, q0 = Q(m) < 0), and that the classical nonnegative elastica-kn

desk verdict Solid extension of the elastica-knot parameter space, but the central claim that an NLSE traveling wave exists on a closed knot is not actually proved; the paper itself concedes the phase and closure periodicities are generically incompatible. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21750 v1 pith:7V2VNOWK submitted 2026-07-23 math-ph math.MPphysics.plasm-ph

Alain J. Brizard This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MPphysics.plasm-ph MSC 33E0535Q5553A04
keywords nonlinearSchrödingerequationelasticaknotJacobiellipticfunctionsWeierstrassFrenet–Serretcurvaturetorsionconservationtravelingwaveparameterextension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is trying to show that a traveling-wave solution of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) can be placed on a closed 3D elastica knot — a closed curve minimizing bending energy — but only if one leaves the classical parameter range for such knots. The author extends the standard elliptic-function notation to negative parameters, maps the NLSE traveling wave onto the elastica curvature equation, and derives both the closed spatial curve and the wave field in closed elliptic form. The central result is that the classical range 0 ≤ m ≤ q0 ≤ 1 gives an imaginary wave speed, while a real speed requires m ≤ q0 = Q(m) < 0 with m < −4.751. If true, this means the classical elastica-knot family is not just a small part of the picture for this problem; a genuinely different, negative-parameter family of closed curves carries the traveling waves. The paper itself flags in Section VII B that the field's phase shift and the knot's angular closure are generically not the same rational fraction of π, so the fully closed-knot existence claim is conditional on a compatibility that is not proved.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the elastica curvature equation κ'' = −κ³/2 + k0⁴τ0²/κ³ + λk0²κ/2, together with the conservation law κ²τ = k0²τ0. The solution is expressed with Jacobi elliptic functions as κ² = k0²[1 − (m/q0) sn²(k0s/(2√q0)|m)], now extended to negative parameters, and in an equivalent Weierstrass σ-function form for the phase. The knot closure Δz=0 fixes q0 = Q(m), and positivity of the torsion and speed parameters selects region II. The phase shift Δθ and angular closure Δφ are both computed as elliptic integrals; the missing compatibility between them is what still separates a curvature-profile result from a true traveling wave on a closed knot.

What would settle it

Scan the range m−1 < m < m0− and evaluate the two closure functions Δθ(m) and Δφ(m) at the points where Δφ reaches a rational multiple of π, for example Δφ=π/3 at m≈−13.95. If no such m gives Δθ equal to the same rational multiple of π, then a true NLSE traveling wave on a closed elastica knot does not exist, and the result reduces to a statement about the curvature profile alone.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Central claim: a traveling-wave solution ψ = κ(s−ct)e^{iθ(s−ct)} of the NLSE can sit on a closed elastica knot only in the extended range m < m0^- ≈ −4.751 with q0 = Q(m) < 0. The exact identification k0²λ = −c²/(2D²) separates the traveling NLSE into the elastica curvature equation, so the field's curvature and phase match the knot's curvature and torsion. Closure Δz=0 forces q0 = Q(m) = 2E(m)/K(m) − (1−m); real wave speed and real torsion select region II. The paper gives Jacobi and Weierstrass formulas for the field and constructs the curve (Δφ=π/3 at m≈−13.95). It also notes in Sec. VII B that Δθ and Δφ are generically not the same rational fraction of π, so the fully closed-knot claim r

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that one can find a parameter m in the extended range for which the NLSE's phase shift per period is exactly the same rational multiple of π as the knot's angular closure; the paper computes both functions but never proves they coincide, and states that they generically do not.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Closed elastica knots admit NLSE traveling waves only outside the classical 0 ≤ m ≤ q0 ≤ 1 region; inside it the wave speed c = k0Dγ is imaginary.
  • For each allowed m, the knot parameters fix the wave speed and torsion: γ² = (1+m)/Q(m) − 3 and ν² = (1−Q(m))(Q(m)−m)/Q(m)².
  • The traveling wave exists in both Jacobi and Weierstrass elliptic forms, with the Weierstrass form giving a compact exponential-signature expression.
  • The periodic Lamé solution ψ = k0 dn(...) exp(iDε²k0²t/2) remains valid for negative parameters, generalizing the sech-soliton limit m→1.
  • The construction yields explicit closed torus knots, such as the Δφ=π/3 knot at m≈−13.95, with well-defined radial and vertical profiles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that if a simultaneous rational compatibility Δθ = Δφ = p1π/p2 is eventually found, the allowed wave speeds will be quantized by the knot's integer pair (p1,p2), producing a discrete spectrum of traveling NLSE solutions rather than a continuum.
  • A concrete numeric check follows from the paper's own figures: scan the allowed interval m−1 < m < m0− for values where Δθ and Δφ take the same rational multiple of π; the paper's plots suggest few or no coincidences, making this a sharp falsification target.
  • A physical test in the vortex-filament setting would be to initialize a filament with the negative-parameter curvature and torsion profiles and integrate the local-induction equation; a true traveling wave should translate rigidly, while mismatch in phase closure should appear as deformation.
  • The same negative-parameter elliptic-function extension could be applied to other integrable curve-flow equations, where analogous closure constraints may select similar extended parameter regimes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives the elastica-knot curvature equation from a constrained variational principle, reviews the Hasimoto transformation, and maps an NLSE traveling wave ψ(s,t)=κ(s_t)e^{iθ(s_t)} to that curvature equation, with θ'=c/(2D)+k0²τ0/κ² and k0²λ=−c²/(2D²). It solves the curvature equation in Jacobi and Weierstrass elliptic form, imposes the vertical closure condition q0=Q(m), identifies an extended parameter region II (m<m0⁻≈−4.751, q0=Q(m)<0), constructs closed torus elastica knots, and gives Weierstrass expressions for the traveling-wave field. The abstract claims that a traveling-wave NLSE solution exists on a closed elastica knot and only in this extended parameter space.

Significance. The paper's strengths are its self-contained variational derivation, the algebraic parameter mapping λ↔(c,D), the explicit Jacobi/Weierstrass solution of the curvature equation, and the concrete numerical construction of extended elastica knots. These parts are internally consistent and largely reproducible. However, the central existence claim for the NLSE traveling wave is not supported as stated, because the phase single-valuedness of ψ on the multiply periodic closed knot is never verified. A revision that either proves the correct full-period compatibility condition or re-scopes the claim to a curvature-profile correspondence would make the extended elastica parameter space a useful contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [§VII B, Eqs. (150)-(151), with §VI D, Eq. (128), Fig. 8] Single-valuedness of Ψ on a closed knot is not established. The closed curve is obtained only after several 2ω1 periods: for Δϕ=p1π/p2, full azimuthal closure needs N=2p2 periods when p1 is odd and N=p2 when p1 is even (e.g., N=6 for the π/3 knot in Fig. 8). Hence the correct periodicity condition for Ψ is NΔθ∈2πℤ, not Δθ∈2πℤ. The paper only computes Δθ over one 2ω1 period (Eq. 151) and, in the last paragraph of Sec. VII B, dismisses the compatibility as “generically” absent. Fig. 10's bound 3π/4<Δθ<2π does not rule out solutions, since e.g. Δθ=5π/6 with N=12 gives an integer multiple of 2π. The abstract's existence claim therefore rests on an unverified discrete compatibility condition. Please impose the full-period condition on the discrete set mc(p1,p2) and either exhibit solutions or state the theorem as a curvature-profile matching result only.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. VIII] The conclusion explicitly defers “further investigation” of consistency with the Hasimoto transformation to future work, which conflicts with the title and abstract claiming a traveling-wave solution on a closed elastica knot. At minimum, the abstract must be revised to distinguish (i) the existence of closed elastica knots in the extended parameter space and (ii) the open problem of whether the NLSE phase can be made single-valued on them. As written, the central claim overreaches what is proved.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (128) and (151)] The term “period” is used ambiguously: 2ω1 is called a single knot period, but the spatial curve closes only after multiple such periods (Fig. 8). Please define the full arclength period L of the closed torus knot and report Δϕ and Δθ over L, or state explicitly that 2ω1 is only the curvature period.
  2. [Fig. 10] The caption alone does not allow the reader to verify the claimed range 3π/4<Δθ<2π. Please give the exact formula plotted, the limiting values at the endpoints, and, in particular, the values of Δθ at the discrete knot parameters mc(p1,p2) used in Fig. 8.
  3. [§V A 2 and Fig. 2] The verbal description of region I as “0<q0<1/2 and −1<m<1/2” does not match the boundaries q0=1 and q0=m shown in Fig. 2. Please state the precise inequalities defining regions I and II.
  4. [App. C, Eq. (C5)] In the jump Δz, the period used is 2√m K(m) (the period of |cn|), not 4√m K(m). Please state this explicitly to avoid confusion when comparing with the usual period of cn.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the traveling-wave NLSE-to-elastica mapping is derived from the equations of motion, the parameter constraints are self-contained algebraic conditions, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The traveling-wave ansatz psi = kappa exp(i theta) is substituted into the NLSE (Eq. 42), and the imaginary part determines theta' as an integrated conservation law (Eq. 46), not as a fitted input; the real part then yields the curvature equation (47). Equating (47) with the independently derived elastica curvature equation (13) fixes the dimensionless elastica constant by the derived relation lambda = -c^2/(2 k0^2 D^2) (Eq. 48), so the central mapping is a comparison of derived equations rather than an assumption. The restrictions gamma^2 > 0 and nu^2 > 0 (Eqs. 66-67), the vertical closure condition q0 = Q(m) (Eq. 105), and the angular/phase-shift formulas (128 and 151) are obtained algebraically from periodicity and reality conditions, with no data fitting and no parameter renamed as a prediction. The extension to m < 0 uses standard Jacobi elliptic transformations (Appendix A), not the author's prior work. The cited prior paper [39] is used for motivation and for the equivalence of elastica knots, but the central closure calculation and the NLSE mapping are carried out in the present paper and do not reduce to that citation. The one admitted limitation, in the last paragraph of Sec. VII B, is that a periodic NLSE solution with Delta theta a rational fraction of pi will generically not occur at the same parameter value as the closed-knot condition Delta phi = p1 pi / p2; this is a completeness/correctness gap in the existence claim, not a circularity, because Delta theta is computed rather than imposed and no input is equivalent to the claimed output by construction. I therefore find no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitting to data. The derivation relies on standard variational calculus, the Hasimoto map, and elliptic-function identities. The only chosen inputs are physical parameters (k0, τ0, D, c) and the elliptic parameter m constrained by closure. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (7)
  • k0 = arbitrary (curvature scale)
    Initial curvature κ(0)=k0; sets length scale and cancels from dimensionless equations.
  • τ0 = arbitrary (torsion at s=0)
    Defines torsion conservation k0²τ0; only the dimensionless ν=2τ0/k0 enters the analysis.
  • D = arbitrary, physical units m²/s
    Circulation constant in the Hasimoto/NLSE equation; taken as input.
  • c = arbitrary real wave speed
    Traveling-wave speed; reality imposes γ²>0.
  • λ = λ = -c²/(2k0²D²)
    Integration constant of the elastica variational problem; fixed by the NLSE mapping to be non-positive.
  • m (elliptic parameter) = e.g., m2 ≈ -13.9483 for Δφ=π/3; must satisfy m < m0^- ≈ -4.751
    Free parameter of the elliptic solution; constrained by knot closure and by real wave speed/torsion.
  • q0 = q0 = Q(m) < 0
    Determined by vertical closure condition Δz=0; negative in the admissible extended region.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Frenet-Serret theory applies: the spatial curve is regular with κ>0.
    Used throughout Sec. II to define curvature and torsion.
  • domain assumption The variational principle (Eq. 2) with Lagrange multiplier Λ(s) correctly describes elastica bending energy under the length constraint.
    Foundation of the curvature equation (13).
  • domain assumption Curve dynamics is governed by the local induction / Betchov-Da Rios equation r_t = D κ b (Eq. 15), which is the starting point of the Hasimoto map.
    Connects the space-curve geometry to the NLSE; not derived from first principles in this paper.
  • standard math The torsion-conservation law κ²τ = k0²τ0 (Eq. 11) follows from the variational Euler equation and is used throughout.
    Derived in Sec. II from the binormal component of Eq. (9).
  • standard math Jacobi/Weierstrass elliptic identities (App. A and Eqs. 70-72, 123) are taken from standard references [37,56].
    Needed to pass between negative and classical moduli and to evaluate phase integrals.
  • domain assumption A closed elastica knot is defined by vertical periodicity Δz=0 and angular closure Δφ = p1π/p2 with rational fraction; no proof of non-self-intersection is given.
    Defines what 'closed knot' means in Secs. VI D; the paper calls the curves knots without topological verification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger equation on a closed 3D elastica knot." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7V2VNOWK

@misc{pith2026260721750,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation on a closed 3D elastica knot},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7V2VNOWK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21750}
}
abstract

An elastica knot is defined in terms of the Frenet-Serret curvature $\kappa(s,t)$ as a function of the arclength $s$ along the spatial curve ${\bf r}(s,t)$ at a fixed time $t$, which is a solution of the curvature differential equation $\partial^{2}_{s}\kappa(s,t) = -\;\kappa^{3}/2 + k_{0}^{4}\tau_{0}^{2}\;\kappa^{-3} + \lambda\,k_{0}^{2}\kappa/2$ that is obtained from a variational principle that minimizes the bending energy of the spatial curve under the constraint of a constant curve length. Here, the Frenet-Serret torsion $\tau(s,t)$ satisfies the conservation law $\kappa^{2}(s,t)\,\tau(s,t) \equiv k_{0}^{2}\,\tau_{0}$, while $\lambda$ is a constant of integration. After briefly reviewing the Hasimoto transformation from a space curve ${\bf r}(s,t)$ to the nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger equation (NLSE) $-\,iD^{-1}\partial_{t}\psi = \partial^{2}_{s}\psi + \frac{1}{2}\,|\psi|^{2}\psi$, where the constant $D$ has units of fluid circulation (m$^{2}$/sec), we show how the traveling-wave solution $\psi(s,t) = \Psi(s_{t} \equiv s - c\,t) \equiv \kappa(s_{t})\;\exp[i\theta(s_{t})]$ is mapped onto the curvature equation for an elastica knot, with $\theta^{\prime}(s_{t}) \equiv c/(2D) + k_{0}^{2}\tau_{0}/\kappa^{2}(s_{t})$ and the elastica-knot constant $k_{0}^{2}\lambda = -\frac{1}{2}\,(c/D)^{2}$ expressed in terms of the traveling-wave NLSE parameters $(c,D)$. The constraint of a closed 3D elastica knot imposes spatial periodicity conditions that introduce a unique set of knot parameters for which the NLSE traveling wave can exist. The present work shows that the traveling-wave solution on a closed elastica knot requires an extension of the classical elastica-knot parameter space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21750 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. 3D Plot of the magnitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the curves a: q0 = 1 and b: q0 = m associated with ν 2 = 0, and the curve c: q0 = (1 + m)/3 associated with γ 2 = 0. Both functions (66) and (67) are positive either inside region I, defined as the closed triangle (0 < q0 < 1 2 and −1 < m < 1 2 ), or inside region II, defined as the open triangle (m < −1 and (1 + m) < a b c I II -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 m 0.5 1 q0 FIG. 2. Plots of the curves ν 2 = 0 (a: q0 = 1 an… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows the function Q(m) in the (m, q0)-plane in the range −6 ≤ m ≤ 1, with the dashed lines (a,b,c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Plots of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Plot of the normalized vertical solution (108) versu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Plot of the normalized radial solution (112) versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Plot of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Parametric 3D plot of the elastica knot ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Top view (left) and side view (right) of the elastica [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Plot of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Plots of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Parametric plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Another simple separable solution of the NLSE (26) is ψ(s,t ) = 2 k sech (ks) exp(iDk 2t), (28) where the wavenumberk is constant

    Simple separable NLSE solutions The simplest separable NLSE solutions include the time-dependent solution Ψ(t) = k0 exp(iDk 2 0t/2) and its Galilean gauge transformation (27) [25] ψ(s,t ) = k0 exp [ iτ0 (s −Dτ 0t) +iDk 2 0t/2 ] , where τ0 ≡ v/(2D). Another simple separable solution of the NLSE (26) is ψ(s,t ) = 2 k sech (ks) exp(iDk 2t), (28) where the wa...

  2. [2]

    Curvature envelope soliton Next, using our notation, Zakharov and Shabat [16] proposed the following traveling-wave envelope-soliton solution for the NLSE (26) ψ(s,t ) = 2 k sech[k (s −ct )] exp [i Φ(s,t )], (30) where the phase Φ( s,t ) is defined, up to a constant, as Φ(s,t ) ≡ c 2D ( s − c 2t ) + Dk2t, (31) 5 which corresponds to the Galilean gauge tran...

  3. [3]

    From the Frenet-Serret curvature κ(s) = 2 τ0 sech(τ0s) and the constant torsion τ (s) = τ0, Hasimoto [10] was then able to construct a spatial curve r(s)

    Torsion envelope soliton Hasimoto [10], on the other hand, considered the case of a spatial curve with constant torsion τ0, and obtained the NLSE solitary wave ψ(s,t ) = 2 τ0 sech [τ0 (s −ct )] exp(iτ0s), (36) where the constant wave speed is c ≡ 2Dτ0. From the Frenet-Serret curvature κ(s) = 2 τ0 sech(τ0s) and the constant torsion τ (s) = τ0, Hasimoto [10...

  4. [4]

    Betchov, On the curvature and torsion of an isolated vortex filament , J

    R. Betchov, On the curvature and torsion of an isolated vortex filament , J. Fluid Mech. 22, 471 (1965)

    1965

  5. [5]

    Here, the parameter m in Eq

    Classical Jacobi elliptic solution If we assume that ( m,q 0) are both positive, we select case (i) for the Jacobi elliptic solution for q(v): q(v) ≡ q0 − m sn2(v|m), (64) so that the solution for the curvature differential equation (58) is expressed as [32–34] κ2(s) = k2 0 [ 1 − m q0 sn2 ( k0s 2√q0 ⏐ ⏐ ⏐ ⏐m )] , (65) which exactly corresponds to the Lange...

  6. [6]

    NLSE elastica knot parameter space Figure 2 shows the curves a: q0 = 1 and b: q0 = m associated with ν2 = 0, and the curve c: q0 = (1 + m)/3 associated with γ2 = 0. Both functions (66) and (67) are positive either inside region I, defined as the closed triangle (0 <q 0 < 1 2 and −1<m < 1 2 ), or inside region II, defined as the open triangle ( m< −1 and (1 ...

  7. [7]

    Nakayama, H

    K. Nakayama, H. Segur, and M. Wadati, Integrability and the Motion of Curves , Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2603 (1992)

    1992

  8. [8]

    Extended Jacobi elliptic solution When both q0 andm are negative (region II of Fig. 2), the argument z = k0s/(2√ q0) ≡ iy becomes imaginary and, using the identity (A12), the solution (65) becomes κ2(s) = k2 0 [ 1 + n |q0| sd2 ( k0s 2 √ |q0|n′ ⏐ ⏐ ⏐ ⏐ ⏐n′ )] , (68) which is periodic, with a real period k0S(m,q 0)/2 = 2 √ |q0|n′ K(n′), where n′(m) = 1 /(1 ...

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    = 4 3q2 0 ( 1 −m +m2) , (76) g3 = 4 e1 e2 e3 = 4 27q3 0 ( 2 − 3m − 3m2 + 2m3) ,(77) ∆ = g3 2 − 27 g2 3 = 16 m2 (1 −m)2/q6

  2. [10]

    from the Frenet-Serret curvature κ(s,t ) and torsion τ (s,t ) of a spatial curve r(s,t ) to the solution ψ(s,t ) ≡ κ(s,t ) exp[ i ∫ s 0 τ (s′,t )ds′] of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation (26). In Sec. IV, we show that the traveling- wave solution κ(st) exp[iθ (st)] of the N...

  3. [11]

    2) or in the range m < m− 0 ≃ − 4.7510 and q0 < 0 (i.e., region II in Fig

    (78) Here, we note that, g2 > 0 for all real values of ( m,q 0), g3 > 0 in the range −1 < m < 1 2 when q0 > 0 (i.e., region I in Fig. 2) or in the range m < m− 0 ≃ − 4.7510 and q0 < 0 (i.e., region II in Fig. 2), while g3 < 0 in the range m− 0 < m <−1 or 1 2 < m <1. Hence, the...

  4. [12]

    Closed elastica knot Since a knot must be confined in space we want the vertical solution to be periodic for all ( m,q 0): ∆z = z(ξ + Ξz) −z(ξ) ≡ 0, (103) which requires that 0 = 1 + 1 2γ2(m,q 0) + 1 q0 ( E(m) K(m) − 1 ) = (1 +m) 2q0 − 1 2 + 1 q0 ( E(m) K(m) − 1 ) , (104) where...

  5. [13]

    Extended elastica-knot parameter space Figure 3 shows the function Q(m) in the (m,q 0)-plane in the range −6 ≤ m ≤ 1, with the dashed lines (a,b,c) 11 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 1 2 3 4 5 FIG. 4. Plots of ν 2(m) (solid) and γ2(m) (dashed) versus m in the range −25 ≤m ≤ 0. We note that...

  6. [14]

    Periodic vertical solution The periodic vertical solution (102) is expressed in di- mensionless form z(ξ) ≡k0z(ξ) as z(ξ) = R2(m)k2 0√ Q(m) Z ( ξ√ Q(m) ⏐ ⏐ ⏐ ⏐ ⏐m ) , (108) where Q(m) is given by Eq. (105). The requirement of periodicity and the positivity of the functions (10...

  7. [15]

    Jacobi elliptic solution The Jacobi elliptic traveling-wave solution of the NLSE (26) on an elastica knot proceeds as follows. First, we write the ansatz (43) in terms of the elastica solution (65): Ψ(ξt) ≡ k0 √ 1 − m q0 sn2 ( ξt √q0 ⏐ ⏐ ⏐ ⏐m ) ei θ(ξt), (139) where we defined ...

  8. [16]

    (81), the phase integral (140) becomes θ(ξt) ≡ γξ t − i 2 ∫ ξt 0 ℘′(v +ω3)dw ℘(w +ω3) − ℘(v +ω3), (144) which has an identical form as Eq

    Weierstrass elliptic solution We now wish to show that the introduction of Weier- strass elliptic functions yields a simpler expression for the traveling-wave NLSE solution (43), where, using Eq. (81), the phase integral (140) becomes θ(ξt) ≡ γξ t − i 2 ∫ ξt 0 ℘′(v +ω3)dw ℘(w ...

  9. [17]

    Complete elliptic integrals First, we begin with the complete elliptic integral of the first kind [37] K(m) = ∫ π/2 0 dφ √ 1 −m sin2φ , (A1) which is real for 0 ≤m< 1, where K(0) = π/2 and K(m) diverges as m → 1. For m < 0, after performing the change of integration variable φ ...

  10. [18]

    Jacobi elliptic functions Next, we consider the transformations (1) of the Jacobi elliptic functions sn( z|m), cn(z|m) and dn( z|m). When m< 0 andz =x is real (i.e.,q0 > 0), we use the identities [37] sn(x|m) = √ n′ sd(x/ √ n′|n), (A9) cn(x|m) = cd( x/ √ n′|n), (A10) dn(x|m) =...

  11. [19]

    Nizette and A

    M. Nizette and A. Goriely, Towards a classification of Euler-Kirchhoff filaments , J. Math. Phys. 40, 2830 (1999)

    1999

  12. [20]

    Singer, Lectures on elastic curves and rods , AIP Conf

    D.A. Singer, Lectures on elastic curves and rods , AIP Conf. Proc. 1002, 3 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    Matsutani, Euler’s elastica and beyond , J

    S. Matsutani, Euler’s elastica and beyond , J. Geom. Symm. Phys. 17, 45 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    Uby, M.B

    L. Uby, M.B. Isichenko, and V.V. Yankov, Vortext fil- ament dynamics in plasmas and superconductors , Phys. Rev. E 52, 932 (1995)

    1995

  15. [23]

    Ricca, Rediscovery of Da Rios equations , Nature 352, 561 (1991)

    R.L. Ricca, Rediscovery of Da Rios equations , Nature 352, 561 (1991)

    1991

  16. [24]

    Ricca, The contributions of Da Rios and Levi-Civita to asymptotic potential theory and vortex filament dy- namics, Fluid Dyn

    R.L. Ricca, The contributions of Da Rios and Levi-Civita to asymptotic potential theory and vortex filament dy- namics, Fluid Dyn. Res. 18, 245 (1996)

    1996

  17. [25]

    Salman, Breathers on quantized surperfluid vortices , Phys

    H. Salman, Breathers on quantized surperfluid vortices , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 165301 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Kleckner and W

    D. Kleckner and W. Irvine, Creation and dynamics of knotted vortices, Nature Phys. 9, 253 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    Hasimoto, Motion of a vortext filament and its relation to elastica , J

    H. Hasimoto, Motion of a vortext filament and its relation to elastica , J. Phys. Soc. Japan 31, 293 (1971)

    1971

  20. [28]

    Hasimoto, A soliton on a vortex filament , J

    H. Hasimoto, A soliton on a vortex filament , J. Fluid Mech. 51, 477 (1972)

    1972

  21. [29]

    Lamb, Jr., Solitons and the motion of helical curves , Phys

    G.L. Lamb, Jr., Solitons and the motion of helical curves , Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 235 (1976); erratum, 37, 723 (1976)

    1976

  22. [30]

    Lamb, Jr., Solitons on moving space curves , J

    G.L. Lamb, Jr., Solitons on moving space curves , J. Math. Phys. 18, 1654 (1977)

    1977

  23. [31]

    lies inside the triangle 0 ≤ m ≤ q0 ≤ 1, our work greatly extends the parameter space by m ≤ q0 ≤ 1, where both m and q0 can be negative (e.g., region II)

  24. [32]

    Kida, A vortex filament moving without change of form, J

    S. Kida, A vortex filament moving without change of form, J. Fluid Mech. 112, 397 (1981)

    1981

  25. [33]

    Hasimoto, Elementary aspects of vortex motion , Fluid Dyn

    H. Hasimoto, Elementary aspects of vortex motion , Fluid Dyn. Res. 3, 1 (1988)

    1988

  26. [34]

    Balakrishnan and R

    R. Balakrishnan and R. Dandoloff, The Schr¨ odinger equation as a moving curve , Phys. Lett. A 260, 62 (1999)

    1999

  27. [35]

    Zakharov and A.B

    V.E. Zakharov and A.B. Shabat, Exact theory of two-dimensional self-focusing and one-dimensional self- modulation of waves in nonlinear media , Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 62 (1972)

    1972

  28. [36]

    Ablowitz and B

    M. Ablowitz and B. Prinari, Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger sys- tems: continuous and discrete , Scholarpedia 3, 5561 (2008)

    2008

  29. [37]

    Here, the complete elliptic integrals K(m) and E(m) of the first and second kinds are defined in Eqs

    Z(u|m) ≡ Z[am(u|m) |m], with the Jacobi ampli- tude function am( u|m) ≡ arcsin[sn(u|m)], and we use the identity [37] m ∫ v 0 sn2(u|m)du = ( 1 − E(m) K(m) ) v − Z (v|m), where Z(v + 2 K(m)|m) = Z(v|m). Here, the complete elliptic integrals K(m) and E(m) of the first and second ...

  30. [38]

    Dewar, A Lagrangian theory for nonlinear wave packets in a collisionless plasma , J

    R.L. Dewar, A Lagrangian theory for nonlinear wave packets in a collisionless plasma , J. Plasma Phys. 7, 267 (1972)

    1972

  31. [39]

    Dysthe and H.L

    K.B. Dysthe and H.L. P´ ecseli,Non-linear Langmuir wave modulation in collisionless plasmas , Plasma Phys. 19, 931 (1977)

    1977

  32. [40]

    Dysthe, E

    K.B. Dysthe, E. Mjølhus, H.L. P´ ecseli, and L. Stenflo, Langmuir solitons in magnetized plasmas , Plasma Phys. 20, 1087 (1978)

    1978

  33. [41]

    Peregrine, Water waves, nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations and their solutions , J

    D.H. Peregrine, Water waves, nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations and their solutions , J. Austral. Phys. B 25, 16 (1983)

    1983

  34. [42]

    Sulem and P.L

    C. Sulem and P.L. Sulem, The nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation: self-focusing and wave collapse . Springer (2007)

    2007

  35. [43]

    Dysthe, H.E

    K.B. Dysthe, H.E. Krogstad, and P. M¨ uller, Oceanic rogue waves, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 287 (2008)

    2008

  36. [44]

    Akbari-Moghanjoughi, Traveling wave solutions of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys

    M. Akbari-Moghanjoughi, Traveling wave solutions of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Plasmas 24, 102313 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    Karjanto, The nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation: A mathematical model with its wide-ranging applications , arXiv:1912.10683v1 (2019)

    R. Karjanto, The nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation: A mathematical model with its wide-ranging applications , arXiv:1912.10683v1 (2019)

    1912 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Carter, C.W

    J.D. Carter, C.W. Curtis, and H. Kalisch, Particle tra- jectories in nonlinear Schr¨ odinger models, Water Eaves 2, 31 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    Smondyrev, P

    M.A. Smondyrev, P. Vansant, F.M. Peeters, and J.T. De- vreese, Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on a circle, Phys. Rev. B 52, 11231 (1995)

    1995

  40. [48]

    Salman, Multiple breathers on a vortex filament , J

    H. Salman, Multiple breathers on a vortex filament , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 544, 012005 (2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    Langer and D

    J. Langer and D. A. Singer, Knotted elastic curves in R3, J. London Math. Soc. 30, 512 (1984)

    1984

  42. [50]

    Langer and D

    J. Langer and D. A. Singer, The total squared curvature of closed curves , J. Diff. Geom. 20, 1 (1984)

    1984

  43. [51]

    Langer and D

    J. Langer and D. A. Singer, Lagrangian aspects of the 20 Kirchhoff elastic rod , SIAM Rev. 38, 605 (1996)

    1996

  44. [52]

    Barros, A

    M. Barros, A. Fernandez, and O.J. Garay, Dynamics of charges and solitons , J. Geom. Phys. 125, 12 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    D. F. Lawden, Elliptic Functions and Applications (Springer-Verlag, 1989)

    1989

  46. [54]

    Reinhart and P.L

    W.P. Reinhart and P.L. Walker, Jacobian Elliptic Func- tions, in NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, F.W.J. Olver, D.W. Lozier, R.F. Boisvert, and C.W. Clark, eds. (Cambridge, 2010), Chap. 22

    2010

  47. [55]

    Milne-Thomson, Jacobi Elliptic Functions and Theta Functions & Elliptic Integrals , in Handbook of mathematical functions, M

    L.M. Milne-Thomson, Jacobi Elliptic Functions and Theta Functions & Elliptic Integrals , in Handbook of mathematical functions, M. Abramowitz and I.A. Ste- gun, eds (National Bureau of Standards Washington, 2006), Chaps. 16 & 17

    2006

  48. [56]

    Pfefferl´ e, L

    D. Pfefferl´ e, L. Gunderson, S.R. Hudson, and L. Noakes, Non-planar elasticae as optimal curves for the magnetic axis of stellarators , Phys. Plasmas 25, 092508 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Brizard and D

    A.J. Brizard and D. Pfefferl´ e, Equivalent elastica knots , arXiv: 1807.04696v1 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Cary and A.J

    J.R. Cary and A.J. Brizard, Hamiltonian theory of guiding-center motion , Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 693 (2009)

    2009

  51. [59]

    Dysthe and K

    K.B. Dysthe and K. Trulsen, Note on breather type So- lutions of the NLS as models for freak-waves , Phys. Scr. T82, 48 (1999)

    1999

  52. [60]

    Chabchoub, B

    A. Chabchoub, B. Kibler, J. M. Dudley, and N. Akhme- diev, Hydrodynamics of periodic breathers , Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20140005 (2014)

    2014

  53. [61]

    Akhmediev and V.I

    N. Akhmediev and V.I. Korneev, Modulation instability and periodic solutions of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equa- tion, Theor. Math. Phys. 69, 1089 (1986)

    1986

  54. [62]

    Akhmediev, A

    N. Akhmediev, A. Ankiewicz, and M. Taki, Waves that appear from nowhere and disappear without a trace , Phys. Lett. A 373, 675 (2009)

    2009

  55. [63]

    Akhmediev, J.M

    N. Akhmediev, J.M. Soto-Crespo, and A. Ankiewicz, Ex- treme waves that appear from nowhere: On the nature of rogue waves, Phys. Lett. A 373, 2137 (2009)

    2009

  56. [64]

    Ma, Studies Appl

    Y.C. Ma, Studies Appl. Math. 60, 43 (1979)

    1979

  57. [65]

    Ince, V.—The Periodic Lam´ e Functions, Proc

    E.L. Ince, V.—The Periodic Lam´ e Functions, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 60, 47 (1940)

    1940

  58. [66]

    Erd´ elyi,XIII

    A. Erd´ elyi,XIII. On Lam´ e functions, The London, Edin- burgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 31, 123 (1941)

    1941

  59. [67]

    Volkmer, Lam´ e Functions, in NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, F.W.J

    H. Volkmer, Lam´ e Functions, in NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, F.W.J. Olver, D.W. Lozier, R.F. Boisvert, and C.W. Clark, eds. (Cambridge, 2010), Chap. 29

    2010

  60. [68]

    A. J. Brizard, An introduction to Lagrangian mechanics , 2nd ed. (World Scientific, 2015)

    2015

  61. [69]

    Hasegawa, An historical review of application of op- tical solitons for high speed communications , Chaos 10, 475 (2000)

    A. Hasegawa, An historical review of application of op- tical solitons for high speed communications , Chaos 10, 475 (2000)

    2000

  62. [70]

    Hasegawa, Optical soliton: Review of its discovery and applications in ultra-high-speed communications , Fron- tiers in Physics 10, 1044845 (2022)

    A. Hasegawa, Optical soliton: Review of its discovery and applications in ultra-high-speed communications , Fron- tiers in Physics 10, 1044845 (2022)

    2022

  63. [71]

    Bohm, A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden ” Variables

    D. Bohm, A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden ” Variables. I , Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952)

    1952

  64. [72]

    Brizard, A primer on elliptic functions with applica- tions in classical mechanics , Eur

    A.J. Brizard, A primer on elliptic functions with applica- tions in classical mechanics , Eur. J. Phys. 30, 729 (2009)

    2009

  65. [73]

    Brizard, Scenarios for magnetic X-point collapse in 2D dissipationless extended magnetohydrodynamics , Comm

    A.J. Brizard, Scenarios for magnetic X-point collapse in 2D dissipationless extended magnetohydrodynamics , Comm. Nonlinear Sci. Num. Sim. 152, 109243 (2026)

    2026

  66. [74]

    Reinhart and P.L

    W.P. Reinhart and P.L. Walker, Weierstrass Elliptic and Modular Functions , in NIST Handbook of Mathemati- cal Functions, F.W.J. Olver, D.W. Lozier, R.F. Boisvert, and C.W. Clark, eds. (Cambridge, 2010), Chap. 23

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.