About the proof of the so called exact classical confidence intervals. Where is the trick?
classification
⚛️ physics.data-an
math.HOmath.PRphysics.ed-ph
keywords
confidenceintervalsproofcalledclassicalconcerningexactexperimental
read the original abstract
In this note I go through the `proof' of frequentistic confidence intervals and show what it logically implies concerning the value of a physical quantity given an experimental observation (nothing).
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.