Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MlingConf: A Comprehensive Study of Multilingual Confidence Estimation on Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.13606 v4 pith:7WACDI4I submitted 2024-02-21 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords confidencetasksestimationslanguagemultilingualllmsdominancecomprehensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The tendency of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate hallucinations raises concerns regarding their reliability. Therefore, confidence estimations indicating the extent of trustworthiness of the generations become essential. However, current LLM confidence estimations in languages other than English remain underexplored. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a comprehensive investigation of Multilingual Confidence estimation (MlingConf) on LLMs, focusing on both language-agnostic (LA) and language-specific (LS) tasks to explore the performance and language dominance effects of multilingual confidence estimations on different tasks. The benchmark comprises four meticulously checked and human-evaluated high-quality multilingual datasets for LA tasks and one for the LS task tailored to specific social, cultural, and geographical contexts of a language. Our experiments reveal that on LA tasks English exhibits notable linguistic dominance in confidence estimations than other languages, while on LS tasks, using question-related language to prompt LLMs demonstrates better linguistic dominance in multilingual confidence estimations. The phenomena inspire a simple yet effective native-tone prompting strategy by employing language-specific prompts for LS tasks, effectively improving LLMs' reliability and accuracy in LS scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Estimating Uncertainty from Reasoning: A Large-Scale Study of Multi- and Crosslingual MCQA Performance in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A large-scale multilingual evaluation of LLM uncertainty estimation methods across 22 languages and 9 models finds that English reasoning closes the UE gap for low-resource languages and that optimal UE method choice ...

  2. UAlign: Leveraging Uncertainty Estimations for Factuality Alignment on Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UAlign improves LLM factuality alignment by adding predicted confidence and semantic entropy as input features to prompts and the reward model, helping the model answer known questions and refuse unknown ones.

  3. Seed-Free Synthetic Data Generation Framework for Instruction-Tuning LLMs: A Case Study in Thai

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A seed-free, Wikipedia-backed synthetic data pipeline lets a 5,000-example Thai fine-tune reach BERTScore close to Thai LLMs trained on tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of instructions.

Pith tools