pith. sign in

arxiv: 1401.6330 · v2 · pith:7WJTMWQMnew · submitted 2014-01-24 · 💻 cs.CL

A Statistical Parsing Framework for Sentiment Classification

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords sentimentparsingpolarityparserclassificationframeworkmodelsentences
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We present a statistical parsing framework for sentence-level sentiment classification in this article. Unlike previous works that employ syntactic parsing results for sentiment analysis, we develop a statistical parser to directly analyze the sentiment structure of a sentence. We show that complicated phenomena in sentiment analysis (e.g., negation, intensification, and contrast) can be handled the same as simple and straightforward sentiment expressions in a unified and probabilistic way. We formulate the sentiment grammar upon Context-Free Grammars (CFGs), and provide a formal description of the sentiment parsing framework. We develop the parsing model to obtain possible sentiment parse trees for a sentence, from which the polarity model is proposed to derive the sentiment strength and polarity, and the ranking model is dedicated to selecting the best sentiment tree. We train the parser directly from examples of sentences annotated only with sentiment polarity labels but without any syntactic annotations or polarity annotations of constituents within sentences. Therefore we can obtain training data easily. In particular, we train a sentiment parser, s.parser, from a large amount of review sentences with users' ratings as rough sentiment polarity labels. Extensive experiments on existing benchmark datasets show significant improvements over baseline sentiment classification approaches.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dual Alignment Between Language Model Layers and Human Sentence Processing

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Later LLM layers align better with human cognitive effort in syntactic ambiguity than early layers do, indicating dual processing modes and complementary benefits from multi-layer probability updates.