Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 69 references

Autonomous Quantum Error Correction of Spin-Oscillator Hybrid Qubits

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single engineered jump operator autonomously stabilizes spin-oscillator hybrid qubits, exponentially suppressing logical phase errors without any measurements or feedforward.

desk verdict Clean hybrid AutoQEC construction with a single jump operator that really does suppress both spin and oscillator phase noise; the math holds and the rapid-dissipation caveat is the only real soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.11145 v2 pith:7XAW7PTO submitted 2026-04-13 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics

Sungjoo Cho , Ju-yeon Gyhm , Hyukjoon Kwon , Hyunseok Jeong This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-phphysics.optics PACS 03.67.Pp03.65.Yz42.50.Lc
keywords autonomousquantumerrorcorrectionhybridqubitspin-oscillatorengineereddissipationnoise-biasedqubitscatcodestrappedionsmetrology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that quantum information encoded jointly in a spin and a harmonic oscillator can be protected from phase noise by continuous engineered dissipation alone. The authors design one correlated jump operator that continuously pulls every state back into a two-dimensional hybrid code space spanned by product states of spin eigenstates and coherent states. As the oscillator amplitude grows, logical phase-error rates fall exponentially while bit-error rates rise only linearly, producing a strongly noise-biased logical qubit. The same dynamics can be concatenated with a simple repetition code to suppress both error types, or used to keep hybrid metrological probes above the standard quantum limit under realistic noise. All required interactions—controlled beam-splitter coupling and spin-dependent displacement—have already been demonstrated in trapped-ion experiments, offering a practical, measurement-free route to hardware-efficient logical qubits.

What carries the argument

The correlated jump operator R̂ = σ̂z(α − σ̂x ⊗ â). It converts both spin phase flips and oscillator number-phase noise into recoveries that return the state to the code space, while commuting with bit flips so those errors remain uncorrected but become the dominant, linearly growing channel.

What would settle it

Prepare the hybrid qubit at several coherent-state amplitudes α, apply controlled dephasing while the recovery channel is running much faster than the noise, and extract the logical phase-error rate; the claim fails if that rate does not fall exponentially approximately as α exp(−2α²).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The recovery Lindbladian generated by the single jump operator R̂ = σ̂z(α − σ̂x ⊗ â) makes every density operator in the hybrid code space span{|+⟩_L, |−⟩_L} a stationary point. First-order perturbation theory in the rapid-dissipation limit then yields an exponentially suppressed logical phase-error rate γ_Z ∼ α e^{−2α²} (or better) for both spin and oscillator phase noise, while bit-error rates grow only linearly with α².

Load-bearing premise

The exponential phase-error suppression holds only when the engineered recovery is much faster than every physical noise rate and the cooled bath that realizes the jump can be eliminated without introducing new decoherence channels that spoil the bias.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Concatenating the hybrid qubits with a distance-d repetition code converts the exponential-linear error trade-off into simultaneous suppression of both logical bit and phase errors.
  • The same AutoQEC dynamics protects hybrid entangled probes so that displacement estimation retains quantum Fisher information beyond the standard quantum limit under laboratory noise levels.
  • Logical X reduces to a bare spin flip and logical Z to a spin-dependent displacement, giving a universal gate set with interactions already native to trapped ions and circuit QED.
  • A single system-bath coupling replaces the multi-qubit interactions of discrete-variable AutoQEC or the strong nonlinear dissipation of pure cat codes, lowering hardware overhead.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the required interactions are only linear in the oscillator operators and first-order in the spin, the same recovery map may transfer more readily to circuit-QED platforms that already couple a transmon to a cavity than schemes relying on engineered two-photon loss.
  • The conserved quantities of the recovery Liouvillian imply a natural gauge freedom after decoding; partial error information may remain usable even when the system is only approximately in the steady-state manifold.
  • If the continuous strong-cooling assumption can be relaxed by pulsed or Floquet driving of the same jump operator, the protocol could become viable in systems where continuous bath relaxation is limited.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an autonomous (measurement-free) quantum error-correction protocol for a hybrid spin-oscillator qubit encoded as |+\rangle_L = |+\rangle_s \otimes |+\alpha\rangle_b and |−\rangle_L = |−\rangle_s \otimes |−\alpha\rangle_b. A single engineered jump operator R̂ = \sigmâ_z (\alpha − \sigmâ_x \otimes â) is used to construct the recovery Lindbladian L_R = \kappa_R D[R̂], which renders the two-dimensional code space a stationary subspace of the dynamics. First-order perturbation theory in the rapid-dissipation limit, together with four conserved quantities of L_R (derived from hybrid parity and an off-diagonal equation for an operator K̂), yields an exponentially suppressed logical phase-error rate \gamma_Z ∼ \alpha e^{−2\alpha^{2}} (or better) while bit-error rates grow only linearly with \alpha^{2} (Table I). The resulting noise-biased hybrid qubits are shown to be concatenable with a repetition code and useful for displacement metrology that preserves quantum Fisher information beyond the SQL. The required system-bath Hamiltonian is assembled from controlled beam-splitter and spin-dependent displacement interactions already demonstrated in trapped-ion platforms.

Significance. If the rapid-dissipation premise holds, the work supplies a concrete, hardware-efficient route to noise-biased logical qubits that avoids multi-qubit interactions (DV AutoQEC) and strong nonlinear oscillator dissipation (CV cat codes). The single correlated jump that simultaneously corrects phase noise on both the spin and the oscillator is a genuine architectural simplification, and the explicit first-order rates, conserved-quantity derivation, and platform-specific numerics make the claim falsifiable. Compatibility with already-demonstrated ion-trap primitives and the dual use for concatenation and metrology further raise the practical interest. The result is therefore a solid, incremental advance in hybrid AutoQEC rather than a paradigm shift, but one that is well-positioned for near-term experimental tests.

major comments (2)
  1. The central quantitative claims (Table I, exponential phase-error suppression) rest on the rapid-dissipation limit \kappa_R/\kappa_E \gg 1 together with adiabatic elimination of a strongly cooled bath (\gamma_b gg g, \kappa_R ≈ 4g^{2}/\gamma_b). While the first-order formulas match the idealized numerics of Fig. 6, the manuscript does not quantify residual bath-induced phase errors or the finite-\kappa_R corrections that would appear under the experimental parameters of Table II. A short analysis or additional simulation showing that the exponential scaling survives for the quoted g/\gamma_b ratios is needed to confirm that the claimed advantage is not confined to an asymptotic regime unreachable with present hardware.
  2. Logical gates are asserted to be simple (X_L = \sigmâ_x, Z_L via spin-dependent displacement or hybrid parity, XX entangling gates), yet no analysis is given of how these operations interact with the continuous recovery dynamics. In particular, it is unclear whether the gates commute with R̂, preserve the noise bias, or require temporary suspension of L_R. Without at least a first-order estimate of gate-induced logical errors, the claim that the construction is “compatible with simple logical gates” remains incomplete for a fault-tolerance-oriented proposal.
minor comments (5)
  1. In the abstract and introduction the phrase “exponentially suppressed … as the coherent-state amplitude increases” should be qualified by the accompanying linear growth of the bit-error rate, which is only later made explicit.
  2. Figure 1(a) caption and the surrounding text refer to an “attractive potential” Γ(ψ); a brief remark that this is an effective potential for the coherent-state ansatz (not a true Hamiltonian potential) would avoid possible misreading.
  3. Table I lists asymptotic expressions involving I(α); the definition of I(α) appears only in the table footnote and should be moved into the main text or SM for easier reference.
  4. End Matter and SM contain essential derivations (conserved quantities, first-order rates). Cross-references in the main text could be made more precise (e.g., “see SM Sec. II for the derivation of Eq. (6)”).
  5. A few typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “substraction” for “subtraction,” occasional missing hats on operators). A careful proof-reading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: stationary code space and exponential phase-error rates follow from the engineered jump operator and conserved quantities without fitted inputs or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The central construction defines the recovery Liouvillian LR = κR D[R̂] with the single correlated jump R̂ = σ̂z(α − σ̂x ⊗ â) and shows by direct action that every density operator in span{|+⟩L, |−⟩L} is stationary (LR(ρL) = 0). Conserved quantities J0–J3 are obtained from the hybrid parity Π̂h = σ̂z ⊗ Π̂b and the off-diagonal equation for K̂; first-order logical rates γX, γZ are then evaluated as Tr[J† D[E] ρL] and yield the exponential suppression γZ ∼ α e^{-2α^{2}} (Table I and SM). These steps are algebraic and self-contained. Experimental κ values are taken from independent published ion-trap and circuit-QED works solely for numerical illustration (Figs. 2–4, End Matter); they are not fitted to produce the claimed rates. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors’ prior work, no ansatz is smuggled via self-citation, and no prediction reduces by construction to a fitted constant. The rapid-dissipation premise (κR/κE ≫ 1, adiabatic elimination κR ≈ 4g^{2}/γb) is an explicit regime-of-validity assumption, not a circular reduction. Score 0 is therefore warranted.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard open-system Lindblad formalism, the hybrid encoding already studied in photonics and circuit QED, and the adiabatic-elimination map from a system-bath Hamiltonian to an effective jump. The only genuinely new object is the correlated jump operator R̂ itself; experimental rates are literature inputs, not free fits that generate the exponential suppression.

free parameters (3)
  • coherent-state amplitude α
    Chosen by the experimenter; controls the exponential-linear tradeoff. Not fitted to data but free in the design space.
  • engineered dissipation rate κR (or g, γb)
    Set by the strength of the system-bath coupling and bath cooling; must satisfy κR ≫ κE for the first-order formulas to hold.
  • physical noise rates (κσx, κσz, κa, κa†, κn, γth, nth)
    Taken from experimental ranges in Table II; used for numerical illustration, not for fitting the analytic γZ formula.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Markovian Lindblad master equation describes both physical noise LE and engineered recovery LR
    Standard open-systems assumption; invoked from the definition of L onward.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic elimination of a strongly damped bath mode yields effective dissipation κR D[R̂] with κR ≈ 4g²/γb
    Cited via Reiter & Sørensen; used to claim experimental realizability of LR.
  • domain assumption Local Markovian error channels (thermal loss/heating, dephasing, spin bit/phase flips) dominate over non-Markovian or control-induced noise from the engineered bath
    Implicit in the decomposition L = LE + LR and in the first-order rate table.
  • standard math Hybrid parity Πh = σ̂z ⊗ Πb is a strong symmetry of R̂, guaranteeing a two-dimensional steady code space
    Direct algebraic consequence of the form of R̂; used to identify conserved quantities.
invented entities (2)
  • Correlated recovery jump operator R̂ = σ̂z(α − σ̂x ⊗ â)
    purpose: Single dissipator that simultaneously corrects phase noise on spin and oscillator and stabilizes the hybrid code space
    The central new object of the paper; no independent experimental observation yet, but it is a concrete operator that can be engineered from demonstrated interactions.
  • Hybrid logical qubit |±⟩L = |±⟩s ⊗ |±α⟩b with associated logical gates and conserved quantities J1,2
    purpose: Encoding that turns the exponential phase-error suppression into a usable noise-biased logical qubit
    Hybrid encodings exist in prior work; the specific AutoQEC-protected version and its conserved quantities are new to this construction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Autonomous Quantum Error Correction of Spin-Oscillator Hybrid Qubits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7XAW7PTO

@misc{pith2026260411145,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Autonomous Quantum Error Correction of Spin-Oscillator Hybrid Qubits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7XAW7PTO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.11145}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a novel measurement-free scheme for stabilizing a spin-oscillator hybrid qubit via autonomous quantum error correction. The engineered Lindbladian renders the code space into an attractive steady-state subspace, realized by coupling the storage mode to a rapidly cooled bath through a controlled beam-splitter and spin-dependent displacement interactions. The continuous variable-discrete variable hybrid approach to autonomous quantum error correction preserves the hardware efficiency of conventional dissipation engineering while simplifying the required system-bath coupling. The construction is compatible with simple logical gates and leverages primitives already demonstrated in experimental platforms, such as trapped-ion systems, suggesting a practical route to hardware-efficient, noise-biased logical qubits without repeated syndrome measurements and feedforward.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11145 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Probability decay rate Γ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Logical (a) bit error rates and (b) phase error rates o [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The error probabilities per single error correction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) QCRB of the probe state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Approximate Markov diagram of states up to excita [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys. �� , 1155 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    Schlosshauer, Decoherence, the measurement prob- lem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics, Rev

    M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence, the measurement prob- lem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. �� , 1267 (2005)

    2005

  3. [3]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge university press, 2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    P. W. Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory, Phys. Rev. A �� , R2493 (1995)

    1995

  5. [5]

    Paetznick et al

    A. Paetznick et al. , Demonstration of logical qubits and repeated error correction with better-than-physical error rates, arXiv:2404.02280

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Putterman et al

    H. Putterman et al. , Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic qubits, Nature ��� , 927 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Acharya et al

    R. Acharya et al. , Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold, Nature ��� , 920 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Bluvstein et al

    D. Bluvstein et al. , Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature ��� , 58 (2024)

    2024

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    H¨ affner, C

    H. H¨ affner, C. F. Roos, and R. Blatt, Quantum comput- ing with trapped ions, Phys. Rep. ��� , 155 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    Kjaergaard et al

    M. Kjaergaard et al. , Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play, Annu. Rev. Condens. �� , 369 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    A. d. iOlius, P. Fuentes, R. Or´ us, P. M. Crespo, and J. E. Martinez, Decoding algorithms for surface codes, Quantum �, 1498 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    J. P. Paz and W. H. Zurek, Continuous error correction, Proc. R. Soc. A ��� , 355 (1998)

    1998

  5. [13]

    Leghtas et al

    Z. Leghtas et al. , Hardware-efficient autonomous quan- tum memory protection, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 120501 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum reser- voir engineering with laser cooled trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. �� , 4728 (1996)

    1996

  7. [15]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Quan- tum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation, Nat. Phys. �, 633 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    P. M. Harrington, E. J. Mueller, and K. W. Murch, Engi- neered dissipation for quantum information science, Nat. Rev. Phys. �, 660 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Sarovar and G

    M. Sarovar and G. J. Milburn, Continuous quantum error correction by cooling, Phys. Rev. A �� , 012306 (2005)

    2005

  10. [18]

    Reiter, A

    F. Reiter, A. S. Sørensen, P. Zoller, and C. A. Muschik, Dissipative quantum error correction and application to quantum sensing with trapped ions, Nat. Commun. �, 1822 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Pastawski, L

    F. Pastawski, L. Clemente, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum memories based on engineered dissipation, Phys. Rev. A �� , 012304 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    H. Kwon, R. Mukherjee, and M. S. Kim, Reversing lind- blad dynamics via continuous petz recovery map, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 020403 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Mirrahimi et al., Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation, New J

    M. Mirrahimi et al., Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation, New J. Phys. �� , 045014 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Lescanne et al

    R. Lescanne et al. , Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator, Nat. Phys. �� , 509 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Putterman et al., Preserving phase coherence and lin- earity in cat qubits with exponential bit-flip suppression, Phys

    H. Putterman et al., Preserving phase coherence and lin- earity in cat qubits with exponential bit-flip suppression, Phys. Rev. X �� , 011070 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Xu et al

    Q. Xu et al. , Autonomous quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation with squeezed cat qubits, npj Quantum Inf. �, 1 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Gottesman, A

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A �� , 012310 (2001)

    2001

  18. [26]

    Campagne-Ibarcq et al

    P. Campagne-Ibarcq et al. , Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator, Nature ��� , 368 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    de Neeve, T.-L

    B. de Neeve, T.-L. Nguyen, T. Behrle, and J. P. Home, Error correction of a logical grid state qubit by dissipative pumping, Nat. Phys. �� , 296 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Hillmann and F

    T. Hillmann and F. Quijandr´ ıa, Quantum error cor- 6 rection with dissipatively stabilized squeezed-cat qubits, Phys. Rev. A ��� , 032423 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Guillaud and M

    J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, Repetition cat qubits for fault-tolerant quantum computation, Phys. Rev. X �, 041053 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Chamberland et al

    C. Chamberland et al. , Building a Fault-Tolerant Quan- tum Computer Using Concatenated Cat Codes, PRX Quantum �, 010329 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Niset, J

    J. Niset, J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, and N. J. Cerf, No-go theorem for gaussian quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. Lett.��� , 120501 (2009)

    2009

  24. [32]

    H. C. J. Gan, G. Maslennikov, K.-W. Tseng, C. Nguyen, and D. Matsukevich, Hybrid quantum computing with conditional beam splitter gate in trapped ion system, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 170502 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Jeon et al., Two-mode bosonic state tomography with single-shot joint-parity measurement of a trapped ion, PRX Quantum �, 040352 (2025)

    H. Jeon et al., Two-mode bosonic state tomography with single-shot joint-parity measurement of a trapped ion, PRX Quantum �, 040352 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    D. J. Wineland et al. , Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. ��� , 259 (1998)

    1998

  27. [35]

    Wallraff et al., Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrody- namics, Nature ��� , 162 (2004)

    A. Wallraff et al., Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrody- namics, Nature ��� , 162 (2004)

    2004

  28. [36]

    Lee and H

    S.-W. Lee and H. Jeong, Near-deterministic quantum teleportation and resource-efficient quantum computa- tion using linear optics and hybrid qubits, Phys. Rev. A �� , 022326 (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    U. L. Andersen, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, P. van Loock, and A. Furusawa, Hybrid discrete- and continuous- variable quantum information, Nat. Phys.�� , 713 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    van Loock, Optical hybrid approaches to quantum information, Laser Photonics Rev

    P. van Loock, Optical hybrid approaches to quantum information, Laser Photonics Rev. �, 167 (2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    Lee et al., Photonic hybrid quantum computing, New- ton �, 100359 (2026)

    J. Lee et al., Photonic hybrid quantum computing, New- ton �, 100359 (2026)

    2026

  32. [40]

    Bose and H

    S. Bose and H. Jeong, Quantum teleportation of hy- brid qubits and single-photon qubits using Gaussian re- sources, Phys. Rev. A ��� (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    S. Bose, J. Singh, A. Cabello, and H. Jeong, Long- distance entanglement sharing using hybrid states of dis- crete and continuous variables, Phys. Rev. Appl. �� (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Omkar, Y

    S. Omkar, Y. S. Teo, and H. Jeong, Resource-efficient topological fault-tolerant quantum computation with hy- brid entanglement of light, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 060501 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Lee et al

    J. Lee et al. , Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation by Hybrid Qubits with Bosonic Cat Code and Single Pho- tons, PRX Quantum �, 030322 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Vlastakis et al., Characterizing entanglement of an ar- tificial atom and a cavity cat state with Bell’s inequality, Nat

    B. Vlastakis et al., Characterizing entanglement of an ar- tificial atom and a cavity cat state with Bell’s inequality, Nat. Commun. �, 8970 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    P. C. Haljan, K.-A. Brickman, L. Deslauriers, P. J. Lee, and C. Monroe, Spin-dependent forces on trapped ions for phase-stable quantum gates and entangled states of spin and motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. �� , 153602 (2005)

    2005

  38. [46]

    K. G. Johnson, J. D. Wong-Campos, B. Neyenhuis, J. Mizrahi, and C. Monroe, Ultrafast creation of large Schr¨ odinger cat states of an atom, Nat. Commun.�, 697 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    Touzard et al

    S. Touzard et al. , Gated conditional displacement read- out of superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 080502 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys. �� , 119 (1976)

    1976

  41. [49]

    V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A �� , 022118 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    Supplemental Material for more detailed analysis and dis- cussions

  43. [51]

    Brownnutt, M

    M. Brownnutt, M. Kumph, P. Rabl, and R. Blatt, Ion- trap measurements of electric-field noise near surfaces, Rev. Mod. Phys. �� , 1419 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Poulin, Stabilizer formalism for operator quantum error correction, Phys

    D. Poulin, Stabilizer formalism for operator quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. Lett. �� , 230504 (2005)

    2005

  45. [53]

    C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, N. M. Linke, M. A. Sepiol, and D. M. Lucas, High-fidelity quantum logic gates us- ing trapped-ion hyperfine qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 060504 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    R. W. Heeres et al. , Cavity state manipulation using photon-number selective phase gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 137002 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    K. A. Gilmore et al. , Quantum-enhanced sensing of displacements and electric fields with two-dimensional trapped-ion crystals, Science ��� , 673 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    C. W. Helstrom, Minimum mean-squared error of esti- mates in quantum statistics, Physics Letters A �� , 101 (1967)

    1967

  49. [57]

    H. Kwon, U. R. Fischer, S.-W. Lee, and L. Jiang, Restor- ing heisenberg scaling in time via autonomous quantum error correction, arXiv:2504.13168

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Reiter and A

    F. Reiter and A. S. Sørensen, Effective operator formal- ism for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A �� , 032111 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    Frattini, Three-wave Mixing in Superconducting Cir- cuits: Stabilizing Cats with SNAILs, Yale Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Dissertations (2021)

    N. Frattini, Three-wave Mixing in Superconducting Cir- cuits: Stabilizing Cats with SNAILs, Yale Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Dissertations (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    Q. Wu, Y. Shi, and J. Zhang, Continuous raman sideband cooling beyond the lamb-dicke regime in a trapped ion chain, Phys. Rev. Res. �, 023022 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Feng et al

    L. Feng et al. , Efficient ground-state cooling of large trapped-ion chains with an electromagnetically-induced- transparency tripod scheme, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� , 053001 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    C. T. Hann et al., Hybrid Cat-Transmon Architecture for Scalable, Hardware-Efficient Quantum Error Correction, PRX Quantum �, 030305 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Puri et al

    S. Puri et al. , Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits, Sci. Adv. �, eaay5901 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    Q. Xu, J. K. Iverson, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, and L. Jiang, Engineering fast bias-preserving gates on stabilized cat qubits, Phys. Rev. Res. �, 013082 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    Van Damme et al., Advanced CMOS manufacturing of superconducting qubits on 300 mm wafers, Nature ��� , 74 (2024)

    J. Van Damme et al., Advanced CMOS manufacturing of superconducting qubits on 300 mm wafers, Nature ��� , 74 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Sivak et al., Kerr-free three-wave mixing in supercon- ducting quantum circuits, Phys

    V. Sivak et al., Kerr-free three-wave mixing in supercon- ducting quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Appl. �� , 054060 (2019)

    2019

  59. [67]

    M. G. A. Paris, Quantum Estimation for Quantum Tech- nology, Int. J. Quant. Inf. �� , 125 (2009)

    2009

  60. [68]

    Hempel et al

    C. Hempel et al. , Entanglement-enhanced detection of single-photon scattering events, Nat. Photon. �, 630 (2013)

    2013

  61. [69]

    Bargmann, On a Hilbert space of analytic functions and an associated integral transform part I, Communica- tions on Pure and Applied Mathematics �� , 187 (1961)

    V. Bargmann, On a Hilbert space of analytic functions and an associated integral transform part I, Communica- tions on Pure and Applied Mathematics �� , 187 (1961). 7 ��� ������ ������� �������� ����� ������ We define a cou- ple of bases that span the spin-oscillator system us...

    1961

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.