REVIEW 2 cited by
Contextualizing Problems to Student Interests at Scale in Intelligent Tutoring System Using Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Contextualizing problems to align with student interests can significantly improve learning outcomes. However, this task often presents scalability challenges due to resource and time constraints. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 offer potential solutions to these issues. This study explores the ability of GPT-4 in the contextualization of problems within CTAT, an intelligent tutoring system, aiming to increase student engagement and enhance learning outcomes. Through iterative prompt engineering, we achieved meaningful contextualization that preserved the difficulty and original intent of the problem, thereby not altering values or overcomplicating the questions. While our research highlights the potential of LLMs in educational settings, we acknowledge current limitations, particularly with geometry problems, and emphasize the need for ongoing evaluation and research. Future work includes systematic studies to measure the impact of this tool on students' learning outcomes and enhancements to handle a broader range of problems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Beyond the Textual: Generating Coherent Visual Options for MCQs
A four-stage framework (convertibility check, question/reason generation, optimal pair selection, and template-based image generation) produces MCQs with image options from ScienceQA content.
-
REVA: Supporting LLM-Generated Programming Feedback Validation at Scale Through User Attention-based Adaptation
REVA uses instructors' highlighting and edits to reorder AI-generated feedback reviews and propagate revisions, and a 12-instructor lab study reports higher feedback precision and recall than a baseline without these ...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.