Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 48 references

Ion-Acoustic Waves and the Proton-Alpha Streaming Instability at Collisionless Shocks

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a proton-alpha streaming instability, driven by the cross-shock potential, is the source of ion-acoustic waves at low Mach number collisionless shocks and can supply the resistivity shocks need to persist.

desk verdict A genuinely new mechanism with a real hole: the observed wave vectors at the highest drifts sit on the stable side of the paper's own linear theory. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07953 v1 pith:7YSC6NG7 submitted 2025-02-11 physics.space-ph physics.plasm-ph

Daniel B. Graham , Yuri V. Khotyaintsev , Ahmad Lalti This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.space-phphysics.plasm-ph
keywords ion-acousticwavesproton-alphastreaminginstabilitycollisionlessshocksbowshockcross-shockpotentialanomalousresistivityparticle-in-cellsimulationMagnetosphericMultiscale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the large relative drift between protons and alpha particles created by a shock's electric potential is the source of the ion-acoustic waves seen at low Mach number collisionless shocks. Using five bow shock crossings observed by the Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft, the authors show that protons are decelerated more than alphas across the ramp, producing drifts of roughly 100 to 200 km/s. Linear theory and a one-dimensional particle-in-cell simulation predict waves with properties matching the observed waves: Debye-scale wavelengths, wave vectors along the shock normal, and propagation highly oblique to the magnetic field. In the simulation the waves grow into ion holes, heat both ion species, and reduce the proton-alpha drift, which provides a resistive mechanism that helps sustain collisionless shocks.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the proton-$\alpha$ streaming instability. Because transmission across a narrow ramp gives a downstream speed $V_{d,n} = \sqrt{V_{u,n}^2 - 2Ze\phi/m_i}$, the lower charge-to-mass ratio of $\alpha$ particles makes them decelerate less than protons for the same cross-shock potential $\phi$, creating a persistent relative drift $\Delta V_n$. The linear analysis uses the unmagnetized dispersion relation with a drifting $\alpha$ population, where Landau resonance with alphas sets the growth; for large drift speeds the most unstable waves become oblique so that $\omega/(k\cos\theta)$ stays near $V_\alpha$. The PIC simulation shows that the same conditions produce waves at $k\lambda_D$ around 1 that grow to roughly 800 mV/m and trap ions in potential wells, matching the observed wave localization and amplitudes.

What would settle it

A comparison of the observed wave properties against a fully magnetized dispersion solver with finite electron Larmor radius effects for θkB near 90 degrees would settle the claim: if the predicted unstable wave numbers and angles no longer cover the observations at all five shock crossings, the mechanism would be called into question.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the proton-alpha streaming instability, fed by the differential deceleration of protons and alphas in the cross-shock potential, can generate the ion-acoustic waves routinely observed at low Mach number quasi-perpendicular shocks. At the five crossings of 24 April 2023, the measured proton-alpha drift reaches about 200 km/s across the ramp, and the observed wave properties (kλD around 0.4 near the ramp, k along the shock normal, θkB near 90 degrees, and wave frequencies below the proton plasma frequency) are consistent with linear growth rates computed from the unmagnetized dispersion relation and with the nonlinear evolution seen in the PIC simulation. The instability saturates by trapping protons and alphas in ion holes, transferring energy from drifting alphas to protons, flattening the alpha distribution, forming a proton shoulder, and reducing the relative drift, thereby acting as a source of anomalous resistivity at shocks.

Load-bearing premise

The linear analysis assumes an unmagnetized plasma, even though the observed waves propagate nearly perpendicular to the background magnetic field, so electron magnetization could change the wave growth and frequencies enough to break the agreement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The proton-alpha streaming instability can explain ion-acoustic waves at shocks where no reflected protons are observed, as in two of the five studied crossings.
  • The instability provides a source of anomalous resistivity at low Mach number shocks, helping sustain the shock without collisions.
  • Downstream of the ramp, the instability leaves alpha particles with flat-top distributions and protons with high-energy shoulders, signatures that can be searched for in spacecraft data.
  • Because large proton-alpha drifts arise from the cross-shock potential over a range of parameters, the same instability should operate at higher Mach number shocks and may contribute to their ion-acoustic wave activity.
  • The strongest wave fields are predicted where electron temperature exceeds ion temperatures, which is close to the ramp, matching the observed localization of the waves.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism implies that alpha abundance controls shock resistivity: shocks in alpha-poor plasma should show weaker ion-acoustic turbulence and possibly different ramp structure, a prediction testable with composition data from other shocks.
  • If the instability operates at supercritical shocks, the predicted flat-top alpha distributions and proton shoulders could serve as diagnostics in existing spacecraft datasets to distinguish this mechanism from proton-proton streaming.
  • A testable extension of the paper's unmagnetized linear model would include magnetized electrons in two or three dimensions; this may shift the most unstable wave vectors off the shock normal while still matching the observed waves, and could change the predicted ion heating rates.
  • The simulated energy transfer from alphas to protons could be converted into an effective collision frequency, parameterizing anomalous resistivity for fluid shock models, although the paper does not provide such a parameterization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that ion-acoustic waves observed at five low-Mach-number quasi-perpendicular bow shock crossings on 24 April 2023 are generated by the proton-alpha streaming instability. Using MMS data, the authors document a proton-alpha relative drift Delta V_n reaching ~100-200 km/s across the shock ramps and intense electrostatic waves with k lambda_D ~ 0.4, wave vectors closely aligned with the shock normal, and wave-normal angles near 90 degrees to B. A Liouville mapping model links the drift to differential deceleration by the cross-shock potential. An unmagnetized homogeneous linear dispersion analysis and a 1D PIC simulation are used to show that this drift is unstable and that the instability saturates by forming ion holes, heating protons and alphas, and reducing the drift. The authors conclude that the instability is the likely source of the observed waves and can provide shock resistivity.

Significance. If established, the proposed mechanism would provide a new, observationally grounded pathway for ion-acoustic wave generation and anomalous resistivity at low-Mach-number shocks, independent of reflected-proton or Buneman mechanisms. The paper's strengths include the use of multi-spacecraft interferometry to constrain the wave vector, the Liouville-model-based prediction of the drift, a systematic parameter survey of the linear instability, a PIC simulation with physical mass ratios, and public availability of the analysis scripts. The main concern is not the plausibility of the mechanism but the quantitative consistency between the model and the observations: the observed wavenumber, the wave-vector geometry, and the largest-drift cases are not yet shown to be reproduced by the theory and simulation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2 (Figure 2f) and Section 4 (Figures 4b, 4l)] Observed waves near the ramp are characterized by k lambda_D ~ 0.4 (Figure 2f), while the linear theory gives peak growth at k lambda_D ~ 1 for both the nominal and V_alpha = 200 km/s cases (Figures 4b and 4l), and the PIC simulation in Section 5 also saturates at k lambda_D ~ 1. No quantitative reconciliation is provided for this factor-of-about-2.5 difference in wavenumber, so the claim of good agreement between predicted and observed wave properties is not yet supported.
  2. [Section 2 (Figure 2g) and Section 4 (Figures 4c-d)] For the observed high-drift events (shocks 1 and 5, Delta V_n ~ 150-200 km/s, Figure 2d), linear theory for V_alpha = 200 km/s predicts unstable waves only for 30 degrees < theta < 73 degrees relative to the drift, with maximum growth at theta ~ 60 degrees (Figures 4c-d). However, the observed waves have k closely aligned with the shock normal n-hat (Figure 2g). If the alpha drift is along n-hat at the interferometry points, these waves fall in the stable theta ~ 0 region; if the drift has a transverse component, the homogeneous calculation with V_alpha along n-hat is not the applicable model. The full three-dimensional drift vector at the wave locations is not reported, so the claimed consistency between the observed k direction and the unstable branch is not established for the largest-drift shocks.
  3. [Section 4, Eq. (2)] The linear analysis uses the unmagnetized homogeneous dispersion relation, yet the observed waves are highly oblique to B, with theta_kB ~ 90 degrees (Figure 2h). Since electron magnetization can significantly modify the dispersion and growth of quasi-perpendicular waves, the unmagnetized calculation cannot be assumed valid for the observed geometry. The authors list magnetized electrons as future work in the Discussion, but because the comparison with observations is the central claim, the paper should either quantify the magnetization effect or restrict the consistency claim to propagation angles where the unmagnetized approximation is valid.
  4. [Section 5] The PIC simulation is one-dimensional and initialized with V_alpha = 100 km/s, corresponding to the nominal, nearly parallel instability. For the cases with the largest observed drift (V_alpha ~ 200 km/s), linear theory predicts maximum growth at theta ~ 60 degrees, which cannot be represented in a 1D simulation. The simulation therefore does not model the wave properties of shocks 1 and 5, and the statement that the simulation agrees with the observations is not supported for those events; this is acknowledged in the Discussion, but it remains a gap in the evidence chain.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Figure 2d] The notation alternates between Delta V_n and delta V_n for the proton-alpha relative drift; please use one symbol consistently.
  2. [Section 2, paragraph after Figure 2g] In the sentence stating that the waves are highly oblique to B, the parenthetical reference should be to Figure 2h, which displays theta_kB, rather than Figure 2g.
  3. [Section 3] The ad hoc 10% reduction of the shock 2 potential should be justified with a quantitative criterion; without such a justification, the claimed agreement between modeled and observed drift across all five shocks is weakened.
  4. [Section 4] The nominal plasma parameters (ne = 12 cm^-3, Te = 100 eV, Tp = 3 eV, T_alpha = 12 eV, V_alpha = 100 km/s) should be compared with the measured local values at the wave intervals, ideally in a table, so that the representativeness of the linear-theory calculations is transparent.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the wave prediction is self-contained; only a minor ad hoc adjustment enters the supporting drift model for shock 2.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Figure 3 caption (Section 3)]
    "Figure 3f–3h show ∆ Vn, ∆Vt2, and |∆V|, respectively. For shock 2 we reduced ϕ by 10 % compared with model prediction in Graham and Khotyaintsev (2024) to reduce the influence of reflected protons on the velocity moments."

    Section 3 presents the modeled drifts as '∆ Vn predicted for the five shocks (Graham & Khotyaintsev, 2024)', but for shock 2 the input cross-shock potential ϕ was reduced by 10% relative to the prior model so that the modeled peak ∆Vn ≈ 100 km/s matches the observed value. Because this modeled drift is the input used to evaluate the proton-alpha streaming instability, the model–observation agreement for shock 2 is partly enforced by the adjustment rather than independently derived. The effect is localized and not load-bearing for the central claim, since the linear theory is evaluated at nominal Vα = 100 and 200 km/s rather than at the fitted per-shock drift, so the predicted wave properties do not reduce to this fit.

full rationale

The derivation chain is largely self-contained. The observed drift ΔVn is measured directly from FPI reduced distributions, and the Liouville model reproduces it independently for four of the five shocks; the 10% ϕ reduction for shock 2 is a minor, localized adjustment to a supporting input, not a fit to the observed wave spectra. The linear analysis solves the standard unmagnetized dispersion relation (Eq. 2) with explicitly stated nominal plasma parameters, and the predicted kλD ≈ 1, ω ≈ 0.76ωpp, and vph ≈ 0.64cs are not regressed against the interferometric wave measurements; the PIC simulation likewise evolves from Maxwellian initial conditions and is not constrained by the observed wave amplitudes or wave vectors. The principal self-citations (Graham & Khotyaintsev 2024 for shock parameters and Liouville mapping; Lalti et al. 2023 for interferometry; Graham et al. 2024 for alpha-particle identification in FPI) supply methods and prior model results, but the central instability conclusion is corroborated by direct observations of ΔVn and wave properties and by an independent linear-theory/simulation calculation. The noted tension between observed kλD ≈ 0.4 and theoretical kmaxλD ≈ 1, and the fact that the Vα = 200 km/s case predicts oblique growth while the observed wave vectors are normal-aligned, are unresolved consistency/correctness concerns rather than circular reductions. No step equates an output to an input by construction apart from the minor shock-2 drift adjustment.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed unmagnetized dispersion relation, the Liouville mapping model from prior work by the same group, and the kinematic deceleration formula. The nominal plasma parameters and the 10% potential reduction for shock 2 are effectively free inputs. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Nominal plasma parameters for linear theory and simulation = ne=12 cm-3, Te=100 eV, np=10 cm-3, Tp=3 eV, nα=1 cm-3, Tα=12 eV, Vα=100 km/s
    Used in Section 4 and the PIC simulation; not connected to a specific event, so they act as chosen inputs. The simulation saturation amplitude (800 mV/m) happens to match the observed peak, but the parameters were not tuned to match wave data.
  • Shock 2 potential reduction = 10% reduction of ϕ compared with model prediction
    Ad hoc adjustment in Figure 3 caption to reduce the influence of reflected protons on modeled velocity moments; affects the predicted ΔVn for shock 2 and improves agreement with observations.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Unmagnetized homogeneous dispersion equation (Eq. 2) with stationary Maxwellian protons and electrons and drifting Maxwellian alphas
    Neglects the magnetic field. The observed waves are highly oblique to B (θkB ~ 90 degrees), and electron magnetization could modify the dispersion and growth rates. The authors acknowledge this in the Discussion.
  • domain assumption Liouville mapping model of ion distributions from Graham and Khotyaintsev (2024)
    Used in Section 3 to predict proton and alpha deceleration and ΔVn across the five shocks. The paper notes that if wave-particle interactions strongly affect ions, the model will be inaccurate downstream.
  • domain assumption Kinematic deceleration of transmitted ions by the cross-shock potential, Eq. (1): Vd,n^2 = Vu,n^2 - 2Zeϕ/mi
    Assumes a narrow ramp, no reflection, and no other forces acting on the ions; used to derive the maximum possible drift between protons and alphas.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ion-Acoustic Waves and the Proton-Alpha Streaming Instability at Collisionless Shocks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7YSC6NG7

@misc{pith2026250207953,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ion-Acoustic Waves and the Proton-Alpha Streaming Instability at Collisionless Shocks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7YSC6NG7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07953}
}
read the original abstract

Ion-acoustic waves are routinely observed at collisionless shocks and could be an important source of resistivity. The source of instability and the effects of the waves are not fully understood. We show, using Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission observations and numerical modeling, that across low Mach number shocks a large relative drift between protons and alpha particles develops, which can be unstable to the proton-alpha streaming instability. The results from linear analysis and a numerical simulation show that the resulting waves agree with the observed wave properties. The generated ion-acoustic waves are predicted to become nonlinear and form ion holes, maintained by trapped protons and alphas. The instability reduces the relative drift between protons and alphas, and heats the ions, thus providing a source of resistivity at shocks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07953 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the crossings of shocks 1 and 5 observed by MMS1. (a)–(e) Shock 1 and (f)–(j) Shock 5.(a) B in (nˆ, ˆt1, ˆt2) coordinates. (b) Reduced 1D ion distribution along vn. (c) ∆Vn = (Vp − Vα)n. (d) δE in despun local (DSL) coordinates. (e) Frequency-time spectrogram of E. The red, yellow, and blue lines are the electron cyclotron frequency fce, proton plasma frequency fpp, and the lower hybrid frequency fLH, re… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the profiles of the five shocks, and properties of the ion-acoustic waves, near the ramp versus position along nˆ, estimated from the shock speed (Graham & Khotyaint￾sev, 2024). Figure 2a shows Bt1 of the five shocks. The shock width l increases with shock number. Figures 2b and 2c show that across the ramps, Te increases significantly and Vp,n decreases. Figure 2d shows that upstream of the shocks ∆Vn > 0, bu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Modeled proton and alpha distributions predicted by Liouville mapping. (a)–(d) Predicted bulk velocities and ion distributions for shock 3, (e)–(h) Vp − Vα for the five shocks. (a) Modeled Bt1 and ϕ for shock 3. (b) and (c) Reduced proton and alpha distributions along vn. The black lines are Vp,n and Vα,n. (d) ∆V in (nˆ, ˆt1, ˆt2) coordinates and |∆V|. (e) Profiles of Bt1 for the five shocks. (f)–(h) ∆Vn, ∆Vt2, and … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Properties of the proton-alpha streaming instability. (a) and (b) Frequency ω and growth rates γ versus k and θ for nominal conditions. (c) and (d) Same as (a) and (b) for Vα = 200 km s−1 . (e)–(g) Peak growth rate γmax, and ω and k corresponding to γmax, ωmax and kmax…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: PIC simulation of the proton-alpha streaming instability. (a) and (b) E and ϕ versus n and t. (c) Spatially-averaged energy densities versus time. The black, red, blue, green, and magenta lines are the electron energy density We, proton energy density Wp, alpha energy …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    apacite url apacite =6pt Acknowledgments. 6pt 1sp \@dates Received \@recvdate\@empty\@rcvaccrule \@recvdate \@revisedate\@empty ; revised \@revisedate; \@accptdate\@empty \@revisedate\@empty; accepted \@accptdate \@pubdate\@empty. ; published \@pubdate. -2pt \@authaddrs @list\@empty =.15in @list 1sp @list =9pt plus 2pt minus 6pt \@sluginfo width 4pc =3000...

    2001

  2. [2]

    gc" journal option for G-Cubed Nov 3, 2003 M Kelly, fixed noindent in subsubsubsection titles and for all sections in rog option Oct 2, 2003 M Kelly, added

    \@ifstar \@figbox \@figbox \@figbox#1#2#3 to !#1! #3 [#1][c] !#2!#3 \@tempdima#2 \@tempdima by2 \@tempdima by- \@tempdima by- \@height\@tempdima\@depth\@tempdima\@width @ to @ #3 Bib ??? ??? ??? =0 =0 = @figure=0 @table=0 #1 --#1 -24pt -2ex #1 0= #1 to 0 #1 I NDEX T ERMS: #1 #1 Citation: #1 Feb 9, 2009 Changed name and references to name from agu2001 to a...

    2009

  3. [3]

    APACrefauthors \ 1972

    abraham-shrauner1972 APACrefauthors Abraham-Shrauner, B. APACrefauthors \ 1972 . Determination of magnetohydrodynamic shock normals Determination of magnetohydrodynamic shock normals . J. Geophys. Res. 77 4 736-739 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/JA077i004p00736 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1029/ja077i004p00736 1972

  4. [4]

    \ Winske, D

    akimoto1985 APACrefauthors Akimoto, K. \ Winske, D. APACrefauthors \ 1985 . Ion-acoustic-like waves excited by the reflected ions at the Earth's bow shock Ion-acoustic-like waves excited by the reflected ions at the earth's bow shock . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 90 A12 12095-12103 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA12p1209...

    work page doi:10.1029/ja090ia12p12095 1985

  5. [5]

    \ Sanderson , J J

    allan1974 APACrefauthors Allan , W. \ Sanderson , J J. APACrefauthors \ 1974 08 . Temperature gradient drive ion acoustic instability Temperature gradient drive ion acoustic instability . Plasma Physics 16 8 753-767 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1088/0032-1028/16/8/005 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1088/0032-1028/16/8/005 1974

  6. [6]

    , Kellogg, P J

    bale1998 APACrefauthors Bale, S D. , Kellogg, P J. , Larson, D E. , Lin, R P. , Goetz, K. \ Lepping, R P. APACrefauthors \ 1998 . Bipolar electrostatic structures in the shock transition region: E vidence of electron phase space holes Bipolar electrostatic structures in the shock transition region: E vidence of electron phase space holes . Geophys. Res. L...

    work page doi:10.1029/98gl02111 1998

  7. [7]

    \ Mozer , F S

    bale2007 APACrefauthors Bale , S D. \ Mozer , F S. APACrefauthors \ 2007 05 . Measurement of Large Parallel and Perpendicular Electric Fields on Electron Spatial Scales in the Terrestrial Bow Shock Measurement of Large Parallel and Perpendicular Electric Fields on Electron Spatial Scales in the Terrestrial Bow Shock . Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 20 205001 . APACr...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.205001 2007

  8. [8]

    , Zhang, T L

    balikhin2008 APACrefauthors Balikhin, M A. , Zhang, T L. , Gedalin, M. , Ganushkina, N Y. \ Pope, S A. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Venus Express observes a new type of shock with pure kinematic relaxation Venus express observes a new type of shock with pure kinematic relaxation . Geophysical Research Letters 35 1 . APACrefDOI doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2007G...

    work page doi:10.1029/2007gl032495 2008

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    \ Langdon , A B

    birdsall1991 APACrefauthors Birdsall , C K. \ Langdon , A B. APACrefauthors \ 1991 . Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation . New York Adam Hilger

    1991

  2. [10]

    , Graham, D B

    boldu2024 APACrefauthors Boldú, J J. , Graham, D B. , Morooka, M. , André, M. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. , Dimmock, A. Owen, C. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Ion-Acoustic Waves Associated With Interplanetary Shocks Ion-acoustic waves associated with interplanetary shocks . Geophysical Res...

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    APACrefauthors \ 1959

    buneman1959 APACrefauthors Buneman, O. APACrefauthors \ 1959 . Dissipation of Currents in Ionized Media Dissipation of currents in ionized media . Phys. Rev. 115 503 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1103/PhysRev.115.503 APACrefDOI

    1959 doi

  4. [12]

    , Moore , T E

    burch2016a APACrefauthors Burch , J L. , Moore , T E. , Torbert , R B. \ Giles , B L. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Magnetospheric Multiscale Overview and Science Objectives Magnetospheric Multiscale Overview and Science Objectives . Space Sci. Rev. 199 5-21 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007...

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    \ Kennel , C F

    edminston1984 APACrefauthors Edmiston , J P. \ Kennel , C F. APACrefauthors \ 1984 . A parametric survey of the first critical Mach number for a fast MHD shock A parametric survey of the first critical Mach number for a fast MHD shock . Journal of Plasma Physics 32 3 429-441 ....

    1984 doi

  6. [14]

    , Valek , P

    elliott2018 APACrefauthors Elliott , H A. , Valek , P. , McComas , D J. , Delamere , P A. , Bagenal , F. , Gladstone , G R. Particle Team APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Determining the Alpha to Proton Density Ratio for the New Horizons Solar Wind Observations Determining the Alpha to...

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    , Lindqvist, P A

    mms1edpscpotbrst APACrefauthors Ergun, R E. , Lindqvist, P A. , Torbert, R B. , Ahmadi, N. , Graham, D B. \ Burch, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2022 1 . MMS 1 Electric Double Probe (EDP) Spacecraft Potential, Level 2 (L2), Burst Mode, 0.1220703125 ms Data , DOI= 10.48322/7T5Y-EQ71 MM...

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    , Lindqvist, P A

    mms1edpdcebrst APACrefauthors Ergun, R E. , Lindqvist, P A. , Torbert, R B. , Ahmadi, N. , Graham, D B. \ Burch, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2022 2 . Three-Dimensional Electric Field, Level 2 (L2), Burst Mode, 0.1220703125 ms Data [Dataset] Three-Dimensional Electric Field, Level 2 ...

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    , Tucker , S

    ergun2016 APACrefauthors Ergun , R E. , Tucker , S. , Westfall , J. , Goodrich , K A. , Malaspina , D M. , Summers , D. Cully , C M. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . The Axial Double Probe and Fields Signal Processing for the MMS Mission The Axial Double Probe and Fields Signal Process...

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    \ Torbert, R

    formisano1982 APACrefauthors Formisano, V. \ Torbert, R. APACrefauthors \ 1982 . Ion acoustic wave forms generated by ion-ion streams at the Earth's bow shock Ion acoustic wave forms generated by ion-ion streams at the earth's bow shock . Geophysical Research Letters 9 3 207-2...

    1982 doi

  11. [19]

    , Coroniti, F V

    fredricks1970 APACrefauthors Fredricks, R W. , Coroniti, F V. , Kennel, C F. \ Scarf, F L. APACrefauthors \ 1970 . Fast Time-Resolved Spectra of Electrostatic Turbulence in the Earth's Bow Shock Fast time-resolved spectra of electrostatic turbulence in the earth's bow shock . ...

    1970 doi

  12. [20]

    \ Conte , S D

    fried1961 APACrefauthors Fried , B D. \ Conte , S D. APACrefauthors \ 1961 . The Plasma Dispersion Function The Plasma Dispersion Function . Academic Press, New York

    1961

  13. [21]

    \ Omidi , N

    gary1987a APACrefauthors Gary , S P. \ Omidi , N. APACrefauthors \ 1987 . The ion-ion acoustic instability The ion-ion acoustic instability . Journal of Plasma Physics 37 1 45-61 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1017/S0022377800011983 APACrefDOI

    1987 doi

  14. [22]

    , Friedman, Y

    gedalin2015 APACrefauthors Gedalin, M. , Friedman, Y. \ Balikhin, M. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Collisionless relaxation of downstream ion distributions in low-Mach number shocks Collisionless relaxation of downstream ion distributions in low-Mach number shocks . Physics of Plasm...

    2015 doi

  15. [23]

    , Giles, B L

    mms1fpidesmomsbrst APACrefauthors Gershman, D J. , Giles, B L. , Pollock, C J. , Moore, T E. \ Burch, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2022 1 . MMS 1 Fast Plasma Investigation, Dual Electron Spectrometer (FPI, DES) Distribution Moments, Level 2 (L2), Burst Mode, 30 ms Data [Dataset] MMS ...

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    , Giles, B L

    mms1fpidisdistbrst APACrefauthors Gershman, D J. , Giles, B L. , Pollock, C J. , Moore, T E. \ Burch, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2022 2 . MMS 1 Fast Plasma Investigation, Dual Ion Spectrometer (FPI, DIS) Instrument Distributions, Level 2 (L2), Burst Mode, 0.15 s Data [Dataset] MMS ...

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    , Ergun, R

    goodrich2019 APACrefauthors Goodrich, K A. , Ergun, R. , Schwartz, S J. , Wilson III, L B. , Johlander, A. , Newman, D. Giles, B. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Impulsively Reflected Ions: A Plausible Mechanism for Ion Acoustic Wave Growth in Collisionless Shocks Impulsively reflecte...

    2019 doi

  18. [26]

    APACrefauthors \ 2025

    graham2025 APACrefauthors Graham, D B. APACrefauthors \ 2025 . Ion-Acoustic Waves and the Proton-Alpha Streaming Instability at Collisionless Shocks (v1.0.1) [ S oftware] Ion-acoustic waves and the proton-alpha streaming instability at collisionless shocks (v1.0.1) [ S oftware...

    2025 doi

  19. [27]

    \ Khotyaintsev, Y V

    graham2024b APACrefauthors Graham, D B. \ Khotyaintsev, Y V. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . The Structure and Kinetic Ion Behavior of Low Mach Number Shocks The structure and kinetic ion behavior of low mach number shocks . APACrefURL https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.09552 APACrefURL

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    , Khotyaintsev, Y V

    graham2024a APACrefauthors Graham, D B. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. , Dimmock, A P. , Lalti, A. , Boldú, J J. , Tigik, S F. \ Fuselier, S A. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Ion Dynamics Across a Low Mach Number Bow Shock Ion dynamics across a low mach number bow shock . Journal of Geophysica...

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    , Walker, S N

    hobara2008 APACrefauthors Hobara, Y. , Walker, S N. , Balikhin, M. , Pokhotelov, O A. , Gedalin, M. , Krasnoselskikh, V. Fazakerley, A. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Cluster observations of electrostatic solitary waves near the E arth's bow shock Cluster observations of electrostati...

    2008 doi

  22. [30]

    , Larson, D E

    hull2006 APACrefauthors Hull, A J. , Larson, D E. , Wilber, M. , Scudder, J D. , Mozer, F S. , Russell, C T. \ Bale, S D. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Large-amplitude electrostatic waves associated with magnetic ramp substructure at Earth's bow shock Large-amplitude electrostatic w...

    2006 doi

  23. [31]

    , Vasko , I Y

    kamaletdinov2024 APACrefauthors Kamaletdinov , S R. , Vasko , I Y. \ Artemyev , A V. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Nonlinear electron scattering by electrostatic waves in collisionless shocks Nonlinear electron scattering by electrostatic waves in collisionless shocks . Journal of P...

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    , Vasko, I Y

    kamaletdinov2022 APACrefauthors Kamaletdinov, S R. , Vasko, I Y. , Wang, R. , Artemyev, A V. , Yushkov, E V. \ Mozer, F S. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Slow electron holes in the Earth's bow shock Slow electron holes in the earth's bow shock . Physics of Plasmas 29 9 092303 . APACr...

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    , Vaivads, A

    khotyaintsev_2024_11550091 APACrefauthors Khotyaintsev, Y. , Vaivads, A. , Johansson, E P G. , Nilsson, T. , Karlsson, J. , Graham, D. Lindberg, M. APACrefauthors \ 2024 06 . irfu/irfu-matlab: v1.16.3 [Software]. irfu/irfu-matlab: v1.16.3 [software]. Zenodo . APACrefDOI doi:10...

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    , Khotyaintsev, Y V

    lalti2023 APACrefauthors Lalti, A. , Khotyaintsev, Y V. \ Graham, D B. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Short-Wavelength Electrostatic Wave Measurement Using MMS Spacecraft Short-wavelength electrostatic wave measurement using mms spacecraft . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Phy...

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    , Olsson , G

    lindqvist2016 APACrefauthors Lindqvist , P A. , Olsson , G. , Torbert , R B. , King , B. , Granoff , M. , Rau , D. Tucker , S. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . The Spin-Plane Double Probe Electric Field Instrument for MMS The Spin-Plane Double Probe Electric Field Instrument for MMS . ...

    2016 doi

  28. [36]

    \ Wilkerson , T D

    ogilvie1969 APACrefauthors Ogilvie , K W. \ Wilkerson , T D. APACrefauthors \ 1969 . Helium Abundance in the Solar Wind Helium Abundance in the Solar Wind . Sol. Phys. 8 2 435-449 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/BF00155391 APACrefDOI

    1969 doi

  29. [37]

    APACrefauthors \ 1985

    papadopoulos1985 APACrefauthors Papadopoulos, K. APACrefauthors \ 1985 . Microinstabilities and Anomalous Transport Microinstabilities and anomalous transport . Collisionless Shocks in the Heliosphere: A Tutorial Review Collisionless shocks in the heliosphere: A tutorial revie...

    1985 doi

  30. [38]

    , Moore , T

    pollock2016 APACrefauthors Pollock , C. , Moore , T. , Jacques , A. , Burch , J. , Gliese , U. , Saito , Y. Zeuch , M. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Fast Plasma Investigation for Magnetospheric Multiscale Fast Plasma Investigation for Magnetospheric Multiscale . Space Sci. Rev. 199 ...

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    , Anderson , B J

    russell2016 APACrefauthors Russell , C T. , Anderson , B J. , Baumjohann , W. , Bromund , K R. , Dearborn , D. , Fischer , D. Richter , I. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . The Magnetospheric Multiscale Magnetometers The magnetospheric multiscale magnetometers . Space Sci. Rev. 199 189-...

    2016 doi

  32. [40]

    , Magnes, W

    mms1fgmbrst APACrefauthors Russell, C T. , Magnes, W. , Wei, H. , Bromund, K R. , Plaschke, F. , Fischer, D. Burch, J L. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . MMS 1 Flux Gate Magnetometer (FGM) DC Magnetic Field, Level 2 (L2), Burst Mode, 128 Sample/s, v4/5 Data [Dataset] MMS 1 Flux Gate Ma...

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    APACrefauthors \ 1966 01

    sagdeev1966 APACrefauthors Sagdeev , R Z. APACrefauthors \ 1966 01 . Cooperative Phenomena and Shock Waves in Collisionless Plasmas Cooperative Phenomena and Shock Waves in Collisionless Plasmas . Reviews of Plasma Physics 4 23

    1966

  34. [42]

    , Mozer, F S

    vasko2022 APACrefauthors Vasko, I Y. , Mozer, F S. , Bale, S D. \ Artemyev, A V. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Ion-Acoustic Waves in a Quasi-Perpendicular Earth's Bow Shock Ion-acoustic waves in a quasi-perpendicular earth's bow shock . Geophysical Research Letters 49 11 e2022GL0986...

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    , Wang , R

    vasko2020 APACrefauthors Vasko , I Y. , Wang , R. , Mozer , F S. , Bale , S D. \ Artemyev , A V. APACrefauthors \ 2020 06 . On the nature and origin of bipolar electrostatic structures in the Earth's bow shock On the nature and origin of bipolar electrostatic structures in the...

    2020

  36. [44]

    , Vasko, I Y

    wang2020b APACrefauthors Wang, R. , Vasko, I Y. , Mozer, F S. , Bale, S D. , Artemyev, A V. , Bonnell, J W. Strangeway, R. APACrefauthors \ 2020 jan . Electrostatic Turbulence and Debye-scale Structures in Collisionless Shocks Electrostatic turbulence and debye-scale structure...

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    , Vasko, I Y

    wang2021b APACrefauthors Wang, R. , Vasko, I Y. , Mozer, F S. , Bale, S D. , Kuzichev, I V. , Artemyev, A V. Strangeway, R. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Electrostatic Solitary Waves in the Earth's Bow Shock: Nature, Properties, Lifetimes, and Origin Electrostatic solitary waves in ...

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    , Cattell, C

    wilson2007 APACrefauthors Wilson, L B. , Cattell, C. , Kellogg, P J. , Goetz, K. , Kersten, K. , Hanson, L. Kasper, J C. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Waves in Interplanetary Shocks: A Wind/WAVES Study Waves in interplanetary shocks: A wind/waves study . Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 041101 ....

    2007 doi

  39. [47]

    , Sibeck, D G

    wilson2014 APACrefauthors Wilson III, L B. , Sibeck, D G. , Breneman, A W. , Contel, O L. , Cully, C. , Turner, D L. Malaspina, D M. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Quantified energy dissipation rates in the terrestrial bow shock: 2. Waves and dissipation Quantified energy dissipation...

    2014 doi

  40. [48]

    , Winske , D

    wu1984 APACrefauthors Wu , C S. , Winske , D. , Zhou , Y M. , Tsai , S T. , Rodriguez , P. , Tanaka , M. Goodrich , C C. APACrefauthors \ 1984 . Microinstabilities associated with a high Mach number perpendicular bow shock. Microinstabilities associated with a high Mach number...

    1984 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.