Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.05012 v2 pith:A3BA5TL7 submitted 2019-07-11 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords datadeletionmodelsefficientindividualk-meanslearningmachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Intense recent discussions have focused on how to provide individuals with control over when their data can and cannot be used --- the EU's Right To Be Forgotten regulation is an example of this effort. In this paper we initiate a framework studying what to do when it is no longer permissible to deploy models derivative from specific user data. In particular, we formulate the problem of efficiently deleting individual data points from trained machine learning models. For many standard ML models, the only way to completely remove an individual's data is to retrain the whole model from scratch on the remaining data, which is often not computationally practical. We investigate algorithmic principles that enable efficient data deletion in ML. For the specific setting of k-means clustering, we propose two provably efficient deletion algorithms which achieve an average of over 100X improvement in deletion efficiency across 6 datasets, while producing clusters of comparable statistical quality to a canonical k-means++ baseline.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gradient Concentration, Not Weight Saliency, Explains Representation-Level Class Unlearning

    cs.LG 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    In class unlearning on CIFAR-10/100 with ResNet-18, the identity of saliency-selected weights does not affect representation-level recovery; late-layer gradient concentration and representation geometry drive the outcome.

  2. A Review on Machine Unlearning

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    The paper provides a structured review and classification of machine unlearning methods, linking them to data lineage management.

Pith tools