REVIEW 2 cited by
Spontaneous Emergence of Agent Individuality through Social Interactions in LLM-Based Communities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study the emergence of agency from scratch by using Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents. In previous studies of LLM-based agents, each agent's characteristics, including personality and memory, have traditionally been predefined. We focused on how individuality, such as behavior, personality, and memory, can be differentiated from an undifferentiated state. The present LLM agents engage in cooperative communication within a group simulation, exchanging context-based messages in natural language. By analyzing this multi-agent simulation, we report valuable new insights into how social norms, cooperation, and personality traits can emerge spontaneously. This paper demonstrates that autonomously interacting LLM-powered agents generate hallucinations and hashtags to sustain communication, which, in turn, increases the diversity of words within their interactions. Each agent's emotions shift through communication, and as they form communities, the personalities of the agents emerge and evolve accordingly. This computational modeling approach and its findings will provide a new method for analyzing collective artificial intelligence.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
How Large Language Models play humans in online conversations: a simulated study of the 2016 US politics on Reddit
GPT-4 impersonating Reddit users in 2016 election threads produces comments that lean toward consensus and are semantically separable from real human comments.
-
SocialEval: Evaluating Social Intelligence of Large Language Models
SocialEval is a 153-tree bilingual benchmark that evaluates LLM social intelligence through goal outcomes and interpersonal ability choices, finding LLMs below humans and biased toward prosocial behavior.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.