Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison of Information-Gain Criteria for Action Selection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.13540 v2 pith:A3YDNAZM submitted 2021-09-28 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords criteriaposeestimationinformationtactileactiondatagain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurate object pose estimation using multi-modal perception such as visual and tactile sensing have been used for autonomous robotic manipulators in literature. Due to variation in density of visual and tactile data, a novel probabilistic Bayesian filter-based approach termed translation-invariant Quaternion filter (TIQF) is proposed for pose estimation using point cloud registration. Active tactile data collection is preferred by reasoning over multiple potential actions for maximal expected information gain as tactile data collection is time consuming. In this paper, we empirically evaluate various information gain criteria for action selection in the context of object pose estimation. We demonstrate the adaptability and effectiveness of our proposed TIQF pose estimation approach with various information gain criteria. We find similar performance in terms of pose accuracy with sparse measurements (<15 points) across all the selected criteria. Furthermore, we explore the use of uncommon information theoretic criteria in the robotics domain for action selection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools