Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Predicting Human Translation Difficulty with Neural Machine Translation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.11852 v1 pith:A4K3XLZO submitted 2023-12-19 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords translationhumandifficultysurprisaltranslatorsdataderivedmachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Human translators linger on some words and phrases more than others, and predicting this variation is a step towards explaining the underlying cognitive processes. Using data from the CRITT Translation Process Research Database, we evaluate the extent to which surprisal and attentional features derived from a Neural Machine Translation (NMT) model account for reading and production times of human translators. We find that surprisal and attention are complementary predictors of translation difficulty, and that surprisal derived from a NMT model is the single most successful predictor of production duration. Our analyses draw on data from hundreds of translators operating across 13 language pairs, and represent the most comprehensive investigation of human translation difficulty to date.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools