Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Verifiable by Design: Aligning Language Models to Quote from Pre-Training Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.03862 v4 pith:A4N5NIZZ submitted 2024-04-05 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsquote-tuningdataquotetrustedverifiabilityaligningcorrectness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

To trust the fluent generations of large language models (LLMs), humans must be able to verify their correctness against trusted, external sources. Recent efforts, such as providing citations via retrieved documents or post-hoc provenance, enhance verifiability but provide no guarantees on their correctness. To address these limitations, we tackle the verifiability goal with a different philosophy: trivializing the verification process by developing models that quote verbatim statements from trusted sources in their pre-training data. We propose Quote-Tuning, which demonstrates the feasibility of aligning models to quote. The core of Quote-Tuning is a fast membership inference function that efficiently verifies text against trusted corpora. We leverage this tool to design a reward function to quantify quotes in model responses, and curate datasets for preference learning. Experiments show that Quote-Tuning significantly increases verbatim quotes from high-quality documents by up to 130% relative to base models while maintaining response quality. Quote-Tuning is applicable in different tasks, generalizes to out-of-domain data and diverse model families, and provides additional benefits to truthfulness. Our method not only serves as a hassle-free method to increase quoting but also opens up avenues for improving LLM trustworthiness through better verifiability.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LCDS: A Logic-Controlled Discharge Summary Generation System Supporting Source Attribution and Expert Review

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A logic-controlled pipeline with source mapping and sentence-level attribution generates discharge summaries that score higher than a GPT-4o chain-of-thought baseline in this study.

Pith tools