Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 74 references

Infrared Spectroscopy and Photochemistry of Aromatic Nitriles in Para-Hydrogen Matrices

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read 193 nm photolysis of benzonitrile and dicyanobenzene isomers splits the ring–CN bond, and the released CN radical picks up hydrogen from the para-hydrogen host to form HCN and HNC.

desk verdict Useful new IR reference data and a clean deuterium control, but the 'major channel' claim outruns the branching-ratio evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09889 v1 pith:A4V4FRKN submitted 2026-08-10 astro-ph.SR cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Sam McGrath , Vincent J. Esposito , Linshan Zeng , Thomas H. Speak , Brendan Moore , Pavle Djuricanin , Jun Miyazaki , Takamasa Momose
show 1 more author
Ilsa R. Cooke
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRcond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 33.20.Ea82.50.-m
keywords AromaticnitrilesPara-hydrogenmatrixisolationPhotochemistryBenzonitrileDicyanobenzeneInterstellarmoleculesAstrochemistryLaboratoryastrophysics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Motivated by the recent detections of benzonitrile and related aromatic nitriles in TMC-1, this study asks what happens when such molecules absorb a 193 nm photon under cold, hydrogen-rich conditions. The authors trapped cyanobenzene, its three dicyanobenzene isomers, and deuterated cyanobenzene in solid para-hydrogen, recorded their infrared spectra, and followed the photoproducts by FTIR. Their central claim is that the dominant dissociation channel is cleavage of the bond between the aromatic ring and the nitrile group, producing an aryl radical plus a CN radical. The CN radical then abstracts hydrogen from the surrounding para-hydrogen, so the major small-molecule products are HCN and HNC; because the deuterated sample also yields only HCN and HNC, the hydrogen is shown to come from the matrix, not from the aromatic ring. This matters for interpreting JWST mid-infrared observations of aromatics and for modeling the lifetimes of nitrile-substituted ring molecules in interstellar environments.

What carries the argument

The central object is the para-hydrogen matrix, a crystal of $p$-H$_2$ held at 3.7 K and described as free of the cage effect—the tendency of a rigid host lattice to trap or redirect photofragments—so that the trapped molecule photodissociates in a nearly gas-phase-like environment. The matrix is not only a host but also the reagent: the key step is the hydrogen-abstraction reaction CN + $p$-H$_2$ $\rightarrow$ HCN/HNC, and the isotope-labelled experiment with $\mathrm{C_6D_5CN}$ is what makes that step visible. For the spectroscopy, the assignments rest on hybrid quartic force fields—fourth-order Taylor expansions of the potential energy surface built from rDSD (double-hybrid DFT) quadratic force constants and B3LYP cubic and quartic constants—processed through second-order vibrational perturbation theory, which reproduces the measured IR transitions including the split CN stretch bands near 2238–2258 $\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be a gas-phase or neon-matrix 193 nm photolysis experiment that directly detects phenyl (or cyanophenyl) radicals and CN as primary products; if ring-opened or other isomers dominate instead, the ring–CN channel is not the major pathway. Equally direct: irradiate $\mathrm{C_6D_5CN}$ in $p$-H$_2$ and search for the DCN and DNC infrared bands—their appearance would mean the hydrogen in HCN/HNC comes at least partly from the ring, not solely from the matrix.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At 193 nm (6.42 eV), all four molecules—cyanobenzene and the 1,2-, 1,3-, and 1,4-dicyanobenzene isomers—produce the same major photoproducts: HCN (3302.7 $\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$) and HNC (3628.4 $\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), together with minor products previously seen in benzene photolysis, such as fulvene, cis-1,3-hexadien-5-yne, ethylene, and methane. The paper interprets the rapid appearance of HCN/HNC as a primary-channel signature and uses the isotope experiment to locate the hydrogen source: irradiating $\mathrm{C_6D_5CN}$ gives HCN and HNC but no detectable DCN or DNC, so the hydrogen atom must be abstracted from the $p$-H$_2$ host. That places the CN radical at the centre of the mechanism and identifies ring–CN bond fission as the dominant dissociation channel. The aromatic fragment, phenyl or cyanophenyl, is not directly observed, and the paper suggests it either reacts with H atoms to form benzene or is itself photolyzed at 193 nm; the benzene intermediate is consistent with the observed benzene-photolysis by-products. The conclusion is that the aromatic backbone survives the primary step, with the nitrile group stripped off as CN and converted to HCN/HNC.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the solid para-hydrogen host does not change which bond of the excited nitrile breaks first, so the ring–CN cleavage seen in the matrix is the same channel that would operate in interstellar space.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If ring–CN cleavage dominates, then in hydrogen-rich regions the first step of aromatic nitrile destruction strips the nitrile group off the ring rather than opening the ring, so the aromatic skeleton survives as phenyl or cyanophenyl.
  • HCN and HNC should be treated as major carbon–nitrogen products of aromatic nitrile photolysis in interstellar environments, not merely as products of small nitriles.
  • The measured CN stretching frequencies and their splitting in $p$-H$_2$ provide laboratory references for interpreting JWST 4.3–4.8 $\mu$m spectra of nitrile-substituted aromatics.
  • The detection of fulvene and cis-1,3-hexadien-5-yne implies benzene is formed as an intermediate, connecting benzonitrile photochemistry to the previously studied 193 nm photolysis of benzene in the same host.
  • The observed HNC/HCN abundance ratio of roughly 0.22–0.35, set by kinetic control rather than thermal equilibrium, gives models a quantitative handle on the hydrogen-abstraction step.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This is an inference: if the same ring–CN cleavage governs larger cyano-substituted PAHs, photolysis of nitrile-PAHs could be a significant source of HCN and HNC in photodissociation regions, connecting aromatic carbon cycling to nitrogen chemistry beyond the single-ring molecules tested here.
  • This is an inference: because the para-hydrogen host is both solvent and reactant, the branching ratios measured here may not transfer directly to gas-phase interstellar conditions; a gas-phase experiment at the same wavelength measuring the HCN/HNC yield would show how matrix-specific the mechanism is.
  • This is an inference: the unknown carrier with bands at 3319.9 and 2270.9 $\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$, suggested to be the cyanopolyyne HC$_3$N, could be identified by depositing authentic HC$_3$N into para-hydrogen and comparing spectra, which would also tie these experiments to the cyanopolyyne detections in TMC-1.
  • This is an inference: the 15–18 $\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$ matrix shift measured for the CN stretch implies that interstellar solid-phase nitrile-PAH features detected by JWST may be offset from gas-phase band centers, so secure assignments will need both matrix and gas-phase laboratory data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. Using para-hydrogen matrix isolation with FTIR spectroscopy, the paper reports mid-infrared spectra of cyanobenzene, d5-cyanobenzene, and the three dicyanobenzene isomers, with vibrational assignments aided by VPT2 on (hybrid) quartic force fields. 193 nm photolysis of these nitriles produces HCN and HNC as the most prominent new IR bands; the d5-cyanobenzene experiment shows the same HCN/HNC bands and no DCN/DNC, indicating that the hydrogen in these products comes from the para-H2 matrix rather than from the aromatic ring. Secondary photoproducts include fulvene, cis-1,3-hexadien-5-yne, ethylene, methane, and an unidentified carrier near 3319.9/3319.2/2270.9 cm^-1 that the authors tentatively assign to HC3N. The authors conclude that the major photodissociation channel is cleavage of the ring-CN bond to give phenyl/cyanophenyl + CN, with subsequent CN + H2 -> HCN/HNC, and they discuss implications for aromatic nitrile chemistry in TMC-1 and for JWST infrared observations.

Significance. The paper provides a useful set of matrix-isolation IR spectra and band assignments for small aromatic nitriles, benchmarked against anharmonic calculations, and it makes the data available on Zenodo. The deuterium-labeling experiment is a particularly strong control: the absence of DCN/DNC from d5-cyanobenzene in p-H2 cleanly demonstrates that the hydrogen in the HCN/HNC products is matrix-derived. If the dominant-channel conclusion is correct, the work constrains the VUV photochemistry of benzonitrile and related species in dense cloud conditions. The main limitation is that the word 'major' is inferred from IR product visibility and relative band strengths rather than from a calibrated branching-ratio measurement, so the headline photochemical claim needs to be either substantiated or substantially qualified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §3.3; §4.3; §5] The claim that ring-CN cleavage is the 'major photodissociation channel' is not established by the data. The experiment measures IR band intensities, not branching fractions. HCN and HNC have large integrated absorption coefficients (Table C2: 60.83 and 226.9 km mol^-1), the phenyl/cyanophenyl coproduct is neither directly observed nor quantified, parent depletion is not reported, and no yield calibration is given for ethylene, methane, fulvene, or the 3319 cm^-1 carrier. Small strongly absorbing molecules can dominate a difference IR spectrum while being a minor mass channel. Please either report calibrated branching ratios (for example, parent depletion plus product column densities from matrix band strengths) or revise the conclusion to state that HCN/HNC are the major observed IR products and that ring-CN cleavage is one operative channel.
  2. [§4.3; Fig. 4; §5] The isotope experiment shows that the hydrogen in HCN/HNC comes from the p-H2 matrix, which is strong evidence that a CN-containing fragment is released and then reacts with H2. However, it does not by itself identify the bond that breaks. The alternative pathways discussed in §4.3 — H migration from the ring prior to dissociation, or ring C-H bond cleavage followed by CN + H — are not excluded by the data. The 'rapid onset' argument in §4.3 is qualitative, and no kinetic fits, time-zero extrapolations, or quantitative comparison of appearance times are provided. Please quantify the primary vs. secondary character of HCN/HNC formation or explicitly list this as a remaining ambiguity.
  3. [§1; §4.4] The extrapolation from p-H2 matrix photochemistry to interstellar conditions rests on the assumption that the matrix does not perturb the dissociation branching (Section 1, citing Fajardo 2013 and Huang et al. 2010). But p-H2 here is not merely a passive host: it is the H-atom source for the observed HCN/HNC. The absence of a control experiment in a non-reactive host (e.g., Ne or Ar) or with a different p-H2 concentration means that the measured product distribution could be shaped by the medium. The paper should either add such a control or explicitly state that the 'major channel' claim applies to p-H2 matrices and that gas-phase branching ratios may differ.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§3.2] The heading 'Dicyaonobenzene' is misspelled, and the text later uses 'dicynobenzene' in the CN-stretch discussion.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption labels the methane feature as 'C6H6'; this should be CH4.
  3. [§4.3] The text uses 'C6D6CN' for d5-cyanobenzene, which is inconsistent with the formula C6D5(CN) in Figure 1 and Table B1.
  4. [Table 2 caption; §2.2] Table 2 states that anharmonic data are computed at B3LYP/N07D, while §2.2 says the dicyanobenzene calculations use the hybrid rDSD/TZ+B3LYP/N07D QFF; please clarify which calculations produced the tabulated values.
  5. [§4.3.1; Table 3] The assignment of the 3319.9/3319.2/2270.9 cm^-1 carrier to HC3N remains tentative, especially because the ZnSe experiment did not detect the expected ν5 band or its overtone; the text acknowledges this, but the conclusion should not treat the HC3N identification as established.
  6. [§4.3.1] The formation of CH4 in the photolysis of d5-cyanobenzene is interesting; please state explicitly whether the spectra were examined for partially deuterated methanes, or whether the conclusion is only that no fully deuterated methane was observed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the photochemistry conclusion is an experimental inference not reducible to its inputs.

full rationale

The central claim, that 193 nm photolysis of cyanobenzene and dicyanobenzenes proceeds mainly by ring-CN cleavage with subsequent CN + H2 -> HCN/HNC, is derived from difference FTIR spectra, the d5-cyanobenzene isotopic control, and literature assignments of HCN/HNC; no parameter is fitted from the data and then presented as a prediction. The d5 experiment directly tests the hydrogen source and shows HCN/HNC rather than DCN/DNC, supporting the matrix-abstraction step as an inference rather than a definitional equivalence. The hybrid quartic force field from Esposito et al. (2025), co-authored by one of the present authors, is used only as an auxiliary aid for vibrational assignments and is benchmarked against gas-phase CN-stretch values; it is not the basis of the photochemical conclusion, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. Citations for the claim that para-hydrogen is free of the cage effect are external (Fajardo 2013; Huang et al. 2010), and the photoproduct line assignments use independent argon-matrix and p-H2 literature. The skeptic's concern that 'major IR products' does not quantify branching ratios is a legitimate scientific caution about evidence strength, but it is not a circularity: the paper does not define its conclusion into existence or fit a parameter that later reappears as the result. No equation in the paper equates the output with an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central photochemistry claim rests on four domain assumptions: the p-H2 matrix's non-perturbing character, the transferability of the hybrid QFF method for assignments, the applicability of gas-phase band strengths for abundance estimates, and the qualitative kinetic inference of primary products. No free parameters are fitted to data in this paper; the single computational setting (200 cm^-1 polyad threshold) is a standard hand-chosen value. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • polyad frequency separation threshold
    Set to 200 cm^-1 in the VPT2/SPECTRO resonance polyad treatment (Section 2.2); a hand-chosen computational setting that affects predicted band positions and intensities but not the experimental photochemistry conclusion.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Solid para-hydrogen is free of the cage effect and approximates gas-phase conditions for photodissociation
    Invoked in Section 1 (citing Fajardo 2013; Huang et al. 2010) to justify transferring matrix photochemistry conclusions to interstellar conditions; load-bearing for the claim that the observed channel is intrinsic.
  • domain assumption The hybrid rDSD/junTZ+B3LYP/N07D quartic force field with VPT2 yields accurate anharmonic IR frequencies for cyano-aromatics
    Used in Section 2.2 for mode assignments and CN-stretch prediction; benchmarked against gas-phase cyanobenzene (Esposito et al. 2025) but assumes transferability to dicyanobenzene isomers.
  • domain assumption Gas-phase integrated band strengths for HCN nu1 (60.83 km/mol) and HNC nu1 (226.9 km/mol) are valid in solid p-H2
    Adopted in Appendix C (from Botschwina et al. 1995) to convert integrated absorbances into ppm abundances; a systematic error here would shift the HCN/HNC curves but not the qualitative ordering.
  • domain assumption 193 nm (6.42 eV) is above the ring-CN dissociation threshold and accesses dissociative states
    Section 4.2 uses a ground-state threshold of about 5.65 eV from formation enthalpies and a gas-phase absorption cross-section of 3.72e-17 cm^2 (Rajasekhar et al. 2022); the dicyanobenzene excited states are uncharacterized, making the vertical excitation pathway an assumption.
  • domain assumption Rapid appearance of HCN/HNC is diagnostic of primary photoproducts
    Section 4.3 infers primary-channel status from the early onset of HCN/HNC in the kinetic traces; this is a qualitative inference, not a fitted kinetic model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Infrared Spectroscopy and Photochemistry of Aromatic Nitriles in Para-Hydrogen Matrices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A4V4FRKN

@misc{pith2026260809889,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Infrared Spectroscopy and Photochemistry of Aromatic Nitriles in Para-Hydrogen Matrices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A4V4FRKN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09889}
}
abstract

Motivated by recent detections of several aromatic nitriles in Taurus Molecular Cloud-1, we report laboratory and theoretical investigations of the vibrational spectroscopy and photochemistry of singly and doubly cyano-substituted benzene in solid para-hydrogen matrices. We compare the photochemistry of cyanobenzene (benzonitrile) and three dicyanobenzene isomers initiated by excitations at 193 nm. In addition, we report the photochemistry of deuterated cyanobenzene (d$_5$-cyanobenzene), enabling us to determine the major products produced during the cyanobenzene photodissociation. The major products observed in the photolysis of all the nitriles are HCN and HNC, which are likely produced by hydrogen abstraction from para-H$_2$ by the CN radical. This indicates that the major photodissociation channel involves cleavage of the bond between the ring and the nitrile group, forming the phenyl (or cyanophenyl) radical + CN. We observe secondary photoproducts similar to those found during benzene photolysis. Our findings may aid the interpretation of recent JWST mid-infrared observations of aromatics in photodissociation regions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09889 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Chemical structure of the aromatic nitriles cyanobenzene, d5-cyanobenzene, 1,2-dicyanobenzene, 1,3- dicyanobenzene and 1,4-dicyanobenzene We have measured and assigned the mid-infrared spec￾tra of the aromatic nitriles cyanobenzene and 1,2- (or￾tho), 1,3-(meta), and 1,4-(para) dicyanobenzene ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of the CN stretching region (shown from 2210–2270 cm−1 , or 4.405–4.525 µm) for the nitrile derivatives cyanobenzene, 1,2-dicyanobenzene, 1,3-dicyanobenzene, and 1,4-dicyanobezene, deposited in p-H2 matrices. of the transitions is flipped in the computed spectrum, indicating a shifting of the peaks, incorrect intensity cal￾culations, or the presence of another transition in the experiment that is not capt… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Absorption spectra showing HCN and HNC formed from the photolysis of cyanobenzene (black) and d5- cyanobenzene (blue) in the range of 3295–3315 cm−1 and 3620–3640 cm−1 . et al. 2009; Bird & Donaldson 1996). Cleavage of the CC bonds within the ring is unlikely to occur until the aro￾maticity is first broken, as discussed for benzene (Kislov et al. 2004). A similar study conducted on the photolysis of cyanobenzene at … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Difference FTIR spectra showing the main photo￾products produced from cyanobenzene at deposition and af￾ter 15, 30 and 60 minutes of irradiation. Panels are shown in the wavenumber ranges: (a) 3650–3610 and 3335–3295 cm−1 , (b) 1460–1300 cm−1 , and (c) 1000–750 cm−1 . …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Temporal behaviour of the photoproducts, HCN (green) and HNC (black), formed after irradiating a ∼40 ppm cyanobenzene sample at 193 nm for 3 hours. cleavages and H reactions then yield photoproducts that overlap with those found for cyanobenzene. The concentration (ppm…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J., Boersma , C., Lee , T

    Allamandola , L. J., Boersma , C., Lee , T. J., Bregman , J. D., & Temi , P. 2021, , 917, L35, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac17f0

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac17f0 2021

  2. [2]

    2008, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 4, 751, 10.1021/ct800034c

    Barone, V., Cimino, P., & Stendardo, E. 2008, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 4, 751, 10.1021/ct800034c

    work page doi:10.1021/ct800034c 2008

  3. [3]

    P., Sandford, S

    Bernstein, M. P., Sandford, S. A., & Allamandola, L. J. 1997, The Astrophysical Journal, 476, 932, 10.1086/303651

    work page doi:10.1086/303651 1997

  4. [4]

    1995, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes, 149-150, 321, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1176(95)04266-N

    Bettens, R., & Herbst, E. 1995, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes, 149-150, 321, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1176(95)04266-N

    doi:10.1016/0168-1176(95)04266-n 1995

  5. [5]

    A., & Donaldson, D

    Bird, C. A., & Donaldson, D. 1996, Chemical Physics Letters, 249, 40, 10.1016/0009-2614(95)01336-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(95)01336-9 1996

  6. [6]

    J., Esposito, V

    Boersma, C., Allamandola, L. J., Esposito, V. J., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 959, 74, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad022b

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad022b 2023

  7. [7]

    2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 123, 10668, 10.1021/ja0104498

    Borget, F., Chiavassa, T., Allouche, A., Marinelli, F., & Aycard, J.-P. 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 123, 10668, 10.1021/ja0104498

    work page doi:10.1021/ja0104498 2001

  8. [8]

    2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 598, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526383

    Borget, F., Müller, S., Grote, D., et al. 2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 598, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526383

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526383 2017

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    1995, Chemical Physics, 190, 345, https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(94)00350-J

    Botschwina, P., Schulz, B., Horn, M., & Matuschewski, M. 1995, Chemical Physics, 190, 345, https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(94)00350-J

    1995 doi

  2. [10]

    M., Lee, K

    Burkhardt, A. M., Lee, K. L. K., Changala, P. B., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 913, L18, 10.3847/2041-8213/abfd3a

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    2025, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 701, L8, 10.1051/0004-6361/202556687

    Cabezas, C., Agúndez, M., Pérez, C., et al. 2025, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 701, L8, 10.1051/0004-6361/202556687

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    2021 a , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 649, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141156

    Cernicharo, J., Agúndez, M., Cabezas, C., et al. 2021 a , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 649, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141156

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    I., et al

    Cernicharo, J., Agúndez, M., Kaiser, R. I., et al. 2021 b , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 652, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141660

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    2021 c , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 655, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142226

    ---. 2021 c , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 655, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142226

    2021 doi

  7. [15]

    M., Tielens, A

    Cernicharo, J., Heras, A. M., Tielens, A. G. G. M., et al. 2001, The Astrophysical Journal, 546, L123, 10.1086/318871

    2001 doi

  8. [16]

    2022, A&A, 663, L9, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244399

    Cernicharo, J., Fuentetaja, R., Ag\'undez, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, L9, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244399

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 690, L13, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452196

    Cernicharo, J., Cabezas, C., Fuentetaja, R., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 690, L13, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452196

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    2026, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 705, L7, 10.1051/0004-6361/202557893

    Cernicharo, J., Tercero, B., Marcelino, N., et al. 2026, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 705, L7, 10.1051/0004-6361/202557893

    2026 doi

  11. [19]

    2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 888, 17, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab584f

    Chabot, M., Béroff, K., Dartois, E., Pino, T., & Godard, M. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 888, 17, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab584f

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    R., & Tielens , A

    Cherchneff , I., Barker , J. R., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 1992, ApJ, 401, 269

    1992

  13. [21]

    E., Tielens, A

    Chiar, J. E., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Adamson, A. J., & Ricca, A. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 770, 78, 10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/78

    2013 doi

  14. [22]

    R., Gupta, D., Messinger, J

    Cooke, I. R., Gupta, D., Messinger, J. P., & Sims, I. R. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 891, 0

    2020

  15. [23]

    P., & Piétri, N

    Coupeaud, A., Kolos, R., Couturier-Tamburelli, I., Aycard, J. P., & Piétri, N. 2006, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 110, 2371, 10.1021/jp055582r

    2006 doi

  16. [24]

    R., Khuseynov, D., & Sanov, A

    Dixon, A. R., Khuseynov, D., & Sanov, A. 2015, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 143, 10.1063/1.4931985

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    J., Ferrari, P., Palmer, C

    Esposito, V. J., Ferrari, P., Palmer, C. Z., et al. 2025, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 16, 1296, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c03396

    2025 doi

  18. [26]

    2013, ChemInform, 44, 10.1002/chin.201304165

    Fajardo, M. 2013, ChemInform, 44, 10.1002/chin.201304165

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    C., & Esposito, V

    Fortenberry, R. C., & Esposito, V. J. 2026, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 10, 1, 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.5c00249

    2026 doi

  20. [28]

    V., Radziszewski, J

    Friderichsen, A. V., Radziszewski, J. G., Nimlos, M. R., et al. 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 123, 1977, 10.1021/ja0024338

    2001 doi

  21. [29]

    2026, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 706, L10, 10.1051/0004-6361/202558398

    Fuentetaja, R., Cabezas, C., Agúndez, M., et al. 2026, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 706, L10, 10.1051/0004-6361/202558398

    2026 doi

  22. [30]

    F., Willetts , A., Green , W

    Gaw , J. F., Willetts , A., Green , W. H., & Handy , N. C. 1991, in Advances in Molecular Vibrations and Collision Dynamics, ed. J. M. Bowman & M. A. Ratner , Vol. 1B, 169

    1991

  23. [31]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 225, 25

    Gratier, P., Majumdar, L., Ohishi, M., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 225, 25

    2016

  24. [32]

    1989, , 347, 289, 10.1086/168117

    Gredel , R., Lepp , S., Dalgarno , A., & Herbst , E. 1989, , 347, 289, 10.1086/168117

    1989 doi

  25. [33]

    J., Francisco, J

    Horwitz, R. J., Francisco, J. S., & Guest, J. A. 1997, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 101, 1231, 10.1021/jp963800y

    1997 doi

  26. [34]

    1999, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 110, 5728, 10.1063/1.478471

    Hoshina, H., Wakabayashi, T., Momose, T., & Shida, T. 1999, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 110, 5728, 10.1063/1.478471

    1999 doi

  27. [35]

    2010, J Chem Phys, 132, 16, 10.1063/1.3386578

    Huang, C.-W., Lee, Y.-C., & Lee, Y.-P. 2010, J Chem Phys, 132, 16, 10.1063/1.3386578

    2010 doi

  28. [36]

    2025, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 16, 5412, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00918

    Huang, W.-J., Chou, S.-L., Chin, C.-H., Lin, S.-Y., & Wu, Y.-J. 2025, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 16, 5412, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00918

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    2005, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 172, 241, 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.11.019

    ichi Aoyama, J., Tabayashi, K., & Saito, K. 2005, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 172, 241, 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.11.019

    2005 doi

  30. [38]

    I., Parker, D

    Kaiser, R. I., Parker, D. S. N., & Mebel, A. M. 2015, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 66, 43, 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040214-121502

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    V., Nguyen, T

    Kislov, V. V., Nguyen, T. L., Mebel, A. M., Lin, S. H., & Smith, S. C. 2004, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 120, 7008, 10.1063/1.1676275

    2004 doi

  32. [40]

    E., Sloan, G

    Kraemer, K. E., Sloan, G. C., Bernard-Salas, J., et al. 2006, The Astrophysical Journal, 652, L25, 10.1086/509778

    2006 doi

  33. [41]

    Lee, K. L. K., Changala, P. B., Loomis, R. A., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 910, L2

    2021

  34. [42]

    2019, Icarus, 329, 55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.03.024

    Loison, J., Dobrijevic, M., & Hickson, K. 2019, Icarus, 329, 55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.03.024

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    E., Cami, J., & Bernard-Salas, J

    Malek, S. E., Cami, J., & Bernard-Salas, J. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 744, 16, 10.1088/0004-637x/744/1/16

    2011 doi

  36. [44]

    C., Lee, K

    McCarthy, M. C., Lee, K. L. K., Loomis, R. A., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 176

    2021

  37. [45]

    E., Wijnen, M

    McElcheran, D. E., Wijnen, M. H. J., & Steacie, E. W. R. 1958, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 36, 321, 10.1139/v58-046

    1958 doi

  38. [46]

    McGrath, S., & Cooke, I. R. 2026, Dataset for Infrared Spectroscopy of Aromatic Nitriles in Para-Hydrogen Matrices, doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20767238, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.20767238

    2026 doi

  39. [47]

    A., Burkhardt, A

    McGuire, B. A., Burkhardt, A. M., Kalenskii, S. V., et al. 2018, Science, 359, 202

    2018

  40. [48]

    A., Loomis, R

    McGuire, B. A., Loomis, R. A., Burkhardt, A. M., et al. 2021, Science, 371, 1265, 10.1126/science.abb7535

    2021 doi

  41. [49]

    M., & Landera, A

    Mebel, A. M., & Landera, A. 2012, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 136, 234305, 10.1063/1.4726455

    2012 doi

  42. [50]

    E., & Jacox, M

    Milligan, D. E., & Jacox, M. E. 1967, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 47, 278, 10.1063/1.1711859

    1967 doi

  43. [51]

    2012, J Chem Phys, 137, 10.1063/1.4765698

    Miyamoto, Y., Momose, T., & Kanamori, H. 2012, J Chem Phys, 137, 10.1063/1.4765698

    2012 doi

  44. [52]

    1998, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 108, 7334, 10.1063/1.476152

    Momose, T., Hoshina, H., Sogoshi, N., et al. 1998, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 108, 7334, 10.1063/1.476152

    1998 doi

  45. [53]

    1997, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 107, 7707, 10.1063/1.475085

    Momose, T., Miki, M., Wakabayashi, T., et al. 1997, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 107, 7707, 10.1063/1.475085

    1997 doi

  46. [54]

    J., Brunsvold, A

    Negru, B., Goncher, S. J., Brunsvold, A. L., et al. 2010, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 133, 10.1063/1.3473743

    2010 doi

  47. [55]

    2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 749, 67, 10.1088/0004-637x/749/1/67

    Oba, Y., Watanabe, N., Hama, T., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 749, 67, 10.1088/0004-637x/749/1/67

    2012 doi

  48. [56]

    1989, Chemical Physics, 134, 421, 10.1016/0301-0104(89)87172-1

    Park, J., Yu, C.-F., & Bersohn, R. 1989, Chemical Physics, 134, 421, 10.1016/0301-0104(89)87172-1

    1989 doi

  49. [57]

    F., Klotz, E

    Pinelo, L. F., Klotz, E. R., Wonderly, W. R., et al. 2018, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 122, 985, 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b11223

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    K., et al

    Rajasekhar, B., Dharmarpu, V., Das, A. K., et al. 2022, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 283, 108159, 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2022.108159

    2022

  51. [59]

    Ruzi, M., & Anderson, D. T. 2012, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 137, 194313, 10.1063/1.4765372

    2012 doi

  52. [60]

    L., Changala , P

    Sita , M. L., Changala , P. B., Xue , C., et al. 2022, , 938, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac92f4

    2022 doi

  53. [61]

    2012, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 136, 044308, 10.1063/1.3679166

    Song, Y., Lucas, M., Alcaraz, M., Zhang, J., & Brazier, C. 2012, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 136, 044308, 10.1063/1.3679166

    2012 doi

  54. [62]

    Tam, S., & Fajardo, M. E. 2001, Applied Spectroscopy, 55, 1634, 10.1366/0003702011953946

    2001 doi

  55. [63]

    Tielens , A. G. G. M. 2008, Annual Reviews of Astronomy & Astrophysics, 46, 289, 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145211

    2008

  56. [64]

    Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Charnley, S. B. 1997, Planetary and Interstellar Processes Relevant to the Origins of Life, ed. D. C. B. Whittet (Springer), 23--51

    1997

  57. [65]

    Y., Djuricanin, P., Momose, T., & Miyazaki, J

    Toh, S. Y., Djuricanin, P., Momose, T., & Miyazaki, J. 2015, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 119, 2683, 10.1021/jp5098537

    2015 doi

  58. [66]

    A., Bhasker, S., Miyamoto, Y., Momose, T., & McCall, B

    Tom, B. A., Bhasker, S., Miyamoto, Y., Momose, T., & McCall, B. J. 2009, The Review of scientific instruments, 80, 10.1063/1.3072881

    2009 doi

  59. [67]

    J., Goulay, F., Taatjes, C

    Trevitt, A. J., Goulay, F., Taatjes, C. A., Osborn, D. L., & Leone, S. R. 2010, J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 1749, 10.1021/jp909633a

    2010 doi

  60. [68]

    M., Huang, C.-L., et al

    Tseng, C.-M., Choi, Y. M., Huang, C.-L., et al. 2004, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 108, 7928, 10.1021/jp049425o

    2004 doi

  61. [69]

    R., Changala, P

    Wenzel, G., Cooke, I. R., Changala, P. B., et al. 2024, Science, 386, 810, 10.1126/science.adq6391

    2024 doi

  62. [70]

    H., Changala, P

    Wenzel, G., Speak, T. H., Changala, P. B., et al. 2025 a , Nature Astronomy, 9, 262, 10.1038/s41550-024-02410-9

    2025 doi

  63. [71]

    2025 b , The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 984, L36, 10.3847/2041-8213/adc911

    Wenzel, G., Gong, S., Xue, C., et al. 2025 b , The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 984, L36, 10.3847/2041-8213/adc911

    2025 doi

  64. [72]

    J., Nikow, M., Letendre, L., & Dai, H.-L

    Wilhelm, M. J., Nikow, M., Letendre, L., & Dai, H.-L. 2009, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 130, 044307, 10.1063/1.3065986

    2009 doi

  65. [73]

    Woon, D. E. 2006, Chemical Physics, 331, 67

    2006

  66. [74]

    Öberg, K. I. 2016, Chem. Rev., 116, 9631, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00694

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.