Patchy particles by self-assembly of star copolymers on a spherical substrate: Thomson solutions in a geometric problem with a color constraint

Gerd E. Schr\"oder-Turk; Jacob J. K. Kirkensgaard; Tobias M. Hain

arxiv: 1907.08103 · v2 · pith:A5CDGGWLnew · submitted 2019-07-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Patchy particles by self-assembly of star copolymers on a spherical substrate: Thomson solutions in a geometric problem with a color constraint

Tobias M. Hain , Gerd E. Schr\"oder-Turk , Jacob J. K. Kirkensgaard This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 19:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft

keywords self-assemblystar copolymersspherical confinementThomson problemtilingscolor constraintpatchy particleseven tilings

0 comments

The pith

ABC star copolymers confined to small spheres form three coexisting tilings, each solving the Thomson problem for its own color.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates self-assembly of ABC and ABB 3-miktoarm star copolymers on spherical shells via dissipative particle dynamics. In flat geometries these stars produce hexagonal tilings, yet spheres forbid pure hexagons and the star architecture adds a further color constraint that admits only even-sided polygons. For small spheres the assembled patterns match solutions of the Thomson problem of repelling charges on a sphere. In ABC systems three possibly distinct tilings coexist, one per color, each satisfying the Thomson condition simultaneously. An observer unable to distinguish B from C can still identify ABC versus ABB systems from the geometry of the A domains alone.

Core claim

For small spherical substrates, all solutions correspond to patterns solving the Thomson problem of placing mobile repulsive electric charges on a sphere. In ABC systems three coexisting, possibly different tilings, one in each color, each solve the Thomson problem simultaneously.

What carries the argument

The color constraint arising from ABC star architecture that restricts the system to even tilings while the spherical topology and inter-domain repulsions are simultaneously satisfied.

If this is right

Both ABC and ABB stars produce spherical tiling patterns whose detailed type depends on substrate radius.
Except on the smallest substrates, multiple solutions with apparently equal free energies appear with different probabilities.
The A-domain geometry alone distinguishes ABC from ABB systems for an observer blind to B-C differences.
All observed small-sphere patterns are Thomson solutions under the even-tiling restriction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The color constraint may select a narrower subset of Thomson solutions than would be stable without it.
Varying the relative arm lengths could shift the radius at which the even-tiling restriction begins to compete with ordinary spherical defects.
The same confinement-plus-color setup might be used to engineer patchy particles whose surface domains encode multiple independent minimal-repulsion arrangements.

Load-bearing premise

The molecular architecture of the ABC stars implies an additional color constraint which only allows even tilings.

What would settle it

Direct observation of any polygon with an odd number of edges in a small-sphere assembly would refute the claim that the color constraint dominates and forces exclusively even tilings.

read the original abstract

Confinement or geometric frustration is known to alter the structure of soft matter, including copolymeric melts, and can consequently be used to tune structure and properties. Here we investigate the self-assembly of ABC and ABB 3-miktoarm star copolymers confined to a shell using coarse-grained Dissipative Particle Dynamics simulations. In bulk and flat geometries the ABC stars form hexagonal tilings, but this is topologically prohibited in a spherical geometry which normally is alleviated by forming pentagonal tiles. However, the molecular architecture of the ABC stars implies an additional 'color constraint' which only allows even tilings (where all polygons have an even number of edges) and we study the effect of these simultaneous constraints. We find that both ABC and ABB systems form spherical tiling patterns, the type of which depends on the radius of the spherical substrate. For small spherical substrates, all solutions correspond to patterns solving the Thomson problem of placing mobile repulsive electric charges on a sphere. In ABC systems we find three coexisting, possibly different tilings, one in each color, each of them solving the Thomson problem simultaneously. For all except the smallest substrates, we find competing solutions with seemingly degenerate free energies that occur with different probabilities. Statistically, an observer who is blind to the differences between B and C can tell from the structure of the A domains if the system is an ABC or an ABB star copolymer system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

ABC miktoarm stars on small spheres produce three coexisting color-specific Thomson tilings, but the mapping from arm connectivity to the even-tiling rule stays asserted rather than derived.

read the letter

The core observation is that ABC 3-miktoarm stars confined to small spherical shells form A, B, and C domains that each solve the Thomson problem independently, and these tilings can differ. ABB stars lack this split. The simulations also show that an observer blind to B versus C can still tell the two architectures apart from the A pattern alone. That combination of spherical topology plus the claimed color constraint is the concrete new piece; prior work on Thomson solutions or flat hexagonal tilings does not cover the three-color coexistence under the even-polygon restriction. The work is grounded in explicit DPD runs that recover the expected low-energy spherical packings for the smallest radii, which is useful evidence. For larger radii the runs turn up multiple near-degenerate states whose probabilities vary, which matches the known multiplicity of Thomson solutions but adds the practical note that free-energy differences are small enough to produce statistical mixtures. The soft spot is the color constraint itself. The abstract states that the ABC architecture forces even-sided polygons, yet supplies no step-by-step link from the single A, B, and C arm per molecule to the prohibition on odd cycles. Without that mapping it is hard to judge whether the even-tiling rule is an extra molecular constraint or simply follows from the spherical geometry already studied in ABB cases. The lack of reported energy minima comparisons or error estimates on the observed patterns also leaves open whether the reported tilings are reliably the lowest-energy states. This paper is aimed at people who already work on confined block-copolymer assembly or on patchy-particle design via curvature. It is narrow but the simulation outcomes are specific enough that a referee could check the color-constraint claim and the degeneracy statistics directly. I would send it to review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses coarse-grained Dissipative Particle Dynamics simulations to study self-assembly of ABC and ABB 3-miktoarm star copolymers on a spherical substrate. It claims that spherical geometry plus an ABC-specific 'color constraint' (restricting solutions to even tilings) produces patterns that, for small substrate radii, solve the Thomson problem of repulsive point charges on a sphere; in ABC systems three coexisting (possibly distinct) tilings, one per color, each solve the Thomson problem simultaneously. For larger radii competing near-degenerate solutions appear, and A-domain structure distinguishes ABC from ABB systems.

Significance. If the claims hold, the work shows how star architecture can enforce simultaneous Thomson solutions under combined geometric and color constraints, offering a route to patchy particles with controlled multi-color tilings. The explicit DPD simulations that generate radius-dependent patterns without fitted parameters constitute a strength.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the molecular architecture of the ABC stars implies an additional color constraint which only allows even tilings' is stated without an explicit mapping from the one-A, one-B, one-C arm connectivity per molecule to the prohibition on odd-sided polygons. This step is load-bearing for the distinction between ABC and ABB cases and for the claim that the observed patterns solve the Thomson problem under the combined constraints rather than spherical geometry alone.
[Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'all solutions correspond to patterns solving the Thomson problem' is supported only by visual matching of simulation snapshots; no quantitative metrics (energy comparisons to known Thomson configurations, error bars, or tests ruling out metastable states) are reported.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim of 'seemingly degenerate free energies' for competing solutions on larger substrates does not specify the criterion used to assess degeneracy or the sampling method for the reported probabilities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to add the requested clarifications and quantitative analyses.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the molecular architecture of the ABC stars implies an additional color constraint which only allows even tilings' is stated without an explicit mapping from the one-A, one-B, one-C arm connectivity per molecule to the prohibition on odd-sided polygons. This step is load-bearing for the distinction between ABC and ABB cases and for the claim that the observed patterns solve the Thomson problem under the combined constraints rather than spherical geometry alone.

Authors: We agree that an explicit mapping from molecular connectivity to the even-tiling rule is needed for clarity. Each ABC star has one arm of each color; in the assembled structure three distinct colors meet at every vertex. This forces polygons to have an even number of sides so that colors can alternate consistently around each vertex while respecting the single-arm-per-color constraint. ABB stars lack the three-color requirement and thus permit odd-sided polygons. We will add a dedicated paragraph with a schematic in the introduction or methods section of the revised manuscript to make this mapping explicit. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'all solutions correspond to patterns solving the Thomson problem' is supported only by visual matching of simulation snapshots; no quantitative metrics (energy comparisons to known Thomson configurations, error bars, or tests ruling out metastable states) are reported.

Authors: The referee is correct that the identification relied on visual inspection. We will add quantitative support by extracting vertex coordinates from the simulations, computing their Coulomb energies, and comparing these values (with error bars from multiple independent runs) to tabulated minimal energies for Thomson configurations of the same particle number. We will also report results from different initial conditions to assess the prevalence of metastable states. These analyses and figures will be included in the results section of the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; simulation outcomes independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper reports tiling patterns obtained from explicit coarse-grained DPD simulations of ABC/ABB star copolymers confined to spherical shells. The claimed correspondence to Thomson-problem solutions and the color constraint on even tilings are presented as consequences of the simulated molecular architecture and geometry, not as quantities fitted to data and then re-predicted. No equations, parameters, or self-citations are shown to reduce the reported patterns to the inputs by construction. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained through direct simulation results rather than definitional or fitted equivalence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central observations rest on the assumption that the chosen coarse-grained DPD model faithfully encodes both the topological frustration of the sphere and the color constraint arising from the three distinct arms; no independent evidence for this mapping is supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (1)

spherical substrate radius
Varied to select different tiling regimes; its value controls which Thomson solution appears.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The molecular architecture of ABC 3-miktoarm stars enforces a strict color constraint permitting only even-sided polygons.
Invoked in the abstract to explain why hexagonal tilings are prohibited and why only even tilings are allowed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5805 in / 1354 out tokens · 20210 ms · 2026-05-24T19:22:06.833872+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the molecular architecture of the ABC stars implies an additional 'color constraint' which only allows even tilings (where all polygons have an even number of edges)
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

all solutions correspond to patterns solving the Thomson problem of placing mobile repulsive electric charges on a sphere

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

[1]

1 F. S. Bates, MRS Bulletin, 2005, 30, 525â˘A¸ S532. 2 M. W. Matsen, in Self Consistent Field Theory and Its Applica- tions, Wiley-Blackwell, 2007, ch. 2, pp. 87–178. 3 G. M. Grason and R. D. Kamien, Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 7371–7380. 4 G. Polymeropoulos, G. Zapsas, K. Ntetsikas, P. Bilalis, Y. Gnanou and N. Hadjichristidis, Macromolecules, 2017, 50, 12...

work page 2005
[2]

Okamoto, H

8 S. Okamoto, H. Hasegawa, T. Hashimoto, T. Fujimoto, H. Zhang, T. Kazama, A. Takano and Y. Isono,Polymer, 1997, 38, 5275 –

work page 1997
[3]

9 J. J. K. Kirkensgaard and S. Hyde, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 2009, 11, 2016–2022. 10 J. J. K. Kirkensgaard, M. C. Pedersen and S. T. Hyde, Soft Matter, 2014, 10, 7182–7194. 11 J. J. K. Kirkensgaard, Interface Focus, 2012, 2, 602–607. 12 T. Gemma, A. Hatano and T. Dotera, Macromolecules, 2002, 35, 3225–3237. 13 L. de Campo, T. Varslot, M. J. Moghaddam, J...

work page 2009
[4]

23 W. T. M. Irvine, M. J. Bowick and P. M. Chaikin, Nature Mate- rials, 2012, 11, 948–51. 24 R. E. Guerra, C. P. Kelleher, A. D. Hollingsworth and P. M. Chaikin, Nature, 2018, 554,

work page 2012
[5]

Lipowsky , M

25 P. Lipowsky , M. J. Bowick, J. H. Meinke, D. R. Nelson and A. R. Bausch, Nature Materials, 2005, 4, 407–11. 26 T. Einert, P. Lipowsky , J. Schilling, M. J. Bowick and A. R. Bausch, Langmuir, 2005, 21, 12076–12079. 27 A. R. Bausch, M. J. Bowick, A. Cacciuto, A. D. Dinsmore, M. F. Hsu, D. R. Nelson, M. G. Nikolaides, A. Travesset and D. A. Weitz, Science...

work page 2005
[6]

Giarritta, M

29 S. Giarritta, M. Ferrario and P. Giaquinta,Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 1993, 201, 649 –

work page 1993
[7]

Zhang, L

1–10 | 9 30 L. Zhang, L. Wang and J. Lin, Soft Matter , 2014, 10, 6713–

work page 2014
[8]

31 R. D. Kamien, Rev. Mod. Phys., 2002, 74, 953–971. 32 M. J. Bowick and L. Giomi, Advances in Physics , 2009, 58, 449–563. 33 J. Conway , H. Burgiel and C. Goodman-Strauss, The Symme- tries of Things , CRC Press,

work page 2002
[9]

34 M. J. Bowick, D. R. Nelson and A. Travesset, Phys. Rev. B , 2000, 62, 8738–8751. 35 M. Bowick, A. Cacciuto, D. R. Nelson and A. Travesset, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, 89, 185502. 36 M. J. Bowick and Z. Yao, EPL (Europhysics Letters) , 2011, 93, 36001. 37 J. J. Thomson, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosoph- ical Magazine and Journal of Science , 1904...

work page 2000
[10]

EspaÃ ´sol and P

50 P. EspaÃ ´sol and P. Warren, EPL (Europhysics Letters) , 1995, 30,

work page 1995
[11]

51 J. J. K. Kirkensgaard, Soft Matter, 2010, 6,

work page 2010
[12]

52 J. J. K. Kirkensgaard, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 10756. 53 J. A. Anderson, C. D. Lorenz and A. Travesset, Journal of Com- putational Physics, 2008, 227, 5342 –

work page 2011
[13]

Glaser, T

54 J. Glaser, T. D. Nguyen, J. A. Anderson, P. Lui, F. Spiga, J. A. Millan, D. C. Morse and S. C. Glotzer, Computer Physics Com- munications, 2015, 192, 97 –

work page 2015
[14]

55 C. L. Phillips, J. A. Anderson and S. C. Glotzer, Journal of Computational Physics, 2011, 230, 7191 –

work page 2011
[15]

56 R. D. Groot and P. B. Warren, The Journal of Chemical Physics , 1997, 107, 4423–4435. 57 https://hoomd-blue.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html. 58 P. J. Flory ,The Journal of Chemical Physics , 1942, 10, 51–61. 59 M. L. Huggins, Annals of the New Y ork Academy of Sciences , 1942, 43, 1–32. 60 R. D. Groot and T. J. Madden, The Journal of Chemical Physi...

work page 1997
[16]

A., Schaller, Fabian M., Schröter, Matthias and Schröder-Turk, Gerd E.,EPJ Web Conf., 2017, 140, 06007

62 Weis, Simon, Schönhöfer, Philipp W. A., Schaller, Fabian M., Schröter, Matthias and Schröder-Turk, Gerd E.,EPJ Web Conf., 2017, 140, 06007. 63 freud, https://freud.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html, Accessed: 2019-01-17. 64 J. Stone, MSc thesis , Computer Science Department, Univer- sity of Missouri-Rolla,

work page 2017
[17]

Humphrey , A

65 W. Humphrey , A. Dalke and K. Schulten,Journal of Molecular Graphics, 1996, 14, 33–38. 66 blender, https://www.blender.org/. 67 J. J. K. Kirkensgaard, M. E. Evans, L. de Campo and S. T. Hyde, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 2014, 111, 1271–1276. 68 B. Grünbaum and G. Shephard, Tilings and Patterns , Dover Publications, Incorporated,

work page 1996
[18]

Semenov, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physic , 1985, 61,

69 A. Semenov, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physic , 1985, 61,

work page 1985
[19]

Zhang and S

70 Z. Zhang and S. C. Glotzer, Nano Letters, 2004, 4, 1407–1413. 71 C. Casagrande, P. Fabre, E. RaphaÃ ´nl and M. Veyssié, Euro- physics Letters (EPL) , 1989, 9, 251–255. 72 I. C. Pons-Siepermann and S. C. Glotzer, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 6226–6231. 73 I. C. Pons-Siepermann and S. C. Glotzer, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 3919–3924. 74 T. Higuchi, A. Tajima, K. Motoyo...

work page 2004

[1] [1]

1 F. S. Bates, MRS Bulletin, 2005, 30, 525â˘A¸ S532. 2 M. W. Matsen, in Self Consistent Field Theory and Its Applica- tions, Wiley-Blackwell, 2007, ch. 2, pp. 87–178. 3 G. M. Grason and R. D. Kamien, Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 7371–7380. 4 G. Polymeropoulos, G. Zapsas, K. Ntetsikas, P. Bilalis, Y. Gnanou and N. Hadjichristidis, Macromolecules, 2017, 50, 12...

work page 2005

[2] [2]

Okamoto, H

8 S. Okamoto, H. Hasegawa, T. Hashimoto, T. Fujimoto, H. Zhang, T. Kazama, A. Takano and Y. Isono,Polymer, 1997, 38, 5275 –

work page 1997

[3] [3]

9 J. J. K. Kirkensgaard and S. Hyde, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 2009, 11, 2016–2022. 10 J. J. K. Kirkensgaard, M. C. Pedersen and S. T. Hyde, Soft Matter, 2014, 10, 7182–7194. 11 J. J. K. Kirkensgaard, Interface Focus, 2012, 2, 602–607. 12 T. Gemma, A. Hatano and T. Dotera, Macromolecules, 2002, 35, 3225–3237. 13 L. de Campo, T. Varslot, M. J. Moghaddam, J...

work page 2009

[4] [4]

23 W. T. M. Irvine, M. J. Bowick and P. M. Chaikin, Nature Mate- rials, 2012, 11, 948–51. 24 R. E. Guerra, C. P. Kelleher, A. D. Hollingsworth and P. M. Chaikin, Nature, 2018, 554,

work page 2012

[5] [5]

Lipowsky , M

25 P. Lipowsky , M. J. Bowick, J. H. Meinke, D. R. Nelson and A. R. Bausch, Nature Materials, 2005, 4, 407–11. 26 T. Einert, P. Lipowsky , J. Schilling, M. J. Bowick and A. R. Bausch, Langmuir, 2005, 21, 12076–12079. 27 A. R. Bausch, M. J. Bowick, A. Cacciuto, A. D. Dinsmore, M. F. Hsu, D. R. Nelson, M. G. Nikolaides, A. Travesset and D. A. Weitz, Science...

work page 2005

[6] [6]

Giarritta, M

29 S. Giarritta, M. Ferrario and P. Giaquinta,Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 1993, 201, 649 –

work page 1993

[7] [7]

Zhang, L

1–10 | 9 30 L. Zhang, L. Wang and J. Lin, Soft Matter , 2014, 10, 6713–

work page 2014

[8] [8]

31 R. D. Kamien, Rev. Mod. Phys., 2002, 74, 953–971. 32 M. J. Bowick and L. Giomi, Advances in Physics , 2009, 58, 449–563. 33 J. Conway , H. Burgiel and C. Goodman-Strauss, The Symme- tries of Things , CRC Press,

work page 2002

[9] [9]

34 M. J. Bowick, D. R. Nelson and A. Travesset, Phys. Rev. B , 2000, 62, 8738–8751. 35 M. Bowick, A. Cacciuto, D. R. Nelson and A. Travesset, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, 89, 185502. 36 M. J. Bowick and Z. Yao, EPL (Europhysics Letters) , 2011, 93, 36001. 37 J. J. Thomson, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosoph- ical Magazine and Journal of Science , 1904...

work page 2000

[10] [10]

EspaÃ ´sol and P

50 P. EspaÃ ´sol and P. Warren, EPL (Europhysics Letters) , 1995, 30,

work page 1995

[11] [11]

51 J. J. K. Kirkensgaard, Soft Matter, 2010, 6,

work page 2010

[12] [12]

52 J. J. K. Kirkensgaard, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 10756. 53 J. A. Anderson, C. D. Lorenz and A. Travesset, Journal of Com- putational Physics, 2008, 227, 5342 –

work page 2011

[13] [13]

Glaser, T

54 J. Glaser, T. D. Nguyen, J. A. Anderson, P. Lui, F. Spiga, J. A. Millan, D. C. Morse and S. C. Glotzer, Computer Physics Com- munications, 2015, 192, 97 –

work page 2015

[14] [14]

55 C. L. Phillips, J. A. Anderson and S. C. Glotzer, Journal of Computational Physics, 2011, 230, 7191 –

work page 2011

[15] [15]

56 R. D. Groot and P. B. Warren, The Journal of Chemical Physics , 1997, 107, 4423–4435. 57 https://hoomd-blue.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html. 58 P. J. Flory ,The Journal of Chemical Physics , 1942, 10, 51–61. 59 M. L. Huggins, Annals of the New Y ork Academy of Sciences , 1942, 43, 1–32. 60 R. D. Groot and T. J. Madden, The Journal of Chemical Physi...

work page 1997

[16] [16]

A., Schaller, Fabian M., Schröter, Matthias and Schröder-Turk, Gerd E.,EPJ Web Conf., 2017, 140, 06007

62 Weis, Simon, Schönhöfer, Philipp W. A., Schaller, Fabian M., Schröter, Matthias and Schröder-Turk, Gerd E.,EPJ Web Conf., 2017, 140, 06007. 63 freud, https://freud.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html, Accessed: 2019-01-17. 64 J. Stone, MSc thesis , Computer Science Department, Univer- sity of Missouri-Rolla,

work page 2017

[17] [17]

Humphrey , A

65 W. Humphrey , A. Dalke and K. Schulten,Journal of Molecular Graphics, 1996, 14, 33–38. 66 blender, https://www.blender.org/. 67 J. J. K. Kirkensgaard, M. E. Evans, L. de Campo and S. T. Hyde, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 2014, 111, 1271–1276. 68 B. Grünbaum and G. Shephard, Tilings and Patterns , Dover Publications, Incorporated,

work page 1996

[18] [18]

Semenov, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physic , 1985, 61,

69 A. Semenov, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physic , 1985, 61,

work page 1985

[19] [19]

Zhang and S

70 Z. Zhang and S. C. Glotzer, Nano Letters, 2004, 4, 1407–1413. 71 C. Casagrande, P. Fabre, E. RaphaÃ ´nl and M. Veyssié, Euro- physics Letters (EPL) , 1989, 9, 251–255. 72 I. C. Pons-Siepermann and S. C. Glotzer, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 6226–6231. 73 I. C. Pons-Siepermann and S. C. Glotzer, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 3919–3924. 74 T. Higuchi, A. Tajima, K. Motoyo...

work page 2004