Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 63 references

Spectroscopy of Free-Floating Planetary-Mass Objects and their disks with JWST

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Six of eight free-floating planetary-mass objects observed with JWST show mid-infrared silicate emission from disks, and one shows photospheric silicate absorption, evidence that disks and atmospheres of these 5-10 Jupiter-mass objects…

desk verdict First JWST 1-13 µm spectral survey of free-floating planetary-mass objects: the disk excess detections are solid, but the two headline 'firsts' (photospheric silicate absorption and grain growth) rest on an extinction law the authors admit is only an average. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05155 v1 pith:A5F4IFGN submitted 2025-07-07 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.GA

Belinda Damian , Aleks Scholz , Ray Jayawardhana , V. Almendros-Abad , Laura Flagg , Koraljka Mužić , Antonella Natta , Paola Pinilla
show 1 more author
Leonardo Testi
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GA
keywords free-floatingplanetary-massobjectsbrowndwarfscircumstellardiskssilicateemissionabsorptionmid-infraredspectroscopyJWSTgraingrowth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses new JWST spectra, covering 1 to 13 microns, to examine eight free-floating planetary-mass objects (5-10 Jupiter masses, ages 1-5 Myr) in nearby star-forming regions. It aims to show that these objects commonly host disks, and that the dust in those disks has been processed, with grains grown and silicates crystallized, just as in disks around stars and brown dwarfs. The paper reports silicate emission in six of the eight objects, the lowest-mass isolated objects with such a feature, and photospheric silicate absorption in one object, UGC0417+2832, which would indicate silicate clouds in the atmosphere. If correct, these findings place planetary-mass rogues in the same disk-evolution sequence as higher-mass objects and suggest that rocky companions could form around them.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the 10 µm silicate feature and its relation to the photospheric model spectrum. A silicate emission or absorption feature arises from the stretching vibration of Si-O bonds in warm dust; its shape and strength are read through continuum-normalized spectra, a flux ratio at 11.3 vs 9.8 µm, and a silicate index, the ratio of continuum flux to absorption flux at 9.0 µm. The paper dereddens every MIRI spectrum with the Gordon et al. (2023) extinction law and compares the derived feature parameters with published brown dwarf, T Tauri, and Herbig Ae/Be samples. This lets the authors separate an amorphous, interstellar-like dust signature, a single 9-10 µm peak, from processed, crystalline-rich dust with additional peaks near 9.3 and 11.3 µm, and to attach photospheric absorption, rather than disk emission, to cloud-bearing atmospheres.

What would settle it

Re-observe UGC0417+2832 with the MIRI medium-resolution spectrometer, deredden using a sightline-specific extinction curve measured from nearby stars along the same line of sight, and re-measure the 9.0 µm silicate index; if the index becomes consistent with unity under that correction, the photospheric silicate absorption is an artifact of the adopted extinction. Alternatively, a larger sample of young diskless free-floating planetary-mass objects with independently measured extinctions could show whether silicate absorption strength tracks spectral type as it does for brown dwarfs.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that disks around free-floating planetary-mass objects are not merely present but actively evolving: six of eight targets show mid-infrared excess with 10 µm silicate emission features whose shapes and strengths indicate grain growth and crystallization, comparable to more massive brown dwarfs and stars. In addition, one disk-free target, UGC0417+2832, shows a 10 µm silicate absorption feature in its photosphere, the first such detection in a very young free-floating planetary-mass object, interpreted as silicate clouds in a cool 1600 K atmosphere. The paper also finds methane and ethylene emission lines in several of the disks and notes photospheric diversity in the 3-5 µm region that current atmospheric models do not reproduce. Together these observations make the eight objects the lowest-mass isolated objects in which disk silicate and hydrocarbon emission have been seen.

Load-bearing premise

The silicate feature shapes and the photospheric absorption claim rest on dereddening every spectrum with extinction values from near-infrared template fits and with one average Milky Way extinction law; if the true extinction toward UGC0417+2832, or the 10 µm extinction curve along that sightline, differs substantially, the silicate absorption detection could weaken or vanish.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Disks around 5-10 Jupiter-mass free-floating objects undergo the same dust-processing sequence, grain growth and crystallization, seen in disks around stars and brown dwarfs, so planet formation conditions are not unique to higher-mass hosts.
  • The 10 µm silicate absorption in UGC0417+2832, if real, shows that silicate clouds can form in very young planetary-mass atmospheres at about 1600 K, not only in older field brown dwarfs.
  • Hydrocarbon emission, methane at 7.7 µm and ethylene at 10.5 µm, in several disks indicates carbon-rich inner-disk chemistry can arise around planetary-mass objects, as in low-mass stars.
  • The presence and evolutionary state of these disks imply the potential for rocky companions to form around free-floating planetary-mass objects.
  • The unexplained 3-5 µm photospheric diversity means current atmospheric models miss a parameter, possibly cloud distribution, metallicity, or inclination-dependent cloud opacity, that shapes these spectra at similar temperatures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: if silicate emission features are common in this mass range, mid-infrared spectroscopy of larger samples of free-floating planetary-mass objects could become a statistical probe of disk evolution and dust processing across star-forming regions.
  • The paper's own caveat about dereddening implies the photospheric silicate absorption claim should be tested with a sightline-specific extinction measurement, for example higher-resolution MIRI/MRS spectroscopy of UGC0417+2832 and neighbouring stars.
  • The two objects without disks were selected on the basis of IRAC excess, so the 6-in-8 disk fraction here is not an unbiased census; an unbiased survey could confirm or revise the apparent disk fraction among planetary-mass objects.
  • If silicate clouds form at 1600 K in young objects, the same 10 µm absorption search in other young, diskless free-floating planetary-mass objects could map cloud formation as a function of spectral type and age, extending the brown-dwarf silicate-index sequence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents JWST NIRSpec (1-5 um) and MIRI LRS (5-13 um) spectra of eight free-floating planetary-mass objects (FFPMOs) in Taurus, Chamaeleon I, and rho Ophiuchus. The authors derive spectral types M9.5-L4, effective temperatures 1600-1900 K, extinctions A_V = 1.3-7 mag, and masses below 0.01 M_sun from an HR diagram. Six of eight objects show mid-infrared excess above the best-fit BT-Settl photospheric model and 10 um silicate emission; the shapes are used to infer grain growth and crystallization. One object without a disk, UGC0417+2832, is reported to show photospheric silicate absorption, claimed as a first for very young FFPMOs. Several objects show hydrocarbon emission lines attributed to disks. The paper concludes that disks around planetary-mass objects undergo dust processing similar to brown dwarfs and stars.

Significance. The dataset is valuable: it is the first systematic 1-13 um spectroscopic survey of FFPMOs with JWST, and the presence of mid-infrared excess is directly visible in the observed spectra (Figures 2 and 5) without recourse to the dereddening procedure, making the disk detections robust. If the extinction-law systematics are properly quantified, the silicate emission and absorption results would constitute a substantial advance in understanding disk evolution and cool atmospheres at planetary masses. The authors are appropriately cautious about model-dependent temperatures and the low resolution of the molecular line identification. However, the two most distinctive claims -- the photospheric silicate absorption 'first' and the 'strong evidence of grain growth and crystallization' -- are measured on dereddened spectra and are sensitive to the adopted average extinction law, which the authors themselves note is not representative of individual sightlines. The paper does not currently propagate this systematic uncertainty into the quoted results.

major comments (3)
  1. [4.2] The dereddening of the MIRI spectra uses the Gordon et al. (2023) extinction law, which includes an interstellar silicate absorption feature near 9.7 um. As the paper itself states in Section 4.2, this law 'does not represent the specific line of sight extinction to the targets.' Because the silicate emission/absorption analysis in Sections 4.2 and 4.3 is performed on dereddened spectra, an error in the strength or shape of the 9.7 um extinction feature will directly create or suppress a 10 um silicate feature. The error bars in Figures 10 and 11 propagate only the +-1 mag uncertainty in A_V, not the systematic uncertainty in the extinction law. I request that the authors repeat the silicate index and the continuum-normalized shape measurements with alternative extinction laws (e.g., Fitzpatrick 1999 with a range of R_V, or regional extinction curves) and report the resulting range in the silicate index and F11.3/F9.8 ratio. Without this, the claims of photospheric silicate absorption in UGC0417+2832 and of 'strong evidence of grain growth and crystallization' are not yet robust.
  2. [4.3] The detection of silicate absorption in UGC0417+2832 is reported without a significance estimate. The silicate index is a ratio of continuum to absorption flux at 9.0 um, but Figure 11 does not show the uncertainty from spectral noise or the number of independent resolution elements contributing to the average. Given that this object has A_V = 4.3 mag and the dereddening correction is substantial, the authors should report a formal significance (e.g., the absorption depth in units of the noise) and show the spectrum before and after dereddening to demonstrate that the 9 um dip is not introduced by the correction. The statement in Section 4.3 that UGC0417+2832 'shows silicate in absorption' is stronger than what is currently demonstrated.
  3. [4.2, Figure 10] The conclusion that FFPMO disks show a higher degree of grain growth and crystallization than the comparison sample depends on the dereddening-induced shift of the six points in the F11.3/F9.8 versus peak-over-continuum plane. The comparison sample from Pascucci et al. (2009) is likely uncorrected for extinction, so the offset between the two samples is not a homogeneous comparison. The qualitative classification of the features in Figure 9 into amorphous and crystalline silicates also rests on the dereddened spectra. The claim should be softened to state that, under the adopted extinction law, the FFPMO points move into a region consistent with more processed silicates, and the systematic uncertainty in this offset should be quantified as in Comment 1.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Title] The title contains an erroneous space in 'F ree-Floating' (a LaTeX artifact in the manuscript text); it should read 'Free-Floating'.
  2. [3.1] The spectral type fitting uses the Fitzpatrick (1999) extinction law, while the model fitting and dereddening use Gordon et al. (2023); the paper states that the choice has no significant effect (citing Almendros-Abad et al. 2022), but it would be clearer to quantify this for the present sample given that the A_V values are subsequently used in the MIR dereddening.
  3. [Figure 1] The x-axis label 'MK - M[4.5]' is confusing because both quantities are absolute magnitudes; it should be labeled as a color (e.g., 'K - [4.5]') with a note that the distance modulus cancels.
  4. [4.1] The 8.0/3.6 um flux ratio is said to be extinction-corrected, but the correction method is described later in Section 4.2; adding a cross-reference would help the reader.
  5. [4.4] The statement that the 10.5 um feature is more plausibly ethylene is reasonable, but the lack of a quantitative comparison of the line flux with the expected hydrogen 12-8 line makes the identification tentative; this caveat should be reflected in the abstract, which currently lists hydrocarbon emission without this qualification.
  6. [Abstract] The sentence 'These are the lowest mass isolated objects found so far with silicate and hydrocarbon emission features arising in their disks' could be read as applying to all six disk objects, whereas hydrocarbon emission is securely reported for only four objects and tentatively for others; a more precise wording would distinguish the silicate and hydrocarbon subsets.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: results are observational measurements with an acknowledged extinction-law systematic, not predictions derived from fitted inputs.

full rationale

This is an observational characterization paper rather than a derivation chain, and I find no load-bearing circular step. Spectral types and A_V are obtained by standard template and BT-Settl model fitting to the 1-2.5 micron NIRSpec data (Sections 3.1-3.2), and the mid-infrared excess, silicate emission, and silicate absorption diagnostics are then measured on the dereddened MIRI spectra (Sections 4.1-4.3). No result claimed as a 'prediction' is constructed from the fitted parameters: the silicate indices are direct flux ratios with independent local continuum fits. The main vulnerability is the assumed extinction law: the paper dereddens with Gordon et al. (2023) and explicitly cautions that 'the extinction law does not represent the specific line of sight extinction to the targets' and that 'differences in the extinction laws may alter the shape of the silicate feature' (Section 4.2). That is a correctly stated systematic uncertainty affecting interpretation, not a circular argument, because the dereddening curve is imported from external published measurements and is not derived from the targets' own silicate features. The only overlapping-author citation, Flagg et al. (2025), provides prior hydrocarbon-line detections for CHA1107-7626; the present paper independently detects the same features in its own MIRI spectra and in three other disks (Section 4.4), so the citation is not load-bearing. The results are externally falsifiable against the published spectra and photometry. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard astrophysical fitting parameters (Teff, log g, Av, radius) and on several domain assumptions about youth, distance, extinction, and model validity. No new physical entities are postulated. The extinction-law assumption is the most fragile because the silicate absorption and feature shapes are derived from dereddened spectra.

free parameters (4)
  • Effective temperature Teff = 1600-1900 K (per object)
    Fitted by chi2 comparison of NIRSpec 1-2.5 um spectra to BT-Settl models; model-dependent, steps of 100 K.
  • Surface gravity log g = 3.5 (cgs)
    Chosen as best match for all targets, consistent with young low-mass objects.
  • Extinction Av = 1.3-7.0 mag (per object)
    Fitted with spectral template matching; for two objects differs from literature by 2.5-3.5 mag.
  • Radius R = 1.8-3.8 RJup (per object)
    Fitted via dilution factor in the BT-Settl fitting; varies with distance assumption.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Targets are members of young (1-5 Myr) star-forming regions Taurus, Chamaeleon I, and rho Ophiuchus.
    Membership from literature cluster catalogues (Esplin et al. 2017, 2019, 2020); if ages are older or membership wrong, derived masses change.
  • domain assumption Distances derived from Gaia DR3 parallaxes of nearby stellar members are representative for each target.
    Targets are too faint for Gaia; adopted mean distance of 8-10 neighboring young stars. If neighbors are not co-located, luminosities and masses shift.
  • domain assumption The Gordon et al. (2023) extinction law applies along each line of sight.
    Used for dereddening; the paper notes the law is an average and may not match specific sightlines, directly affecting silicate feature shapes.
  • domain assumption BT-Settl model atmospheres and ATMO-2020 evolutionary tracks are valid for these objects.
    Teff and mass estimates depend on these models; the paper states temperatures are model-dependent and could shift with different models.
  • domain assumption The 10.5 um emission line is ethylene rather than H I 12-8.
    At R~100 the lines are blended; authors infer ethylene from absence of other hydrogen lines, but this is not decisive.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectroscopy of Free-Floating Planetary-Mass Objects and their disks with JWST." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A5F4IFGN

@misc{pith2026250705155,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectroscopy of Free-Floating Planetary-Mass Objects and their disks with JWST},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A5F4IFGN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05155}
}
abstract

Free-floating planetary-mass objects (FFPMOs) are known to harbor disks at young ages. Here, we present 1-13 $\mu m$ spectra for eight young FFPMOs with masses of 5-10 M$_\mathrm{Jup}$ (at ages of 1-5 Myr), using the NIRSpec and MIRI instruments on the James Webb Space Telescope. We derive fundamental properties of these targets, and find spectral types of M9.5 to L4, with effective temperatures of 1600-1900 K. The photospheric spectra of our targets show a clear diversity at similar temperatures, especially in the 3-5 $\mu m$ range, unaccounted for by existing atmospheric models. We find a silicate absorption feature in the photosphere of one of our targets, the first such detection in very young FFPMOs, indicating silicate clouds in their cool atmospheres. Six of our objects show mid-infrared excess emission above the photosphere, as well as silicate emission features, demonstrating the presence of disks. The shape and strength of the latter features constitute strong evidence of grain growth and crystallization, similar to what is seen in more massive brown dwarfs and stars. We also detect emission lines from hydrocarbon molecules in the disks of several targets. These are the lowest mass isolated objects found so far with silicate and hydrocarbon emission features arising in their disks. The presence of disks and their characteristics point to the potential for the formation of rocky companions around free-floating planetary-mass objects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05155 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A K−4.5 µm color-magnitude diagram highlight￾ing the location of our objects observed with JWST along with the distribution of low-mass members from similar age σ Orionis (Damian et al. 2023b) and Chamaeleon I (Esplin et al. 2017) star-forming regions. The magnitudes are in absolute scale, transformed using their respective extinction and distance to the cluster (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Observed spectra of all the eight objects with JWST NIRSpec (green) and MIRI (orange) normalised to the flux at 2.5µm. Published photometry at near-infrared (red) and mid-infrared wavelengths (blue) is overplotted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (left) AV vs spectral type map of one of our targets (CHA1110-7633). The order of templates in the y-axis has no significance and are only grouped according to their ages. The spectral types prefixed with ’Y’ and ’F’ indicate the young dwarfs and old field dwarfs, respectively. The colorbar indicates the normalised 1/(χ 2 ) 2 value where the lowest χ 2 corresponds to the brightest color. The blue colored marker deno… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: NIRSpec spectrum of UHWJ247.95-24.78 over￾plotted with the three best fitting photospheric models red￾dened and scaled by the corresponding AV and radius as indicated. The wavelength range considered for the compar￾ison is highlighted by the shaded region. We find that…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Complete NIRSpec and MIRI spectra of all eight targets dereddened by the extinction estimated through the model fitting along with the best fit photospheric model from BT-Settl (Allard et al. 2012) scaled by the corresponding dilution factor (see text for details). and…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison spectra of two of our targets with similar spectral type objects in literature. The prominent molecular absorption features are highlighted. The spectra of the literature objects are resampled to match the resolution of our targets and are normalised to the …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: MIRI dereddened spectra normalized to the con￾tinuum estimated in the previous figure. We show only the 7 to 12.5 µm region to highlight the silicate emission feature and the diversity in its shape among our 6 objects with disk. panions in the disks around free-floatin…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Shape and strength of the silicate emission fea￾ture of our FFPMOs with disk (before and after deredden￾ing) and a sample of brown dwarfs, T Tauri stars, and Herbig Ae/Be stars from Pascucci et al. (2009). The error bars in￾dicate the upper and lower values for a chan…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (left) Measurement of silicate index for the two targets in our sample that do not show excess emission above the photosphere in the MIR. Both the spectra are corrected for extinction using the Gordon et al. (2023) relation and AV from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_f…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 370, 2765, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0269

    Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 370, 2765, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0269

    arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    N., & Liu, M

    Allers, K. N., & Liu, M. C. 2013, ApJ, 772, 79, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/79 —. 2020, PASP, 132, 104401, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aba811

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/2/79 2013

  3. [3]

    2022, A&A, 657, A129, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142050

    Krone-Martins, A., & Kubiak, K. 2022, A&A, 657, A129, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142050

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142050 2022

  4. [4]

    2005, Science, 310, 834, doi: 10.1126/science.1118042

    Apai, D., Pascucci, I., Bouwman, J., et al. 2005, Science, 310, 834, doi: 10.1126/science.1118042

    doi:10.1126/science.1118042 2005

  5. [5]

    M., Kamp, I., Henning, T., et al

    Arabhavi, A. M., Kamp, I., Henning, T., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 1086, doi: 10.1126/science.adi8147 —. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.02748. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02748 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M....

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    2021, AJ, 161, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 2021

  7. [7]

    2015, A&A, 577, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425481

    Baraffe, I., Homeier, D., Allard, F., & Chabrier, G. 2015, A&A, 577, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425481

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 2015

  8. [8]

    2017, ApJL, 841, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7046

    Bayo, A., Joergens, V., Liu, Y., et al. 2017, ApJL, 841, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7046

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7046 2017

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    J., Esposito, V

    Boersma, C., Allamandola, L. J., Esposito, V. J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad022b

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    Burgasser, A. J. 2014, in Astronomical Society of India Conference Series, Vol. 11, Astronomical Society of India Conference Series, 7–16. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4887

    2014 arXiv

  3. [11]

    2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.15.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12692459

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.15.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12692459

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    L., Stapelfeldt, K

    Cieza, L., Padgett, D. L., Stapelfeldt, K. R., et al. 2007, ApJ, 667, 308, doi: 10.1086/520698

    2007 doi

  5. [13]

    L., N´ u˜ nez, A., Burgasser, A

    Cruz, K. L., N´ u˜ nez, A., Burgasser, A. J., et al. 2018, AJ, 155, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9d8a

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    C., Roellig, T

    Cushing, M. C., Roellig, T. L., Marley, M. S., et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, 614, doi: 10.1086/505637

    2006 doi

  7. [15]

    Damian, B., Jose, J., Biller, B., & Paul, K. T. 2023a, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 44, 77, doi: 10.1007/s12036-023-09968-2

    doi

  8. [16]

    2023b, ApJ, 951, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd115

    Damian, B., Jose, J., Biller, B., et al. 2023b, ApJ, 951, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd115

    doi

  9. [17]

    D., Andrews, J

    Decleir, M., Gordon, K. D., Andrews, J. E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5dbe

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    2012, A&A, 548, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219984 14 Damian et al

    Delorme, P., Gagn´ e, J., Malo, L., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219984 14 Damian et al

    2012 doi

  11. [19]

    J., Liu, M

    Dupuy, T. J., Liu, M. C., Evans, E. L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 1688, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3557

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    J., Liu, M

    Dupuy, T. J., Liu, M. C., Magnier, E. A., et al. 2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 54, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ab8942

    2020 doi

  13. [21]

    L., & Luhman, K

    Esplin, T. L., & Luhman, K. L. 2019, AJ, 158, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab2594 —. 2020, AJ, 159, 282, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab8dbd

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    L., Luhman, K

    Esplin, T. L., Luhman, K. L., Faherty, J. K., Mamajek, E. E., & Bochanski, J. J. 2017, AJ, 154, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa74e2

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63, doi: 10.1086/316293

    1999 doi

  16. [24]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.13714, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.13714

    Flagg, L., Scholz, A., Almendros-Abad, V., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.13714, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.13714

    2025 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    2024, A&A, 687, A96, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348034 Gagn´ e, J., Faherty, J

    Franceschi, R., Henning, T., Tabone, B., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A96, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348034 Gagn´ e, J., Faherty, J. K., Cruz, K. L., et al. 2015, ApJS, 219, 33, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/33 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 5...

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    D., Cartledge, S., & Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Cartledge, S., & Clayton, G. C. 2009, ApJ, 705, 1320, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1320

    2009 doi

  19. [27]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Decleir, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    D., Misselt, K

    Gordon, K. D., Misselt, K. A., Bouwman, J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 916, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b7

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    A., Liu, M

    Hurt, S. A., Liu, M. C., Zhang, Z., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0b12

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    R., Stelzer, B., & Haisch, Jr., K

    Jayawardhana, R., Ardila, D. R., Stelzer, B., & Haisch, Jr., K. E. 2003, AJ, 126, 1515, doi: 10.1086/377144

    2003 doi

  23. [31]

    Jayawardhana, R., & Ivanov, V. D. 2006, Science, 313, 1279, doi: 10.1126/science.1132128

    2006 doi

  24. [32]

    2013, A&A, 558, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322432 JWST Transiting Exoplanet Community Early Release Science Team, Ahrer, E.-M., Alderson, L., et al

    Joergens, V., Bonnefoy, M., Liu, Y., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322432 JWST Transiting Exoplanet Community Early Release Science Team, Ahrer, E.-M., Alderson, L., et al. 2023, Nature, 614, 649, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05269-w

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    B., Scholz, A., Muˇ zi´ c, K., et al

    Langeveld, A. B., Scholz, A., Muˇ zi´ c, K., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad6f0c

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    W., & Roche, P

    Lucas, P. W., & Roche, P. F. 2000, MNRAS, 314, 858, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03515.x

    2000

  27. [35]

    Luhman, K. L. 2007, ApJS, 173, 104, doi: 10.1086/520114

    2007 doi

  28. [36]

    L., Adame, L., D’Alessio, P., et al

    Luhman, K. L., Adame, L., D’Alessio, P., et al. 2005, ApJL, 635, L93, doi: 10.1086/498868

    2005 doi

  29. [37]

    L., & Alves de Oliveira, C

    Luhman, K. L., & Alves de Oliveira, C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.08969. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08969

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    L., Mamajek, E

    Luhman, K. L., Mamajek, E. E., Shukla, S. J., & Loutrel, N. P. 2017, AJ, 153, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/46

    2017 doi

  31. [39]

    L., Allen, L

    Luhman, K. L., Allen, L. E., Allen, P. R., et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 1375, doi: 10.1086/527347

    2008 doi

  32. [40]

    2024, AJ, 167, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad2938 Mart ´ ın, E

    Manjavacas, E., Tremblin, P., Birkmann, S., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad2938 Mart ´ ın, E. L.,{ˇZ}erjal, M., Bouy, H., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.13497, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.13497

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    E., Biller, B

    Miles, B. E., Biller, B. A., Patapis, P., et al. 2023, ApJL, 946, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb04a

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    N., et al

    Miret-Roig, N., Bouy, H., Raymond, S. N., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 89, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01513-x

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    2004, ApJL, 609, L33, doi: 10.1086/422555 Muˇ zi´ c, K., Scholz, A., Geers, V

    Mohanty, S., Jayawardhana, R., Natta, A., et al. 2004, ApJL, 609, L33, doi: 10.1086/422555 Muˇ zi´ c, K., Scholz, A., Geers, V. C., Jayawardhana, R., & L´ opez Mart ´ ı, B. 2014, ApJ, 785, 159, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/159

    2004 doi

  36. [44]

    2001, A&A, 376, L22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011055

    Natta, A., & Testi, L. 2001, A&A, 376, L22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011055

    2001 doi

  37. [45]

    2009, ApJ, 696, 143, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/143

    Pascucci, I., Apai, D., Luhman, K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 143, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/143

    2009 doi

  38. [46]

    W., Tremblin, P., Baraffe, I., et al

    Phillips, M. W., Tremblin, P., Baraffe, I., et al. 2020, A&A, 637, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937381

    2020 doi

  39. [47]

    2022, European Physical Journal Plus, 137, 1206, doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03384-1

    Pinilla, P. 2022, European Physical Journal Plus, 137, 1206, doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03384-1

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    2024, A&A, 686, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347327

    Piscarreta, L., Muˇ zi´ c, K., Almendros-Abad, V., & Scholz, A. 2024, A&A, 686, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347327

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    2014, ApJ, 793, 75, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/75

    Radigan, J., Lafreni` ere, D., Jayawardhana, R., & Artigau, E. 2014, ApJ, 793, 75, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/75

    2014 doi

  42. [50]

    2023, PASP, 135, 048001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb293

    Rigby, J., Perrin, M., McElwain, M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb293

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    C., Best, W

    Sanghi, A., Liu, M. C., Best, W. M. J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acff66

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    C., Windsor, J., Cushing, M

    Schneider, A. C., Windsor, J., Cushing, M. C., Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Wright, E. L. 2016, ApJL, 822, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/822/1/L1

    2016 doi

  45. [53]

    2008, ApJL, 672, L49, doi: 10.1086/526340

    Scholz, A., & Jayawardhana, R. 2008, ApJL, 672, L49, doi: 10.1086/526340

    2008 doi

  46. [54]

    2012, ApJ, 756, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/24

    Scholz, A., Jayawardhana, R., Muzic, K., et al. 2012, ApJ, 756, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/24

    2012 doi

  47. [55]

    2007, ApJ, 660, 1517, doi: 10.1086/513066

    Scholz, A., Jayawardhana, R., Wood, K., et al. 2007, ApJ, 660, 1517, doi: 10.1086/513066

    2007 doi

  48. [56]

    2023, AJ, 165, 196, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acc65d JWST spectroscopy of planetary-mass objects 15

    Scholz, A., Muzic, K., Jayawardhana, R., Almendros-Abad, V., & Wilson, I. 2023, AJ, 165, 196, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acc65d JWST spectroscopy of planetary-mass objects 15

    2023 doi

  49. [57]

    2005, A&A, 430, L49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200400121

    Lodieu, N. 2005, A&A, 430, L49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200400121

    2005 doi

  50. [58]

    H., & Scholz, A

    Seo, H. H., & Scholz, A. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 2579, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf163

    2025 doi

  51. [59]

    2012, ApJ, 760, 151, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/151 Su´ arez, G., & Metchev, S

    Sorahana, S., & Yamamura, I. 2012, ApJ, 760, 151, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/151 Su´ arez, G., & Metchev, S. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 5701, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1205 Su´ arez, G., Vos, J. M., Metchev, S., Faherty, J. K., & Cruz, K. 2023, ApJL, 954, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acec4b

    2012 doi

  52. [60]

    S., Lada, C

    Teixeira, P. S., Lada, C. J., Marengo, M., & Lada, E. A. 2012, A&A, 540, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015326

    2012 doi

  53. [61]

    2011, ApJ, 734, 73, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/73

    Tsuji, T., Yamamura, I., & Sorahana, S. 2011, ApJ, 734, 73, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/73

    2011 doi

  54. [62]

    M., et al

    Venuti, L., Stelzer, B., Alcal´ a, J. M., et al. 2019, A&A, 632, A46, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935745

    2019 doi

  55. [63]

    M., Allers, K

    Vos, J. M., Allers, K. N., & Biller, B. A. 2017, ApJ, 842, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa73cf Zapatero Osorio, M. R., B´ ejar, V. J. S., Mart ´ ın, E. L., et al. 2000, Science, 290, 103, doi: 10.1126/science.290.5489.103

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.