REVIEW 4 cited by
Supersymmetric And Smooth Hybrid Inflation In The Light Of WMAP3
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In their minimal form both supersymmetric and smooth hybrid inflation yield a scalar spectral index n_s close to 0.98, to be contrasted with the result n_s=0.951+0.015-0.019 from WMAP3. To realize better agreement, following hep-ph/0604198, we extend the parameter space of these models by employing a non-minimal Kaehler potential. We also discuss non-thermal leptogenesis by inflaton decay and obtain new bounds in these models on the reheat temperature to explain the observed baryon asymmetry.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Sneutrino Tribrid Inflation in Flipped $\mathbf{SU(5)}$: Confronting ACT DR6 and Planck
A flipped SU(5) sneutrino tribrid inflation model with an independent cutoff scale matches the ACT DR6 and Planck n_s and predicts an observable tensor-to-scalar ratio plus non-thermal leptogenesis.
-
GUT-Scale Smooth Hybrid Inflation with a Stabilized Modulus in Light of ACT and SPT Data
A smooth hybrid inflation model, augmented with a stabilized modulus, reproduces the spectral index measured by ACT and SPT while keeping Higgs v.e.v.s at the GUT scale.
-
Supersymmetric Hybrid Inflation with K\"{a}hler-Induced $\mathbf{R}$-Symmetry Breaking
Nonrenormalizable R-symmetry breaking in the Kahler potential can tune the spectral index of supersymmetric hybrid inflation into the ACT DR6 window while keeping tensor modes below 1e-5.
-
Waterfall phase in supersymmetric hybrid inflation
Waterfall-phase e-foldings in R-symmetric SUSY hybrid inflation can produce a PTA-compatible scalar-induced gravitational wave background and, in SU(5), dilute monopoles to observable levels.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.