Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

JADES NIRSpec Spectroscopy of GN-z11: Evidence for Wolf-Rayet contribution to stellar populations at 430 Myr after Big Bang?

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A model library that adds Wolf-Rayet stars to the stellar population of the z=10.6 galaxy GN-z11 reproduces the observed C III]/He II versus C III]/C IV line ratios, resolving a discrepancy in earlier starburst and AGN models.

desk verdict A useful WR-inclusive model grid for GN-z11 that demonstrates plausibility, but the 'essential' claim overreaches without a WR-off control. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.12584 v1 pith:A5NFEFB4 submitted 2025-04-17 astro-ph.GA

Madusha L. P. Gunawardhana , Jarle Brinchmann , Scott Croom , Andrew Bunker , Julia Bryant , Sree Oh This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Wolf-RayetstarsGN-z11stellarpopulationsynthesisphotoionizationmodellingultravioletemissionlineshigh-redshiftgalaxiesnitrogenabundanceJWSTNIRSpec
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars, the hot, dense-wind remnants of the most massive stars, can explain the extreme ultraviolet emission-line ratios measured by JWST in GN-z11, a galaxy seen 430 million years after the Big Bang. Using an updated stellar population synthesis code paired with a photoionisation model, the paper finds that adding WR stars lets the models occupy the C III]/He II versus C III]/C IV region where GN-z11 lies, which earlier starburst and AGN models could not reach. The models also reproduce the galaxy's inferred metallicity, ionization parameter, and young age. However, they underproduce the N III]/O III] ratio by more than an order of magnitude, so WR stars alone cannot explain the nitrogen excess. The paper concludes that WR stars are a necessary ingredient for the carbon and helium lines, while the nitrogen excess points to some additional enrichment process.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a four-step modelling chain. The Starburst99 population synthesis code is updated with Parsec and Geneva evolutionary tracks that identify when massive stars enter the Wolf-Rayet phase. Each WR star is mapped onto the Potsdam (PoWR) grid of expanding, iron-line-blanketed, non-local-thermodynamic-equilibrium model atmospheres using the transformed radius $R_T$ and a weighted-mean temperature

What would settle it

A decisive test is to look for the broad stellar-wind emission wings that the models attach to He II 1640 and C IV 1550 in GN-z11's medium-resolution NIRSpec spectrum; if those lines are purely narrow nebular emission, the Wolf-Rayet contribution required by the models is absent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a young starburst whose population includes Wolf-Rayet stars produces enough hard ionizing photons to place a galaxy at the exact spot where GN-z11 sits in the C III]/He II versus C III]/C IV diagnostic diagram, something standard starburst models do not do. The same models yield a metallicity of 0.07–0.15 $Z_\odot$, an ionization parameter $\log U \approx -2$, and dominant stellar ages near 3–3.5 Myr, all compatible with earlier estimates. The paper also shows that these models under-predict the observed N III]/O III] ratio by more than an order of magnitude, so WR stars alone cannot account for the nitrogen enrichment. It therefore proposes that the carbon and helium lines trace the WR phase of the current burst, while the nitrogen excess requires additional mechanisms such as rapid chemical enrichment in a young, metal-poor environment.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument hinges on how the paper converts a Wolf-Rayet star's evolutionary temperature into the effective temperature used to pick its model spectrum; if that conversion is off, the predicted line ratios shift and GN-z11 may no longer be reproduced.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The observed ultraviolet carbon and helium line ratios of GN-z11 no longer sit outside the star-forming model grid, so a massive-star starburst emerges as a viable explanation for the hard ionizing radiation at z=10.6.
  • The model-derived metallicity, ionization parameter, and young stellar ages are consistent with earlier SED fitting, giving independent support to a low-metallicity, intense starburst interpretation.
  • During the WR phase, the models predict excursions into the AGN/composite region of optical BPT diagrams, meaning powerful starbursts can imitate AGN signatures in some diagnostics.
  • The persistent under-prediction of N III]/O III] shows that WR stars alone cannot supply the nitrogen excess, so an additional enrichment channel must be operating at early times.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If WR-dominated phases are common in very high-redshift starbursts, UV diagnostics used to separate AGNs from star-forming galaxies will need WR-inclusive tracks; otherwise some z>10 AGN candidates could be misclassified starbursts.
  • The nitrogen under-prediction suggests a two-stage enrichment picture in which carbon and helium ratios trace the current burst's WR stars while the nitrogen excess is set by an earlier, faster enrichment channel, such as rotating massive-star winds or a prior generation of very massive stars.
  • The same modelling pipeline could be applied to other JWST targets that show C III], C IV, and He II in order to estimate the Wolf-Rayet fraction and thereby probe the presence of the most massive stars in the first galaxies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper models the z=10.6 galaxy GN-z11 with Starburst99/Cloudy, adding a high-resolution Wolf-Rayet (WR) spectral treatment based on PoWR atmosphere grids coupled to Parsec and Geneva stellar evolutionary tracks. The models are compared with the JADES NIRSpec line ratios of Bunker et al. (2023), with emphasis on the C III]/He II versus C III]/C IV diagnostic plane. The authors report that inclusion of WR stars is essential for reproducing GN-z11's position in that plane, that the derived metallicity (0.07 ≲ Z/Z⊙ ≲ 0.15) and log U ≈ -2 agree with previous estimates, and that the models under-predict N III]/O III] by more than an order of magnitude, indicating that WR stars alone cannot explain the nitrogen excess.

Significance. If established, the claim that WR stars are required to explain GN-z11's ultraviolet line ratios would be an important step toward understanding the ionizing sources in this exceptionally early galaxy, supporting a massive-star starburst interpretation over the AGN alternative. The paper has genuine strengths: it couples independent stellar-evolution and photoionization codes, uses external JADES data, and is explicit about the N III]/O III] shortfall. However, the central claim of necessity is currently supported only by a demonstration of sufficiency, because no WR-free control run is presented in the same model framework. With an added control and appropriately softened wording, the paper would constitute a useful contribution to the high-redshift stellar-population literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §5; Fig. 8] The central assertion that WR stars are essential is not established by the presented models. The tracks in Fig. 8 pass through the GN-z11 point only during ages within the WR phase, while the comparison models (Gutkin et al. 2016, as shown in Bunker et al. 2023) differ in multiple respects: continuous 100 Myr star formation versus an instantaneous burst, a different stellar library, and a galaxy-scale ensemble of H II regions rather than an individual burst. The pre-WR early-age segments of the same tracks are not a valid WR-off control because they sample younger, less evolved stellar populations with different O-star content and ionization parameter. I request a run in which the WR spectral contribution is suppressed while all other assumptions are held fixed (e.g., PoWR spectra replaced by the underlying CMFGEN/O-star spectra for stars classified as WR). If such a run also reaches the GN-z11 location, the conclusion should be reframed from 'essential' to 'sufficient' in the abstract and §6.
  2. [§3.3.1–3.3.2, Eq. (3), Fig. 1] The hybrid temperature correction T_WR = 0.6 T_hyd + 0.4 T_2/3 is calibrated at solar metallicity (Smith et al. 2002), yet the authors' own Fig. 1 shows that for the SMC grid the selected temperatures extend beyond the PoWR grids. Because the PoWR spectral selection controls the hardness of the ionizing spectrum, which directly sets the C III]/He II and C III]/C IV ratios in Fig. 8, this acknowledged inadequacy is a load-bearing uncertainty for the central claim. The paper should quantify how much the predicted diagnostic position changes under plausible variations of the weighting coefficients, or when the SMC/sub-SMC selections are excluded or interpolated, and state explicitly whether the GN-z11 overlap survives.
  3. [§5.3, Fig. 13(a)] The predicted carbon-line ratios are highly sensitive to the assumed C/O ratio, as the paper itself notes when discussing a 40% change in C/O. The models fix (C/O) = 0.44 (solar) and ξ_d = 0.36 following Gutkin et al. (2016), but the C/O ratio of GN-z11 is not fixed by the data used here; Cameron et al. (2023) report a lower bound of C/O > 0.17. Since the central diagnostic plane is carbon-based, the robustness of the WR-essential conclusion to C/O and depletion variations should be demonstrated, for example by recomputing Fig. 8 for the range of C/O values consistent with the GN-z11 constraints.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption lists two curves as '0.5Z⊙ (blue) and 0.5Z⊙ (green)', but the text and context indicate that one of these should be 0.25Z⊙.
  2. [§4.2] The phrase 'probes the the ionising continuum shape' contains a duplicated article and should read 'probes the ionising continuum shape'.
  3. [§3.3.2] The sentence 'For this phase to occur in Parsec models require higher stellar masses' is ungrammatical; consider 'For this phase to occur in the Parsec models requires higher stellar masses.'
  4. [Table 1, note (d)] The note writes '−0.5 ≲ U ≲ 4' where the surrounding text refers to log U; please clarify whether the quoted range applies to U or log U.
  5. [Abstract; §5] The abstract states a model-derived metallicity range 0.07 ≲ Z/Z⊙ ≲ 0.15, but Fig. 8 explicitly does not show the 0.07Z⊙ Parsec models, and the lowest Parsec metallicity shown is 0.25Z⊙; please make clear whether the low-metallicity end comes from the Geneva tracks, from the [Ne III]/[O II] diagnostics, or from the literature comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the WR-plus-Cloudy grid is independently constructed and the observed line ratios are external; the 'essential' wording is under-supported but not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from independent inputs: Parsec/Geneva stellar evolution tracks, PoWR/CMFGEN/UVBlue atmosphere libraries, and the Cloudy photoionization code. The GN-z11 line ratios are external data from Bunker et al. (2023) plus continuum-subtracted measurements made in this paper. No parameter of the models is fitted to the C III]/He II versus C III]/C IV location; the overlap in Figure 8 is a computed consequence of the synthesis and therefore has independent content. The WR temperature weighting T_WR = 0.6 T_hyd + 0.4 T_2/3 (Eq. 3) is adopted from Smith et al. (2002), an external source, and the paper itself flags its inadequacy for the SMC grid in Section 3.3.2, which is an acknowledged limitation rather than a circular step. The under-prediction of N III]/O III] (Section 5.3, Figure 13f) is an honest non-fit, and the paper explicitly concludes that WR stars alone cannot explain the nitrogen excess. The self-citations (e.g., Gunawardhana et al. 2020; Brinchmann et al. 2004) appear in methodology or context and are not load-bearing. The central claim that WR stars are 'essential' is stronger than the evidence: no model suppresses WR spectral contributions while holding the stellar population fixed, so necessity is not demonstrated. But the models do demonstrate sufficiency, and the absence of a WR-off control is an evidential gap, not a by-construction equivalence. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited from the paper's equations or citation chain, and the minor self-citations do not carry the argument.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a chain of modeling choices: the WR temperature weighting, the wind clumping factor, the adopted IMF and mass-loss prescriptions in the Geneva/Parsec isochrones, and the assumption that gas and stellar metallicities are equal. No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are not fitted to the GN-z11 line ratios in a statistical sense, but the grid boundaries are chosen to encompass the observed point, which weakens the predictive strength of the reproduction.

free parameters (5)
  • WR temperature weighting coefficients = 0.6 and 0.4 in T_WR = 0.6*T_hyd + 0.4*T_2/3 (Eq. 3)
    Adopted from Smith et al. (2002); sets the effective temperatures of WR spectra selected from PoWR grids, directly influencing the ionizing spectrum hardness and the predicted C III]/He II and C III]/C IV ratios.
  • Wind clumping factor D = 4-10 (adopted range)
    Downward revises mass-loss rates for WR stars in the transformed radius R_T (Eq. 1); affects the R_T values and thus which PoWR model spectra are used. The exact value is uncertain and chosen from literature.
  • Starburst strength and gas density grid = log M_burst = 2-5 M_sun; n_H = 100, 500, 1000 cm^-3
    Grid parameters chosen so that model tracks cover the observed GN-z11 positions in diagnostic diagrams; the ability to reach the observed point depends on these ranges.
  • Dust attenuation normalization in continuum fitting = free parameter with tau(lambda) proportional to lambda^-1.3
    Used in Platefit to extract nebular line fluxes from the GN-z11 spectrum; the resulting line ratios are then compared to models.
  • Assumed C/O ratio and dust depletion fraction = C/O = 0.44 (solar) and xi_d = 0.36
    Adopted from Gutkin et al. (2016); C/O directly affects the C III] and C IV line strengths used in the central diagnostic plane, and xi_d affects cooling and electron temperatures.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Single stellar population with Kroupa IMF and upper mass cutoff 120 M_sun
    Assumed in Table 1 and throughout; binary evolution and top-heavy IMFs are excluded, which could change WR populations and line ratios.
  • domain assumption Gas-phase metallicity equals stellar metallicity for all models (Z_ISM = Z_s)
    Stated in §4 and Table 1; ignores possible enrichment differences between stars and gas, which are central to the N/O debate.
  • domain assumption Spherical geometry for the HII region
    Cloudy models assume spherical geometry (§4); authors argue line ratios minimize the effect, but clumpy geometry could alter predicted line strengths.
  • domain assumption PoWR grids apply to the selected WR evolutionary phases, with WO phases substituted by WC spectra
    Stated in §3.3.2; the substitution and the grid applicability are necessary to assign WR spectra, and the authors note the SMC grid is not fully covered by the temperature correction.
  • domain assumption Nebular emission lines are dominated by the starburst, with no significant AGN contribution to the UV lines used in the diagnostics
    The paper follows the starburst interpretation of Álvarez-Márquez et al. (2024) and others; if a weak AGN contributes to C IV or He II, the inferred WR contribution would be overestimated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JADES NIRSpec Spectroscopy of GN-z11: Evidence for Wolf-Rayet contribution to stellar populations at 430 Myr after Big Bang?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A5NFEFB4

@misc{pith2026250412584,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JADES NIRSpec Spectroscopy of GN-z11: Evidence for Wolf-Rayet contribution to stellar populations at 430 Myr after Big Bang?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A5NFEFB4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12584}
}
abstract

We investigate the unusual emission line luminosity ratios observed in the JADES NIRSpec spectroscopy of GN-z11, which reveal exceptionally strong emission lines and a significant detection of the rarely observed N III] $\lambda1748-1753$\r{A} multiplet. These features suggest an elevated N/O abundance, challenging existing models of stellar populations and nebular emission. To assess whether Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars can account for the observed line ratios, we construct a suite of stellar and nebular models incorporating high-resolution stellar spectral libraries, enabling a more accurate treatment of WR evolution and its influence on the ionising radiation field. We find that the inclusion of WR stars is essential for reproducing the observed position of GN-z11 in the C III]/He II versus C III]/C iv diagnostic plane, resolving discrepancies from previous studies. The model-derived metallicity (0.07$\lesssim$Z/Z$_{\odot}\lesssim$0.15), ionisation parameter ($\log\,U$$\approx$-2) and stellar ages are consistent with the literature estimates. However, our models under-predict the N III/O III] ratio, suggesting that WR stars alone cannot fully explain the nitrogen enrichment. This suggests that additional mechanisms, such as rapid chemical enrichment in a young, metal-poor environment, may be necessary to explain the nitrogen excess. While our models successfully reproduce most observed line ratios, further refinements to the models are needed to fully characterise the stellar populations and the enrichment processes of high-redshift galaxies like GN-z11.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.12584 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. On the selection of WR spectra as a function of TWR [103 K] and RT [R⊙] for Parsec and Geneva stellar isochrones from PoWR library. The panels (left-to-right, top-to-bottom) show PoWR grids for WNE, WNL-H20, and WC spectra at solar, LMC-like, SMC-like, and sub-SMC-like (∼0.7 Z⊙) metallicities. The contours and color gradients represent photospheric temperatures as a function of TWR and RT. Overlaid on each grid are … view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. (Continued) The selection of WR spectra as a function of TWR [103 K] and RT [R⊙] for Parsec and Geneva stellar isochrones from PoWR library for the sub-SMC-like (∼0.7 Z⊙) stellar metallicity. Finally, since the PoWR grids begin at a wavelength of 950Å, we supplement the spectra at shorter wavelengths by integrating them with the low-resolution CMFGEN library available in Star￾burst99 (Hillier & Miller 1998), selecti… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The behaviour of the predicted nebular lines used in BPT diagnostics (Baldwin et al. 1981). (a) The evolution of [O iii] 𝜆5007Å/H𝛽 line luminosity ratio as a function of 𝑛𝐻 (solid and dotted lines) at solar metallicity (Zs=Zg) for bursts of star formation of strengths 1000 and 10 000 𝑀⊙ for a model HII region of a fixed radius. (b) and (c) show the evolution of [O iii] 𝜆5007 Å/H𝛽 and [N ii] 𝜆6584 Å/H𝛼 as a function … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The sound-crossing time as a function of n𝐻 for starbursts of different strengths. -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The model predictions for a starburst of 1000 M⊙ at solar metal￾licity, with nH values of 100 and 1000 cm−3 (solid lines, same as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The evolution of the number of ionising photons (𝑄) for ages ≲ 10 Myr in the ionising continua of C++ (i.e. 258.9 ≲ 𝜆 [Å]≲ 508.5), He+ (i.e. 504 ≲ 𝜆 [Å]≲ 228) and O++ (i.e. 225.7 ≲ 𝜆 [Å]≲ 353) species at 𝑍 = 𝑍⊙ (red), 0.5𝑍⊙ (blue) and 0.5𝑍⊙ (green) for a starburst of 1…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The evolution in ionising luminosity and hardness of ionising spectra. (a) The evolution of the number of ionising photons (𝑄) for ages ≲ 10 Myr in the ionising continua of H0 (≲ 912Å), He0 (≲ 504Å), He+ (≲ 228Å) at 𝑍⊙ (solid) and 0.5𝑍⊙ (dotted) for a starburst of 1000…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The evolution of different line luminosity ratios as a function of nH and metallicity for a burst of star formation of strength 10 000 M⊙ for a model HII region of a fixed radius. The evolutionary behaviour for 𝑛𝐻 = 100 (solid lines) and 1000 (dotted lines) [cm−3 ], an…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Our Starburst99/Parsec + Cloudy models’ equivalent of Bunker et al. (2023) Figures 4. The behaviour of the predicted CIII] 𝜆𝜆1907, 1909Å to CIV 𝜆1550Å versus CIII] 𝜆𝜆1907, 1909Å to Heii 𝜆1640Å for a starburst of strength 10 000 M⊙ for a model HII re￾gion of a fixed rad…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: our Starburst99/Parsec + Cloudy models’ equivalent of Bunker et al. (2023) ] Figures 8 (see also [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The best-fitting continuum model at 𝑍𝑠 = 𝑍⊙ with (blue solid line) and without (red solid line) a residual correction to GN-z11 medium resolution G140M (blue), G235M (green) and G395M (red) grating data shown in black. The prominent emission lines observed in the spec…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The light-weighted and dust-obscured individual stellar population templates contributing to the best-fitting model shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The new AGN diagnostics based on the [O iii] 𝜆4363Å auroral line introduced by Mazzolari et al. (2024). The Starburst99/Parsec + Cloudy predictions of the [Ne iii] 𝜆3869Å/[O ii] 𝜆𝜆3726,3729Åversus [O iii] 𝜆4363Å/H𝛾 line ratios used by Mazzolari et al. (2024) for dis￾c…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The UV diagnostics of prominent emission line luminosities observed in GN-z11. (a) Ciii] 𝜆𝜆1907, 1909Å/C iv 𝜆𝜆1548, 1550Å against Ciii] 𝜆𝜆1907, 1909Å to He ii 𝜆1640Å (b) [Ne iii] 𝜆3869Å/[O ii] 𝜆𝜆3726,3729Å against ([Ne iii] 𝜆3869Å+ [O ii] 𝜆𝜆3726,3729Å) / H𝛿 (c) C iv 𝜆…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: PyNeb analysis on the variation of N iii] 𝜆1750Å multiplet to O iii] 𝜆𝜆1661,66Å doublet ratio covering all combinations of atomic pa￾rameters (i.e. energy levels, statistical weights, transition probabilities, ef￾fective collision strengths) in a grid of density and t…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Discovery of a new transitional type of evolved massive stars with hard ionizing flux

    astro-ph.SR 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors identify a new WN/WO transitional Wolf-Rayet stage in five hot, weak-winded massive stars, implying a direct WN to WO evolutionary path at low metallicity with strong hard ionizing flux.

  2. MARTA: The connection between chemical enrichment, feedback, and dust in a Wolf-Rayet galaxy at z${\sim}$2

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MARTA-4327, a z=2.2 galaxy, hosts a young Wolf-Rayet population whose localized effects include a higher gas-phase Fe/O ratio, while global abundances match local galaxies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    G., Dopita M

    Allen M. G., Dopita M. A., Tsvetanov Z. I., 1998, , 493, 571

    1998

  2. [2]

    \'A lvarez-M \'a rquez J. et al. , 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.12826

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    J., Scott P., 2009, , 47, 481

    Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Scott P., 2009, , 47, 481

    2009

  4. [4]

    , 2022, , 935, 167

    Astropy Collaboration et al. , 2022, , 935, 167

    2022

  5. [5]

    , 2018, , 156, 123

    Astropy Collaboration et al. , 2018, , 156, 123

    2018

  6. [6]

    A., Phillips M

    Baldwin J. A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, PASP, 93, 5

    1981

  7. [7]

    Bouwens R. J. et al. , 2010, , 725, 1587

    2010

  8. [8]

    Bressan A., Marigo P., Girardi L., Salasnich B., Dal Cero C., Rubele S., Nanni A., 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127

    2012

Show all 111 references
  1. [9]

    Brinchmann J., Charlot S., White S. D. M., Tremonti C., Kauffmann G., Heckman T., Brinkmann J., 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1151

    2004

  2. [10]

    Brinchmann J., Pettini M., Charlot S., 2008, MNRAS, 385, 769

    2008

  3. [11]

    Bunker A. J. et al. , 2023, , 677, A88

    2023

  4. [12]

    J., Conroy C., Johnson B

    Byler N., Dalcanton J. J., Conroy C., Johnson B. D., 2017, ApJ, 840, 44

    2017

  5. [13]

    M., Stanway E

    Byrne C. M., Stanway E. R., 2023, , 521, 4995

    2023

  6. [14]

    C., Kinney A

    Calzetti D., Armus L., Bohlin R. C., Kinney A. L., Koornneef J., Storchi-Bergmann T., 2000, ApJ, 533, 682

    2000

  7. [15]

    Cameron A. J. et al. , 2023, , 677, A115

    2023

  8. [16]

    A., 2004, , 604, 153

    Chandar R., Leitherer C., Tremonti C. A., 2004, , 604, 153

    2004

  9. [17]

    Charbonnel C., Meynet G., Maeder A., Schaller G., Schaerer D., 1993, A&AS, 101, 415

    1993

  10. [18]

    M., 2000, ApJ, 539, 718

    Charlot S., Fall S. M., 2000, ApJ, 539, 718

    2000

  11. [19]

    Chatzikos M. et al. , 2023, , 59, 327

    2023

  12. [20]

    Chen Y., Bressan A., Girardi L., Marigo P., Kong X., Lanza A., 2015, MNRAS, 452, 1068

    2015

  13. [21]

    Chen Y., Girardi L., Bressan A., Marigo P., Barbieri M., Kong X., 2014, MNRAS, 444, 2525

    2014

  14. [22]

    W., 2007, MNRAS, 382, 498

    Coelho P., Bruzual G., Charlot S., Weiss A., Barbuy B., Ferguson J. W., 2007, MNRAS, 382, 498

    2007

  15. [23]

    A., 2007, ARA&A, 45, 177

    Crowther P. A., 2007, ARA&A, 45, 177

    2007

  16. [24]

    A., Dessart L., Hillier D

    Crowther P. A., Dessart L., Hillier D. J., Abbott J. B., Fullerton A. W., 2002, A&A, 392, 653

    2002

  17. [25]

    Cunha K., Hubeny I., Lanz T., 2006, , 647, L143

    2006

  18. [26]

    A., 1988, A&AS, 72, 259

    de Jager C., Nieuwenhuijzen H., van der Hucht K. A., 1988, A&AS, 72, 259

    1988

  19. [27]

    A., Hillier D

    Dessart L., Crowther P. A., Hillier D. J., Willis A. J., Morris P. W., van der Hucht K. A., 2000, MNRAS, 315, 407

    2000

  20. [28]

    A., Groves B

    Dopita M. A., Groves B. A., Sutherland R. S., Binette L., Cecil G., 2002, , 572, 753

    2002

  21. [29]

    A., Kewley L

    Dopita M. A., Kewley L. J., Heisler C. A., Sutherland R. S., 2000, ApJ, 542, 224

    2000

  22. [30]

    Doran E. I. et al. , 2013, , 558, A134

    2013

  23. [31]

    Efstathiou A., Rowan-Robinson M., Siebenmorgen R., 2000, MNRAS, 313, 734

    2000

  24. [32]

    J., Stanway E

    Eldridge J. J., Stanway E. R., 2009, MNRAS, 400, 1019

    2009

  25. [33]

    J., Stanway E

    Eldridge J. J., Stanway E. R., Xiao L., McClelland L. A. S., Taylor G., Ng M., Greis S. M. L., Bray J. C., 2017, PASA, 34, e058

    2017

  26. [34]

    Feltre A., Charlot S., Gutkin J., 2016, , 456, 3354

    2016

  27. [35]

    Ferland G. J. et al. , 2013, RMxAA, 49, 137

    2013

  28. [36]

    Ferruit P. et al. , 2022, , 661, A81

    2022

  29. [37]

    H., Eggenberger P., 2015, in Wolf-Rayet Stars: Proceedings of an International Workshop held in Potsdam, Germany, 1-5 June 2015

    Georgy C., Ekstr \"o m S., Hirschi R., Meynet G., Groh J. H., Eggenberger P., 2015, in Wolf-Rayet Stars: Proceedings of an International Workshop held in Potsdam, Germany, 1-5 June 2015. Edited by Wolf-Rainer Hamann, Andreas Sander, Helge Todt. Universit \"a tsverlag Potsdam, ...

    2015

  30. [38]

    M., Hirschi R., Eggenberger P., Maeder A., 2012, A&A, 542, A29

    Georgy C., Ekstr \"o m S., Meynet G., Massey P., Levesque E. M., Hirschi R., Eggenberger P., Maeder A., 2012, A&A, 542, A29

    2012

  31. [39]

    M., Papaderos P., 2017, A&A, 603, A63

    Gomes J. M., Papaderos P., 2017, A&A, 603, A63

    2017

  32. [40]

    E., Groh J

    G \"o tberg Y., de Mink S. E., Groh J. H., Leitherer C., Norman C., 2019, A&A, 629, A134

    2019

  33. [41]

    Gr \"a fener G., Koesterke L., Hamann W.-R., 2002, A&A, 387, 244

    2002

  34. [42]

    P., Grassitelli L., Langer N., 2017, , 608, A34

    Gr \"a fener G., Owocki S. P., Grassitelli L., Langer N., 2017, , 608, A34

    2017

  35. [43]

    J., Mackey J., Bestenlehner J

    Grassitelli L., Langer N., Grin N. J., Mackey J., Bestenlehner J. M., Gr \"a fener G., 2018, , 614, A86

    2018

  36. [44]

    J., 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161

    Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161

    1998

  37. [45]

    A., Sutherland R

    Groves B., Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., Kewley L. J., Fischera J., Leitherer C., Brandl B., van Breugel W., 2008, ApJS, 176, 438

    2008

  38. [46]

    A., Dopita M

    Groves B. A., Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., 2004, ApJS, 153, 9

    2004

  39. [47]

    Gunawardhana M. L. P. et al. , 2020, , 497, 3860

    2020

  40. [48]

    Gutkin J., Charlot S., Bruzual G., 2016, , 462, 1757

    2016

  41. [49]

    Hainich R. et al. , 2014, , 565, A27

    2014

  42. [50]

    Hamann W.-R., Gr \"a fener G., 2004, A&A, 427, 697

    2004

  43. [51]

    Harris C. R. et al. , 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    2020

  44. [52]

    J., 1991, A&A, 247, 455

    Hillier D. J., 1991, A&A, 247, 455

    1991

  45. [53]

    J., Miller D

    Hillier D. J., Miller D. L., 1998, ApJ, 496, 407

    1998

  46. [54]

    D., 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    Hunter J. D., 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  47. [55]

    Ji X. et al. , 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.05772

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Kauffmann G. et al. , 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055

    2003

  49. [57]

    J., Dopita M

    Kewley L. J., Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., Heisler C. A., Trevena J., 2001, ApJ, 556, 121

    2001

  50. [58]

    Kobayashi C., Ferrara A., 2024, , 962, L6

    2024

  51. [59]

    Kroupa P., 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

    2001

  52. [60]

    Kurucz CD-ROM No

    Kurucz R., 1993, SYNTHE Spectrum Synthesis Programs and Line Data. Kurucz CD-ROM No. 18. Cambridge, Mass.: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 1993., 18

    1993

  53. [61]

    L., 1992, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Kurucz R. L., 1992, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 149, The Stellar Populations of Galaxies, Barbuy B., Renzini A., eds., p. 225

    1992

  54. [62]

    Langer N., 1989, , 210, 93

    1989

  55. [63]

    B., Levesque E

    Leitherer C., Ekstr \"o m S., Meynet G., Schaerer D., Agienko K. B., Levesque E. M., 2014, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 212, 14

    2014

  56. [64]

    Leitherer C. et al. , 1999, APJS, 123, 3

    1999

  57. [65]

    A., Heckman T

    Leitherer C., Tremonti C. A., Heckman T. M., Calzetti D., 2011, , 141, 37

    2011

  58. [66]

    M., Kewley L

    Levesque E. M., Kewley L. J., Larson K. L., 2010, AJ, 139, 712

    2010

  59. [67]

    M., Richardson M

    Levesque E. M., Richardson M. L. A., 2014, , 780, 100

    2014

  60. [68]

    A., 2013, PyNeb: Analysis of emission lines

    Luridiana V., Morisset C., Shaw R. A., 2013, PyNeb: Analysis of emission lines . Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1304.021

    2013

  61. [69]

    Maeder A., 1990, , 84, 139

    1990

  62. [70]

    Maiolino R. et al. , 2024, , 627, 59

    2024

  63. [71]

    Mazzolari G. et al. , 2024, , 691, A345

    2024

  64. [72]

    Meynet G., 1995, , 298, 767

    1995

  65. [73]

    Meynet G., Maeder A., 2005, , 429, 581

    2005

  66. [74]

    Meynet G., Maeder A., Schaller G., Schaerer D., Charbonnel C., 1994, A&AS, 103, 97

    1994

  67. [75]

    Mingozzi M. et al. , 2022, , 939, 110

    2022

  68. [76]

    Mingozzi M. et al. , 2024, , 962, 95

    2024

  69. [77]

    Moffat A. F. J., Drissen L., Lamontagne R., Robert C., 1988, ApJ, 334, 1038

    1988

  70. [78]

    Munari U., Sordo R., Castelli F., Zwitter T., 2005, A&A, 442, 1127

    2005

  71. [79]

    Nagao T., Maiolino R., Marconi A., 2006, , 459, 85

    2006

  72. [80]

    Nagele C., Umeda H., 2023, , 949, L16

    2023

  73. [81]

    Oesch P. A. et al. , 2016, , 819, 129

    2016

  74. [82]

    Pacifici C. et al. , 2023, , 944, 141

    2023

  75. [83]

    Paxton B. et al. , 2013, ApJS, 208, 4

    2013

  76. [84]

    F., Contini T., D \' az \'A

    P \'e rez-Montero E., H \"a gele G. F., Contini T., D \' az \'A . I., 2007, , 381, 125

    2007

  77. [85]

    L., Lequeux J., Maurice E., Prevot L., Rocca-Volmerange B., 1984, A&A, 132, 389

    Prevot M. L., Lequeux J., Maurice E., Prevot L., Rocca-Volmerange B., 1984, A&A, 132, 389

    1984

  78. [86]

    Rizzuti F., Matteucci F., Molaro P., Cescutti G., Maiolino R., 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.05363

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    H., Chavez M., Bertone E., Buzzoni A., 2005, ApJ, 626, 411

    Rodr \' guez-Merino L. H., Chavez M., Bertone E., Buzzoni A., 2005, ApJ, 626, 411

    2005

  80. [88]

    Sander A., Hamann W.-R., Todt H., 2012, A&A, 540, A144

    2012

  81. [89]

    D., 1998, , 497, 618

    Schaerer D., Vacca W. D., 1998, , 497, 618

    1998

  82. [90]

    Schaller G., Schaerer D., Meynet G., Maeder A., 1992, A&AS, 96, 269

    1992

  83. [91]

    R., Wessolowski U., 1989, A&A, 210, 236

    Schmutz W., Hamann W. R., Wessolowski U., 1989, A&A, 210, 236

    1989

  84. [92]

    Schmutz W., Leitherer C., Gruenwald R., 1992, , 104, 1164

    1992

  85. [93]

    Scholtz J. et al. , 2024, , 687, A283

    2024

  86. [94]

    P., Rudie G

    Senchyna P., Plat A., Stark D. P., Rudie G. C., Berg D., Charlot S., James B. L., Mingozzi M., 2024, , 966, 92

    2024

  87. [95]

    Siebenmorgen R., Kr \"u gel E., 2007, A&A, 461, 445

    2007

  88. [96]

    J., Norris R

    Smith L. J., Norris R. P. F., Crowther P. A., 2002, MNRAS, 337, 1309

    2002

  89. [97]

    Stark D. P. et al. , 2014, , 445, 3200

    2014

  90. [98]

    Stark D. P. et al. , 2015, , 454, 1393

    2015

  91. [99]

    Steidel C. C. et al. , 2014, , 795, 165

    2014

  92. [100]

    Tang J., Bressan A., Rosenfield P., Slemer A., Marigo P., Girardi L., Bianchi L., 2014, MNRAS, 445, 4287

    2014

  93. [101]

    B., 2005, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Taylor M. B., 2005, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 347, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV, Shopbell P., Britton M., Ebert R., eds., p. 29

    2005

  94. [102]

    Todt H., Sander A., Hainich R., Hamann W.-R., Quade M., Shenar T., 2015, A&A, 579, A75

    2015

  95. [103]

    Tremonti C. A. et al. , 2004, ApJ, 613, 898

    2004

  96. [104]

    J., Rivero-Gonz \'a lez J

    Vazdekis A., Ricciardelli E., Cenarro A. J., Rivero-Gonz \'a lez J. G., D \' az-Garc \' a L. A., Falc \'o n-Barroso J., 2012, , 424, 157

    2012

  97. [105]

    A., Leitherer C., Schaerer D., Meynet G., Maeder A., 2007, , 663, 995

    V \'a zquez G. A., Leitherer C., Schaerer D., Meynet G., Maeder A., 2007, , 663, 995

    2007

  98. [106]

    Villar-Martin M., Tadhunter C., Clark N., 1997, , 323, 21

    1997

  99. [107]

    S., 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.18980

    Vink J. S., 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.18980

    2024 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Virtanen P. et al. , 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

    2020

  101. [109]

    R., Panek R

    Walborn N. R., Panek R. J., 1984, , 286, 718

    1984

  102. [110]

    Watanabe K. et al. , 2024, , 962, 50

    2024

  103. [111]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.