Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Back Attention: Understanding and Enhancing Multi-Hop Reasoning in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.10835 v1 pith:A6QRRZV4 submitted 2025-02-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords attentionreasoningbackmulti-hopattributeextractionpredictionrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate how large language models perform latent multi-hop reasoning in prompts like "Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart's mother's spouse is". To analyze this process, we introduce logit flow, an interpretability method that traces how logits propagate across layers and positions toward the final prediction. Using logit flow, we identify four distinct stages in single-hop knowledge prediction: (A) entity subject enrichment, (B) entity attribute extraction, (C) relation subject enrichment, and (D) relation attribute extraction. Extending this analysis to multi-hop reasoning, we find that failures often stem from the relation attribute extraction stage, where conflicting logits reduce prediction accuracy. To address this, we propose back attention, a novel mechanism that enables lower layers to leverage higher-layer hidden states from different positions during attention computation. With back attention, a 1-layer transformer achieves the performance of a 2-layer transformer. Applied to four LLMs, back attention improves accuracy on five reasoning datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing latent multi-hop reasoning ability.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AudioLens: A Closer Look at Auditory Attribute Perception of Large Audio-Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    By projecting hidden states to the vocabulary at every layer, the paper shows that failed attribute recognition in three LALMs is marked by mid-network information peaks followed by degradation, and that models rely o...

  2. Does Faithfulness-Guided Alignment Hurt Accuracy? Unlocking Accurate and Faithful Post-Retrieval Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A dual-reward RL framework (deterministic + judge-based faithfulness) improves both answer accuracy and trace faithfulness for RAG-based multi-hop QA, with 7B models matching or beating large closed APIs.

  3. A Survey on Latent Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes latent reasoning methods into vertical recurrence, horizontal recurrence, and infinite-depth diffusion, arguing that silent reasoning can beat explicit chain-of-thought.

Pith tools